2nd nose cone would look something like you put a radar dish on it which is kinda useless on a CAS aircraft because you won't need a radar so 1st one is better
@Builder12345
if possible, change the rear weapons bay to solid and add two additional weapon bays to the side of the fuselage
this is to prevent the inlet to go straight through the engine and prevent engine fans from being exposed to the radar cross section
also it looks cooler
@Mrgoofy
I'm not really sure how I could simplify it more but here we go
basically the engine is only able to be operated in one way, not two ways
and since it's only be able to be operated in one way, only pitch down activates the engine, and not pitch up
to counteract this, put abs(Pitch) on the input so the engine turns on regardless of whether you pitch up or down
one reason is because the engines only support one sided input, which means it'll only pick up the positive value of the input, and not the negative
and since pitch down is positive pitch input, it only picks up the input from the pitch down
one way to fix this issue is using abs(Pitch) as the engine input
what abs(x) does is it turns every value except neutral or 0 of what x is to a positive value
so for example, if you pitch up 0.1 times the max value, it doesn't output the value as -0.1 (which is what it does without abs(x)) but rather as 0.1
I feel like I'm going to go down the same path, but I'm not sure
we'll see
Though I'm not even sure what's wrong about making Genshin liveries, people are just being themselves, expressing their creativity.
Sure, you might dislike the livery solely because of... stereotypical stuff, but you can't disagree that they have the creativity and passion to make something most people don't wanna bother about. This is happening to me with Hololive themed liveries.
Either way, fly safe out there bud. I'm sure some people will miss ya. If you need any help, don't hesitate to contact someone you're comfortable with.
it depends on the creator I guess
if for example they feel most mobile devices could handle their builds, they'll mark it as a mobile friendly device
I myself consider a build to be mobile friendly to be around <300 parts, but even a 300 part creation would sometimes be unfriendly, so the barrier is really vague tbh
am I the only person who uses the mirror button frequently
ok but fr, yeah the mirror button is a bit weird
it shouldn't just mirror a part's properties and positions, it should also match the part's connection instead of auto reconnecting it after it gets mirrored
and that goddamn, fucking part obstruction on mirrorings... they really should remove that
if you're aiming for that upvote points, just don't
you're essentially going to be losing what potential you have in you, by limiting the fact that you just want upvotes
people with an aim of getting upvotes usually when they don't get enough upvotes, they'll try to cope and seethe by complaining about why does this other dude seem to do better when he has practically the same quality build as you do
and soon enough, they'll lose motivation and interest in building because they won't get enough stupid internet points, and essentially be depressed
so my advice, just don't
as Korzalerke said, you'll enjoy the game more because you enjoy building, pushing yourself to the limit instead of... whatever you're trying to do with those stupid and useless internet points
so... How are you trying to achieve this "warning"?
Through texts, mayhaps? or lights?
nvm, I understand now, kinda
lemme get this straight
you want to make a warning about the rpm overspeed by stating how much time it has spent in it's overspeeding state, and you want it to count from 0 again when it reaches safe rpm before it spent 11 seconds in it's overspeed state?
in that case smooth(RPM1>maxRPM, (RPM1>maxRPM ? 1/11 : 1)) should work
need explanation?
so, RPM1>maxRPM should've been a boolean, right? But a boolean is also a value. True is essentially just 1, and False is 0. smooth(x, l) is essentially forcing the value to go through a rate, instead of instantaneously turning into the value it's supposed to be, whether it activates or deactivates.
to combat this, use the "if" format on the l part of smooth(x, l). If it reaches the maxRPM, it'll smoothen out the code. If it returns to a safe RPM after it oversped, it'll instantly return to 0 because you're not limiting it's rate of change, aka matching the same max rate as it's max value.
if you don't want the final value to show up as 1, then add *11 at the end of the code.
can confirm, this is how I did le gura plane
however, image from texts I don't recommend because it will significantly take up your performance
and you don't want to fly your own creation with 2fps after all
all I want honestly is a rework of the weapons (including but not limited to the combat that is AI and the countermeasures) and some measures of part reduction
as long as those things can be achieved, I'm happy
yeah sure, part reduction has been able to be achieved with the addition of fuselage cutting but imho, there's alot more things that can still be done
2nd nose cone would look something like you put a radar dish on it which is kinda useless on a CAS aircraft because you won't need a radar so 1st one is better
+1cringe.
+4nice.
+1@OwO
what the hell are you talking about
I swear to god stop asking for updates
+1be patient for once
also yeah they're focusing more on SP this year so we might see something
mainly an attack on mental state
+1@Builder12345
+1move it a bit forwards, don't make it too close to the engine it looks weird
@32
not sure
but the most important part is what throttle percentage is it at for the aircraft to be level
@MiG29lover2018acc
+1I mean yeah, alot of people don't care about it
it's just slight nitpick dw about it
@Builder12345
+1if possible, change the rear weapons bay to solid and add two additional weapon bays to the side of the fuselage
this is to prevent the inlet to go straight through the engine and prevent engine fans from being exposed to the radar cross section
also it looks cooler
@OwO
what the fuck do you mean a pudding
oh damn
+1I mean it's a little unconventional but it's good
what in the 19klbs F-14 and Flanker series
+1depends on how strong the thrust of your aircraft is compared to the weight of your aircraft
get those datas first then we can talk about business
just try not to care then
also this was a fucking month ago it's not even worth bringing up anymore
@OwO
never once I remembered talking about a pudding
@OwO
mayhaps you got the wrong person?
