I can relate, I had an ADA-01(not on this acc) and it's terrible XD
.
if it behooves you, I also made the adf-01 and this too actually.. as to whether it's great... yeah no, by this point it's like, wildy terrible, it's been like 4 years ago I think?
perfection is the opposite of good enough, which is like, for what it's worth, the 20% of effort that results in 80% completion or something however that goes idk
personally? I am everywhere with my interest. one moment you see me with ships, the other you see me messing with planes, and then somehow airships like I am.
.
maybe try something new? something that just suddenly you find neat or interesting? doesn't have to be fleshed out, just the test concept is good(I wonder who does that- oh wait, it's me *cough*)
ah, side note of rambles..
.
this aircraft was originally called "Doug", and ADRA stands for... actually I forgot, but the "R" stands for Recovered or just recover or something, it's been a while lol
@AviationLoverGEEK444 nerd eyes?
I can dig it up if you just wanna see it
+1I can relate, I had an ADA-01(not on this acc) and it's terrible XD
+1.
if it behooves you, I also made the adf-01 and this too actually.. as to whether it's great... yeah no, by this point it's like, wildy terrible, it's been like 4 years ago I think?
well, this is something that I can't help.. ish..?
it's not perfect(as in, for planes rolling and all), but I do use this for mine on ships or some else :
.
|[ Fore Facing ]|
TargetSelected ? (((TargetHeading - Heading) + (rate(TargetHeading) * (TargetDistance / 1000)))/ 180) : 0
.
|[ Aft Facing ]|
TargetSelected ? (((TargetHeading +180 - Heading) + (rate(TargetHeading) * (TargetDistance / 1000)))/ 180) * clamp01(TargetDistance < 50000) * clamp01(TargetDistance > 2) : 0
.
|[ Vertical/Elevation(the important one) ]|
TargetSelected ? (clamp((TargetElevation + (rate(TargetElevation)) * (TargetDistance + rate(TargetDistance)*TargetDistance/825)/825 + (asin((cos(TargetElevation + (rate(TargetElevation)) * (TargetDistance + rate(TargetDistance)*TargetDistance/825)/825) * (TargetDistance + rate(TargetDistance)*TargetDistance/825) * 9.81)/(pow(825, 2)))/2) -PitchAngle*cos(TargetHeading - Heading + (rate(TargetHeading)) * (TargetDistance + rate(TargetDistance)*TargetDistance/825)/825) - RollAngle*sin(TargetHeading - Heading + (rate(TargetHeading)) * (TargetDistance + rate(TargetDistance)*TargetDistance/825)/825)),-7,33)/90) : 0
(the -7,33 is the depression/elevation you want)
great guy, maybe busy?
+2perfection is the opposite of good enough, which is like, for what it's worth, the 20% of effort that results in 80% completion or something however that goes idk
personally? I am everywhere with my interest. one moment you see me with ships, the other you see me messing with planes, and then somehow airships like I am.
.
maybe try something new? something that just suddenly you find neat or interesting? doesn't have to be fleshed out, just the test concept is good(I wonder who does that- oh wait, it's me *cough*)
pray tell, what do you actually wanna build as opposed as to what people expect you to build?
if it behooves you, I have a Samsung Galaxy J5 lmfao
in the spirit of wrong equations but correct answer, I did made the max value 0.1 and it's stable, so I don't know how I should feel
oh hot! this is nice information I didn't need but happy to have.. I think I might have did my PID wrong too lmfao
@VigilantEyes I'm Indonesian, if it helps
+1ooh
@AviationLoverGEEK444 no eyes?
@Gander oh shxt, I would be honoured if you did so lol. just tag me tho, I wanna see too XD
@Nonso np
@VigilantEyes yeah thanks, sometimes I trip over lol
+1@AviationLoverGEEK444 red eyes?
@Nonso yeah sorry, that was mean, there's a working version of this on the description
@C47skytrain maybe? but I think it's geared towards its recovery. I was thinking Air-Dropped Recoverable Aircraft but it feels wrong for some reason
+1oh man, it's it lol XD
ah, side note of rambles..
+2.
this aircraft was originally called "Doug", and ADRA stands for... actually I forgot, but the "R" stands for Recovered or just recover or something, it's been a while lol
@VigilantEyes thanks! you too enjoy your.. would calling it races or racings be appropriate? I have not dabbled in those worlds so I don't know kek
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover s p i i i c e e e
@TheUltimatePlaneLover *THE ANTITHESIS!?? MIKU HATES BRITISH PEOPLE!????*
*I mean they're hot, yes. outdated sure, but hot? yes.*
@TheUltimatePlaneLover *Yakuza yanderes are outdated man, when did you live, the 50s?*
@YarisSedan ah, for shame XD, GIMME SIME F-16S
chill and get well soon! even I'm taking a break too, reading and studying and all
+1@AviationLoverGEEK444 I mean come on, the V I B E S
I think I'll stick with the airships for now XD
@RB107 1350pc sounds like it'll kill me XD
@SILVERPANZER I can see why, personally I am a big fan of the pagoda one, it's wonderfully-styled
@YarisSedan damnit, switch places with me you XD
@MonsNotTheMonster hot samn
@TheUltimatePlaneLover *you hear a sound of many... what do yanderes use usually.. AH! knives.*
@TheUltimatePlaneLover *cawk!?*
YOU'RE ALREADY ON SPACE!?? AND IM STUCK HERE ON THE ATMOSPHERE HELP
+1if it does, then USSR would've steamrolled NATO
@AviationLoverGEEK444 yeah, too bad drones got better, nice aesthetic y'know? aesthetics don't win wars though
@TheUltimatePlaneLover y e s
*s i g h*
+1@Nonso do you not read the description, you walnut?
and if you want to control it, the link for the controllable version is LITERALLY on the description
erm..?
@AviationLoverGEEK444 ah, maybe it's this one?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover S P I C E
@TheUltimatePlaneLover *cawk..?*
@TheUltimatePlaneLover *distant giggle*
+1@AviationLoverGEEK444 didn't the marines(or army) had a recon observations tethered balloon at one point in.. Afghanistan I think?
breaking the law- breaking the law- breaking the LAW!
+1@Speedhunter do you use WhatsApp a lot or something? I can't think of anything else