@CrazyCatZe sure!
Pixie!!
looks nice but why didn't you use the new features?
as you've won the second place in the challenge, you will get a free spotlight. so tag me on the build you want a spotlight.
looks amazing!
I'll call her Necco!
SimpleDefense
@Dude32 yeah
now I can make Dynamites!!
@Dude32 the prop version was made. the jet version was not I guess.
@Dude32 well, good for a first time
@Dude32 I tagged you to see the results
(YAY!)*10^100000
@NightmareCorporation probably WW1
@Bigboi2077 @Okay67M8 I tagged you to see the final results of the challenge
Check the Results here!
@Okay67M8 @Mastermind1941
@TrojanAircraftSystems @Airbus747SP @FuriousChicken
@Dude32 @Dystopian @DJkekkeroni06
@BeastHunter @Cassius @Mark757
@merrickdaig @Mech @Parehare
@Jdktheking @Generalkeath @Jaspy
@Blyatsickle @ShiptyTheLucario @GiorunoGioccellati
@Aviator01 @bong777 @Puffin9173
@ThePlaninatior @Bigboi2077 @RejsDen
@TurtlesThatFly @Captaincarroca @Memri
@GCPrototypes @HyperViper @ThePropellerIsAFan
@LordAidanYT @CreeperOfTheFortress @PieroKH2B
@NightmareCorporation @Pita
@ZWLenning @Treadmill103 @RicardoAs1515
@SimplyPlain @Hedero @DarthAbhinav
@mikoyanster @CrazyCatZe @Rambojutter
man I gotta make a simple plane soon
This is EPIC!!!
@CrazyCatZe even at lowest settings?
@mikoyanster no problem! And THANKS for entering!
@BigChunguss nP!
@MrSilverWolf but there was a mandatory "Weaponry" rating for all the entries. if no weapons, then it's zero.
@MrSilverWolf oh
looks Awesome!!
@MrSilverWolf sighs. what happened to him? yes, it was a prototype but the specs include 4 cannons on the nose.
@MrSilverWolf also, take a look at this - Wiki
@MrSilverWolf but he tagged fighter. so if no weapons, then how is it a fighter?
@Hedero Indeed! Thanks for entering!!
it looks so Awesome but why is the performance not so good?
Looks : 9.5/10 pts. Performance : 8.75/10 pts. Details : 9.5/10 pts. Weaponry : 9.5/10 pts. Functionality : 9/10 pts. Bonus : 9.55/10 (Cockpit)
Looks : 9.45/10 pts. Performance : 9/10 pts. Details : 9.45/10 pts. Weaponry : 9.45/10 pts. Functionality : 9.45/10 pts. Bonus : 9.15/10 (Nuke)
Looks : 9.35/10 pts. Performance : 9.25/10 pts. Details : 9.4/10 pts. Weaponry : 9.35/10 pts. Functionality : 9.4/10 pts. Bonus : 9/10 (Landing Gears)
also, learn FT codes for LG doors. that will improve functionality. use the bottom lair of the wing for flaps, not the top one.
it's a bit smaller than the real plane. also you can improve the performance by making sure that CoM and CoL are in the same Y-axis and reducing distance between them a little bit.
@CrazyCatZe sure!
Pixie!!
looks nice but why didn't you use the new features?
as you've won the second place in the challenge, you will get a free spotlight. so tag me on the build you want a spotlight.
looks amazing!
I'll call her Necco!
SimpleDefense
@Dude32 yeah
now I can make Dynamites!!
@Dude32 the prop version was made. the jet version was not I guess.
@Dude32 well, good for a first time
@Dude32 I tagged you to see the results
(YAY!)*10^100000
@NightmareCorporation probably WW1
@Bigboi2077 @Okay67M8 I tagged you to see the final results of the challenge
Check the Results here!@Okay67M8 @Mastermind1941
@TrojanAircraftSystems @Airbus747SP @FuriousChicken
@Dude32 @Dystopian @DJkekkeroni06
@BeastHunter @Cassius @Mark757
@merrickdaig @Mech @Parehare
@Jdktheking @Generalkeath @Jaspy
@Blyatsickle @ShiptyTheLucario @GiorunoGioccellati
@Aviator01 @bong777 @Puffin9173
@ThePlaninatior @Bigboi2077 @RejsDen
@TurtlesThatFly @Captaincarroca @Memri
@GCPrototypes @HyperViper @ThePropellerIsAFan
@LordAidanYT @CreeperOfTheFortress @PieroKH2B
@NightmareCorporation @Pita
@ZWLenning @Treadmill103 @RicardoAs1515
@SimplyPlain @Hedero @DarthAbhinav
@mikoyanster @CrazyCatZe @Rambojutter
man I gotta make a simple plane soon
This is EPIC!!!
@CrazyCatZe even at lowest settings?
@mikoyanster no problem! And THANKS for entering!
@BigChunguss nP!
@MrSilverWolf but there was a mandatory "Weaponry" rating for all the entries. if no weapons, then it's zero.
@MrSilverWolf oh
looks Awesome!!
@MrSilverWolf sighs. what happened to him? yes, it was a prototype but the specs include 4 cannons on the nose.
@MrSilverWolf also, take a look at this - Wiki
@MrSilverWolf but he tagged fighter. so if no weapons, then how is it a fighter?
@Hedero Indeed! Thanks for entering!!
it looks so Awesome but why is the performance not so good?
RATING
Looks : 9.5/10 pts.
Performance : 8.75/10 pts.
Details : 9.5/10 pts.
Weaponry : 9.5/10 pts.
Functionality : 9/10 pts.
Bonus : 9.55/10 (Cockpit)
OVERALL RATING : 9.3/10
RATING
Looks : 9.45/10 pts.
Performance : 9/10 pts.
Details : 9.45/10 pts.
Weaponry : 9.45/10 pts.
Functionality : 9.45/10 pts.
Bonus : 9.15/10 (Nuke)
OVERALL RATING : 9.33/10
RATING
Looks : 9.35/10 pts.
Performance : 9.25/10 pts.
Details : 9.4/10 pts.
Weaponry : 9.35/10 pts.
Functionality : 9.4/10 pts.
Bonus : 9/10 (Landing Gears)
OVERALL RATING : 9.3/10
also, learn FT codes for LG doors. that will improve functionality. use the bottom lair of the wing for flaps, not the top one.
it's a bit smaller than the real plane. also you can improve the performance by making sure that CoM and CoL are in the same Y-axis and reducing distance between them a little bit.