@DeeganWithABazooka Of course, it's a backward product anyway.
It uses the most basic coordinate aiming method, and the latest version uses the proportional guidance method.
(You received it again because I accidentally deleted the previous one)
@DeeganWithABazooka No, the missile is an FT missile, and the starting method is not very important. The reason why shells can be used to start is that I have tied the starting method to the number of shells.
By the way, this is my earliest FT missile, far inferior to current technology
@KPLBall If this is your universe, then of course I have no objections.
But! You must mark it at the beginning!
This is not a warning, but because I am familiar with you, I am able to restrain myself. Let other Chinese people see, that is direct blasting.
Who can withstand splitting someone else's country in half?
Everything is proceeding within planned parameters, but... completing 1 foundational theory, 7 applied weapon systems, and 9 projects within a month... It sounds challenging, and in reality, it's anything but simple
This is a mass-produced subsonic missile, so it can be intercepted.
FT is not a symbol of OP, it is just a means of diversifying weapons. But the OP caused by the all-round impact brought by diversified weapons is another matter.
@RestlessGalaxies …? abs(VerticalG)>10?Pitch-PitchRate*0.015: (Throttle>0.91?0:Pitch)
so I cant use vector engine? Well, actually there's no problem writing it on the wing surface
To be honest, I'm curious. Haven't you ever seen a vector engine?
@RestlessGalaxies I noticed that there is a clause in the entry that restricts the G-force. If I cannot meet the requirements, will my eligibility for the competition be cancelled or will all points be deducted for this project
Hmm... Although our main fleet cannot be produced yet due to unlocked technologies like mobile auto-aiming artillery and ballistic anti-ship missiles,our advanced technology has already completed all theoretical R&D for attack submarines. Perhaps we might be able to roll them off the production line within three days.
Regarding our response... the setting is strong and invincible, and the actual performance may only be a lower level substitute for Shock, identified as not requiring targeting. It's the reaction you want from me, this is real
?
- The speed value is relatively conservative, not as good as M49
- During my testing, I was unable to drive in a straight line normally
+1This matter is unremarkable —— +3 Sociology
+2@DeeganWithABazooka Of course, it's a backward product anyway.
It uses the most basic coordinate aiming method, and the latest version uses the proportional guidance method.
(You received it again because I accidentally deleted the previous one)
@DeeganWithABazooka Of course, it's a backward product anyway.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover No, You did plan to use tens of thousands of tanks to carry out the landing at that time, but it was cancelled
+1@DeeganWithABazooka No, the missile is an FT missile, and the starting method is not very important. The reason why shells can be used to start is that I have tied the starting method to the number of shells.
By the way, this is my earliest FT missile, far inferior to current technology
@UnitedinOne90XCVBNKA "" I think I should launch a massive airstrike and attacks using some AC-130 we bought from the U.S in 1998.
Ya know what, no imma take that back"
It doesn't feel very realistic
@DeeganWithABazooka ? pardon?
@DeeganWithABazooka Wow, indeed.
Sorry, this is an older taglist
@DeeganWithABazooka It should have been shelled by RB107 ships last month and repaired two days later
"They are currently stationed in wright"
+1You mean you're stationed at my base, right?
@KPLBall If this is your universe, then of course I have no objections.
But! You must mark it at the beginning!
This is not a warning, but because I am familiar with you, I am able to restrain myself. Let other Chinese people see, that is direct blasting.
Who can withstand splitting someone else's country in half?
You were supposed to focus on the Congo Civil War Challenge properly. Why did you have to insert your personal agenda here? Are you out of yourmind?
@KPLBall What timeline are you on? Did you invent history?
If you don't provide a clear explanation, I will report you for involvement in politics
West China
East China
你想干嘛？
tell me why
Everything is proceeding within planned parameters, but... completing 1 foundational theory, 7 applied weapon systems, and 9 projects within a month... It sounds challenging, and in reality, it's anything but simple
+1@KPLBall fine bro, I wont tag you next time
@KPLBall so… Have you withdrawn from the war?
This is a mass-produced subsonic missile, so it can be intercepted.
FT is not a symbol of OP, it is just a means of diversifying weapons. But the OP caused by the all-round impact brought by diversified weapons is another matter.
@RB107 (RRHI - Loyalist)
-@SomeSPGuyWhoLikesLore (Loyalist)
@NominalSituation (Sorbet Onion - Loyalist)
@NerfAddict (MDA - Loyalist)
-@Boeing727200F (MDA - Loyalist)
-@SuperSuperTheSylph (Diable Defense - Loyalist)
@Dracul0Anderson (Skypark - Loyalist?)
-@SPSidearm (DoF Leader - Loyalist?)
-@MonsNotTheMonster (Pearlian Republic - Loyalist)
@JaxHere (MDA - Loyalist)
-@LunarEclipseSP (Snowstone - Loyalist)
@UnitedinOne90 (Loyalist)
@windshifter1 (MDA - Loyalist)
-@Karroc9522 (MDA - Loyalist)
@DeeganWithABazooka (Deegan - Loyalist)
@TheMouse (MDA Leader - Loyalist)
-@Monarchii (The Monarchii - Loyalist)
@SamuelJamesCastor (Snowstone - Loyalist)
@CrestelAeronautics (MDA - Loyalist)
-@TheUltimatePlaneLover (- MDA - Loyalist)
-@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 (MDA - Loyalist)
@Zero0Two2
@BlackGearCompany
@Graingy … Let's forget about it. With this time, my stealth carrier based aircraft have been mass-produced
@Graingy 12 F-225, $240 million USD, no time limit
@Graingy Okay, then I won't force you. Cancel time limit, no rush
@Graingy How much are you raising the price? If it's too much, I'll just use my own
@Graingy 12 F-225, $240 million USD
@Graingy I need 12 planes, the faster the better. Can you give me a price.
@Graingy Do you have a shipboard aircraft? Delivery within two days, you can set the price
@RestlessGalaxies …?
I don't think most people would think of the one you mentioned…
@RestlessGalaxies I don't quite understand why vector engines should be banned for non realistic reasons, as they are clearly widely used in reality.
+1@RestlessGalaxies …?
+2abs(VerticalG)>10?Pitch-PitchRate*0.015: (Throttle>0.91?0:Pitch)
so I cant use vector engine? Well, actually there's no problem writing it on the wing surface
To be honest, I'm curious. Haven't you ever seen a vector engine?
@RestlessGalaxies Um... It makes sense, anyway, limiting G-force only requires adding a correction code to the vector engine
@RestlessGalaxies I noticed that there is a clause in the entry that restricts the G-force. If I cannot meet the requirements, will my eligibility for the competition be cancelled or will all points be deducted for this project
must VTOL?
@Lake so bad
Hmm... Although our main fleet cannot be produced yet due to unlocked technologies like mobile auto-aiming artillery and ballistic anti-ship missiles,our advanced technology has already completed all theoretical R&D for attack submarines. Perhaps we might be able to roll them off the production line within three days.
+1@Someonefun yeah I saw it.
To be honest, I am honored to receive such an evaluation. I hope you can continue to work hard in the future
@Lake surely no
I am sorry to hear that
It's strange, I didn't even receive any notification, why?
+1By the way, nice one bro
Regarding our response... the setting is strong and invincible, and the actual performance may only be a lower level substitute for Shock, identified as not requiring targeting. It's the reaction you want from me, this is real
+1@SomeSPGuyWhoLikesLore You cut off the function of the most essence... I think it is not as good as track
+1It took us a long time to confirm that it really doesn't have any shock absorbers
Confusing design
+1