@MobileBuilder21 I came up with this idea after a couple of games at Lichess. I didn't really think about the functionality, I just wanted to make chess. Maybe an idea will come to mind how to make two manipulators that will be controlled separately, I don't know yet
@Kerbango Yes. I plan to improve them, as this is a simple version made in half an hour. I will add numbers, letters, detailed figures, a more beautiful manipulator, I will remove a lot of figures and the manipulator itself so that everything works more clearly.
@Khanhlam Once, when I was just starting to build airplanes here, I solved this problem with wings made of several panels. Only then I started changing from 3 to 2. But I always build airplanes with a large wing extension with standard wings so that they fluctuate a little, because in reality this also happens
@Khanhlam Yes, this will eliminate the property of the aircraft to accelerate underwater, but it's not the solution to the problem that is interesting, but the very existence of this bug
Legendary technique! The K-700 still plows fields in Russia and cleans snow in winter, although it was developed in 1961! This power must be seen live.
For takeoff and landing, I put 5/5. For flying qualities 4/5. FOR appearance 4/5. My question is, how were the floats supposed to work? After activating the first group, it begins to shake and eventually breaks off. Therefore, from myself I put 4/5. A total of 17 points
Für Start und Landung setzen 5/5. Für den Flug 3/5 (er zieht ständig die Nase), für das Aussehen 3/5, von sich selbst 2/5. Insgesamt 13 Punkte. Wenn Sie noch Fragen zur Bewertung haben, fragen Sie.
@malumuteanaerospace You can use any engine, even a screw engine, even a jet engine, even a rocket engine, even a reverse-thrust brake. The evaluation criteria are entered, the rest is not important.
@Aye0ey0en Ich lebe in einem Dorf, das von den deutschen Kolonisten gegründet wurde und sogar Oberdorf hieß, aber jetzt wurde es in Kuptsovo umbenannt.
The chassis is interestingly made, the view is also not bad). True, a person half-submerged in the block does not look very good. 4/5, for takeoff and landing 5/5, for flight characteristics 5/5, for personal opinion 4/5 (the retractable landing gear should be retracted, and not slightly pressed against the fezulage, otherwise there is simply no point in such a function). Total 18/20. The best work at the moment).
The design is interesting) For the appearance I will put 3/5. For flying qualities 4/5. It does not take off very well, but at a speed below 500 km / h (310 miles/h) loses control of 2/5. I did not like how you gave it buoyancy (small blocks from the bottom look bad), for folding I will put a score (2/5). Total 11/20. Relatively not bad )
I see you know how to build sea planes. Would you like to participate in my challenge? This is a great chance to earn an Upvote) Link: https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/hp27EO/Challenge
@gt33 I used a powerful engine in my race car, pointing up (that is, it pressed the car against the road). As a result, even at 1000 km / h, it is quite taxiable. In addition to the engine, you can use the wings at the right angles or a large mass at the lowest height.
@TrojanAircraftSystems No one forbids you to do this). Aircraft on floats is not as impressive, but it is possible that your plane will like me for other reasons.
@BombBoi1822 The number of entries is not limited, but only one from one participant can take the prize. If you count on it (you can)), and do better, then I will be happy to fly it.
Unfortunately, I couldn't take off from the water. But I liked the design, I put 4/5 for it (too large floats look strange. It was possible to make them smaller on longer beams). For the flight characteristics of 4/5, as it constantly misses the nose and rolls on the right wing. For takeoff 3/5 (did not take off from the water). Personal rating: 3/4, since I didn't like the big floats. Total 15
@Aye0ey0en I'll give you a hint. I love the "flying boat" aircraft (I hope it sounds like this in English), in the likeness of the Soviet Be-12. And if it lands and takes off without additional floats on the wings, then it will be chic. I just realized from your posts that you know how to build such planes)
It is impossible to take off on it, either from the water or from the ground. It is also impossible to fly, as the plane immediately falls into a spin. The center of gravity and the center of lift are too close. 1/5 view. Personal opinion 0/4. The result is 1 out of 20 points. The number of jobs is unlimited, so you can try again. Only next time, make the post a successor.
