yawn, a bit of politeness goes a long way, do as Deathtrap says, download someones, see how they do it and then build your own, its a simple as using a rotator with it on landing gear and -1 changed to 0, then add your shapes.
@KerlonceauxIndustries ive only ever used them when i want something to hover, i find they reduce the handling by damping it, but im no expert on them.
@KerlonceauxIndustries i didnt do anything with the engines other than give them more power, mby reduce the power or check if collisions is disabled, if you want more manoeveablilty increase the movement of the control surfaces, pylon racers where not massively manoverable anyway.
@KerlonceauxIndustries try this. I changed the wing sections for fuselage panels and hid some small wings where necessary. feel free to use the shrunk bits etc ive added into this.
@Tully2001 lol so as soon as I become black I'm not eligible for features? I would have thought builds by all levels would be a better advert for the game but nvm, ill just build as always.
@Kerbango it does seem a bit strange though as rank doesn't matter surely? Everyone should be treated the same, it's a tool to intentavise people to greater builds....
@Tang0five now then, it's been a while since we have been treated to one of your builds, how are you managing? Got anything in the pipeline? I need some tang0five inspiration :)
@Awsomur @Minecraftpoweer ah K, thanks for clearing that up, I only got featured a couple of times on some early builds but nothing for ages so I did wonder if it was something I was doing wrong. Anyway, chocks away building time is being wasted.
@Chancey21 @ThePilotDude @ryanalan @CRJ900Pilot @Sgtk @TheGuyYouMightKnow thanks for the comments and votes, any suggestions for improvements or ideas for revised versions?
@EternalDarkness thanks, it's a rehash of one of my early designs hence the trailing edges, no autoroll when I'm flying (or very little anyway) is there a different physics setting or something?
@BobTheTitanSP Lol, I knew I should have put the droptanks on AG1. Well I can get a plane on YouTube but not featured on here :) pity he didn't mention who built it though :p
@ThePrototype @bjac0 @CRJ900Pilot @iLikeipads thanks guys, sorry I've been on holiday hence late responses, most of small-brown-dog and cutangus designs have no outboard wings as they are based on the fiction of electric anti-grav hence large section behind piston engines.
@Tang0five lol I've just been to bruntingthorpe cold war jets day where I was having a good look at the bucc, I've figured out the bomb bay so bow all I need is some time :)
@WIZARD2017 Yeah, someone made that for me a while back but I didn't have the opportunity to use it till bow. Once I remember who it was I will credit properly
@TheGuyYouMightKnow Just in case you think i had forgotten about your suggestion http://www.simpleplanes.com/a/11TQj3/Pierre-Drolet-Viper-1-2 I have made a start but keep getting distracted at present :)
@fernado475 yes kid, there's progression, all I was trying to say was a bit more time and effort will help you get points, my builds are massively different to when I started as they all bow have large parts counts and more detail, which is what attracts people to the builds (I like to think). Spend some more time on your next build to make sure it's right and nicely detailed and see what happens.
@fernado475 ok, no worries, try the forums. I did have a look at your builds, they aren't bad, just need a bit more time and detail and you will get the votes etc. Nick some bits from mine if it helps.
@Tang0five @Treadmill103 @Trainzo @ChiChiWerx @niggelas100 Thanks for the votes and comments, I enjoyed this build, pity my computer slows down so much when it's 700+ parts otherwise I would have added more detail (wing section for tail, lettering, bombs and racks etc)
Aw you didn't do the landing light in the intake :( barring that good job (quite strange as I was looking at the example at Sunderland aircraft museum yesterday)
@GhostHTX the eagle blood helps but mainly I found out that if u scale down a wing section it seems to maintain the same lifting characteristics as the larger panel so it's small but still has big lift, magic.
@Tang0five yeah suppose you are right, I don't mind constructive criticism I.e. this bit doesn't work right have you tried doing it this way etc. But the other stuff just comes across as unnecessary. I enjoy the game as it's lets me build whatever I can imagine (or pilfer from artwork / reality) and other people are obviously inspired in the same way, what you do on that tablet still amazes me. Anyway I'm running short on inspiration at present so may be a little while till the next build.
