@Botfinder
That's what I meant by saying fighter/bomber/attacker. It's designated as a fighter, but it's referred to as an attacker, but in actuality it's a light stealth bomber. The F-117 is pretty fragile though.
I came to SP to bring my designs to another dimension, and I have TONS of designs in my nogan. I won't ever delete my account but once my aviation companies catch up to modern times my builds will probably slow down. I won't leave SimplePlanes forever but after I'm done with high school (btw I'm homeschooled/online schooled so that's why I'm able to visit SimplePlanes so much during the day) things will get very hectic as I'll start flight training.
Ok so before I bought simpleplanes I was trying to see if they had a demo so I could try it to make sure my PC can handle the game, and I found that SimplePlanes on Softonic for download, however when I downloaded it and opened the file I think there was a virus or something, most likely adware or malware from what I can remember, because there were ads all over my google page and when I clicked anywhere on a google page it would redirect me to an ad. Can't remember if that happened before or after I wiped my drive clean, but either way I think I simply reset my PC to a previous date before I downloaded the file and it was gone. Don't even think about downloading ANYTHING from that site. 60-80% of the time those files will have viruses, adware, and malware.
@mikoyanster
That wouldn't be that big of a problem, except I have no jets in my development portfolio yet. Everything in my hangars are still props. By the 50's prop fighters would become mostly (but not totally) obsolete.
@Alien
Yes I know I think E.E. built the lightning until the F.6, which BAC/BAE produced the F.6 Lightning. I was referring to your Wright Wiring Thunder which looks exactly like a Lightning.
Quick question: Do I have to submit an original design, or can it be a modified airframe as well? I made an electronic warfare attack aircraft based on the Jundroo AI Enemy fighter. Press the trigger and it creates a force field around it that destroys missiles and you can use it as a battering ram. It's also armed with 2 other missiles. Another problem, is that with the EMP weapon/shield active, it creates a ton of lag. The AI loves flying it, but when they use the shield it creates lag.
@wonkapilot
That's because it has a high part-count (600 parts in the plane), which most mobile devices can't handle 600 part planes. Sorry about that.
Basically, there's an alternate universe where I didn't post this comment....
M I N D B L O W N
I don't think alternate universes exist physically. I mean, we have 7-9 Billion something people on this planet. Think of the zillions of alternate universes there would be. In my opinion, alternate universe is just an alternate scenario that could have happened.
I see them more as paths that could have happened, depending on your choice. So alternate universes really exist in your mind, how things could have happened, but I don't think there are actual physical alternate universes because their would be an infinite number of them. Damn, your brain really does start to melt when you think real hard about this. It's just incredible.
Thanks, these are incredible! It's not too hard to make gauges when your experienced, my problem with making good and functional gauges like these ones, is my cockpit space becomes to cluttered, and parts will start latching onto other parts even though I don't move them, and it makes every thing a mess and the functionality is broken. I think on my next virtual cockpit-equipped airplane I'll try making the gauges separately, or use these ones.
Very excited for FS19, I have FS15 on my Xbox 360. Although I'm pretty sure my PC won't meet system requirements for FS19. Plus farming is at the bottom of my "simulations hobbies" (1st is Flying/FSX/SimplePlanes, 2nd is Trucking/ATS, 3rd is Hunting/theHunter, and 4th is Farming/FS15) so I don't think it's worth it for me to put money in a game that I'll hardly touch. But by all means FS19 will be the best in the Farming Simulator series!
@Bo123
You can't use mods on iOS so you can't edit the bullet properties since you can't use Overload. If you want, you can use the casing-ejectors off of my NA-3 Lark design. However there guns that shoot the casings are buried in the fuselage, so you'll have to dig around or take apart the plane to find them. Their really small.
@Texasfam04
Oh I sure do have another plane in my development hangar being worked on! It's going to be one sexy bird compared to the Lark. It's called the NA-4 Storm Petrel/Sparrow (name undecided yet). Also thanks for the compliment! I do like to take my time so I can perfect my design, but another reason why I take so much time on my builds is simply because I have other things going on and I can't work on SimplePlanes 24/7.
