@Diloph yes, but accelerates like a rocket and can probably climb vertically or almost vertically. I think you'd find realistic performance quite enjoyable, and all you need to do is play with drag a little. Some 3000 to 3500 drag points would be perfect, and reduce the power accordingly. Do that and tell me if it feels better, if you've got the time.
Looks quite nice. I can't fly it now, but judging by the specs, it has more drag than an apartment building. You should decrease drag and engine power until you have realistic acceleration and climb rate.
@Jim1the1Squid no, it's not a full-time job. As for RP, I don't care. If you have to post it on your profile to use it, make sure you make major changes.
@Jim1the1Squid There's no certain way to become a moderator. Just be a good user, be active, help others, make a reputation, be with the community for years, and maybe, just maybe you'll be picked to be a moderator if we ever happen to need one. Andrew will pick one among dozens of good users, and it just might be you. Then you get to solve problems of other users in your spare time.
@Jim1the1Squid around 180k. I'm by far the highest rated user to ever become a moderator. Becoming a moderator is a difficult goal though, as it's Andrew's personal choice.
@PlaneCreator1 to edit description, tap the down-pointing arrow under the bottom right corner of the thumbnail and select "Edit". If you have any other problems, feel free to tag me.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
@belugasub no problem. I've already sent you the wing and you chose not to use it. I won't force it upon you. Your technique ain't bad either, just a bit more complicated and doesn't give a proper sharp trailing edge.
@88blaroo trying matters a lot. You've gotten feedback on it, so now you know how to make a much better system next time. Also, what I forgot to tell you is that colors you used are really off-putting. Dark base against the dark background, with eyesore green drums of extra ammo. You should work a bit on that.
@JohnnyBoythePilot systems operating such small missiles are usually light and mobile, meant to be at the very front line with troops to protect against drones and helicopters. This truck is too big for that, and would do area defence. In area defence role, any missile with the range of under 20km is useless. Furthermore, your system is not even independent, which frontline systems need to be. It needs a separate radar and command vehicle, as it doesn't appear to have a potent enough search radar and control room.
@Tiseth you should have linked that picture. I tried searching the name of the build, but didn't find the picture you linked here. I probably would have if I searched more, but there were too many entries to do a thorough research on them. You would have gotten a few more design points.
@Awsomur my Trainer Challenge had to be separated into three posts, partially due to there being three categories. My General Aviation Challenge results also had to be two posts as I couldn't fit all entries into one.
@Leehopard @CoolPeach congrats. Your rewards will be issued soon.
@BogdanX unfortunately, I can't spotlight you and I've already upvoted all of your builds. I can give you a feature instead if that's fine by you.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
While this build does look nice, its flight characteristics are quite poor. I suggest working more on the performance. Also, CoM should be a lot closer to the main landing gear to allow the plane to rotate the nose up at lower speed. I also suggest using [this] technique for wings, as it gives much better visual effect. Flaps should only extend one way, down. You can achieve that by editing rotator input to "0,1" instead of "-1,1"
@term01 we never take down accounts for one offense. We usually do that after the account gets banned for the third time, and it's not that easy to get banned three times. What was the name of that account?
@Diloph only if you like the changes. You don't have to do it for me. I'm just sharing my experience so you can use it in the future.
@Diloph yes, but accelerates like a rocket and can probably climb vertically or almost vertically. I think you'd find realistic performance quite enjoyable, and all you need to do is play with drag a little. Some 3000 to 3500 drag points would be perfect, and reduce the power accordingly. Do that and tell me if it feels better, if you've got the time.
Looks quite nice. I can't fly it now, but judging by the specs, it has more drag than an apartment building. You should decrease drag and engine power until you have realistic acceleration and climb rate.
@yoshicraze thanks.
@PlaneCreator1 no problem.
@UnguidedCylinder sure. I'm glad you like it. You can find instructions to the gun and a few better examples on Leehopard's profile.
@PositivePlanes @EliteArsenals24 thanks.
@ChiyomiAnzai thanks.
@Jim1the1Squid no, it's not a full-time job. As for RP, I don't care. If you have to post it on your profile to use it, make sure you make major changes.
