@Spacedoge12345plane it would be a borderline case. Point system is there so that builders can get a reward for their own work, not for posting something you are no longer happy with.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
If you want to make a statement, use a forum post, not a build. And make sure it is appropriate to a child-friendly community about planes. I find this post to be too far off-topic to be tolerated. I will not issue you a strike for it, but please, refrain form advertising your views via builds.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
@TheChosenOne practice makes perfect. For the rest, join the Port SP discord server through the link in my bio and follow the instructions there to get verified.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
@Tessemi you may disagree with others using your builds, but it is a successor, has changes, and credit is given, so this build hasn't broken any rules. When you upload a build, everyone is free to use and modify it any way they want.
@CptJacobson it is not. It is a valuable source of feedback before the further development for the devs. Beta is not meant for you to have fun, but for devs to pinpoint major problems that need fixing before further work is done.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
@The3Box6With0AXOnIt unfortunately, it has too few parts. You should try to upgrade it. Add exhaust pipes, antennas, maybe even try custom control surfaces. Also, (friendly advice) main landing gear legs seem too tall and wheels too large.
@ClarkSpernato it depends on the launch angle and starting altitude. You can also adjust burn timer and reduce their mass through XML editing to get them to go further.
@RamboJutter no, it shouldn't disable upvotes. I just upvoted to check, and it works. You can't see your name under upvotes, but the number grows by one.
@DrunkenRaider I have removed all comments from that post and disabled the comments on it, as some very salty people made quite a mess there. As for featuring, since around two and a half years ago, you have an option to feature a build yourself. Option is called spotlight, and it shows all your followers the build that you like.
@RussianAS I do like ships. But I don't want to deal with "why was this featured?" comments on them when I feature them, so I simply upvote and spotlight.
@Benny3053 only way I could help you is by building it for you, and that's way too much work. A few hours, at least. That's why I generally don't build airliners.
@CustomAircraftMods it would carry two 12.7mm MGs with ammo, camera pod, and two 50l tanks and would struggle to take off... The most engineous solution I ever saw for a COIN aircraft was adding pylons to a crop duster. They are generally lightweight, can carry more than their own weight, have ridiculous loiter time... Perfect planes for the job. I don't mind you making another successor to my build, but it would be a bit ridiculous.
@CustomAircraftMods yes, last version would be unnecessary. Also, strike version would be pretty useless. With full fuel load, this plane could carry some 240kg and fly for some four hours under full load. Floats would also limit the useful load and reduce the speed via drag.
@GeneralPatrick2 I wasn't looking at blueprints of either one. I just wanted to make a plane somewhat like Utva Kobac, so I made a generic turboprop trainer.
Nice looking build, but not quite Fi-156. Window panels of Fi-156 extend beyond trailing edges of wings, wingtips are more rounded, and so are elevator tips, and it's smaller. Also, wing loading is 10% of what it should be and drag is, I believe, way too high.
@Spacedoge12345plane it would be a borderline case. Point system is there so that builders can get a reward for their own work, not for posting something you are no longer happy with.
@Notaleopard I don't know. If it looks like the plane from the cartoon, then it is.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
IS ENTRY (by ThunderNova)
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
If you want to make a statement, use a forum post, not a build. And make sure it is appropriate to a child-friendly community about planes. I find this post to be too far off-topic to be tolerated. I will not issue you a strike for it, but please, refrain form advertising your views via builds.
@Vidal99977 dude, that's an airliner. It has 100 seats, as opposed to 11 that the challenge allows.
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
Thanks for the entry.
@SalemASaberhagen Thanks. I've edited your comment to make it more visible.
Comment the clickable link to it on the challenge post so I don't lose it.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
No problem buddy.
@Schiefensnarglez you don't. At least not yet. Parts that will allow you to use it aren't implemented yet.
@TheChosenOne practice makes perfect. For the rest, join the Port SP discord server through the link in my bio and follow the instructions there to get verified.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
@Tessemi you may disagree with others using your builds, but it is a successor, has changes, and credit is given, so this build hasn't broken any rules. When you upload a build, everyone is free to use and modify it any way they want.
And disable detacher by setting it to Ag9 via XML.
USS Beast has reduced detection range. I forgot to mention that earlier.
@CptJacobson it is not. It is a valuable source of feedback before the further development for the devs. Beta is not meant for you to have fun, but for devs to pinpoint major problems that need fixing before further work is done.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
@The3Box6With0AXOnIt ugh, it's still far below the required part count. It's cute, but I can't accept it. Sorry.
@The3Box6With0AXOnIt no problem :)
@The3Box6With0AXOnIt it is the second highest rated mod. Easy to find.
@randomusername I meant a prop in a tube. No need to overcomplicate it.
@The3Box6With0AXOnIt use Overload mod and disable collisions on parts that should go through other parts.
@The3Box6With0AXOnIt unfortunately, it has too few parts. You should try to upgrade it. Add exhaust pipes, antennas, maybe even try custom control surfaces. Also, (friendly advice) main landing gear legs seem too tall and wheels too large.
@CustomAircraftMods RIP
@ClarkSpernato it depends on the launch angle and starting altitude. You can also adjust burn timer and reduce their mass through XML editing to get them to go further.
@RamboJutter it shouldn't do that.
@RamboJutter no, it shouldn't disable upvotes. I just upvoted to check, and it works. You can't see your name under upvotes, but the number grows by one.
@DrunkenRaider I have removed all comments from that post and disabled the comments on it, as some very salty people made quite a mess there. As for featuring, since around two and a half years ago, you have an option to feature a build yourself. Option is called spotlight, and it shows all your followers the build that you like.
@RussianAS I do like ships. But I don't want to deal with "why was this featured?" comments on them when I feature them, so I simply upvote and spotlight.
@Benny3053 only way I could help you is by building it for you, and that's way too much work. A few hours, at least. That's why I generally don't build airliners.
@CustomAircraftMods ok.
@CustomAircraftMods it would carry two 12.7mm MGs with ammo, camera pod, and two 50l tanks and would struggle to take off... The most engineous solution I ever saw for a COIN aircraft was adding pylons to a crop duster. They are generally lightweight, can carry more than their own weight, have ridiculous loiter time... Perfect planes for the job. I don't mind you making another successor to my build, but it would be a bit ridiculous.
@CustomAircraftMods yes, last version would be unnecessary. Also, strike version would be pretty useless. With full fuel load, this plane could carry some 240kg and fly for some four hours under full load. Floats would also limit the useful load and reduce the speed via drag.
@DerekSP I don't think you've missed any.
@GeneralPatrick2 I wasn't looking at blueprints of either one. I just wanted to make a plane somewhat like Utva Kobac, so I made a generic turboprop trainer.
Thanks for the entry.
Thanks for the entry.
Part count of this build is below the required 150 parts.
@CustomAircraftMods it's good. I wouldn't have invested more effort into it myself.
Nice looking build, but not quite Fi-156. Window panels of Fi-156 extend beyond trailing edges of wings, wingtips are more rounded, and so are elevator tips, and it's smaller. Also, wing loading is 10% of what it should be and drag is, I believe, way too high.
@RYAviation you can rip parts with no collisions off my builds.
Thanks for the entry.
Ok, so, I rate this one?
@Deboss311 sure.