@Monarchii Yes, they build about 25% of what we build here in SP, Piston engines do not exist. and so the turboprops. You have to use "electric motors" for Prop engines. And the engine sounds are not attractive. But the snapping, stock wings, and textures are great. The graphics are great. It is not detailed and serious to build for airplanes. Jut is a general focus - A different kind of joy, after all.
@ZeroWithSlashedO as this tutorial is “for beginners” I don’t want to explain too much about the forces acting upon the body- just make it happen and let the kids happy - quick and easy
Good try. I would label it as a "Compound Helicopter" instead of "AutoGyro" - the latter has NO power in the main rotor. The main rotor is just a rotating wing. You could try making it without power for the main rotor on the same airframe.
waiting for it. T
that's amazing
+1nice buddy, the mudguards reminds me of the NASA's Moon-Rover
+1Lov this land cruiser
+1@TheHungryCarpet Thanks for the ups -
+1Keep calm and building
Great work, great collection :)
+1another cool work from CrazyCat!
Wow, Happy 10th anniversary! That is a long time. Cool plane.
+1@blt not sure, I think I discovered by myself
+1I am seeing more helis this week - awesome
+1beautiful work - very nice
+1Wishing for a great challenge.
+1@Monarchii I guess you might like it. Good for PEA projects.
+1cool design
+1@Monarchii Yes, they build about 25% of what we build here in SP, Piston engines do not exist. and so the turboprops. You have to use "electric motors" for Prop engines. And the engine sounds are not attractive. But the snapping, stock wings, and textures are great. The graphics are great. It is not detailed and serious to build for airplanes. Jut is a general focus - A different kind of joy, after all.
+1@TheCommentaryGuy Thanks, yea, next time
looks good.
Download the VTOL tutorial plane here
Good luck buddy
+1@Monarchii the player are silent as death
+1@mypanda999 I will do that if you want
@ZeroWithSlashedO as this tutorial is “for beginners” I don’t want to explain too much about the forces acting upon the body- just make it happen and let the kids happy - quick and easy
@SilverStar Lol, of course
@DwiAngkasaAeronautics Great to know, well, But I love adding or reducing weight, which makes me feel more natural to real-world situation
+1@SilverStar, and I believe nothing wrong with using a gyro - since nearly every "real world" plane does.
@NapoleonPizza, great work - so cool and notable
+1@MrCOPTY That's awesome. I want to use a "screen" for one of my supersonic projects. It will be great if I can use one.
+2@V Lol
Number of parts: 3206 - WOW....WOW. that is amazing work, I can't imagine how many hours it would take
nice looking SkyHawk
@Erionh my pleasure. Let me see when yo do
@DynamicHorizon thanks, that is fast
This is my digital painting (marker on paper style), freehand drawing of a MiG (Loosely referenced to the MiG 1.44) - Size 8"x10" ProCreate on iPad.
Good try. I would label it as a "Compound Helicopter" instead of "AutoGyro" - the latter has NO power in the main rotor. The main rotor is just a rotating wing. You could try making it without power for the main rotor on the same airframe.
+2great work, just only with 300+ part count
+1love the way they armed the missiles
@MrPigee Yes, this is the plane that was shot down by its own guns. Find it out on YouTube and some history channels
+1@Monarchii Yes, I want to build one. But so many other things to do. and lately, I was on Juno fooling around with that game this month
+1great work
nice and cute
+1graceful
+2@L1nus, yes, I can imagine. It was on my bucket list, but never done yet
+1beautiful
+1This pack idea is very cool.
+2keep up the good work
beautiful work, congrats on the 5th anniversary
+2@Halcyon215 Banning History is dangerous for society. Since people forget their previous mistakes, they tend to repeat them.
+1lol, what is that growing in its belly?
@RepublicofWrightIsles true
@MrCOPTY true
+1