35.2k WarHawk95 Comments

  • Meme challenge French flags 3.7 years ago

    @CharlesDeGaulle 116*
    You forgot the Pixel War bro

    +3
  • Normandy 3.9 years ago

    @SCPCalebkid hey he said it looked like a mobile game, he didn't play the mod on his phone

    +3
  • How to not get rick rolled. 3.9 years ago

    Or you can just put your mouse on the link. Your browser will tell you what's the link's adress.

    +3
  • soviet aircraft challenge 3.9 years ago

    THANK YOU FOR CREDITING ME

    +3
  • What do you call a stolen F-35B that crashes after taking off from a ship? 4.1 years ago

    🐝- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

    +3
  • Rafale VS F35, F15, F18 and F16 4.5 years ago

    @MemrWii just stop commenting, please. Delete your SP and Discord account or something, for heaven's sake.
    Stop being this racist.
    You can't just call us "sub-humans" and hope think everyone will be fine with that.

    +3
  • POLIKARPOV VS DASSAULT 4.5 years ago

    @One2 please no.

    +3
  • A Complete List of Rafale Air to Air Kills 1986-2021 4.5 years ago

    Not Air-to Air but still a kill against a plane :
    http://tempsreel.nouvelobs.com/actualite/monde/20110324.FAP6851/un-rafale-francais-a-detruit-un-appareil-libyen.html
    Basically a Rafale shot a Libyan Soko G-2 Galeb.
    March 24th, 2011.
    https://www.lefigaro.fr/international/2011/03/26/01003-20110326ARTFIG00337-libye-les-rebelles-gagnent-la-ville-strategique-d-ajdabiya.php
    Later, the number of kills against planes was 5 and against helicopters, 2.

    +3
  • For the SP team and Jundroo 4.7 years ago

    wholesome

    +3
  • Swastika and Hammer (NOT FOR NAZIISM, ROLEPLAY PURPOSES ONLY) 4.8 years ago

    I mean that's not clever

    +3
  • Some 4K runway textures 4.8 years ago

    How many gigabytes this time ?

    +3
  • F-6EJ Zenko 4.8 years ago

    Now this is some serious Mikoyanster-like type of s#it, looks awesome man.
    Even tho I don't like fictional planes, I salute the effort put into this

    +3
  • B-17 Flying Fortress 4.8 years ago

    Why the hell does this plane have four blade propellers

    +3
  • Important Collab Request 4.8 years ago

    My bro @Koengerays will surely be happy to help you

    +3
  • Beware the Bearcat (320 parts) 4.9 years ago

    You should remove this propeller cone, it looks too much like a SeaFury and not like a true Bearcat. The F8F just had the propeller pitch cross thingy

    +3
  • P-51 Mustang 2.0 4.9 years ago

    I'm not sure this has been modified enough to be counted as a real successor, it might be considered as a simple reupload of the original plane.
    This is what the Rules say about that :

    • However, if your variation does not offer any improvements over the existing airplane, then it may be removed.

    If you have any question, please contact a moderator such as @EternalDarkness.

    +3
  • I felt the limit 4.9 years ago

    Looks great so far. Go on, finish your work and see how you'll be satisfied.

    +3
  • Naval fighter 4.9 years ago

    @AsteroidAsteroidTheBook don't tell me it's gonna happen again... Please... Just don't try to make another drama, for real

    +3
  • Fw-190 A-5 graf special 5.0 years ago

    I'd love to know how that propeller is made but I can't just run 4000 parts lmao
    Looks cool tho. Really cool.

    +3
  • 9mm Ammunition 5.0 years ago

    shows 9x19mm Parabellum
    Puts an AR in the background

    +3
  • thebanbehindtheslaughter is back 5.0 years ago

    I heard he was permabanned with 4 strikes, because the mods considered he violated the rules once again
    By the way this forum he made is really offensive

    +3
  • Q&A with EternalDarkness 5.0 years ago

    Please don't hate me for asking this
    Are there special conditions (other than being chosen by the devs and titular mods) to become a moderator ? Minimum/maximum age, minimun age on the website, minimun number of points... ?

    +3
  • I unleashed Andrew Garrison upon you all 5.1 years ago

    Excuse me what the fuck

    +3
  • Douglas DGP-1 Gun Package 5.1 years ago

    @russianspy I don't know, I just put the pods under the wing pylons of the SBD...
    @NAD here, for example : https://fr.scribd.com/document/191570148/Douglas-DGP-1-Twin-50-Cal-Gun-Package

    +3
  • How to publish my car? 5.1 years ago

    Just go in the designer menu, press the "share" button, take some nice screenshots, and upload your build.
    You must be connected to your SP account in-game via this same menu to be able to upload.