@Smarty He was supposed to be the successor. All right, consider the job counted. I will immediately withdraw one point for my personal opinion, so that the participants who met this requirement are not in the red.
@Aye0ey0en Up to 1000 (if you do not fit, then I will still accept 1200) parts and until the first of April. The era is not important, the plane should be the successor of this post. All
Strange decoration of the box, the wheels are completely superfluous, and the flamethrower is still attached to one of the walls (the box opens, but the flamethrower falls along with the wall). You should still attach it to the bottom plate. But I've already tried it myself. The flamethrower is well made, I don't dispute that.
(sorry for my English) you scored: 1 point for box decoration, 1 point for gift size, 3 points for originality, 1 point for gift functionality. Minus: the flamethrower is attached to the walls, which is why the box does not open. Total 1+1+1+3+1 (from me) = 7 points. If there are no more jobs before January 1, you will receive 10 Upvotes, not counting this. (you scored less than 9 (the number of parts is less than 200, so for this point 0, but you have time to load more work, since the rules do not prohibit this)
@osaz Only the debut of Groba (G4), only hardcore
Russkij sprechen good
+1We need all the figures! I laid out working chess, it remains only to add normal pieces)
@MobileBuilder21 I came up with this idea after a couple of games at Lichess. I didn't really think about the functionality, I just wanted to make chess. Maybe an idea will come to mind how to make two manipulators that will be controlled separately, I don't know yet
+1@Kerbango Yes. I plan to improve them, as this is a simple version made in half an hour. I will add numbers, letters, detailed figures, a more beautiful manipulator, I will remove a lot of figures and the manipulator itself so that everything works more clearly.
+1Why are ENGLISH (Latin) letters on the RUSSIAN tank?
@Khanhlam Once, when I was just starting to build airplanes here, I solved this problem with wings made of several panels. Only then I started changing from 3 to 2. But I always build airplanes with a large wing extension with standard wings so that they fluctuate a little, because in reality this also happens
@Khanhlam Yes, this will eliminate the property of the aircraft to accelerate underwater, but it's not the solution to the problem that is interesting, but the very existence of this bug
@Cowy The stone will slow down very quickly, and this plane accelerates in the water
@PhanTomRoyalty444 The challenge was a year ago). You can build it, I'll evaluate it, I'll put an upvote
Legendary technique! The K-700 still plows fields in Russia and cleans snow in winter, although it was developed in 1961! This power must be seen live.
+1@MrShenanigans This is for decoration.
Is it possible to use jet engines as scenery (without thrust, just to simulate a jet jet)
Flight characteristics: 1/5, appearance 4/5, takeoff and landing 4/5, personal points: 3/5, total 12/20
For takeoff and landing, I put 5/5. For flying qualities 4/5. FOR appearance 4/5. My question is, how were the floats supposed to work? After activating the first group, it begins to shake and eventually breaks off. Therefore, from myself I put 4/5. A total of 17 points
Für Start und Landung setzen 5/5. Für den Flug 3/5 (er zieht ständig die Nase), für das Aussehen 3/5, von sich selbst 2/5. Insgesamt 13 Punkte. Wenn Sie noch Fragen zur Bewertung haben, fragen Sie.
+1@malumuteanaerospace You can use any engine, even a screw engine, even a jet engine, even a rocket engine, even a reverse-thrust brake. The evaluation criteria are entered, the rest is not important.
@Goorengan This is not prohibited)
+1@Aye0ey0en Ich lebe in einem Dorf, das von den deutschen Kolonisten gegründet wurde und sogar Oberdorf hieß, aber jetzt wurde es in Kuptsovo umbenannt.
@Aye0ey0en Meine Vorfahren lebten in Deutschland. Zu drei Vierteln bin ich Deutscher. Aber ich lebe in Russland.
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/EyNPo0/R-220-Sports-Car
You can use a gyroscope. This will solve all the problems.
@210100 Ich habe in der Schule Deutsch gelernt. Ich kann ein wenig darauf schreiben und sprechen.
+2Please forgive me for my English. The work is cool, even outside of the challenge I would put upvote.
