what do your centers look like?
.
I commonly have this issue. One thing you could do from a general standpoint is move the center of mass forwards, and then enlarge the vertical stabilizer (assuming you are using fuselage wings)
@Phoebe @X99STRIKER OH CRAP
.
I'm sorry. I deleted this after wanting to post it, and for some reason it actually posted and didn't just disappear? XD
.
Sorry
I know the drawing is terrible, I just wanted an idea
.
I did make the fuselage WAY too bloated, but I did that to see it better, and I ran out of room for the wings lol. I currently have most of the fuselage done, and am working on the horizontal stabilizers
Mate, this is not Jundroo's fault
.
A policy was made with Google Play and Apple, which resulted in them not being allowed to add third-party data into the game (unless you download a source code and embed it yourself, which is a loophole)
.
You'd need to take it up with those guys, not Jundroo. But there is no chance of them changing it. We're better off getting Jundroo to just add the mods into the game like Overload and FineTuner
@Bellcat huh. That is very true, thank you mate
.
It was probably an error on their part, as @ReinMcDeer stated, but they should have at least cited it, because no matter what it is obviously not a historic drawing or a real picture, so they should have checked. But oh, well
It's gonna be wayyy more realistic, especially now that I know how to make landing gear lol (my recent posts have been side projects. I have 2 almost done actual projects that will reflect that statement a lot better)
Wait.. is the goal to make a craft that can fly with the lowest possible part count, or to make a craft look as good as possible with minimal parts?
.
I did the former XD
I was going to make a custom screenshot for this, but for the literal 2 minutes of effort I put into this, I didn't feel like removing my blueprints from my current build to place it in. Sorry
.
But this is my submission! I know it has no details, but I got a 5 part craft to fly! I almost made it 4 parts, but I decided against it because the control surfaces were acting up
In theory, I could make a 3 part craft...
@Mage2IsTriggered the update also added text rotation on the other plane (pun intended; basically, you can rotate it vertically OR horizontally now), the connections thing is changes so you don't go to the next part unless you tap, so it's not as annoying, lots of bug fixes, and I think I'm missing something...
You know you can edit the posts, right? There's a white arrow at the top right of the page. When you press it, a drop down menu will come down. You can then press edit and modify the post. I hope this helps!
This is an awesome idea!!
I personally suck at cars and am already busy on other projects, so I will not be able to participate, but I hope that my spotlight helps attract some attention to this :)
@OrderlyHippo f-36?
This reminds me of the Neptune
@Flewey okay! I'll check her out in a bit
Dude, this is so good!!! Probably your most detailed yet!
Also, is it okay if I've been working on the remaster for some time and haven't finished it yet, or do you want me to start from scratch?
What if I remastered this into a semi-god tier build? Would that be good enough?
@AlmostADev cough 4000 parts cough
@Flewey
@Flewey I remember you tho. Glad you're still around, I thought you had left!
@Flewey aww, thank you mate! I absolutely will
.
I'll send you a link to a thing I'm working on too lol
@CarrotSlicingCompanyCat lol
Lol
@Sparky6004 @Dathcha 💀
yay!
what do your centers look like?
.
I commonly have this issue. One thing you could do from a general standpoint is move the center of mass forwards, and then enlarge the vertical stabilizer (assuming you are using fuselage wings)
Cessna 337 allowed? I might be in
@IceCraftGaming no change anymore. It used to be double points tho
It was a question about an insignia for my alternate WW2 for a combined US and USSR symbol for aircraft
@Phoebe @X99STRIKER OH CRAP
.
I'm sorry. I deleted this after wanting to post it, and for some reason it actually posted and didn't just disappear? XD
.
Sorry
I know the drawing is terrible, I just wanted an idea
.
I did make the fuselage WAY too bloated, but I did that to see it better, and I ran out of room for the wings lol. I currently have most of the fuselage done, and am working on the horizontal stabilizers
A-HA
@MemrWii cool, thx mate
Is amphibious allowed?
I think that better summarizes my question lol
If so, I have an interesting heavy bomber design I've been wanting to try
Is the only stipulation that it can take off of and land on water?
@Jackrei a beauty like this never rusts
@Jackrei no, it sits in a garage or in a forest for 50 years
This is really nice!
.
But if I might ask, why is there roll control on the thrust vectoring system?
Also, you kinda have to hit the "reply" button for someone to see your response
Mate, this is not Jundroo's fault
.
A policy was made with Google Play and Apple, which resulted in them not being allowed to add third-party data into the game (unless you download a source code and embed it yourself, which is a loophole)
.
You'd need to take it up with those guys, not Jundroo. But there is no chance of them changing it. We're better off getting Jundroo to just add the mods into the game like Overload and FineTuner
@Bellcat huh. That is very true, thank you mate
.
It was probably an error on their part, as @ReinMcDeer stated, but they should have at least cited it, because no matter what it is obviously not a historic drawing or a real picture, so they should have checked. But oh, well
You know I wanna 488, my friend
I would say I have an entry, but it's at 790 parts, and I haven't started on the cockpit yet... 😂😂😂
@Justaguy56 lmao. Gotcha
TVC systems?
under 200 parts!? Woah lol
.
Anywho, I'm going to spotlight this so it gets more attention
@Planeerf3 I just think it's cool lol. I like the design, and the open cockpit
It's gonna be wayyy more realistic, especially now that I know how to make landing gear lol (my recent posts have been side projects. I have 2 almost done actual projects that will reflect that statement a lot better)
@Planeerf3 you need to hit the "reply" button for them to see you're sending a message. This is dope though!
Wait.. is the goal to make a craft that can fly with the lowest possible part count, or to make a craft look as good as possible with minimal parts?
.
I did the former XD
I was going to make a custom screenshot for this, but for the literal 2 minutes of effort I put into this, I didn't feel like removing my blueprints from my current build to place it in. Sorry
.
But this is my submission! I know it has no details, but I got a 5 part craft to fly! I almost made it 4 parts, but I decided against it because the control surfaces were acting up
In theory, I could make a 3 part craft...
Nevermind... I didn't see the photo until now
.
3 downloads!?
1: A
2: C
You probably put the flaps behind the center of lift, you want them in front of it
Every one of your posts have 1 extra download because of it
@Mage2IsTriggered the update also added text rotation on the other plane (pun intended; basically, you can rotate it vertically OR horizontally now), the connections thing is changes so you don't go to the next part unless you tap, so it's not as annoying, lots of bug fixes, and I think I'm missing something...
And HERE is something I think you will find interesting
You know you can edit the posts, right? There's a white arrow at the top right of the page. When you press it, a drop down menu will come down. You can then press edit and modify the post. I hope this helps!
.45 ACP best wireless hole puncher. Prove me wrong
(Kidding... 20mm is where it is at)
.
This is amazing!!
This is an awesome idea!!
I personally suck at cars and am already busy on other projects, so I will not be able to participate, but I hope that my spotlight helps attract some attention to this :)