@KerlonceauxIndustries put them on detachers. They'll launch only on LaunchWeapons if you set detachers to AG9, but you can adjust the launch strength.
Not bad, but pretty basic. Why don't you invest time you spend on three builds a day into one build? You could have added custom control surfaces to this plane, and support cables, more detailed landing gear. Maybe even interior. Oh yes, and a paint job. Believe me, things like that pay off. You get ten times more upvotes for three times the work. And you get people telling you you are amazing.
@Othawne nope. Plates work as one rod. You use plates for the look. You go like this: Hinge, leafs, hinge, block, hinge, leafs, hinge, shock. First hinge and the shock are attached to the chassis. Shock should be horizontal.
@Othawne lemme help you: sure, go ahead :)
Put a rotator on one end, two rotators in the middle, a rotator on the other end, a shock on one end rotator, and a block in the middle (between the middle rotators) to attach the axle to.
You leave the name part empty. As for picture, upload it to an image sharing site, copy direct link (the one that ends with jpg, png, or other image format), and paste it in the form RedstoneAeroAviation gave you. And yes, you need an exclamation mark. Otherwise, you get a clickable link, not a visible picture.
I like the flip switch, but maybe set the engine to Ag1 input, and set its max input to 3, to speed up and slow down more gently. Engine block on these planes worked as a flywheel, afterall.
There is a law that'll give right to service providers to reduce internet speed to the sites that don't pay racket, and increase it for those that do pay, effectively being a potential internet censorship and making a monopoly on the internet possible. Net neutrality is non-existence of that law.
@Tully2001 Well, internet censorship in the hands of money-hungry companies does sound scary. I don't want to go far with my predictions of the possible outcome, but it won't end well probably. Those who control internet, control information. Those who control information, control the world.
@shipster I understand that. For future notice, I never comment on a plane if I don't like it, except if it's breaking rules. And I always have improvements to suggest, and I understand that a builder may have his reason not to implement them. And don't worry, I'm not annoyed by your comment :)
@shipster I'm just giving him suggestions, not saying it sucks. I have modified the aircraft to my personal liking for the second flight I did on it. As for time, 90min SP time, you would have enough fuel to halfway down the runway, basically. Even on the longest day settings, time (earth's rotation) is accelerated 3x. And time that you feel on SP is normal. If you go 120mph, you will go 120 miles in one real hour, and 40 miles in SP hour.
@EpicPigster1 I would agree with armament if every missile had its own pylon. Launching four missiles from one looks way too arcadish, and lock angle so big kills all the fun of getting on the enemy's tail. Early infra-red missiles used to have around 5-15° lock angle (interceptor missile), and radar guided (Guardian) around 20°. And gun armament was usually made up of 20-30mm single-barrel cannons and 12.7mm machine guns. Still, it was fun flying this plane.
One more thing: add at least enough fuel for 90 minutes of flight.
@chancey21 add details like this to equally well-made builds, and you'll find this number of upvotes insignificant. Although, I mostly checked this out because I drive a Ford :)
This is very hard to shoot down. Nothing to hit except wings and engine. And there's so many wings I can't destroy enough, and it doesn't really need the engine when it's airborn anyway. It just keeps gliding to the runway.
@Helicopterboy on Android, to use Discord, download the Discord app, make an account, and join a server you want. You can find a link to one of the most popular SP servers in my bio.
I would have made suspension a bit stiffer, so it can go off-road at high speed. Which I did XD. Nice work. I like the mechanism that lifts the body, and suspension is very well done.
You can put the link to the fixed version like this: [Fixed version]+(https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/tE88pm/Spitfire-mk24-the-final-version). Just remove "+".
@ProKillaV12 @Maiqu no problem guys. If you need any more info/tips, just say. You can join Builders chat on discord for easier communication. There's a link in my bio, under Builders chat logo.
@Maiqu in wing setting, you have a button that says "Symmetric". Click it, and it'll say "Semi-symmetric". Click it again, and it'll say "Flat bottom". Those are airfoil types available on SP. Symmetric is like fins on a dart. They produce no lift at neutral AoA. Semi-symmetric produce some lift, and flat bottom produces a lot of lift. When having a nose-down issue, use flat bottom airfoil on main wings, and symmetric on tail. As for torque, it's not simulated on SimplePlanes. Press "Space" to show CoM, CoL, and CoT. You will notice that CoM and CoL are right of the center line.
@KerlonceauxIndustries put them on detachers. They'll launch only on LaunchWeapons if you set detachers to AG9, but you can adjust the launch strength.
Not bad, but pretty basic. Why don't you invest time you spend on three builds a day into one build? You could have added custom control surfaces to this plane, and support cables, more detailed landing gear. Maybe even interior. Oh yes, and a paint job. Believe me, things like that pay off. You get ten times more upvotes for three times the work. And you get people telling you you are amazing.
That happens when SP server is offline. It can be offline for maintenance, site update, and a number of other reasons. It's nothing unusual.
@GermanWarMachine that would almost be as much work as making a new ship.
That would be very interesting. I'm sure @BlazeInfinity would make a Japanese destroyer from the WW2, and put it in the race :)
It's pretty cute. There are resemblances to T-4. But you could have made cockpit blend with the plane's back.
Nice plane. But ailerons are glitching through the wing. Again.
@Othawne no problem. Here's the diagram.
@Othawne nope. Plates work as one rod. You use plates for the look. You go like this: Hinge, leafs, hinge, block, hinge, leafs, hinge, shock. First hinge and the shock are attached to the chassis. Shock should be horizontal.
