35.3k GhostHTX Comments

  • The Bomb Challenge 21 hours ago

    @Boeing727200F You know what? Go for it. Whats the worst that could happen?

    +1
  • The Bomb Challenge 22 hours ago

    @Boeing727200F Adding parts is fine. Deleting parts from the bomb is not. The thought of a rocket propelled Yellow Sun makes me happy.

    @Hooha12 Yeah sure why not? Just stick to the rules and youre good!

  • B-1A(N) Barga (The Bomb Challenge) yesterday

    Wow. Very big. BUFF, one could say…

    +1
  • The Bomb Challenge yesterday

    @RRV19 well yeah - I said I dropped it from 10000ft. I didnt say I made it back to base… :-)

    Looking forward to your entry!

  • The Bomb Challenge yesterday

    @RRV19 Im not sure what you mean? I just dropped it from 10000ft, and it went boom just fine?

  • The Bomb Challenge yesterday

    @RRV19 Hm. Ive dropped the bomb tens of times from several bombers, and apart from the times where it completely missed the ground (hit the water instead) Ive never had a misfire like you describe. You can add bits to it, though. A parachute is fine.

  • The Bomb Challenge yesterday

    @Mrcooldude the B-29 is Edward C. Wells’ solution for dropping nukes. I want to see Mrcooldudes solution!

  • The Bomb Challenge yesterday

    @Pakdaaircraftindustries thats what I like to hear. You have no idea, but will try anyway! This is the way.

    @Mrcooldude Absolutely! Have at it!

  • Unnanned One (The Bomb Challenge) yesterday

    Its as if a Hughes XF-11 and a Lockheed P-38 loved each other very much… Some might say too much…

    +1
  • The Bomb Challenge yesterday

    @WarLightning Thats the spirit!

  • The Bomb Challenge yesterday

    @WarLightning its a big boy, no doubt. But dont lose heart! Think outside the box! Think big! Think small! Think pink! Or blue! Green? You choose! You have until 20.01.26, so take your time…

    +1
  • The Bomb Challenge yesterday

    NOTE! RULES CLARIFICATION!!
    The bomb itself is around 15 parts. So I will not crucify anyone for going slightly over the max part count.

  • The Bomb Challenge yesterday

    @Warsforyou Good stuff! Looking forward to your entry!

  • The Bomb Challenge yesterday

    @nwa This competition requires smart and dumb in equal measures.

    Thanks very much for the spotlight, btw!

    +2
  • The Bomb Challenge yesterday

    @WarLightning Full on replicas are not allowed. You’ll just be copying a solution that someone else came up with. I could end up with a competition full of V bombers… Which isn’t a bad thing per se, but against the spirit of the competition.

    That being said, if someone were to make a cursed Victor, or a chibi Vulcan then I would be happy… so long as it can still drop the nuke.

    I would also love to see how a P-47 could be made to deliver this, though. I would judge that any P-47 modified to deliver a 7250lb strategic nuke isn’t really a replica any more…

    +2
  • The Bomb Challenge 2 days ago

    @TateNT34
    First, thanks for the interest and the upvote! Second - answers!

    1- As a general rule you cant recolour the bomb itself. It is green with a black head and orange stripes. But! If its a hassle to not recolour, of if the colouring makes it awesome, then I might even give added bonus points…

    2- you can add things (like parachutes, detatchers etc) yeah. As it is, it is set to drop on an AG. AG3, if I dont remember wrong. But if you want to use a detatcher to make it drop on firing weapons or whatever its totally fine.

    Rename it? Rename what?

    As a rule Im not going to disqualify folks unless the rule breaking is flagrant, egregious, reprehensible, or just generally really bad.

    Please just build something, and if its inkeeping with the spirit of the competition then youre all good.

    +1
  • The Bomb Challenge 2 days ago

    @tetozz a Spotlight?!? Youre too kind.

    +1
  • English Electric Lightning F.6 18 days ago

    @Spitfirelad05 Thanks. The Lightning was a beast, for sure. Funny to think that it was developed in the early 50s.

    +1
  • Yuzhnoye Yu-31 Feral one month ago

    @LettuceRob119 Yay! Many thanks!

  • Folland Flash F.1 2 months ago

    @mikoyanster thanks! I just hope the cockpit is fully functional. I hate building cockpits…

  • !!CHALLENGE 50s JET DOGFIGHT 2 months ago

    Quick question regarding the hinge / rotator parts - I see they are set up for use as elevators, and that you stipulate using the structural wing only for our builds. Is it allowed to modify the structural wing you require so that it can have control surfaces? And if so, can we use it for flaps, rudder, ailerons and so on (keeping the g-limit you have in the code)?

    +1
  • -CLOSED- Fictional build competition 1.4 years ago

    @RealMicroZackSP You’re joking, right?

  • -CLOSED- Fictional build competition 1.4 years ago

    @RealMicroZackSP I didnt.

  • -CLOSED- Fictional build competition 1.5 years ago

    You son of a bitch I’m in.

