@Aye0ey0en Up to 1000 (if you do not fit, then I will still accept 1200) parts and until the first of April. The era is not important, the plane should be the successor of this post. All
@Aye0ey0en I'll give you a hint. I love the "flying boat" aircraft (I hope it sounds like this in English), in the likeness of the Soviet Be-12. And if it lands and takes off without additional floats on the wings, then it will be chic. I just realized from your posts that you know how to build such planes)
If you don't like anime, that's your problem. If you think that your opinion about anime is important to someone, then I will upset you, everyone on your opinion does not care. The job is great! It's been a long time since I've seen anything like it. The author of all the best, and the rest to think what they write.
@MobileBuilder21 I came up with this idea after a couple of games at Lichess. I didn't really think about the functionality, I just wanted to make chess. Maybe an idea will come to mind how to make two manipulators that will be controlled separately, I don't know yet
@Kerbango Yes. I plan to improve them, as this is a simple version made in half an hour. I will add numbers, letters, detailed figures, a more beautiful manipulator, I will remove a lot of figures and the manipulator itself so that everything works more clearly.
Legendary technique! The K-700 still plows fields in Russia and cleans snow in winter, although it was developed in 1961! This power must be seen live.
Für Start und Landung setzen 5/5. Für den Flug 3/5 (er zieht ständig die Nase), für das Aussehen 3/5, von sich selbst 2/5. Insgesamt 13 Punkte. Wenn Sie noch Fragen zur Bewertung haben, fragen Sie.
@gt33 I used a powerful engine in my race car, pointing up (that is, it pressed the car against the road). As a result, even at 1000 km / h, it is quite taxiable. In addition to the engine, you can use the wings at the right angles or a large mass at the lowest height.
Unfortunately, I couldn't take off from the water. But I liked the design, I put 4/5 for it (too large floats look strange. It was possible to make them smaller on longer beams). For the flight characteristics of 4/5, as it constantly misses the nose and rolls on the right wing. For takeoff 3/5 (did not take off from the water). Personal rating: 3/4, since I didn't like the big floats. Total 15
@Smarty He was supposed to be the successor. All right, consider the job counted. I will immediately withdraw one point for my personal opinion, so that the participants who met this requirement are not in the red.
Question: do you need the plane to fly at low speed always or just be able to fly at low speed? In the first case, I would create a small biplane, and in the second, an aircraft with a variable wing geometry.
Tank for Eggy sounds crazy, but no wolf, as in a fairy tale, on the way to his grandmother will not eat it. And most importantly in the tank he will not get sick:-)
@BlackHole Not just a gyroscope, but a system with gyroscopes. Just with gyroscopes, the rocket, if you lower the jostle, immediately rose up. Now this problem is solved.
@Khanhlam Once, when I was just starting to build airplanes here, I solved this problem with wings made of several panels. Only then I started changing from 3 to 2. But I always build airplanes with a large wing extension with standard wings so that they fluctuate a little, because in reality this also happens
@Khanhlam Yes, this will eliminate the property of the aircraft to accelerate underwater, but it's not the solution to the problem that is interesting, but the very existence of this bug
For takeoff and landing, I put 5/5. For flying qualities 4/5. FOR appearance 4/5. My question is, how were the floats supposed to work? After activating the first group, it begins to shake and eventually breaks off. Therefore, from myself I put 4/5. A total of 17 points
@malumuteanaerospace You can use any engine, even a screw engine, even a jet engine, even a rocket engine, even a reverse-thrust brake. The evaluation criteria are entered, the rest is not important.
@Aye0ey0en Ich lebe in einem Dorf, das von den deutschen Kolonisten gegründet wurde und sogar Oberdorf hieß, aber jetzt wurde es in Kuptsovo umbenannt.
The chassis is interestingly made, the view is also not bad). True, a person half-submerged in the block does not look very good. 4/5, for takeoff and landing 5/5, for flight characteristics 5/5, for personal opinion 4/5 (the retractable landing gear should be retracted, and not slightly pressed against the fezulage, otherwise there is simply no point in such a function). Total 18/20. The best work at the moment).
Make a Megumin from the anime "Konosuba". Just need to add a staff and a hat, a little repaint. I WILL BE VERY HAPPY!
+5@Aye0ey0en Up to 1000 (if you do not fit, then I will still accept 1200) parts and until the first of April. The era is not important, the plane should be the successor of this post. All
+3I see you know how to make sea planes). Would you like to participate in the challenge? https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/hp27EO/Challenge
+2@Aye0ey0en I'll give you a hint. I love the "flying boat" aircraft (I hope it sounds like this in English), in the likeness of the Soviet Be-12. And if it lands and takes off without additional floats on the wings, then it will be chic. I just realized from your posts that you know how to build such planes)
+2If you don't like anime, that's your problem. If you think that your opinion about anime is important to someone, then I will upset you, everyone on your opinion does not care. The job is great! It's been a long time since I've seen anything like it. The author of all the best, and the rest to think what they write.
+2Change the color. It shouldn't be so shiny. And reduce the speed, and then 160 km / h for the tank is too much.
+2Hello 2019!
