29.1k ShiroNeko Comments

  • Is it possible to make something invisible but still have its function? yesterday

    @Tiper4062. Go to the part where it's attached, press the name of the object you made 'invisible'.

  • Is it possible to make something invisible but still have its function? 2 days ago

    @Tiper4062
    You can make the scale of the the part reduced by two to three decimal places (0.001).
    If the part is still visible, you add another decimal place.

  • Is it possible to make something invisible but still have its function? 2 days ago

    You cannot make things invisible in this game as far as I know. However, you can make things really, really small that it seems like it's invisible and still retain their function.

    for example, you can make a rotator extremely small and still make it function as long as you correctly added inputs to it.

  • Any tips to get better at building stuff? 2 days ago

    *Create a building style- As everyone have previously mentioned, time and experience is one of the best ways to improve your work.
    *Explore different types of builds to create- Do not limit yourself when you're starting. Try to build things you have not yet made and remove the mindset of it not working.
    *Compare your self from others- Often times, this may sound like a bad idea but creating a comparison of yourself to other builders (or your build to another user's build) is a great way to learn things you may have not discovered or tried. You could say that you should be making constructive criticism for yourself in order to improve.
    *Asking for opinions on your recent builds- Most of the time, experienced users have several other friends in the site that supports their work and gives various opinion about builds they are working on. A good way to do this is to join Discord servers that encourages players to send their builds. This way, you could ask people regarding the things it might need in order to be improved.
    *Take your time- You are not a mass-production factory. Make sure that your builds are up to your own standards before uploading. This way, you can feel more accomplished on your work and be encouraged to create better ones.
    *Download other users' builds and test them- Mimicking other users' builds is not a problem. I myself have copied techniques of other users in order to create some of my works.
    *Proficiency on certain parts- Not all parts are made to do just one purpose. Some may be useful on other things such as the refueling drogue for example. With extra editing, you can make the refueling drogue be a steering wheel for a car with just one part.
    Most importantly, always consider improvement. You are not perfect, the things you build will not be perfect, and the previous users before you are not perfect, too. Always strive for things that you can improve.

    +1
  • Whats happening? 5 days ago

    The user ShinyGemsBro has been temporarily banned for the reason of 'creating unnecessary drama' towards a (offensive) comment from another user (which was also temporarily or permanently banned).

  • Splash 1. 6 days ago

    ShinyGemsBro is temporarily banned. The user will be back in approximately a month.

  • [LHI] IJN Furutaka 23 days ago

    @TemporaryReplacement. Alright, I'd add you. Cheers.

    +1
  • [LHI] IJN Furutaka 24 days ago

    Really interesting projects you've been working on recently. If you don't mind me asking, do you have a Discord account?

    +1
  • [LHI] IJN Asashimo one month ago

    @TemporaryReplacement, Surely. Though if you were to try, please do tag me in a post. If ever, I could help you with suggestions.

    +1
  • [LHI] IJN Asashimo one month ago

    Do you plan on creating surface combat-focused modified ships, as well as larger vessels in the future?

    +1
  • [LHI] Fletcher class destroyer one month ago

    @TemporaryReplacement, Hopefully you don't mind me using the code used in this build for other creations. If I were to decide to upload, I will credit you.

    +1
  • [LHI] Fletcher class destroyer one month ago

    @TemporaryReplacement. Something like this is rare, quite possibly non-existent in the site. As someone who likes to build ships rather than other else, this is quite a treat as the code for the anti-aircraft can also be used for surface combat with a bit of tweaks.

  • [LHI] Fletcher class destroyer one month ago

    Thank you.

  • asphalt veteran returns to asphalt 8 one month ago

    @Boeig, Stating another example is not an argument. This video is way too off-topic and not even slightly related to SimplePlanes.

    +1
  • Herring clas destroyer cool missle launching systemy medium ver lock but anti-air cannon 2 months ago

    It would be nice to credit me with the whole build.

  • Community Structures 2 months ago

    @MrSilverWolf.
    Honest question, did you even know what the full context was all about?
    I know this is probably the least favourable place to talk about this but there currently isn't any better.
    We were not merely arguing over something petty nor are we attacking/harassing someone just because we felt like it, but rather, we were trying to stop the 'bullshit' he's doing. A lot of people are tired of what he's up to (or had been up to). As BMilan has previously mentioned in his now-deleted comment explaining the situation, WCAC has had a track record of stealing, rule breakings and other misbehaviors. In addition, this has still happened even after being called out. HE IS a repeat offender.
             
    Among other things, here is a list of things he's done on the site:
    -Stealing without credit and auto-credit bypass (see Section 1)
    -Mutual point-begging (upvote yours = upvote mine. See Section 2)
    -Misleading thumbnail (Section 3)
    -Post re-upload without changes (Section 4)
    -Mass tagging (Section 5)
             
    There are only a few things he has done in which he received little to no repercussions, a summary of sorts. I am trying to speak for everyone who he managed to rip off. This is NOT hate speech against WCAC, this is NOT meant to be harassment, nor is it defamation. This is meant for you, SilverWolf, to learn the context before hastily giving probable strikes and temporary bans. I know that this should no longer be talked about but we, and the other people who he manages to upset, some of whom wishes to remain anonymous, would probably agree to the accusations given above. I already am well-aware that this constitutes a strike but given the circumstances, I would gladly receive one.
             
