The design is interesting) For the appearance I will put 3/5. For flying qualities 4/5. It does not take off very well, but at a speed below 500 km / h (310 miles/h) loses control of 2/5. I did not like how you gave it buoyancy (small blocks from the bottom look bad), for folding I will put a score (2/5). Total 11/20. Relatively not bad )
I see you know how to build sea planes. Would you like to participate in my challenge? This is a great chance to earn an Upvote) Link: https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/hp27EO/Challenge
@TrojanAircraftSystems No one forbids you to do this). Aircraft on floats is not as impressive, but it is possible that your plane will like me for other reasons.
@BombBoi1822 The number of entries is not limited, but only one from one participant can take the prize. If you count on it (you can)), and do better, then I will be happy to fly it.
It is impossible to take off on it, either from the water or from the ground. It is also impossible to fly, as the plane immediately falls into a spin. The center of gravity and the center of lift are too close. 1/5 view. Personal opinion 0/4. The result is 1 out of 20 points. The number of jobs is unlimited, so you can try again. Only next time, make the post a successor.
Strange decoration of the box, the wheels are completely superfluous, and the flamethrower is still attached to one of the walls (the box opens, but the flamethrower falls along with the wall). You should still attach it to the bottom plate. But I've already tried it myself. The flamethrower is well made, I don't dispute that.
(sorry for my English) you scored: 1 point for box decoration, 1 point for gift size, 3 points for originality, 1 point for gift functionality. Minus: the flamethrower is attached to the walls, which is why the box does not open. Total 1+1+1+3+1 (from me) = 7 points. If there are no more jobs before January 1, you will receive 10 Upvotes, not counting this. (you scored less than 9 (the number of parts is less than 200, so for this point 0, but you have time to load more work, since the rules do not prohibit this)
@MAHADI Fuel consumption on the BI-1 was very high. The maximum running time was 160 seconds. If my replica BI1 didn't have this fuel consumption, it wouldn't be a BI-1 anymore. This is a replica of an existing plane, not a fictional one.
@MAHADI I made a realistic fuel consumption, and this is at least +1 to Functionality. And 1/10 of the appearance is directly understated to the maximum. I want to see a job where you put more than 5/10.
@Highground The tower has a gyroscope. It should rotate the tower as much as possible on Yaw. But the tower rotates by itself when the tank is launched. Look at my work T-54, there is implemented this system and everything works
@ThatsAHotTopic This is created for the "big change" contest. According to the results of the competition, 20 schools receive 2 million rubles each. This model was created for this competition. However, when considering it, it was decided to change it, which I am currently working on.
Question: do you need the plane to fly at low speed always or just be able to fly at low speed? In the first case, I would create a small biplane, and in the second, an aircraft with a variable wing geometry.
@HawaiiRanger Interesting idea, but no. I will give you a reward according to the points you received, since 20 upvote is a lot for such work. You have scored 12 points, if you have questions why so little, I will answer.
@RandomDisplay there were problems when your plane was the enemy. Instead of speed, it gave out an error and the game decided to "go out for a walk". But this happened when your plane was already winning.
Your opponent was BeastHunter. The result of the battle 3:0. The victory went to you. Congratulations! You have passed the second stage! Your opponent will be SimpleWlad.
Your plane is poorly controlled. The result of the fights is 3: 0. RandomDisplay Won. Maneuverability is important, but it is useless without manageability.
Your plane has low maneuverability, but it has a high speed and fuel reserve. I think you will have a great chance of winning. Much, of course, will depend on the opponent. As soon as I get another job, I'll have a fight.
@RandomDisplay The restriction on XML are on the engine. You can increase the damage and rate of fire of the guns indefinitely, but if the spread is too large, I will have to reduce it). After all, it looks stupid if the projectile flying out of the gun suddenly turns out to be 20 meters away from it. The first battles showed that the quality of guns is important only at a long distance, in other cases it almost does not affect the battle.
The fights were very interesting, there were even two rams. The score 3:2 in favour.............................................................................................................simplewlada. Congratulations, you have passed the next stage. Your opponent will be known later.
Your plane doesn't have enough engine thrust. The fights were very interesting, there were even two rams. The score 3:2 in favour.............................................................................................................simplewlada. Unfortunately, you're out.
In a training battle (training because there were no bids yet) between your and my plane the score is 2: 3, your plane won at low altitudes, mine at high and longer distances.
@Yte1234567 It looks somewhat better than my other works, has good maneuverability and powerful weapons. But it is not so interesting in terms of mechanics. Just a plane.
The number of planes is unlimited, so you can try to score even more
The design is interesting) For the appearance I will put 3/5. For flying qualities 4/5. It does not take off very well, but at a speed below 500 km / h (310 miles/h) loses control of 2/5. I did not like how you gave it buoyancy (small blocks from the bottom look bad), for folding I will put a score (2/5). Total 11/20. Relatively not bad )
I see you know how to build sea planes. Would you like to participate in my challenge? This is a great chance to earn an Upvote) Link: https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/hp27EO/Challenge
I see you know how to build sea planes. Would you like to participate in my challenge? Link: https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/hp27EO/Challenge
I've made your plane more or less acceptable. So he at least flies, and also takes off from the water and the ground.
@TrojanAircraftSystems No one forbids you to do this). Aircraft on floats is not as impressive, but it is possible that your plane will like me for other reasons.
@BombBoi1822 The number of entries is not limited, but only one from one participant can take the prize. If you count on it (you can)), and do better, then I will be happy to fly it.