    +3
  • "The missile with a man in it." 5.1 years ago

    It's not an F-104. My disappointment is immeasurable and my day is ruined.

    +3
  • "Earthquake Resistant" Building 5.2 years ago

    Am I the only one who saw Red killing Black ?!?
    Everybody vote red, he's the impostor

    +3
  • German Corsair 5.2 years ago

    Please delete this. Nobody wants to see that drama rebirth

    +3
  • DISCORD SERVER? 5.2 years ago

    Also there's this server called SimplePlanes Builder's Chat.

    +3
  • Asteroidbook is Publicly Japanese 5.3 years ago

    @ImaCat Ikr
    At least he'll stop insulting everybody he doesn't like

    +3
  • Where did great builders go? PLS respond!!! 5.3 years ago

    Bogdan didn't leave because he was arrogant or because he has mental or health problems. He's totally sane, and one of the nicest builders I know, even though he has high standards. In fact, he was tired of the GC drama and haters who keep bitching/trashtalking about him, and insulting him because of his high standards. He helped whoever needed him and even if some people here don't realize it yet, the whole community will soon miss him.

    +3
  • Just A Heads-Up 5.3 years ago

    Maybe the first time a relatively high ranked builder points out multiple small builds at the same time. Wholesome

    +3
  • He’s gone 5.3 years ago

    @jamesPLANESii as Zuko said, he truly has a cool personality. Also about arguments, he has his own ideas, you have yours. Someone two people just can't have the same point of view on things. But I honestly think he's an amazing dude, and the greatest builder here. His points counter is a good proof since they were all deserved

    +3
  • He’s gone 5.3 years ago

    @asteroidbook345 that's really mean you know
    You should be ashamed to say that

    +3
  • Congratulations Andrew!! 5.3 years ago

    @KnightOfRen [sad other devs noise]

    +3
  • Tom's "Ten Commandments of Simpleplanes" 5.4 years ago

    Surely the best beginner's guide out there

    +3
  • Havok H.T "flying fish" 5.4 years ago

    @Anyway2278 think about it. If the cockpit catch fire, the pilot can stop the fire !

    +3
  • Goodbye. 5.5 years ago

    Were you bullied on this site ? If yes, contact a moderator such as @EternalDarkness or @Tully2001. They can help you and stop this. Bullies don't belong to this site and nobody will support them, trust me.

    +3
  • Mitsubishi KI.46 III Type 100 "Dinah" 5.5 years ago

    Wow the dude that drawed the blueprints has the same first name as me

    +3
  • Goodbye.. (read desc.!.!) 5.5 years ago

    Sorry dude. @Koengerays lost his cat 2-3 months ago, he was 5 too and had heart problems too. Go speak to him maybe he can help you

    +3
  • Everything and everyone in SP is AWESOME 5.5 years ago

    Thanks but don't you mean everything instead of everyone ?

    +3
  • How do you make large creations less laggy? 5.5 years ago

    @AircroftDesigin oh you're on tablet ? Dowload more RAM then
    (Go on your app store, it's 100% real and efficient !)

    +3
  • I discovered old engines! 5.5 years ago

    @Hedero @Biscool @An2k some people including me already made posts gathering all the old parts

    +3
  • Need Help to Identify This Aircraft???? 5.6 years ago

    @FatEgg NO GOD PLEASE NO. NO, NO, NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

    +3
  • (TEASER/UPDATE + ANNOUNCEMENT) - i'm back :0 5.6 years ago

    @Dllama4 hey ! Don't joke about WWII ! My grandpa died at Auschwitz... He fell from a watchtower.

    +3
  • Update 1.9.205 5.7 years ago

    I was wondering, which F8F is displayed on the thumbnail ?
    Is it available on this site ?

    +3
  • The title here is too long for SP to allow. I guess you gotta kinda click this to find out. Don't blame me for accidental clickbait. 5.7 years ago

    Well that looks like "supersonic fighter, MiG-29 "Fulcrum-C" " with extra steps

    +3
  • F-104 Starfighter ver.2 5.8 years ago

    CHA CHA REAL SMOOTH

    +3
  • Suggestion: the ability to change the input for the brakes on wheels 5.8 years ago

    Yeah And we should definitely have an option for multiple inputs. I.E. a wheel for the left main landing gear of a jet fighter, that would brake when yaw is actionned to turn left and that would ALSO break when "Brake" is actionned, to brake both gears simultaneously.
    I hope y'all see what I mean...
    @jamesPLANESii could you add that to the user voice ?

    +3
  • Funky Trees Magic: Real, Computerized Flak! 5.9 years ago

    Nobody :
    Me when I see "Theory" and what's below :
    The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't.
    In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was.
    The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows. Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.

    +3