@Jaguargery @Trainzo @FlyingHueman thanks for the comments and upvotes, I'm happy with the way it turned out, I made some big changes to it during the build which definitely improved it.
@ChiChiWerx thanks :) I was wondering about the evolution of the American roundels, I didn't realise the significance of the older symbols, thanks for the info.
@Chancey21 if you can do that wing shape and camo it, include custom undercarriage hollow undercarriage bays and custom weapons for 400 parts less your doing well :) where do you think my extra parts are?
@BlackhattAircraft Thanks, I'm sure your entry will be fine, I was going to wait before posting as I don't like the idea of putting people off but then I thought I'd forget about it :)
@FairFireFight thanks, i went for the v tail for a number of reasons, i am trying to use it sort of like a signature on my builds of late and i was trying to keep the number of turrets down. By using the v tail the top turret can cover more sky and backup the rear turret. I didnt know you where running a competition, i havnt been keeping track of competitions for a while since the last disaster...
@ssenmodnar I looked at them before, I was going to do the 1 that changes from a biplane to a monoplane but I've ran out of motivation for sp at present
@Thecatbaron tell me about it, dont get me wrong i enjoy the building, but as you say they just keep missing the mark apparently, ive tried shaking it up a bit going from ww1 to modern day but no luck. I dont have much interest in other vehicles hence not many builds that are not aircraft =)
@lastv801 I have a long range medium bomber, 4 different evolutions of my f4, a couple of apc type vehicles and then a load of part built aircraft concepts.
@ThomasRoderick about 4 days ago here, F3F2F1. So having a jet engine producing 100% of the thrust via a reducing gear box and a drive shaft doesnt allow me to say that it is powered by a jet engine? I didnt say it was a jet, i said it was powered by one, which as far as i can see would be correct?
@Tang0five I have just realised that you where the very first person to upvote my very first build =)
@Tang0five well i hit the part limit so it had to be white =) now what else could I have called it lol
@magvera whats BR?
@Treadmill103 @Mattangi2 @Type2volkswagen thanks =) its odd but fun.
@Nuclearbomber36 yep :)
@Jaguargery @Trainzo @FlyingHueman thanks for the comments and upvotes, I'm happy with the way it turned out, I made some big changes to it during the build which definitely improved it.
Well i did 12 first as it was closer to being finished, number 1 is causing all sorts of consternation....
@Aarons123 i was typing it lol.
Results of the poll, 1=6v, 2=4v, 3=2v, 4=2v, 5=3v, 6=1v, 7=1v, 8=3v, 9=4v, 10=4v, 11=1v, 12=5v, 13=3v.
So the next build i should finish is number 1 then number 12.
@Thundrhawk1 it has 2 engines both driving 2 contra rotating props. So weighs about as much as most twin engine fighters.
@ChiChiWerx thanks :) I was wondering about the evolution of the American roundels, I didn't realise the significance of the older symbols, thanks for the info.
@Mustang51 yeah I saw that, wasn't a replica really was it.
@Mustang51 more from the Martin baker mb5 to be honest.
@Chancey21 wings, camo and sign writing. most of my recent builds are over 1000 parts for the same reason
@Chancey21 if you can do that wing shape and camo it, include custom undercarriage hollow undercarriage bays and custom weapons for 400 parts less your doing well :) where do you think my extra parts are?
@WIZARD2017 thanks for the faith in my abilities but an actual vulcan wood take a long time to make. If I get some free time I may give it a go.
@Tang0five so did I =)
@Nuclearbomber36 The skybolt would be but i havnt used the nuke mod if thats what you mean?
@enzoBoeing757 here 900 sonic booms a minute from props....
@WarHawk95 yep.
@asteroidbook345 I thought the thunderscreech was the loudest?
@asteroidbook345 I can try but the rotators have a max turning speed that can't be changed hence I had to use a proppellor
@weebabyseamus is there a limit on numbers of entries from each person?
@Strikefighter04 yeah k
@FairFireFight no worries, does that mean it's valid then?
@BlackhattAircraft Thanks, I'm sure your entry will be fine, I was going to wait before posting as I don't like the idea of putting people off but then I thought I'd forget about it :)
2 rotators, or 3 if u want trim as well. Have a look at my last attack aircraft I left the rotators accessible
@Trainzo thanks again Trainzo, glad you like it =)
@EternalDarkness thanks for the spotlight, much appreciated.
@FairFireFight thanks, i went for the v tail for a number of reasons, i am trying to use it sort of like a signature on my builds of late and i was trying to keep the number of turrets down. By using the v tail the top turret can cover more sky and backup the rear turret. I didnt know you where running a competition, i havnt been keeping track of competitions for a while since the last disaster...
@Nickr not much chance, to do that i have to delete all the decoration, the interior, the turrets and remake the fus and wings....
@Viper3000ad glad you like them, im sure to use them again... =p
@ssenmodnar I looked at them before, I was going to do the 1 that changes from a biplane to a monoplane but I've ran out of motivation for sp at present
@Thecatbaron tell me about it, dont get me wrong i enjoy the building, but as you say they just keep missing the mark apparently, ive tried shaking it up a bit going from ww1 to modern day but no luck. I dont have much interest in other vehicles hence not many builds that are not aircraft =)
@AtlanticStandard yeah i was thinking of that, but i dont know, its a lot of work for 20 upvotes....
@Mattangi2 that's cos I set it up as a company (see profile) no different to hawker or Martin baker etc :)
@lastv801 here for some examples...
@lastv801 I have a long range medium bomber, 4 different evolutions of my f4, a couple of apc type vehicles and then a load of part built aircraft concepts.
@lastv801 thanks :) I'm struggling with building at present, have over 10 builds incomplete..
@lastv801 nah man that was a one off for the spy special :)
@CRJ900Pilot thanks. Glad you liked it
@ChiChiWerx that has to be one of my best comments ever, you got power and speed to be the same as i used when configuring it :)
@ThomasRoderick about 4 days ago here, F3 F2 F1. So having a jet engine producing 100% of the thrust via a reducing gear box and a drive shaft doesnt allow me to say that it is powered by a jet engine? I didnt say it was a jet, i said it was powered by one, which as far as i can see would be correct?
@BlackhattAircraft you tell me.... I thought it was the best one of my latest posts.
@CptJacobson help yourself, thanks for asking
@EternalDarkness jets :) and tricycle gear, damn, you guessed it...
@Generalkrayt thanks :) wait until you see the F4.
@CZECHSPACEPROGRAM Tak určitě (if google translate was correct, that should mean sure... =)
@Tang0five quite probably, was looking at some aa missile batteries at Sunderland aircraft museum.
@Caat2 lol a few months ago they did