@Smarty Correct the errors. Shift the weight a little forward, the wings back. After that, you can score at least some points.
It is impossible to take off on it, either from the water or from the ground. It is also impossible to fly, as the plane immediately falls into a spin. The center of gravity and the center of lift are too close. 1/5 view. Personal opinion 0/4. The result is 1 out of 20 points. The number of jobs is unlimited, so you can try again. Only next time, make the post a successor.
The winner is highflycustoms with 7 points. It gets a 10 Upvote
Strange decoration of the box, the wheels are completely superfluous, and the flamethrower is still attached to one of the walls (the box opens, but the flamethrower falls along with the wall). You should still attach it to the bottom plate. But I've already tried it myself. The flamethrower is well made, I don't dispute that.
HighFlyCustoms scored 7 points
(sorry for my English) you scored: 1 point for box decoration, 1 point for gift size, 3 points for originality, 1 point for gift functionality. Minus: the flamethrower is attached to the walls, which is why the box does not open. Total 1+1+1+3+1 (from me) = 7 points. If there are no more jobs before January 1, you will receive 10 Upvotes, not counting this. (you scored less than 9 (the number of parts is less than 200, so for this point 0, but you have time to load more work, since the rules do not prohibit this)
I'm not surprised to see the game "simple planes" Chan from the anime.
@captainhall When I read the task about "anything of the first world war" I immediately decided to make this tank
@MAHADI Fuel consumption is not required, the actual size of the same was not necessary, fine!
@MAHADI Fuel consumption on the BI-1 was very high. The maximum running time was 160 seconds. If my replica BI1 didn't have this fuel consumption, it wouldn't be a BI-1 anymore. This is a replica of an existing plane, not a fictional one.
@MAHADI I made a realistic fuel consumption, and this is at least +1 to Functionality. And 1/10 of the appearance is directly understated to the maximum. I want to see a job where you put more than 5/10.
@Highground The tower has a gyroscope. It should rotate the tower as much as possible on Yaw. But the tower rotates by itself when the tank is launched. Look at my work T-54, there is implemented this system and everything works
@Highground I'm saying that when you launch it, the tower starts spinning uncontrollably on its own
@ThatsAHotTopic This is created for the "big change" contest. According to the results of the competition, 20 schools receive 2 million rubles each. This model was created for this competition. However, when considering it, it was decided to change it, which I am currently working on.
Question: do you need the plane to fly at low speed always or just be able to fly at low speed? In the first case, I would create a small biplane, and in the second, an aircraft with a variable wing geometry.
Why does the SU-152 have a 250-mm instead of 152-mm gun? NOT HISTORICAL!
I will do it. It will be realistic, but there will be about 300 parts.
@HawaiiRanger Interesting idea, but no. I will give you a reward according to the points you received, since 20 upvote is a lot for such work. You have scored 12 points, if you have questions why so little, I will answer.
@MAHADI Chiki dance
The familiar cabin... Descendant of my "Katyusha"?
Congratulations! You won the final! Score 3: 2.
@RandomDisplay there were problems when your plane was the enemy. Instead of speed, it gave out an error and the game decided to "go out for a walk". But this happened when your plane was already winning.
The second stage will be held on may 20. You have every chance!
The second stage will be held on may 20. You have every chance!
Your opponent was BeastHunter. The result of the battle 3:0. The victory went to you. Congratulations! You have passed the second stage! Your opponent will be SimpleWlad.
Your plane is poorly controlled. The result of the fights is 3: 0. RandomDisplay Won. Maneuverability is important, but it is useless without manageability.
Great! Your application is accepted! Your opponent will be RandomDisplay. I will report the result of the fighting later!
Your plane has low maneuverability, but it has a high speed and fuel reserve. I think you will have a great chance of winning. Much, of course, will depend on the opponent. As soon as I get another job, I'll have a fight.
Great! Your application is accepted! The opponent will be known later.
@RandomDisplay I don't approve of bullets the size of planes, of course. If you set it up, then within reasonable limits.
@RandomDisplay The restriction on XML are on the engine. You can increase the damage and rate of fire of the guns indefinitely, but if the spread is too large, I will have to reduce it). After all, it looks stupid if the projectile flying out of the gun suddenly turns out to be 20 meters away from it. The first battles showed that the quality of guns is important only at a long distance, in other cases it almost does not affect the battle.
The fights were very interesting, there were even two rams. The score 3:2 in favour.............................................................................................................simplewlada. Congratulations, you have passed the next stage. Your opponent will be known later.
Your plane doesn't have enough engine thrust. The fights were very interesting, there were even two rams. The score 3:2 in favour.............................................................................................................simplewlada. Unfortunately, you're out.
Great! Your application is accepted! Your plane will be in the first round to fight against the plane simplewlada
The task was to make a SCREW fighter. You have a jet engine. So please make a screw version, otherwise I can't accept it for the challenge
In a training battle (training because there were no bids yet) between your and my plane the score is 2: 3, your plane won at low altitudes, mine at high and longer distances.
Application accepted, wait for your fight!
@Yoyoyooo good always wins. Tank for good
flies like a galosh
I have flown 800 AND more, you can find the corresponding post on my page
@Yte1234567 It looks somewhat better than my other works, has good maneuverability and powerful weapons. But it is not so interesting in terms of mechanics. Just a plane.
Sorry, I accidentally posted my plane twice
I have fewer parts on my plane than on this engine