    *Section 1 (wasn't credit from Pancelvonat's Vehicle Pack)
    Case1 & Case2
    *Section 2 (A strike was given for this)
    (WCAC birthday post & An archived post regarding the matter)
    *Section 3
    (Makima post & a removed one)
    *Section 4
    (Original & Re-upload)
    *Section 5
    (WCAC Birthday post)
             
    These are only a few, more could follow when warranted.

    +10
  • Fontaine Boat 4 months ago

    I now knight you to boatmanship.

    +1
  • Choufleur - Sloop 6 months ago

    @Majakalona, You gotta dig deep for that. I'd give a cookie for it 🍪

    +2
  • Shrimp Island 7 months ago

    Very nice, simple and clean plugin, though I have a change request if possible. Could the boat dock's terrain be lowered so that watercrafts can be as close to it (almost touching)?

  • Bi-Plane Challenge [CLOSED] 7 months ago

    @LunchBox. That's what I have in mind too. But to be honest, I'm just quite disappointed OP changed the rules because someone wants to basically reupload a plane with a different colour scheme. And no, I am not worried about it.

    +1
  • Bi-Plane Challenge [CLOSED] 7 months ago

    @MrCOPTY, Wasn't the focus of the challenge around Biplanes? I don't wanna be that guy but not because someone asked, doesn't mean you already should.

    +1
  • Bi-Plane Challenge [CLOSED] 7 months ago

    Why were triplanes allowed? I guess you might as well call it as a multiplane aircraft challenge.

    +3
  • Bi-Plane Challenge [CLOSED] 7 months ago

    I don't really wanna join as a competitor but I wanna participate.
    my entry

    +1
  • KMS Odin 8 months ago

    Congratulations for Gold.

    +1
  • Mini-Cirno 8 months ago

    Funky

    +1
  • Isokaze-Class Destroyer, Isokaze 9 months ago

    @Tanglednebula19 It is a part of the SeaTraffic Mod

  • RNVS Violence 10 months ago

    angry spiky violent lady

  • Failed ship 10 months ago

    what went wrong?

  • Sms Wilhelmshaven 11 months ago

    Fastest fingers in the whole Southern East Asia

    +2
  • Vanitatum-class Dreadnaught, Vanitatum 11 months ago

    @CharlesDeGaulle
    Thank you very much :))

  • IJN Fusou 11 months ago

    not first, not pog

    +1
  • Vanitatum-class Dreadnaught, Vanitatum 11 months ago

    @typeZERO
    Azusa's halo is a pretty beautiful imo, I actually planned to use Kisaki's but I have skill issue doing her's.

    I used the vanity quote due to her EX skill animation line.
    (Now I'm sad that I forgot to add a Peroro plushie somewhere onboard)

    +1
  • Vanitatum-class Dreadnaught, Vanitatum 11 months ago

    @typeZERO
    Cuteness solves a cold heart
    (Im glad someone gets a reference I made lol)

  • Vanitatum-class Dreadnaught, Vanitatum 11 months ago

    In case you missed it, there is a PDF file for the ship regarding its specifications and controls (in-game)

    click here
    EDIT
    THIRD PLACE
    Thank you !

  • Vanitatum-class Dreadnaught, Vanitatum 11 months ago

    @Samflugzeugpanzer
    I am not willing to dive into the lore too much, there's too much to read so I made it vague and easier to understand for the common user. If you meant the dates, I plan to leave it to your own imagination

    +1
  • Project : Dreadnaught one year ago

    @Graingy
    It took me like a couple of hours to get your point lol
    I guess I actually needed that breakfast.

  • Project : Dreadnaught one year ago

    @Randomplayer
    13,000 as far as I remember

  • USS Pennsylvania BB38 one year ago

    Does this participate in the dreadnaught challenge?

    +1
  • Isokaze-Class Destroyer, Isokaze one year ago

    @IDNSatyaSlebew
    It does, need to sacrifice though since its basically my Platinum build.
    Proud of both ships, though.

  • Anti-Aircraft one year ago

    @MrShenanigansSP
    precisely.

    +1
  • Caravela one year ago

    Really, really nice. I like it.

    +1
  • Question to those who know 1.1 years ago

    @SPAircraftOfficial

    the wheels are limited to a specific rate, which limits the maximum speed of the vehicle.

    +1
  • bristol f2b 1.1 years ago

    @YeetDoctor
    it gets to be pinned on top of the front page of the site for a set amount of days.
    Also, bragging rights.

  • Lockheed YF-22 1.1 years ago

    AG2 activates both payload doors and the Roll TVC

    other than that, very good.

    +2
  • King Piece 1.2 years ago

    @JustMiko
    similar reason as to why the Americans did.

    +2
  • Aeroclub2 1.2 years ago

    Since the link of the map is broken for some reason, I summoned my old device which has the original .spmod file and uploaded it on my own.


    Click here to download.

    +4
  • KYV Kolomyia 1.3 years ago

    @Fineilldoitmyself
    awesome, glad I helped :))

    +1
  • KYV Kolomyia 1.3 years ago

    Does this have the buoyancy technique you mentioned? looks great btw.

    +1
  • Anti-Aircraft 1.3 years ago

    @Fineilldoitmyself
    Sure, no problem.

    +1