@EternalDarkness
I made a painted variant awhile back of it. What if it bring it up to proper standards with a detailed cockpit interior and more exterior detail? (I don't mind if I don't make the cut for this challenge, I'm just curious) I'm to busy on a new fighter to focus on a new trainer. I also have a twin-engined fighter that can very well be used as a trainer (and a civilian sports plane) if I add a second seat but the entry for this challenge can't branch off from a fighter. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
So it can't be a reupload nor an updated version of an already existing plane you made? I already made a WW2 trainer awhile back, and I can update it with a full cockpit but I don't think it will count in this competition.
@rubbishcraft
Thanks!
@WNP78
+1Ah ok.
There is also FireGuns and FireWeapons.
@Texasfam04
You can have 50-100 parts. 100 parts is max for this challenge. Also thx!
@RenxBlake
No problem! I love the aggressive and futuristic looks it has!
@Texasfam04
It's pretty cool, very basic and very fast. I'd like to pit this against your Wraith drone and see how they stand up to each other.
@Texasfam04
@RenxBlake
Thanks for the upvotes!
@Botfinder
That's what I meant by saying fighter/bomber/attacker. It's designated as a fighter, but it's referred to as an attacker, but in actuality it's a light stealth bomber. The F-117 is pretty fragile though.
I came to SP to bring my designs to another dimension, and I have TONS of designs in my nogan. I won't ever delete my account but once my aviation companies catch up to modern times my builds will probably slow down. I won't leave SimplePlanes forever but after I'm done with high school (btw I'm homeschooled/online schooled so that's why I'm able to visit SimplePlanes so much during the day) things will get very hectic as I'll start flight training.
Ok so before I bought simpleplanes I was trying to see if they had a demo so I could try it to make sure my PC can handle the game, and I found that SimplePlanes on Softonic for download, however when I downloaded it and opened the file I think there was a virus or something, most likely adware or malware from what I can remember, because there were ads all over my google page and when I clicked anywhere on a google page it would redirect me to an ad. Can't remember if that happened before or after I wiped my drive clean, but either way I think I simply reset my PC to a previous date before I downloaded the file and it was gone. Don't even think about downloading ANYTHING from that site. 60-80% of the time those files will have viruses, adware, and malware.
Ha ha congrats buddy! I'd love to get into gliding one of these days once I get my PPL. It's definitely something on my aviation bucket list.
That part count is scary......
+2@MI
I think the F-117 could be considered a 4 gen fighter/bomber/attacker.
@Gestour
@Strikefighter04
Thanks man!
@mikoyanster
That wouldn't be that big of a problem, except I have no jets in my development portfolio yet. Everything in my hangars are still props. By the 50's prop fighters would become mostly (but not totally) obsolete.
@mikoyanster
Yea I know I have some 50's designs in my head but canonically my fictional company isn't quite their yet (still in the mid-40's).
@Alien
Oh whoops. I had a mix-up, I thought I was talking to the builder lol. Well you guys did build the Typhoon and Tornado, and parts of the F-35.
@Gestour
Ok got it. I have an unmanned fighter I made myself that I'll probably submit instead.
@Alien
Yes I know I think E.E. built the lightning until the F.6, which BAC/BAE produced the F.6 Lightning. I was referring to your Wright Wiring Thunder which looks exactly like a Lightning.
Quick question: Do I have to submit an original design, or can it be a modified airframe as well? I made an electronic warfare attack aircraft based on the Jundroo AI Enemy fighter. Press the trigger and it creates a force field around it that destroys missiles and you can use it as a battering ram. It's also armed with 2 other missiles. Another problem, is that with the EMP weapon/shield active, it creates a ton of lag. The AI loves flying it, but when they use the shield it creates lag.
It sucks being trapped in the 1940's....
English Electric would like to have a word with you....
@wonkapilot
That's because it has a high part-count (600 parts in the plane), which most mobile devices can't handle 600 part planes. Sorry about that.