The chassis is interestingly made, the view is also not bad). True, a person half-submerged in the block does not look very good. 4/5, for takeoff and landing 5/5, for flight characteristics 5/5, for personal opinion 4/5 (the retractable landing gear should be retracted, and not slightly pressed against the fezulage, otherwise there is simply no point in such a function). Total 18/20. The best work at the moment).
I see you know how to make sea planes). Would you like to participate in the challenge? https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/hp27EO/Challenge
+2@FlyingCat5000 Participation in challenges will help you gain experience)
The number of planes is unlimited, so you can try to score even more
The design is interesting) For the appearance I will put 3/5. For flying qualities 4/5. It does not take off very well, but at a speed below 500 km / h (310 miles/h) loses control of 2/5. I did not like how you gave it buoyancy (small blocks from the bottom look bad), for folding I will put a score (2/5). Total 11/20. Relatively not bad )
I see you know how to build sea planes. Would you like to participate in my challenge? This is a great chance to earn an Upvote) Link: https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/hp27EO/Challenge
I see you know how to build sea planes. Would you like to participate in my challenge? Link: https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/hp27EO/Challenge
@gt33 I used a powerful engine in my race car, pointing up (that is, it pressed the car against the road). As a result, even at 1000 km / h, it is quite taxiable. In addition to the engine, you can use the wings at the right angles or a large mass at the lowest height.
+1@210100 Spread it out). So that I don't have to search when announcing the results, please make it a successor.
+1I've made your plane more or less acceptable. So he at least flies, and also takes off from the water and the ground.
@TrojanAircraftSystems No one forbids you to do this). Aircraft on floats is not as impressive, but it is possible that your plane will like me for other reasons.
@BombBoi1822 The number of entries is not limited, but only one from one participant can take the prize. If you count on it (you can)), and do better, then I will be happy to fly it.
@Smarty Correct the errors. Shift the weight a little forward, the wings back. After that, you can score at least some points.
Unfortunately, I couldn't take off from the water. But I liked the design, I put 4/5 for it (too large floats look strange. It was possible to make them smaller on longer beams). For the flight characteristics of 4/5, as it constantly misses the nose and rolls on the right wing. For takeoff 3/5 (did not take off from the water). Personal rating: 3/4, since I didn't like the big floats. Total 15
+1@Aye0ey0en I'll give you a hint. I love the "flying boat" aircraft (I hope it sounds like this in English), in the likeness of the Soviet Be-12. And if it lands and takes off without additional floats on the wings, then it will be chic. I just realized from your posts that you know how to build such planes)
+2It is impossible to take off on it, either from the water or from the ground. It is also impossible to fly, as the plane immediately falls into a spin. The center of gravity and the center of lift are too close. 1/5 view. Personal opinion 0/4. The result is 1 out of 20 points. The number of jobs is unlimited, so you can try again. Only next time, make the post a successor.
@Smarty He was supposed to be the successor. All right, consider the job counted. I will immediately withdraw one point for my personal opinion, so that the participants who met this requirement are not in the red.
+1@Smarty Your post should be the successor to this post.
+1@Aye0ey0en Up to 1000 (if you do not fit, then I will still accept 1200) parts and until the first of April. The era is not important, the plane should be the successor of this post. All
+3The winner is highflycustoms with 7 points. It gets a 10 Upvote
Strange decoration of the box, the wheels are completely superfluous, and the flamethrower is still attached to one of the walls (the box opens, but the flamethrower falls along with the wall). You should still attach it to the bottom plate. But I've already tried it myself. The flamethrower is well made, I don't dispute that.
HighFlyCustoms scored 7 points
(sorry for my English) you scored: 1 point for box decoration, 1 point for gift size, 3 points for originality, 1 point for gift functionality. Minus: the flamethrower is attached to the walls, which is why the box does not open. Total 1+1+1+3+1 (from me) = 7 points. If there are no more jobs before January 1, you will receive 10 Upvotes, not counting this. (you scored less than 9 (the number of parts is less than 200, so for this point 0, but you have time to load more work, since the rules do not prohibit this)
F
+1I'm not surprised to see the game "simple planes" Chan from the anime.
@captainhall When I read the task about "anything of the first world war" I immediately decided to make this tank