@tucan atm, complex shapes (especially concave ones) require lots of panelling, which gives an absurdly high polygon count and overall decrease in physics.
The ability to subtract one part from another (to create a hollow where that part was) could be invaluable in creating low part count, low poly, high detail builds
@Jester my hdd is pretty shot, so I can average about 0.2mb/s on a good day. so i like to look into mods before i get them to make sure they are actually worth it
@Destroyerz117 if you use clouds 1, that functions really really stable. until this becomes somewhat more stable and finished I will continue to use that as it does essentially the same but worse
how much might performance drop (fps especially) on downloading this mod?
I've encountered an issue with reshade where it literally attempts to send my computer to the fire realm, so have been trying to build my own 'reshade' with photo editors and mods
in my opinion:
- for the multiplayer mod: 300 max
- low end mobile friendly: up to 500 max
- high end mobile friendly: 750 to 1000 max
- lower performance computers (pentiums etc): 1000
- mid performance computers (i3, i5 & equivalent ryzens): 1500-2000
- high end computers: up to 3000
anything above 3000 is possible to run on some devices, but is kind of stupidly big
the biggest trick is making it look good from the thumbnail. that is the main difference between my MiG-21 and my Me-262. similar quality, but the 262 screenshot is superior.
@HansUlrichRudel don't be, it's not coming any time soon xD
I can tell you that it's framework is in place though it needs editing. It's maybe 2% complete and the debugging will take 2 months on its own. It is already painful
um simple answer? (i assume you mean mouse aim)
dont think so, cuz i dont think theres a way of returning the position of the cursor relative to the screen
i mean i tried something similar, may or may not have blue screened
@Pita that is the gist.
The people made planes willingly - including one I'm working on.
I am proud to be part of an account that got this far. I don't see why... A plane I'm making shouldn't be posted there if I made it for that purpose... Hence why we are all cross
To celebrate the SimpleRockets Chat Discord hitting 1,000+ members, we are hosting a giveaway for 9 SimpleRockets 2 Steam Keys. 10 in total considering I'm going to do a small giveaway here in this very forum post!
To join the giveaways in our Discord server, join here https://discord.gg/HFJ6jkp and make sure you read the rules. You should find the giveaways in #news.
To join the giveaway hosted in this post, literally just leave a comment!
The giveaway here will end Thursday, August 13th 23:59.
Also upvote 99 SO CLOSE COME ON GUYS
100 upvotes dude
auto-orient?
holy detail
@tucan atm, complex shapes (especially concave ones) require lots of panelling, which gives an absurdly high polygon count and overall decrease in physics.
The ability to subtract one part from another (to create a hollow where that part was) could be invaluable in creating low part count, low poly, high detail builds
Perhaps a negate tool as well. This allows us to easily make complex, but low polygon shapes that run better and look better than equivalent today
Nice
Nice work
Lag 100
@exosuit ahh ok thanks
@Jester my hdd is pretty shot, so I can average about 0.2mb/s on a good day. so i like to look into mods before i get them to make sure they are actually worth it
@Jester fair enough I guess
RX Vega IGPU so i will assume 5-10fps
@Destroyerz117 if you use clouds 1, that functions really really stable. until this becomes somewhat more stable and finished I will continue to use that as it does essentially the same but worse
how much might performance drop (fps especially) on downloading this mod?
I've encountered an issue with reshade where it literally attempts to send my computer to the fire realm, so have been trying to build my own 'reshade' with photo editors and mods
High part count they said
Lovely
'simple' he said
i love it
i love that hes upvoted the post but not commented. that about sums up the situation xD
@Captainboeing no problem mate :) and thank you!
200/15= ~14
brb
edit: aight that should do it
@rexzion ayo thanks
if it doesnt work i can edit existing codes. my problem is writing them for myself xD
in my opinion:
- for the multiplayer mod: 300 max
- low end mobile friendly: up to 500 max
- high end mobile friendly: 750 to 1000 max
- lower performance computers (pentiums etc): 1000
- mid performance computers (i3, i5 & equivalent ryzens): 1500-2000
- high end computers: up to 3000
anything above 3000 is possible to run on some devices, but is kind of stupidly big
try
Altitude/[chosen drop altitude]@BagelPlane ah nice thanks
what is the pink used for? i need a shiny pink for something else - how would that affect the appearance
@MaliciousMuffin yeah, its main benefit was its price because it was so rare
Ayo do you mind if I steal this for a helicopter I'm making?
I will try and remember to credit you, I am making a list xD
brilliant! i shall now somehow find out how that display works and completely butcher it for my own plane
cant get to it, tag me in the post
the biggest trick is making it look good from the thumbnail. that is the main difference between my MiG-21 and my Me-262. similar quality, but the 262 screenshot is superior.
shitt dude im so sorry
if you arent getting help, please consider it, i can tell you that its worth it :)
i will need to be t
Jester: "you will not cringe my mod"
Bacon aircraft: "haha ducc"
That's a T from me
Looks mighty fine imo :)
g.... glass?
can't do opaque with light i dont think but will do invisible, opaque and anything in between
T O N K
@HansUlrichRudel don't be, it's not coming any time soon xD
I can tell you that it's framework is in place though it needs editing. It's maybe 2% complete and the debugging will take 2 months on its own. It is already painful
@russianspy gun fig I was wrong, I stand by my word on everything else I said.
@brians1209 ook
@MobileFriendly ooooh congrats on plat from a while back
sorry its late i havent been here in so long
um simple answer? (i assume you mean mouse aim)
dont think so, cuz i dont think theres a way of returning the position of the cursor relative to the screen
i mean i tried something similar, may or may not have blue screened
those graphics look... enviable and impossible for my computer to run. can you send me a link to whatever shaders you used please?
tankss
@Pita that is the gist.
The people made planes willingly - including one I'm working on.
I am proud to be part of an account that got this far. I don't see why... A plane I'm making shouldn't be posted there if I made it for that purpose... Hence why we are all cross
@SimplyPlain by the looks of it you more than deserved it
This is nice xD
To celebrate the SimpleRockets Chat Discord hitting 1,000+ members, we are hosting a giveaway for 9 SimpleRockets 2 Steam Keys. 10 in total considering I'm going to do a small giveaway here in this very forum post!
To join the giveaways in our Discord server, join here https://discord.gg/HFJ6jkp and make sure you read the rules. You should find the giveaways in #news.
To join the giveaway hosted in this post, literally just leave a comment!
The giveaway here will end Thursday, August 13th 23:59.
@CrazyCatZe I see
@CrazyCatZe it's the same layout... But it has a v/t tail instead of a conventional one
@CrazyCatZe this.... Thing