Beautiful! I'd spotlight this if I could. The Q400 is one of my favorite regional airliners.
I like the story behind it!
@CRJ900Pilot
Honestly, your an awesome builder. Your first builds certainly beat the pants off of my first designs.
Here's something I always go by when making a new design:
+2"You Trial and Error Until There are No Errors Left to Trial."
Basically, there's an alternate universe where I didn't post this comment....
M I N D B L O W N
I don't think alternate universes exist physically. I mean, we have 7-9 Billion something people on this planet. Think of the zillions of alternate universes there would be. In my opinion, alternate universe is just an alternate scenario that could have happened.
I see them more as paths that could have happened, depending on your choice. So alternate universes really exist in your mind, how things could have happened, but I don't think there are actual physical alternate universes because their would be an infinite number of them. Damn, your brain really does start to melt when you think real hard about this. It's just incredible.
@jamesPLANESii
Thanks!
Thanks, these are incredible! It's not too hard to make gauges when your experienced, my problem with making good and functional gauges like these ones, is my cockpit space becomes to cluttered, and parts will start latching onto other parts even though I don't move them, and it makes every thing a mess and the functionality is broken. I think on my next virtual cockpit-equipped airplane I'll try making the gauges separately, or use these ones.
+1Yay my favorite car! <3
+1Top notch quality!
@Texasfam04
No problem!
Nice job buddy! Your getting better and better! Wish I could spotlight this!
"POS AIR"? XD
Or pull out a handheld VHF radio and pretend ur ATC and tell the flight they need to taxi back to the gate....
Very excited for FS19, I have FS15 on my Xbox 360. Although I'm pretty sure my PC won't meet system requirements for FS19. Plus farming is at the bottom of my "simulations hobbies" (1st is Flying/FSX/SimplePlanes, 2nd is Trucking/ATS, 3rd is Hunting/theHunter, and 4th is Farming/FS15) so I don't think it's worth it for me to put money in a game that I'll hardly touch. But by all means FS19 will be the best in the Farming Simulator series!
+1@Bo123
You can't use mods on iOS so you can't edit the bullet properties since you can't use Overload. If you want, you can use the casing-ejectors off of my NA-3 Lark design. However there guns that shoot the casings are buried in the fuselage, so you'll have to dig around or take apart the plane to find them. Their really small.
OH gosh I can't stop laughing! 😂😂😂
+1@Texasfam04
+1Oh I sure do have another plane in my development hangar being worked on! It's going to be one sexy bird compared to the Lark. It's called the NA-4 Storm Petrel/Sparrow (name undecided yet). Also thanks for the compliment! I do like to take my time so I can perfect my design, but another reason why I take so much time on my builds is simply because I have other things going on and I can't work on SimplePlanes 24/7.
@EternalDarkness
Ok I'll make a revamped version with a full-cockpit interior and more external details.
@EternalDarkness
I made a painted variant awhile back of it. What if it bring it up to proper standards with a detailed cockpit interior and more exterior detail? (I don't mind if I don't make the cut for this challenge, I'm just curious) I'm to busy on a new fighter to focus on a new trainer. I also have a twin-engined fighter that can very well be used as a trainer (and a civilian sports plane) if I add a second seat but the entry for this challenge can't branch off from a fighter. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Ha you surpassed me! Congrats on that!
This is one epic cluster bomb!
@Minecraftpoweer
Thanks for the upvote here!
@Minecraftpoweer
That's the White Bliss. Here it is.
So it can't be a reupload nor an updated version of an already existing plane you made? I already made a WW2 trainer awhile back, and I can update it with a full cockpit but I don't think it will count in this competition.
@Minecraftpoweer
Which one? The White Bliss (1st picture) or the proof-of-concept? (2nd picture)
@Minecraftpoweer
@SomeFox
Thanks!
@Texasfam04
Yea 😂. No problem you deserve it!
Thanks WW3! You gave birth to this face!
Damn Vonteco sure loves our missile defense system!