@Tang0five Thanks for the positive comments as always, I enjoy building different things, sometimes I just dont want to spend a week building something =) Some people do seem to be very negative and judgemental on here mind....
@ProcessedPlAnEs oops, I obv missed them when I nudged the rest, just nudge em into the tail, at least it flies better though now, oh and your welcome.
@Planefun ouch, burn time. If I had any control over game mechanics the suspension would not detach but as I don't and as I fancied using it for the first time I built this. If u don't use the booster engines it's fine, if it not daft when using them it's fine....
yawn, a bit of politeness goes a long way, do as Deathtrap says, download someones, see how they do it and then build your own, its a simple as using a rotator with it on landing gear and -1 changed to 0, then add your shapes.
@KerlonceauxIndustries ive only ever used them when i want something to hover, i find they reduce the handling by damping it, but im no expert on them.
@KerlonceauxIndustries i didnt do anything with the engines other than give them more power, mby reduce the power or check if collisions is disabled, if you want more manoeveablilty increase the movement of the control surfaces, pylon racers where not massively manoverable anyway.
@Tang0five theres nothing mediocre about it, you build on a tablet, your builds are excellent.
@KerlonceauxIndustries try this. I changed the wing sections for fuselage panels and hid some small wings where necessary. feel free to use the shrunk bits etc ive added into this.
@AvroPilot lol appart from the roundels etc =) but yeah i know what you mean, its probably the heinkel type cockpits
@RailfanEthan thanks man. Glad you like it
@Tully2001 lol so as soon as I become black I'm not eligible for features? I would have thought builds by all levels would be a better advert for the game but nvm, ill just build as always.
@Kerbango it does seem a bit strange though as rank doesn't matter surely? Everyone should be treated the same, it's a tool to intentavise people to greater builds....
@Tang0five ah well, the bucks still on the drawing board, I'm working on a voodoo at present but have your problem of too little time.
@Tang0five now then, it's been a while since we have been treated to one of your builds, how are you managing? Got anything in the pipeline? I need some tang0five inspiration :)
@Awsomur @Minecraftpoweer ah K, thanks for clearing that up, I only got featured a couple of times on some early builds but nothing for ages so I did wonder if it was something I was doing wrong. Anyway, chocks away building time is being wasted.
@ThePilotDude I built a fighter version and got part count down to just less than 800. Thanks for your suggestion.
@bjac0 Lol, it's blue therefore it's an f15 isn't it?
@Chancey21 @ThePilotDude @ryanalan @CRJ900Pilot @Sgtk @TheGuyYouMightKnow thanks for the comments and votes, any suggestions for improvements or ideas for revised versions?
They are probs in front of centre of lift and thus acting as canards, just change them to be decorative instead of lifting surfaces
@Briancat24 I can try but it's the detail that makes up the part count
@EternalDarkness thanks, it's a rehash of one of my early designs hence the trailing edges, no autoroll when I'm flying (or very little anyway) is there a different physics setting or something?
See you thought it needed canards as well (didnt realise you had made one).
@Irobert55 help yourself, thanks for asking.
@Treadmill103 @MrDoolittle @TheGuyYouMightKnow @CRJ900Pilot @Sgtk @ThePrototype thanks guys, and special that's to TGYMK for the inspiration
@BobTheTitanSP Lol, I knew I should have put the droptanks on AG1. Well I can get a plane on YouTube but not featured on here :) pity he didn't mention who built it though :p
@DisferGoatz you spelt colour wrong, or are you using English simplified? :)
@ThePrototype @bjac0 @CRJ900Pilot @iLikeipads thanks guys, sorry I've been on holiday hence late responses, most of small-brown-dog and cutangus designs have no outboard wings as they are based on the fiction of electric anti-grav hence large section behind piston engines.