@Jim1the1Squid There's no certain way to become a moderator. Just be a good user, be active, help others, make a reputation, be with the community for years, and maybe, just maybe you'll be picked to be a moderator if we ever happen to need one. Andrew will pick one among dozens of good users, and it just might be you. Then you get to solve problems of other users in your spare time.
@Jim1the1Squid around 180k. I'm by far the highest rated user to ever become a moderator. Becoming a moderator is a difficult goal though, as it's Andrew's personal choice.
@Dinoairplanes I don't know. I'm yet to come up with one.
@Jim1the1Squid @Viper3000ad @ErvenDynamics @CRJ900Pilot thanks.
@DerpyPuppy thanks :)
Done. It is now your job to promote the tag.
@PlaneCreator1 to edit description, tap the down-pointing arrow under the bottom right corner of the thumbnail and select "Edit". If you have any other problems, feel free to tag me.
@Minecraftpoweer remind me tomorrow on your build matching such tag.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
@DPSAircraftManufacturer might be over a hundred by now.
@DPSAircraftManufacturer with what?
@Jerba dunno. It can throw quite a distance away.
Not fair! I'm not the first anymore :(
@SpencerTreePuncher what would that be? Heavy lift helicopter?
@Mmdben no problem. You may want to try this too.
@belugasub no problem. I've already sent you the wing and you chose not to use it. I won't force it upon you. Your technique ain't bad either, just a bit more complicated and doesn't give a proper sharp trailing edge.
@BlazeInfinity well, it needs a lock-on to fire. 60° would be great. Or 45°. The kind of angle at which the radar would allow it to launch.
@88blaroo trying matters a lot. You've gotten feedback on it, so now you know how to make a much better system next time. Also, what I forgot to tell you is that colors you used are really off-putting. Dark base against the dark background, with eyesore green drums of extra ammo. You should work a bit on that.
@JohnnyBoythePilot systems operating such small missiles are usually light and mobile, meant to be at the very front line with troops to protect against drones and helicopters. This truck is too big for that, and would do area defence. In area defence role, any missile with the range of under 20km is useless. Furthermore, your system is not even independent, which frontline systems need to be. It needs a separate radar and command vehicle, as it doesn't appear to have a potent enough search radar and control room.
@SirTimothy1943 at least now you know how to do better next time.
Who's reading this in 2019?
@UnguidedCylinder no problem. Your entry was perfectly acceptable. It would be great if it was smaller.
@DeathStalker627 no problem.
@JohnnyBoythePilot @EliteArsenals24 I'm glad you enjoyed the challenge.
@Stoney no problem. Thank you for participating.
@Tiseth you should have linked that picture. I tried searching the name of the build, but didn't find the picture you linked here. I probably would have if I searched more, but there were too many entries to do a thorough research on them. You would have gotten a few more design points.
@Awsomur my Trainer Challenge had to be separated into three posts, partially due to there being three categories. My General Aviation Challenge results also had to be two posts as I couldn't fit all entries into one.
@Leehopard you can pick two more of your builds to be spotlighted.
@Mmdben very difficult. All five are great builds.
@CoolPeach I'm glad you liked it.
@Leehopard @CoolPeach congrats. Your rewards will be issued soon.
@BogdanX unfortunately, I can't spotlight you and I've already upvoted all of your builds. I can give you a feature instead if that's fine by you.
@Atheist have you read the description that you have written?
@ValenR you may need to update Fine Tuner, Overload, and some other mods. Delete the old mod files and redownload.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
Sexually suggestive content is strictly forbidden on the site. You have been issued a strike.
Sexually suggestive content is strictly forbidden on the site. You have been issued a strike.
While this build does look nice, its flight characteristics are quite poor. I suggest working more on the performance. Also, CoM should be a lot closer to the main landing gear to allow the plane to rotate the nose up at lower speed. I also suggest using [this] technique for wings, as it gives much better visual effect. Flaps should only extend one way, down. You can achieve that by editing rotator input to "0,1" instead of "-1,1"
@WarHawk95 my graphics card doesn't support video. Copy the example wing part for part and you'll figure it out.
@term01 we never take down accounts for one offense. We usually do that after the account gets banned for the third time, and it's not that easy to get banned three times. What was the name of that account?