+2Russkij sprechen good
+1@MobileBuilder21 I came up with this idea after a couple of games at Lichess. I didn't really think about the functionality, I just wanted to make chess. Maybe an idea will come to mind how to make two manipulators that will be controlled separately, I don't know yet
+1@Kerbango Yes. I plan to improve them, as this is a simple version made in half an hour. I will add numbers, letters, detailed figures, a more beautiful manipulator, I will remove a lot of figures and the manipulator itself so that everything works more clearly.
+1Legendary technique! The K-700 still plows fields in Russia and cleans snow in winter, although it was developed in 1961! This power must be seen live.
+1Für Start und Landung setzen 5/5. Für den Flug 3/5 (er zieht ständig die Nase), für das Aussehen 3/5, von sich selbst 2/5. Insgesamt 13 Punkte. Wenn Sie noch Fragen zur Bewertung haben, fragen Sie.
+1@Goorengan This is not prohibited)
+1@210100 Ich habe in der Schule Deutsch gelernt. Ich kann ein wenig darauf schreiben und sprechen.
+1@gt33 I used a powerful engine in my race car, pointing up (that is, it pressed the car against the road). As a result, even at 1000 km / h, it is quite taxiable. In addition to the engine, you can use the wings at the right angles or a large mass at the lowest height.
+1@210100 Spread it out). So that I don't have to search when announcing the results, please make it a successor.
+1Unfortunately, I couldn't take off from the water. But I liked the design, I put 4/5 for it (too large floats look strange. It was possible to make them smaller on longer beams). For the flight characteristics of 4/5, as it constantly misses the nose and rolls on the right wing. For takeoff 3/5 (did not take off from the water). Personal rating: 3/4, since I didn't like the big floats. Total 15
+1@Smarty He was supposed to be the successor. All right, consider the job counted. I will immediately withdraw one point for my personal opinion, so that the participants who met this requirement are not in the red.
+1@Smarty Your post should be the successor to this post.
+1F
+1Question: do you need the plane to fly at low speed always or just be able to fly at low speed? In the first case, I would create a small biplane, and in the second, an aircraft with a variable wing geometry.
+1And how to change poses on a PC?
+1I watched this anime, I really liked the main character. I will subscribe to you just to see more work on this anime!
+1@Lorens if you specify that the tank is a receiver, you can
+1Tank for Eggy sounds crazy, but no wolf, as in a fairy tale, on the way to his grandmother will not eat it. And most importantly in the tank he will not get sick:-)
+1@BlackHole Not just a gyroscope, but a system with gyroscopes. Just with gyroscopes, the rocket, if you lower the jostle, immediately rose up. Now this problem is solved.
+1@Thorne and? what should I do now? I suppose I should be happy
+1@Thorne Sorry. I usually write descriptions in English, but this time I forgot and left them in German.
+1Good work, redesign the nose and reduce the load on the wing, change the shape of the consoles.
+1I like it! This is my favorite plane, and you made it small and functional! I'll do a modification of it, but I will give you credit.
+1https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/oL6hRa/Biplane-of-the-19th-century
+1We need all the figures! I laid out working chess, it remains only to add normal pieces)
Why are ENGLISH (Latin) letters on the RUSSIAN tank?
@Khanhlam Once, when I was just starting to build airplanes here, I solved this problem with wings made of several panels. Only then I started changing from 3 to 2. But I always build airplanes with a large wing extension with standard wings so that they fluctuate a little, because in reality this also happens
@Khanhlam Yes, this will eliminate the property of the aircraft to accelerate underwater, but it's not the solution to the problem that is interesting, but the very existence of this bug
@Cowy The stone will slow down very quickly, and this plane accelerates in the water
@PhanTomRoyalty444 The challenge was a year ago). You can build it, I'll evaluate it, I'll put an upvote
@MrShenanigans This is for decoration.
Is it possible to use jet engines as scenery (without thrust, just to simulate a jet jet)
Flight characteristics: 1/5, appearance 4/5, takeoff and landing 4/5, personal points: 3/5, total 12/20
For takeoff and landing, I put 5/5. For flying qualities 4/5. FOR appearance 4/5. My question is, how were the floats supposed to work? After activating the first group, it begins to shake and eventually breaks off. Therefore, from myself I put 4/5. A total of 17 points
@malumuteanaerospace You can use any engine, even a screw engine, even a jet engine, even a rocket engine, even a reverse-thrust brake. The evaluation criteria are entered, the rest is not important.
@Aye0ey0en Ich lebe in einem Dorf, das von den deutschen Kolonisten gegründet wurde und sogar Oberdorf hieß, aber jetzt wurde es in Kuptsovo umbenannt.
@Aye0ey0en Meine Vorfahren lebten in Deutschland. Zu drei Vierteln bin ich Deutscher. Aber ich lebe in Russland.
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/EyNPo0/R-220-Sports-Car
You can use a gyroscope. This will solve all the problems.
Please forgive me for my English. The work is cool, even outside of the challenge I would put upvote.
The chassis is interestingly made, the view is also not bad). True, a person half-submerged in the block does not look very good. 4/5, for takeoff and landing 5/5, for flight characteristics 5/5, for personal opinion 4/5 (the retractable landing gear should be retracted, and not slightly pressed against the fezulage, otherwise there is simply no point in such a function). Total 18/20. The best work at the moment).
@FlyingCat5000 Participation in challenges will help you gain experience)
The number of planes is unlimited, so you can try to score even more