  • F-111D Aardvark 2.6 years ago

    VARK VARK VARK VARK!

    +1
  • Amerika-bomber challange 2.6 years ago

    @Dogedogebread13 when is the deadline for submissions? I might make some small alterations first.

    Edit: Never mind - I just read your pinned comment.

  • Amerika-bomber challange 2.6 years ago

    I would try this out, but I literally just built one for the Wunderwaffen challenge.

  • Where You From? 2.6 years ago

    Im from the UK, but live in Norway. The Scandinavian one, not the Michigan one.

    +2
  • The 1946 Naval Design Bureau Results [1946 Specifications Challenge Results] 2.6 years ago

    Thanks! A very well run challenge! Looking forward to the next one!

    +1
  • Messerschmitt ME264 v1 Wunderwaffen Challenge 2.6 years ago

    @WinsWings Thank you! Im glad you like it!

    +1
  • Messerschmitt ME264 v1 Wunderwaffen Challenge 2.6 years ago

    @ChiChiWerx Thanks! She rolls really well too, huh?

    I think I finally found my groove in terms of building stuff. I figured that since I hate doing cockpits, why bother? I build primarily for myself anyway… Just build until Im happy and release the damn thing. Thats my motto from now on.

    +1
  • Messerschmitt ME264 v1 Wunderwaffen Challenge 2.6 years ago

    @TASTEinc kein problem, kamerat! Im just happy to be here.

    +1
  • Closed - Wunderwaffe Challenge 2.6 years ago

    Sorry! Im a wee bit late! Goering got donut dust all over the cockpit…

  • U.S.S. KELVIN 2.7 years ago

    Ah. You went for the Kelvin, eh? Very nice, old boy!

    +2
  • Strike Fighter Challenge (Closed) 2.7 years ago

    @Dogedogeman1 Mobile most certainly does have Krakabloa.

  • North American XF2J-2 Charger 2.7 years ago

    @LieutenantSOT ding ding ding ding! We have a winner!

    +1
  • North American XF2J-2 Charger 2.7 years ago

    @LieutenantSOT No worries! Im happy to have lots of comments (for once). As for the speed - yeah… I might have gotten a bit carried away with the drag reduction. I think making her a bit more draggy would solve the speed issue. She is bloody good fun to fly, though, and Im glad you like her (that was the plan 😁).

    +1
  • North American XF2J-2 Charger 2.7 years ago

    @LieutenantSOT Yeah! I looked at the XF15C to get ideas as to how the markings / colourscheme would look. The NATC was new to me so I googled it. I thought it would be perfect for a prototype.

  • North American XF2J-2 Charger 2.7 years ago

    @LieutenantSOT Thanks! I really appreciate it!

    +1
  • North American XF2J-2 Charger 2.7 years ago

    Bonus points to the man, woman, person, camera, tv that spots the mistake in the picture / title.

  • 1946 Specifications Challenge! [CLOSED] 2.7 years ago

    Ok chief! My entry is in. Løp og kjøp! (As the Norwegians say).

    +1
  • North American XF2J-2 Charger 2.7 years ago

    @Kazin Fr fr no 🧢. Seriously, though - thanks! Im actually amazed it has so few parts myself. Especially since there is a working cockpit, flaps, custom landing gear and custom canopy. I really appreciate the upvote and comment 🙏🏻

  • 1946 Specifications Challenge! [CLOSED] 2.7 years ago

    @LieutenantSOT No worries! This looks like a lot of fun. Quick question about the counter rotating props - would you prefer one engine that powers the plane, one engine that is just for decoration (power multiplier set to 0) or 2 engines with a combined power rating below or equal to the challenge limit?

    +1
  • Handley Page Victor B.2 (Blue Steel) 2.7 years ago

    @1VirtualRealityConversion Not sure I follow you?

    +1
  • Handley Page Victor B.2 (Blue Steel) 2.7 years ago

    @1VirtualRealityConversion Dropping the nuke? I also have a version with a freefall nuke - Should I stick that up too?

    +1
  • Handley Page Victor B.2 (Blue Steel) 2.7 years ago

    @1VirtualRealityConversion No worries - its ok to ask. I hope you enjoy?

    +1
  • Handley Page Victor B.2 (Blue Steel) 2.7 years ago

    @1VirtualRealityConversion Look at the Craft Instructions?

    +1
  • Handley Page Victor B.1a 2.7 years ago

    @dINE Thanks! Im partial to them myself.

  • Handley Page Victor B.1a 2.7 years ago

    @Tang0five Ive actually built something for the Star Trek Challenge! Great minds think alike, what? As for being back - agreed on the anime stuff (although I almost finished building the tank from the "drive me closer, I want to hit them with my sword" meme… sorry. But we cant let the kids have the run of the place, can we? Now all we need is the return of our resident Lightning jockey / seat - stick interface Alien and we’re in back in business!

    Oh! Before I forget - check out this… (coming soon)…
    https://www.reddit.com/gallery/11svukm