@Graingy oh, just a Torpedo (rocket) Bomber or "Lancers" as I call them in my (semi-dieselpunk) world. Will is based on a US Design which is rather obscure iirc?
.
genuinely tho, most of the AI-ASAP planes were obscure(if not, less known) ones. Geoff was based on Ar 80, Doug was based on USS Akron/Macon's Sparrowhawk... actually, I think only most of them are obscure, the rest are more decently known(e.g. Fulcrum, Nachteule which is that German jet bomber, Sakura which is gunified Ohka, and.. was it Kaisen? Kansen? Senkan? AH I FORGOT BUT IT WAS BASED ON THE KI-43).
@GalmTwoPixy uhh... so like [words](link) results in clickable text
.
like let's say galmypixie broken down is [galmypixie](https://www.simpleplanes.com/u/GalmTwoPixy)
@SimplyElegant I mean if it's runnable and doesn't really do anything, sure? currwnr part count says otherwise though but I imagine it could be lowered
@Graingy well, for cannons there's the impactScalar or something, and the damage is calculated by multiplying that to velocity and dividing it by 1,2, or 3 and said result is the damage in points
.
but yeah, it doesn't calculate heft-to-weight ratio.. maybe? I got an idea I wanna test.. I'll update you on that
@Graingy well, given if the Dynamite Gun(it's fired using Detacher; IRL it's fired by compressed air) fired a hefty fuselage piece the same weight as said projectile, I think it would've done a great deal of damage against light targets?
@BOSKnight do tawgy
@Kurizin I know it's too much to ask to Russia, but can't they like, preserve her like the USA did with USS Texas?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover *alternatively, Ouroboros/Jormungand.*
@TheUltimatePlaneLover I DONT NEED A SLEEP I NEED TO WIPE THIS OFF
@Graingy (s)he does exude that energy.
@Graingy oh, just a Torpedo (rocket) Bomber or "Lancers" as I call them in my (semi-dieselpunk) world. Will is based on a US Design which is rather obscure iirc?
.
genuinely tho, most of the AI-ASAP planes were obscure(if not, less known) ones. Geoff was based on Ar 80, Doug was based on USS Akron/Macon's Sparrowhawk... actually, I think only most of them are obscure, the rest are more decently known(e.g. Fulcrum, Nachteule which is that German jet bomber, Sakura which is gunified Ohka, and.. was it Kaisen? Kansen? Senkan? AH I FORGOT BUT IT WAS BASED ON THE KI-43).
@GalmTwoPixy I am lmao. so, which of my gals do you like the most..? is it, Geoff? Will? Doug? Nachteule maybe? or maybe clearly, the Fulcrum?
@Graingy terrunch
@GalmTwoPixy miggyboi betteur
@GalmTwoPixy GAAHHH MIIIGGGG
also can relate lol, I have one too called "Structure Colour Palette" cause yknow, it's my prop's colour palette lol
h..hmmm
@GalmTwoPixy hellaaamig
@GalmTwoPixy migpoggin
@TheUltimatePlaneLover AAAAA YOU SHNEEZED ON ME EWWW
@TheUltimatePlaneLover *continuous yet loops back, it's fitting no?*
@GalmTwoPixy hella one,hellaaaa
oh thas hella, damn.
@GalmTwoPixy try it lmao
@GalmTwoPixy I mean, most of my old PEA definitely is, but my latest ones are more of a... mini replica. (excluding the Bloch)
@Graingy crunch
@Graingy beep
@Graingy exactly. FRENCHY BASTETS
for images in like forums or description, preface it with "!", like
@GalmTwoPixy uhh... so like
[words](link)results in clickable text.
like let's say galmypixie broken down is
[galmypixie](https://www.simpleplanes.com/u/GalmTwoPixy)@Graingy can attest
or Oiseaux, God I hate Oiseaux as a word.
@Graingy yeah I guess? what is "what" to a baby if you don't teach the meaning of it though?
@GalmTwoPixy well, the main reason that PEA has 70-96 parts is that...
researched and teste by His AI Majesty, MAPA
@GalmTwoPixy WHAT HOW
@Graingy its objectively funny crushing foot with a heft shell of a cannon
.
ill probably test it after this
@SimplyElegant I mean if it's runnable and doesn't really do anything, sure? currwnr part count says otherwise though but I imagine it could be lowered
@TheUltimatePlaneLover *more like a mobius strip*
@TheUltimatePlaneLover AAAAAAAA
@Graingy well, it has meaning so it's definitely a word.
@Graingy fair point, I'll stop.
@Graingy elephant? TRUNK??
@Graingy well, for cannons there's the impactScalar or something, and the damage is calculated by multiplying that to velocity and dividing it by 1,2, or 3 and said result is the damage in points
.
but yeah, it doesn't calculate heft-to-weight ratio.. maybe? I got an idea I wanna test.. I'll update you on that
@Graingy what's a sand's melting point to a boiling water anyway?
yknow?
@Graingy t r u n k e d
@Graingy well, given if the Dynamite Gun(it's fired using Detacher; IRL it's fired by compressed air) fired a hefty fuselage piece the same weight as said projectile, I think it would've done a great deal of damage against light targets?
@Kurizin grace of the old lady, I suppose?
WAO
happy n e w y e a e r
well, if you ever came back, try to build for yourself, hella better in the long run
happy yeahr YEAH
whY DID YOU DO THIS TO ME NOW I FEEL OLD
+1HAMPY yehAR
+1late, but HAMPY NEW YEAH