@Boeing727200F Other lanuages have semblance of structure.
Unless it's Polish. That's just a massive pile of neglected letters that decided to go unionize.
K, W, Z, C. The like.
... I swear I know the rough answer...
Eh, just take it from one of the VR stock craft. That's where I got the first FT text components I ever adapted.
I'm gonna go out on a limb and say {AmmoName}, but I could be wrong. Strings might not be considered values on their own, I can't remember. They haven't been the focus of my efforts to learn FT.
@Randomplayer We're doing USD. In USD that'd be a lot lower.
Minor nations didn't typically produce jets. If they did, they'd likely be expensive by virtue of being museum pieces.
Agree to disagree visually. Personally I prefer its straighter fuselage. B1 looks odd to me.
And being a copy doesn't necessarily mean it shouldn't be considered for its merits.
@keiyronelleavgeek566
Shockingly, there were reasons:
the material was adopted extensively during World War II to make easily-built, sturdy and inexpensive structures for military purposes. It continued to be used widely following the war as an affordable external cladding for buildings.[2] Advertised as a fireproof alternative to other roofing materials such as asphalt, asbestos-cement roofs were popular, not only for safety but also for affordability.[3] Due to asbestos cement's imitation of more expensive materials such as wood siding and shingles, brick, slate, and stone, the product was marketed as an affordable renovation material.
Who'd have thunk?
(I'm being sarcastic, if you can't tell. If there weren't nobody would have used it.)
@Ashdenpaw1 The age of airframe purchased is dependent on price, not vise versa.
An older, less advanced airframe would be purchased because a newer one of that class would be too expensive.
@B1BLancer Probably structural. Smoke sounds like Russian maintenance, unless it was also there in Soviet times.
Nose looks pretty straightforward to me. Not sure what you’re getting at there.
Blended wings were hardly a new concept. I can’t speak to the internal arrangement, but it’s probably used to increase fuselage volume.
Snazzy
Hi bored, I’m Grain.
How many engines?
Weekly Dose of LQR.
That a pun?
@Convex glad to know we have that sort of cultural weight in the Tumour.
@DeeganishCountryball lobsters
+1Same difference
+1@Randomplayer that’s the US. Not minor.
You need Tu therapy
@TheMouse I can’t speak to its performance, but it looks egregious.
+1@Boeing727200F Other lanuages have semblance of structure.
+1Unless it's Polish. That's just a massive pile of neglected letters that decided to go unionize.
K, W, Z, C. The like.
wrfew ar wea stjifd mofejwer
+1wefihtj mkwe bitchc
I'm sorry it someone did it for the what
@Boeing727200F To help the pilot stretch
Do you take constructive criticism?
Yeah, but your degree of aversion is a tad... odd.
+1Yeah that works
+1Try this?
Damnit the text highlight didn't work
Aight, found it.
+1... I swear I know the rough answer...
+2Eh, just take it from one of the VR stock craft. That's where I got the first FT text components I ever adapted.
I'm gonna go out on a limb and say {AmmoName}, but I could be wrong. Strings might not be considered values on their own, I can't remember. They haven't been the focus of my efforts to learn FT.
@Randomplayer We're doing USD. In USD that'd be a lot lower.
Minor nations didn't typically produce jets. If they did, they'd likely be expensive by virtue of being museum pieces.
"Copy"
convergent evolution.
Agree to disagree visually. Personally I prefer its straighter fuselage. B1 looks odd to me.
And being a copy doesn't necessarily mean it shouldn't be considered for its merits.
I think I picked that one up from a Garfield strip...
@keiyronelleavgeek566 Dolt.
@Boeing727200F Both are safe, unless...!
Better than lead, arguably.
You know how many aircraft become known as Widow-Makers because they crash a lot?
+4This one gets that reputation from springlock failures.
@TheMouse GOOD LORD WHAT IS HAPPENING IN THERE
+1@keiyronelleavgeek566
Shockingly, there were reasons:
Who'd have thunk?
+1(I'm being sarcastic, if you can't tell. If there weren't nobody would have used it.)
@Ashdenpaw1 The age of airframe purchased is dependent on price, not vise versa.
An older, less advanced airframe would be purchased because a newer one of that class would be too expensive.
@TheMouse swacp
What's the picture? Won't load for me.
@Ashdenpaw1 See the pinned comment.
That looks nice
+1Not on my end. Must be an issue on yours.
+1Wait it out.
It's literally two buttons
Good lord what is that thing
+1Put this in a forum, dumbass.
Oh, that's pretty
bom
bom
bom
oh it loaded.
+1Impressive.
I'm not clicking that
+1cool beans
+1I didn't make one either.
@B1BLancer Probably structural. Smoke sounds like Russian maintenance, unless it was also there in Soviet times.
Nose looks pretty straightforward to me. Not sure what you’re getting at there.
Blended wings were hardly a new concept. I can’t speak to the internal arrangement, but it’s probably used to increase fuselage volume.
y tho
@PlaneFlightX I sense falsehoods
@THEOKPILOT lmao.
Look, if I ever get around to adding late model Archfiends to the catalogue on this site I'll have to remember to tag you.