@Cedy117 I was thinking if we could work together to develop a 2.5-ton truck based off the M35 design, since Paternian Army trials indicated a desire for a 6x6 truck for this role.
@Cedy117 You should release it. It would be an interesting comparison between two different interpretations of a similar concept.
I assume that yours is designed by engineers and technicians to be able to fire forwards and probably comes as a kit or straight from the factory, while mine is a modification made by mechanics from a regimental or divisional maintenance depot that later became manufactured as kits.
@Cedy117 Just wondering whether you think whether a 5-ton truck can withstand the repeated force of recoil from a 105mm howitzer mounted on the truck bed.
Yep. Victoria as of now, is probably the standard which all tanks are compared to in C&C. When they speak of their machine's power, it is usually a claim that it can defeat the Victoria. @SimpleTechAndResearch
Originally, the plane was like a cargo jet version of the CH-54 Skycrane. He had a tanker, transport, and bomber variant. One of its prospective customers was me in the form of the fictional Paternian Air Force.
We liked the aircraft, but sought a variant with a more conventional cargo bay for use with troops. So we made a bolt-on conversion kit.
This aircraft was incredibly popular with operators. Soon, Fox Industries was making the aircraft as a more conventional transport. @WNP78
@Cedy117 I was thinking if we could work together to develop a 2.5-ton truck based off the M35 design, since Paternian Army trials indicated a desire for a 6x6 truck for this role.
@Cedy117 Yep.
@Cedy117 Don't mind if I make lots of variants of this truck.
The Paternian Armed Forces, for its great power, employs foreign equipment when they are superior to locally-produced stuff.
@Cedy117 You should release it. It would be an interesting comparison between two different interpretations of a similar concept.
I assume that yours is designed by engineers and technicians to be able to fire forwards and probably comes as a kit or straight from the factory, while mine is a modification made by mechanics from a regimental or divisional maintenance depot that later became manufactured as kits.
@Killjoy543 Thanks!
@Cedy117 what I am talking about.
Mine is a little different. @Cedy117
@Cedy117 Just wondering whether you think whether a 5-ton truck can withstand the repeated force of recoil from a 105mm howitzer mounted on the truck bed.
@Cedy117 Sounds good!
Also, I have a variant of the M26 that I think you would find interesting.
Thanks! @RailfanEthan
Do you think this would work for a 2.5-ton tuck?
I'd probably call it M36.
Yes, I use a lot of your trucks. You do have a subsidiary in the Paternian Republic (Cedco Paternia), yes?
@Supercraft888 Looks nice. The 416-style stock works well.
If they're on the ground. @Spikerya
@Spikerya lol.
Little does he know, that it's not necessarily the raw performance of Paternian fighters that make them so dangerous.
It's all the other stuff that comes with them.
@marcox43 I suppose.
@Makcoink
@Dllama4 My real AR-15 is nonexistent because I have other priorities.
@PyrusEnderhunter Isn't the ALEK-90 based off a lot of guns like the ARX-160 and G36?
@PyrusEnderHunter for updated 5.56mm ammo and mags.
@PyrusEnderhunter So a bullpup 5.56mm assault rifle based off of the Paternian M16A5.
@PyrusEnderhunter So this is still technically a modified M16A5, right?
@YuukaNeko Yes, that is a scope mount atop a fixed carry handle. Those are 10-round and 5-round magazines.
Is the lower receiver the same as the the ALEK-90? @PyrusEnderhunter
@CWhat016 Detach then reattach the springs.
@marcox43 Just a truck is fine.
@Botfinder We do take account for lefties though.
That's why our M16 comes with ambidextrous controls and a brass deflector so that lefties don't get a face-full of brass casings.
It is. @PINK
@PINK That's literally 10% of the population.
Usually, we tell the lefty to learn to be a righty.
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation @Flash0of0green Thanks!
@Smasher Agreed.
Why is the sight on the right side?
@Testin123 lol yep.
Yep. Victoria as of now, is probably the standard which all tanks are compared to in C&C. When they speak of their machine's power, it is usually a claim that it can defeat the Victoria. @SimpleTechAndResearch
The Model 1 Manual Rifle.
I may have to compare it to the Rifle, Magazine, Manual, M10.
@Flash0of0green The USAS-12 is actually closer to a Korean AA-12.
Because that's literally what it is.
@Flash0of0green It was modeled loosely off the USAS-12.
@KillShot86 You already did.
The normal one. @MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation
@CWhat016 Only one way to find out.
By the way, if you want to save the whole unit as a subassembly, the cockpit is in the scope.
Yes, the ship may be faster, but that doesn't help with not sinking from inclement weather that would literally drown your ship.
See the loss of the USS Monitor as an example. @TheBroadside
@Cedy117 Permission to enter into Paternian service?
What a heavenly palace!
@RailfanEthan @BogdanX Precision is overrated.
Not. @TheBroadside
Interesting story behind the Liquidfox tanker.
Originally, the plane was like a cargo jet version of the CH-54 Skycrane. He had a tanker, transport, and bomber variant. One of its prospective customers was me in the form of the fictional Paternian Air Force.
We liked the aircraft, but sought a variant with a more conventional cargo bay for use with troops. So we made a bolt-on conversion kit.
This aircraft was incredibly popular with operators. Soon, Fox Industries was making the aircraft as a more conventional transport. @WNP78
@CWhat016 Sounds good!
@CWhat016 Credit is preferable, but not necessary.
I understand that people may run into builds that employ this subassembly without knowing its actual origin.
@TheBroadside A bigger engine isn't going to help your ship from getting swamped in slight waves.
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation They don't call it the "Girlfriend of Four" for no reason.
@Alix451 Thanks!
And yes, it's the M9 cannon.