@CaptFoxworth19 After going through the process of learning how to make something like this, I have come to the conclusion this is a difficult thing to learn how to do. I'm still going to make a tutorial, however it will take quite a while to come out.
Looks amazing. Take your time with the cockpits, I personally spend months on mine (saying that, I have built a single plane from the update, with another in development).
@CaptFoxworth19 I half made one a while ago and scrapped it due to inexperience. After I'm done the SWL-120 wing remake, I'll make a tutorial about the whole process. I personally am still learning; this is a basic rectangular wing I made as part of my "lessons" from a friend.
@Hazerz That's fine, I do realize all the earlier vids were actually part SWL-120 progress updates, and part variables tutorial video. I need to create a more refined tutorial.
Actually, here's something even better (you'll have to wait a while, I'm not sure when it will be out): Snowflake0s is updating the FT guide to be completely different. I helped refine it, and I can say with confidence it will help you and users like you understand the variables system, as well as all of funky trees.
@ILoveAirplanes Again, I need to write a paragraph about this in the next big forum update. The plan is for this plane to technically be VR compatible, even if the performance cost is too much. I will also post several different versions, including a flying cockpit. So yes, it will be VR compatible, even if it has too much of a performance impact. So the answer to your question is no, however you can download another version of it to get the cockpit experience.
How to make wings rigid:
Step 1: Make the wing which works, with control surfaces and stuff (a default wing)
Step 2: Open Overload (the plane icon with 2 arrows) and locate the text which says "Wing-(some number)". Change that to Wing-2. You will need to reconnect the wing afterwards.
Step 3: Rigid wing.
@CaptFoxworth19 After going through the process of learning how to make something like this, I have come to the conclusion this is a difficult thing to learn how to do. I'm still going to make a tutorial, however it will take quite a while to come out.
+1@CaptFoxworth19 Remember that picture I sent? Here's that picture now.
+1@DeveloperKorzalerke hmmmm
+1@Hazerz I'm not "helping" so much, I'm revising the text for improvements in writing.
+1Looks amazing. Take your time with the cockpits, I personally spend months on mine (saying that, I have built a single plane from the update, with another in development).
Also T.
+1hmmm muffler
+1I made it even better.
+1@LEDOverCharge My PC specs are these. I'm the one who tested it and flew it, at a measly 30 FPS.
+1Way better than my plat special
+1@CaptFoxworth19 I half made one a while ago and scrapped it due to inexperience. After I'm done the SWL-120 wing remake, I'll make a tutorial about the whole process. I personally am still learning; this is a basic rectangular wing I made as part of my "lessons" from a friend.
+1Random thing, but the link to the PID controller information isn't defined. It just links back here, like the url wasn't pasted in.
+1If you'd like, I can host the source code on my drive. I already have a copy saved too.
+1@Hazerz I know that link, I was talking about the user who asked in the beginning.
+1Tags:
+1@X99STRIKER
🗿
+1I use the right side. After I do the initial mirror, I add details from random sides.
+1@Hazerz That's fine, I do realize all the earlier vids were actually part SWL-120 progress updates, and part variables tutorial video. I need to create a more refined tutorial.
+1Actually, here's something even better (you'll have to wait a while, I'm not sure when it will be out): Snowflake0s is updating the FT guide to be completely different. I helped refine it, and I can say with confidence it will help you and users like you understand the variables system, as well as all of funky trees.
@CaptFoxworth19 Of course it is. In fact I'm building that right now. Here's a picture.
+1@ILoveAirplanes Again, I need to write a paragraph about this in the next big forum update. The plan is for this plane to technically be VR compatible, even if the performance cost is too much. I will also post several different versions, including a flying cockpit. So yes, it will be VR compatible, even if it has too much of a performance impact. So the answer to your question is no, however you can download another version of it to get the cockpit experience.
+1@KDnotSpy I guess it is...
+1I get 60 fps all max settings with the original.
+1@Hazerz That's not mine, it's one I was adding a startup sequence to for someone.
+1How to make wings rigid:
+1Step 1: Make the wing which works, with control surfaces and stuff (a default wing)
Step 2: Open Overload (the plane icon with 2 arrows) and locate the text which says "Wing-(some number)". Change that to Wing-2. You will need to reconnect the wing afterwards.
Step 3: Rigid wing.
@Hazerz mmm... maybe. A lot of them are still new enough where I think they're okay.
+1But what's the problem?
+1@Hazerz As I was told, put the link to the image (blablabla.png) in the code for a text link, for example:
+1[](desired link).Mate, the variables system allows you to make a flight simulator. For example. Upcoming.
+1@MeuseFlugzeugbau Glad you figured it out. The equation(s) go(es) in the variable setters, in one of the three values.
+1@CarrotDynamics There is no rule saying that.
+1@IceCraftGaming Yes it is...
+1Oh I see.... What is the purpose of the variable setter?
+1T for the stationair
+1You are probably going to overtake me eventually.
+1clamp01(AltitudeAgl > (Put some number in here like 20)) * other code
+1Steam syncs your game files to the cloud. You stuff is saved. Just reinstall SP on the new drive and your stuff will be there.
+1@FRIGGLES What do you mean?
+1@MrShenanigansSP I see, I could have done that.
+1Is this mod going to be updated for 1.11?
+1@ThatDr42 Labels normally display normal text. To make them do an FT expression, place the FT expression in {}.
+1I've found this guide to be helpful.
+1In 41 minutes, there have been 3 new ones.
+1@FRIGGLES Thanks!
+1@V lol
+1Did you know you can rename it?
no #2
+1wat
+1test
+1@BeastHunter The points war? I guess I forgot about it. I'll add it.
+1@BeastHunter Thanks!
+1@BeastHunter Is it just a coincidence?
+1@BeastHunter Wait what?
+1