@SupremeDorian
It just occurred to me to ask, but is there a reason why only two inputs are accepted at once? Since coordinated flight is now a thing with the new wings and surfaces, it's rather troublesome to not be able to roll, yaw, and pitch all at the same time.
Wondering why this is the case in both SP1 and now SP2 as well? IIRC it's also a limitation in War Thunder, which leads me to suspect there may be some reason beyond technical issues.
@Boeing727200F 2807.
If you're at the limit and you have droplets to spare, increase your limit! It'll give you the ones you missed out on (assuming it's less than your new limit; if it's still greater you'll just be maxed out).
Don't draw anything or else it'll completely throw them out.
For example, if you were maxed at 500 but it would theoretically be 600 going off time passed, buying 150 would give you 600/650.
If you had 500 but you used 1, it'll set you to 499 and that's final.
@Boeing727200F In Vancouver of all places? It’s not a super rail-y city AFAIK. Boats are more its thing, I thought? Granted that requires rail but still.
@PlaneFlightX I see. So the curve you needed couldn’t be remotely practically achieved using fuselage, at least not without truly ludicrous part counts and paneling.
@PlaneFlightX Same could be said for this entire project, I reckon.
You do you, but it seems like an odd place to back down when you’ve already thoroughly violated half the game’s name.
@Boeing727200F Having a part of the power plane that'd switch out textures on buildings would certainly be interesting, though I'd imagine it's probably too late in development to make such a change.
@Boeing727200F So am I.
Cultural osmosis.
@TheRLAF The less I think about it the easier it is to go about my day. When I do think about it the absurdity of people believing all that hits me so hard I go back to not thinking about it.
Let's not think about it.
@AndrewGarrison Oh my goodness it's canon.
In the off chance I ever get around to writing a SimplePlanes Bible, the Great Penis Flood is absolutely going to be a part of the creation myth.
@TheRLAF And they’re on an English website, so should try to be easily legible.
Alternatively, they could speak their native language; it’s not against the rules or anything. They’d simply have to accept that they’d be majorly limiting their potential audience.
@OverlordPrime Hm. No idea, then.
When I read the title I thought you were talking about the view offset for cockpits, but that's an XML attribute rather than a variable (and for a different part).
Can't help, sorry.
@SupremeDorian
+1It just occurred to me to ask, but is there a reason why only two inputs are accepted at once? Since coordinated flight is now a thing with the new wings and surfaces, it's rather troublesome to not be able to roll, yaw, and pitch all at the same time.
Wondering why this is the case in both SP1 and now SP2 as well? IIRC it's also a limitation in War Thunder, which leads me to suspect there may be some reason beyond technical issues.
@Boeing727200F 2807.
+1If you're at the limit and you have droplets to spare, increase your limit! It'll give you the ones you missed out on (assuming it's less than your new limit; if it's still greater you'll just be maxed out).
Don't draw anything or else it'll completely throw them out.
For example, if you were maxed at 500 but it would theoretically be 600 going off time passed, buying 150 would give you 600/650.
If you had 500 but you used 1, it'll set you to 499 and that's final.
@SupremeDorian I'm quite the master of that, if I do say so myself ;)
+1But yeah, that went pretty long.
@Boeing727200F They locked in.
+1@Boeing727200F we never received it.
+1Frankly how the Soviets would develop and ship one I can't imagine.
@Boeing727200F My company-provided notes only tell me it was important. They don't actually say what happened...
+1Almost like some sort of foamer...
+1vroom
+1@Boeing727200F In Vancouver of all places? It’s not a super rail-y city AFAIK. Boats are more its thing, I thought? Granted that requires rail but still.
+1@PlaneFlightX Odd… curious what sort of math you use?
+1@PlaneFlightX how would that be? Did the 24 side fuselage cause clipping issues? I’ve had that happen before resulting in asymmetries.
+1@PlaneFlightX I see. So the curve you needed couldn’t be remotely practically achieved using fuselage, at least not without truly ludicrous part counts and paneling.
+1@PlaneFlightX what calculations?
+1Keep in mind, you've been immersed in this for who knows how long. I haven't been.
@TheRLAF no
+1@PlaneFlightX I still don't understand what you mean.
+1Sshuhsi
+1@LunarEclipseSP I'm making it. Ran out of charges though, ironically.
+1The moment I'm actually trying to MAKE something...
@PlaneFlightX In what sense?
+1@LunarEclipseSP only condition is that I do the filling. I need places to put charges.
+1@PlaneFlightX Same could be said for this entire project, I reckon.
+1You do you, but it seems like an odd place to back down when you’ve already thoroughly violated half the game’s name.
@PlaneFlightX Crikey. Why were some parts custom modded?
+1@Boeing727200F God they are insufferable.
+1@Boeing727200F Thank you.
+1@Lwillswith2sentryguns You forgot the trains.
+1And the ships.
And the character models.
And the buildings.
And the trees.
And the-
@Jmestes There's no room for an engine, only pedals in the cockpit.
+1The pilot must pedal
+1Nice
+1@Boeing727200F Having a part of the power plane that'd switch out textures on buildings would certainly be interesting, though I'd imagine it's probably too late in development to make such a change.
+1That's basically how the rules here work half the time.
+1If people fight about then it's a problem. If not, not likely a problem.
@Boeing727200F If it's likely to start a fight, yes. If not, probably not.
+1I have no intention to get into a fight, so I'm not too worried.
I know.
+1Nice cat.
+1@LunarEclipseSP We got SimplePlanes.com headcanon ships before SP2
+1@Boeing727200F So am I.
+1Cultural osmosis.
@TheRLAF The less I think about it the easier it is to go about my day. When I do think about it the absurdity of people believing all that hits me so hard I go back to not thinking about it.
Let's not think about it.
@AndrewGarrison Oh my goodness it's canon.
+1In the off chance I ever get around to writing a SimplePlanes Bible, the Great Penis Flood is absolutely going to be a part of the creation myth.
It needs a hottub.
+1EIGHT OF THEM!!??!
+1@TitanVector I wasn't addressing you directly.
+1@TheRLAF If they type in a way that makes it hard to read, they shouldn’t be surprised when people don’t bother to read it.
+1@TheRLAF Reread what I said.
+1@TheRLAF And they’re on an English website, so should try to be easily legible.
+1Alternatively, they could speak their native language; it’s not against the rules or anything. They’d simply have to accept that they’d be majorly limiting their potential audience.
@P0LARIS k
+1@Mrcooldude
+1@P0LARIS
You fuckers I had to reread this entire thing and I’m still lost!
@Boeing727200F It's a tiny, blurry flag on the plate carrier thing.
+1You removed the background one, remember?
got it is lights on
+1guh
+1@OverlordPrime Hm. No idea, then.
+1When I read the title I thought you were talking about the view offset for cockpits, but that's an XML attribute rather than a variable (and for a different part).
Can't help, sorry.
I haven't looked in a while, but I thought it allowed the camera to output by where it's pointing?
+1I can't remember any math.
+1Once upon a time I was decent at it. Then, suddenly, completely lost the ability to do any at all.
ok
+1