aeugh
+1nobody told me there was such challenge
count me the fucking in
oh shit
+1look guys it's the ace combat f15
@OwO
I don't though
@OwO
wtf do you mean
@OwO
what
I can't tell if this is a genuine copyright issue or if it's a lore thing
+1this is more of a Feeling type of forum tbh
hard to tell with such little detail
heya
so uh
new things? there's quite alot of them
@ColonelCanada
+1no
I don't want to bother
but who knows I might change my mind
@Mrgoofy
you're supposed to be putting that code only on the blasto vtol though
very cool plane
+1@Mrgoofy
I'm not really sure how I could simplify it more but here we go
basically the engine is only able to be operated in one way, not two ways
and since it's only be able to be operated in one way, only pitch down activates the engine, and not pitch up
to counteract this, put
abs(Pitch)on the input so the engine turns on regardless of whether you pitch up or downone reason is because the engines only support one sided input, which means it'll only pick up the positive value of the input, and not the negative
and since pitch down is positive pitch input, it only picks up the input from the pitch down
one way to fix this issue is using
abs(Pitch)as the engine inputwhat
abs(x)does is it turns every value except neutral or 0 of whatxis to a positive valueso for example, if you pitch up 0.1 times the max value, it doesn't output the value as -0.1 (which is what it does without
abs(x)) but rather as 0.1I feel like I'm going to go down the same path, but I'm not sure
+1we'll see
Though I'm not even sure what's wrong about making Genshin liveries, people are just being themselves, expressing their creativity.
Sure, you might dislike the livery solely because of... stereotypical stuff, but you can't disagree that they have the creativity and passion to make something most people don't wanna bother about. This is happening to me with Hololive themed liveries.
Either way, fly safe out there bud. I'm sure some people will miss ya. If you need any help, don't hesitate to contact someone you're comfortable with.
it depends on the creator I guess
if for example they feel most mobile devices could handle their builds, they'll mark it as a mobile friendly device
I myself consider a build to be mobile friendly to be around <300 parts, but even a 300 part creation would sometimes be unfriendly, so the barrier is really vague tbh
am I the only person who uses the mirror button frequently
+1ok but fr, yeah the mirror button is a bit weird
it shouldn't just mirror a part's properties and positions, it should also match the part's connection instead of auto reconnecting it after it gets mirrored
and that goddamn, fucking part obstruction on mirrorings... they really should remove that
very epique
if you're aiming for that upvote points, just don't
+4you're essentially going to be losing what potential you have in you, by limiting the fact that you just want upvotes
people with an aim of getting upvotes usually when they don't get enough upvotes, they'll try to cope and seethe by complaining about why does this other dude seem to do better when he has practically the same quality build as you do
and soon enough, they'll lose motivation and interest in building because they won't get enough stupid internet points, and essentially be depressed
so my advice, just don't
as Korzalerke said, you'll enjoy the game more because you enjoy building, pushing yourself to the limit instead of... whatever you're trying to do with those stupid and useless internet points
so... How are you trying to achieve this "warning"?
Through texts, mayhaps? or lights?
nvm, I understand now, kinda
lemme get this straight
you want to make a warning about the rpm overspeed by stating how much time it has spent in it's overspeeding state, and you want it to count from 0 again when it reaches safe rpm before it spent 11 seconds in it's overspeed state?
in that case
smooth(RPM1>maxRPM, (RPM1>maxRPM ? 1/11 : 1)) should work
need explanation?
so, RPM1>maxRPM should've been a boolean, right? But a boolean is also a value.
Trueis essentially just 1, andFalseis 0.smooth(x, l)is essentially forcing the value to go through a rate, instead of instantaneously turning into the value it's supposed to be, whether it activates or deactivates.to combat this, use the "if" format on the
lpart ofsmooth(x, l). If it reaches the maxRPM, it'll smoothen out the code. If it returns to a safe RPM after it oversped, it'll instantly return to 0 because you're not limiting it's rate of change, aka matching the same max rate as it's max value.if you don't want the final value to show up as 1, then add *11 at the end of the code.
can confirm, this is how I did le gura plane
however, image from texts I don't recommend because it will significantly take up your performance
and you don't want to fly your own creation with 2fps after all
understandable
+1those moments exist
I too would probably step down from my position in the [REDACTED] if I was ever given one
@Gryphus322
+1even better:
tomocat because she will casually friendzone you.
pink.
very pog :D
all I want honestly is a rework of the weapons (including but not limited to the combat that is AI and the countermeasures) and some measures of part reduction
as long as those things can be achieved, I'm happy
yeah sure, part reduction has been able to be achieved with the addition of fuselage cutting but imho, there's alot more things that can still be done
very cool suggestion, apdut
+1@ReinMcDeer
thanks
@NotRandomBuilder8732
lah kan bilang sendiri
@Farewellntchii
thanks
there's still alot of room to improve though
@Farewellntchii
I don't think I'll put foob on the plane
whether as a pilot model or a 2d fuselage art
it's not even surprising at this point
udah sering mah sekarang, dari dulu malah
yeah
+2may I also remind you that the fins on the base missiles are angled 50° instead of 45°