@phanps I don't like to tag peeps. It seems like begging for upvotes. If it's good, you'll see it on the front page.
@Othawne lemme help you: sure, go ahead :)
Put a rotator on one end, two rotators in the middle, a rotator on the other end, a shock on one end rotator, and a block in the middle (between the middle rotators) to attach the axle to.
You leave the name part empty. As for picture, upload it to an image sharing site, copy direct link (the one that ends with jpg, png, or other image format), and paste it in the form RedstoneAeroAviation gave you. And yes, you need an exclamation mark. Otherwise, you get a clickable link, not a visible picture.
@Fjorge did it work?
@blackvultureaeroespace nah, I don't like to play with unfinished builds. Tag me when it's done.
@blackvultureaeroespace nice. But why would you have to wait?
That's shipbuilding for you. Scale it to 0.5 and continue. Large builds lag more.
@blackvultureaeroespace SA-2 as in S-75 Dvina?
@ploptro7 thanks
@EinsteinEX hvala
@PlanesOfOld I'm glad to hear that. Just blip switch is too hard to control. Can't wait to see a plane with "mixture control".
@PlanesOfOld great. Can't wait to see more of these vintage planes. Maybe do one of those Gotha bombers?
I like the flip switch, but maybe set the engine to Ag1 input, and set its max input to 3, to speed up and slow down more gently. Engine block on these planes worked as a flywheel, afterall.
@PyrusEnderhunter you mean rotation lights? For that, just enter negative length to fuselage blocks. You might need Overload for that, I'm not sure.
There is a law that'll give right to service providers to reduce internet speed to the sites that don't pay racket, and increase it for those that do pay, effectively being a potential internet censorship and making a monopoly on the internet possible. Net neutrality is non-existence of that law.
@Tully2001 Well, internet censorship in the hands of money-hungry companies does sound scary. I don't want to go far with my predictions of the possible outcome, but it won't end well probably. Those who control internet, control information. Those who control information, control the world.
@Blue0Bull I'm glad to hear that. There's more coming.
@MEERKAT978 I'm not really the best with cockpits. For me, it's just trial and error.
Eh, where's landing gear?
@EpicPigster1 no problem
@Dllama4 river patrol boats of river flotilla of Republic of Serbia.
@shipster I'm glad to hear that.
@shipster I understand that. For future notice, I never comment on a plane if I don't like it, except if it's breaking rules. And I always have improvements to suggest, and I understand that a builder may have his reason not to implement them. And don't worry, I'm not annoyed by your comment :)
@shipster I'm just giving him suggestions, not saying it sucks. I have modified the aircraft to my personal liking for the second flight I did on it. As for time, 90min SP time, you would have enough fuel to halfway down the runway, basically. Even on the longest day settings, time (earth's rotation) is accelerated 3x. And time that you feel on SP is normal. If you go 120mph, you will go 120 miles in one real hour, and 40 miles in SP hour.
@EpicPigster1 I would agree with armament if every missile had its own pylon. Launching four missiles from one looks way too arcadish, and lock angle so big kills all the fun of getting on the enemy's tail. Early infra-red missiles used to have around 5-15° lock angle (interceptor missile), and radar guided (Guardian) around 20°. And gun armament was usually made up of 20-30mm single-barrel cannons and 12.7mm machine guns. Still, it was fun flying this plane.
One more thing: add at least enough fuel for 90 minutes of flight.
Design is very nice, and performance are great. But armament is a bit of an overkill.
@chancey21 add details like this to equally well-made builds, and you'll find this number of upvotes insignificant. Although, I mostly checked this out because I drive a Ford :)
You really know how to make details. Good job.
Very night. I love the look of that machinery. Keep up the good work.
@KASA sometimes it does, sometimes it doesn't. Missile is mostly for decoration. The other one is just for decoration.
@Mercyaircraftcorporation you must have 100 points here, or you don't get points there.
This is very hard to shoot down. Nothing to hit except wings and engine. And there's so many wings I can't destroy enough, and it doesn't really need the engine when it's airborn anyway. It just keeps gliding to the runway.
@TheLatentImage thank you. I spent half a night making it.
@Warbrine I'm not sure if it's fine to post a Discord bot in SP mods section, as it's not SPmod. Still, here's an upvote.
@Helicopterboy on Android, to use Discord, download the Discord app, make an account, and join a server you want. You can find a link to one of the most popular SP servers in my bio.
I would have made suspension a bit stiffer, so it can go off-road at high speed. Which I did XD. Nice work. I like the mechanism that lifts the body, and suspension is very well done.
You can put the link to the fixed version like this: [Fixed version]+(https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/tE88pm/Spitfire-mk24-the-final-version). Just remove "+".
@ESIOTROT121 tag me when you do. I'd like to see it.
@ProKillaV12 @Maiqu no problem guys. If you need any more info/tips, just say. You can join Builders chat on discord for easier communication. There's a link in my bio, under Builders chat logo.
@Maiqu in wing setting, you have a button that says "Symmetric". Click it, and it'll say "Semi-symmetric". Click it again, and it'll say "Flat bottom". Those are airfoil types available on SP. Symmetric is like fins on a dart. They produce no lift at neutral AoA. Semi-symmetric produce some lift, and flat bottom produces a lot of lift. When having a nose-down issue, use flat bottom airfoil on main wings, and symmetric on tail. As for torque, it's not simulated on SimplePlanes. Press "Space" to show CoM, CoL, and CoT. You will notice that CoM and CoL are right of the center line.
@Jacobdaniel same. Let's just hope this evolves into ComplicatedVehicles, like SimplePlanes did.