Update:
This post is outdated. I will make a new Falcon, but don't be too excited. Restarting everything from scratch is a pain in the ass, and do not expect me to start building any time soon.
However, expect teasers.
I don't really understand the website suggestions, as I'm quite dumb, but
Game
Fix the undo button.
I'm gonna be the one who say it, but the undo button is not broken. It does what it needs to do, which is undo. However, the steps that counts to the undo and redo button is when you add to (by dragging the said part from the menu) or remove a part from the designer (I might miss some, if I do, lmk). If you change the properties of the part through overload, say, input, or mass, or drag, it won't count. Same thing with changing the shape of the fuselage. And what I think devs need to do is add these considerations into the undo/redo button. If that makes sense.
TL;DR, these two buttons are outdated.
Fix the mirror button
Honestly, I never ever had issues with the mirror button. Well, maybe other than the fact that the "Can't mirror part because a part already exist there" still exist, I never had issues with it.
A tutorial update
I agree broski
Some updates to the map
This is by far the 2nd thing I wanted most in SP. The terrains in SP is bad, and boring. No canyon runs that looks cool, the mountains on wright looked impossible to traverse, theres no road, cities, just a barren, empty land with a fleet, and a couple of airbases. It's honestly boring. Also, the islands' transition is bad. You would think that there is some sand, but no. It's just... Grass. And stone. No sand.
@xNotDumb
Yet it's outdated. Thus, it is not a reliable source.
would require massive amounts of ft and auto aim systems, and also rotating cockpits
+1you realize you didn't undo much:
kalm
curious how people know the look and details of the gargantuan
I know there's like some fossil in the game but eh
When you tried to press the open AG panel button but instead changed your speed indicator on set_depth 10 (he's a mobile player)
+1no?
I'm pretty sure countless of people have launched themselves into the great beyond with the cannon part. Me included.
nice
+1we doin a hornet fight now, eh?
Update:
This post is outdated. I will make a new Falcon, but don't be too excited. Restarting everything from scratch is a pain in the ass, and do not expect me to start building any time soon.
However, expect teasers.
@xNotDumb
The posts you have been commenting at are outdated.
siuuuuuu
+1bagus juga bjir
@TRD
+1probably will be making a new one since my style has changed too much
wait I only got 11 days left
+1shit
@Rakoval500k
+1Correct me if I'm wrong, but it is a prototype, yes?
holy hell I didn't know the livery was that
+1god the opening music is playing in my head
+2god berkuts with blue burners and tvcs looks kinda good and kinda cursed at the same time
+1You play on low physics?
Try playing on mid/high if yes.
@ReinMcDeer
+1smoother tho
@ReinMcDeer
true
oh well there's nothing we can do about it
@DeveloperKorzalerke
1. I mean I barely used the undo button so uh, yeagh.
2. Huh. That somehow never happened to me. Lucky.
@ReinMcDeer
interesting
still though, why? Like, dude, it looks nothing like a huey
that fuselage tho
smooth
thing has huey in it's name, wtf?
I don't really understand the website suggestions, as I'm quite dumb, but
Game
I'm gonna be the one who say it, but the undo button is not broken. It does what it needs to do, which is undo. However, the steps that counts to the undo and redo button is when you add to (by dragging the said part from the menu) or remove a part from the designer (I might miss some, if I do, lmk). If you change the properties of the part through overload, say, input, or mass, or drag, it won't count. Same thing with changing the shape of the fuselage. And what I think devs need to do is add these considerations into the undo/redo button. If that makes sense.
TL;DR, these two buttons are outdated.
Honestly, I never ever had issues with the mirror button. Well, maybe other than the fact that the "Can't mirror part because a part already exist there" still exist, I never had issues with it.
I agree broski
This is by far the 2nd thing I wanted most in SP. The terrains in SP is bad, and boring. No canyon runs that looks cool, the mountains on wright looked impossible to traverse, theres no road, cities, just a barren, empty land with a fleet, and a couple of airbases. It's honestly boring. Also, the islands' transition is bad. You would think that there is some sand, but no. It's just... Grass. And stone. No sand.
I have no comment on this one tbh.
dunno why but I can't see the image if it's supposed to be one
man, wish I have the money for sr2
+1I don't wanna pirate sr2 the same way I pirated sp because dude, it's just not it
also sr2 bussin
cope
+1you suck
l + ratio
:troll:
Honestly, I wish.
+3not bad
+1might inspire me to make more gen 5s
keep the amazing work my dude
reinmcdeer
+2back at it again at simpleplanes
making the truly simple planes
amazing
wish I could've spotlighted this
@PUMPKINSIDD
who says I'm ranting
I'm simply amazed in extreme measures
how is this a t2
it's more than a fucking t2
@ReinMcDeer
+1I think it should.
Update:
Got somewhat better... Really hard to sleep with this feeling though.
so, I can't participate
I was busy
now I'm sick so yeagh
No. You can't do this to me. No, no!
+1Ohhhhh god noooo
the urge to enter like every challenge is very hard to be overcame
@SemiCollin
+1No. That's not what you call a Roll TVC.
@SemiCollin
+2No, the F-22 doesn't have Roll TVC.
Mountainous region that's actually... Plausible.
+1Some trees on it would be nice.
Not that I would be able to access it soon...
@Panzerwaifu69
+1I'm making my own :)
is a4 gud?
if no I ma do horney boi
:o
not actual turbofan tho sadge
@Ultra12311
bro it's old
@GriseoCattus
Ah, no wonder.
I see
hmm
countermeasure placement is wrong
How have I not upvoted and spotlighted this
@Reworkable
+1Yay! Thank you so much!
I will proceed to participate because this sounds fun.
@Reworkable
+1:O
Really?
Wait.
+1August 1st?
Oh no.
Wait, is this supposed to be "Expert - Experimental"?
If yes, ask someone to curate it.