@TheTankMuseum2005 I do believe the Germans manufactured Israeli-designed M111, M413, and M426 Hetz ammo as DM23, DM33, and DM63 respectively, M111 able to pierce T-72s used by Syria in both combat accounts and in Soviet testing with a captured Magach that was carrying the ammunition.
It certainly isn't going to defeat newer T-72, T-80, and T-90 from the front, but older T-72 and T-80 variants as well as captured T-64 and reactivated T-62 and T-55 (some which aren't even modernized) are fair game.
@FirstFish83828 Could an exception be made to the maximum part count? I suspect the part count is for simply getting it to run in SP (a challenge which I know well), so I had turned off drag calculation for almost all of it.
@IndoMaja Yeah. As much as it pains me to say this as an aviation enthusiast, sometimes that is the best option.
Airplanes are ultimately one of many tools we have, and once the tool is no longer of any value and cannot be practically repaired or refurbished to regain value, be it practical or sentimental, the tool should either be disposed of or recycled so its materials can be useful once more.
Without reconstruction or some form of lifespan extension, aircraft which have exceeded their designed lifespan are worse than useless; they are death traps. A prime example is the MiG-21 in the 21st century; a good fighter in the early 60's, the MiG-21 is well past its prime and even when heavily upgraded, has a nasty habit of crashing.
@Cedy117 It's been awhile lol.
+2@TheTankMuseum2005 I do believe the Germans manufactured Israeli-designed M111, M413, and M426 Hetz ammo as DM23, DM33, and DM63 respectively, M111 able to pierce T-72s used by Syria in both combat accounts and in Soviet testing with a captured Magach that was carrying the ammunition.
It certainly isn't going to defeat newer T-72, T-80, and T-90 from the front, but older T-72 and T-80 variants as well as captured T-64 and reactivated T-62 and T-55 (some which aren't even modernized) are fair game.
@MikoyanGurevich165 Am afraid it is.
He's only doubled down on his insanity and has progressed to what I can best describe as "full Q MAGA Z."
@HermanTheGermanSherman
+1Right here, at 4:25
I would like you to know that Sparky is actively advertising the link, unironically, on his bitchute, as an example of his brilliance.
I wish I was kidding. I really do.
@Tohu Well, I do have a couple of entries…
+1@Tohu Understandable, though I do feel the limit where it sits is extremely limiting in the potential of the entries.
+1Though I could simply XML away drag calculations, if that helps with performance issues.
+1@Tohu Impressive, though I was thinking of something a bit more complex in mind.
+1Question: Does it need to be mechanically functional, or is a static model okay?
Also, can there be a much higher maximum part count, or exceptions thereof? I do not believe I can make a satisfactory entry with such few parts.
+1@YuukaNeko
+1@exosuit I was wondering that myself lmao
@Walvis Thanks!
@BaconAircraft Thanks.
@BaconAircraft can you make it a successor to FirstFish’s IFV challenge?
@FirstFish83828 Thanks.
@FirstFish83828 Could an exception be made to the maximum part count? I suspect the part count is for simply getting it to run in SP (a challenge which I know well), so I had turned off drag calculation for almost all of it.
@MrSilverWolf Could you make this a successor to this challenge?
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/Z8QhCT/The-IFV-challange
Nice.
+1Hmm... I should re-do the AR-15 Contractor.
+1@MilotPario Nah.
@MilotPario Yes.
Hi.
@AverroesIndustries Thanks!
@IndoMaja Of course.
@IndoMaja Yeah. As much as it pains me to say this as an aviation enthusiast, sometimes that is the best option.
Airplanes are ultimately one of many tools we have, and once the tool is no longer of any value and cannot be practically repaired or refurbished to regain value, be it practical or sentimental, the tool should either be disposed of or recycled so its materials can be useful once more.
Without reconstruction or some form of lifespan extension, aircraft which have exceeded their designed lifespan are worse than useless; they are death traps. A prime example is the MiG-21 in the 21st century; a good fighter in the early 60's, the MiG-21 is well past its prime and even when heavily upgraded, has a nasty habit of crashing.
@MAHADI It's been awhile.
The vehicle design is based on the older M38 and Willys Jeep, but the grille is straight from the MUTT. @Johnnyynf
@PyrusEnderhunter Just so you know I uploaded this.
@KerlonceauxIndustries Thanks!
+1@BaconAircraft Can you make this a successor to Walvis' Remaster Challenge?
Perfect timing.
+1@Flash0of0green Not bad myself.
@YuukaNeko I do have a PEQ-15 clone lol. Most impressive are the wires tho.
+1This... this is a fine work of art. Especially the DBAL and the optics.
Now I have to release my tactical'd AR. Though given my model's strictly military use, it'd have some things like that third pin.
Say, you wouldn't mind if I nabbed a few things like the charging handle and the DBAL, would you? @YuukaNeko
+1How'd I miss this gem?
+1Wait is that my old MP5 build?
+1@Shirakami56709 Benny
@YuukaNeko The circumstances of my disappearance have been greatly exaggerated.
Glorious.
Would it be possible to create multiple holes with this?
+4I see a problem already.
+3Nice job with the interior. The magazine is rather large to-scale, but the internals and Magpul CTR stock are really nice.
@realSavageMan No problem.
Impressive.
It’s worth a read. @LittleTOADY
@Grob0s0VBRa Does the muzzle flash count as a flashlight for you?
Thanks. @PapaKernels
This one doesn’t have glass? @smolensk
Not bad.