@Tang0five lol I've just been to bruntingthorpe cold war jets day where I was having a good look at the bucc, I've figured out the bomb bay so bow all I need is some time :)
@LegnaK thanks man, i was starting to despair, everytime i spend a significant amount of time on a build it flops..
@Alien nice, I grew up with my dad having a 600ss :)
@Alien thanks man, I have a white and red 848 but never got round to putting a pic on here for my profile so stock photo will have to do :)
@WIZARD2017 Yeah, someone made that for me a while back but I didn't have the opportunity to use it till bow. Once I remember who it was I will credit properly
@AdlerSteiner thanks, the slant on the cockpit was the point of some criticism previously
@TheGuyYouMightKnow Just in case you think i had forgotten about your suggestion http://www.simpleplanes.com/a/11TQj3/Pierre-Drolet-Viper-1-2 I have made a start but keep getting distracted at present :)
Exactly what deathtrsp said. Have a look at my fitter or Heyford for an example
Well 17 upvotes sort of tells me that ww1 stuff isnt really appreciated.... Thanks to the 17 though.
@fernado475 have a look at @Tang0five s builds, he's on iOS (for his sins) and builds really well. It's all just a learning process though.
@fernado475 yes kid, there's progression, all I was trying to say was a bit more time and effort will help you get points, my builds are massively different to when I started as they all bow have large parts counts and more detail, which is what attracts people to the builds (I like to think). Spend some more time on your next build to make sure it's right and nicely detailed and see what happens.
@fernado475 ok, no worries, try the forums. I did have a look at your builds, they aren't bad, just need a bit more time and detail and you will get the votes etc. Nick some bits from mine if it helps.
@fernado475 just out of curiosity, why plug your own builds on someone else's and not even upvotes the build you are commenting on?
@Tang0five @Treadmill103 @Trainzo @ChiChiWerx @niggelas100 Thanks for the votes and comments, I enjoyed this build, pity my computer slows down so much when it's 700+ parts otherwise I would have added more detail (wing section for tail, lettering, bombs and racks etc)
@GhostHTX @MoonKnight @TheGuyYouMightKnow Thanks guys, it is a futuristic design but also very 1940s in colour equipment etc.
@freedompilot98 good wow or bad wow?
Aw you didn't do the landing light in the intake :( barring that good job (quite strange as I was looking at the example at Sunderland aircraft museum yesterday)
@Tang0five @CRJ900Pilot @RailfanEthan @ThePilotDude @Formula350 @LegnaK @TheGuyYouMightKnow Thanks guys, appreciate the comments as always.
@Trainzo thanks, glad you like it.
@GhostHTX the eagle blood helps but mainly I found out that if u scale down a wing section it seems to maintain the same lifting characteristics as the larger panel so it's small but still has big lift, magic.
@Carbonfox1 yeah I saw it a while back but focused on some of his other work first, glad u like it though.
@Tang0five yeah suppose you are right, I don't mind constructive criticism I.e. this bit doesn't work right have you tried doing it this way etc. But the other stuff just comes across as unnecessary. I enjoy the game as it's lets me build whatever I can imagine (or pilfer from artwork / reality) and other people are obviously inspired in the same way, what you do on that tablet still amazes me. Anyway I'm running short on inspiration at present so may be a little while till the next build.
@GhostHTX Thanks, sorry I didn't reply earlier, I missed your post. Glad you are enjoying them, which 300 did you prefer?
@Tang0five Thanks for the positive comments as always, I enjoy building different things, sometimes I just dont want to spend a week building something =) Some people do seem to be very negative and judgemental on here mind....
@ProcessedPlAnEs oops, I obv missed them when I nudged the rest, just nudge em into the tail, at least it flies better though now, oh and your welcome.
@Planefun ouch, burn time. If I had any control over game mechanics the suspension would not detach but as I don't and as I fancied using it for the first time I built this. If u don't use the booster engines it's fine, if it not daft when using them it's fine....