If you want pictures to show up in the forum or description, you first need to upload them somewhere else. I used to use Imgur.com for that before it broke. Now I'm using Discord (I simply post a picture in the chat). Once you have uploaded a picture, write "", and the picture will show up. If you are using Imgur, remove "s" from "https" (beginning of the link).
Ask whoever is in charge of the school Wi-Fi to remove him from the list maybe? Black lists are generally stored on the server, not on the blacklisted device.
Excellent build, especially for your level. Very smooth flier, nice details, and good proportion.
By the way, to tag a user, put "@" in front of their username. That sends them notification about your comment. You can tag up to three users per comment, the rest won't get a notification.
I'll feature your plane so everybody can see it on the front page :)
Looks nice. However, that vertical windshield is a huge weak spot. Also, judging by the door, it's the size of a normal APC. Judging by the RCWS, it's the size of a four floor apartment building (if the little thing above the windshield is RCWS).
You can tag people in a comment to send them notification. If the build is a joint project, you should keep your plane a successor to their unlisted version.
@haogejiuhaoge1 I can't do a thing. I only moderate the site. You need guys with blue tags. Or post your suggestion to Uservoice. You can find the link to it under "Stuff".
Btw, upvote is for the flight model. This is a very stable flyer. Landing gear is a bit basic, but nice. I'm glad you have left control surfaces visible (I hate it when people cover control surfaces), but I think you should try experimenting with custom ones. And what I meant by "better, more realistic proportion" is that the fuselage is too tall. Usually, planes of this category (busyness turboprop) have nearly cylindrical or perfectly cylindrical fuselage.
Except that the part count is too low, it's not a successor, and wouldn't win due to other entries being far more detailed, having custom surfaces, and better, more realistic proportion, @Vidal99977
Tags in the post don't work. Only in comments. And you can only tag three people per comment. Fourth person won't get a notification.
Unless you are a moderator. I can tag as many as I want XD
@ShrimpRex you need to add more bits. Honestly, I've seen some entries that haven't yet been submitted, and you don't stand much chance without at least 250 parts. Minimal part count for the build to be rated as an entry is 150.
@Speedhunter I've just placed very floaty blocks on a piston, made them tiny by scaling them (don't scale mass, it reduces buoyancy), and placed a VTOL engine (equally tiny) on the floating block so it will always stay above the surface.
@Spacedoge12345plane it would be a borderline case. Point system is there so that builders can get a reward for their own work, not for posting something you are no longer happy with.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
If you want to make a statement, use a forum post, not a build. And make sure it is appropriate to a child-friendly community about planes. I find this post to be too far off-topic to be tolerated. I will not issue you a strike for it, but please, refrain form advertising your views via builds.
@engineerier antennas, custom landing gear and control surfaces, registration, more complex fuselage shape, intake for turbocharger, door outlines and handles, position and landing lights...
Use this. It lets you edit part properties without leaving the editor. calculateDrag is in the first tab for every part. And here's the tutorial for sharp trailing edge. You can use multiple intakes placed that way with different intake angles to get a curve on the trailing edge.
You should, in my opinion, practice techniques for sharp trailing edge. It will give the build a far more realistic look. If you want, I can link you to my simple sharp trailing edge tutorial. I also think that your wings are too thick and that the fuselage is a bit too skinny. However, upvote for the effort and paint scheme. Also, use calculateDrag = False to get realistic drag (should be around 3500 for this plane).
Your post has been removed as spam. Please put some effort into your builds.
Your post has been removed as spam. Please put some effort into your builds.
Not bad. You can use a triangle shaped block like in this demonstration to have wing taper in thickness towards the tip.
If you want pictures to show up in the forum or description, you first need to upload them somewhere else. I used to use Imgur.com for that before it broke. Now I'm using Discord (I simply post a picture in the chat). Once you have uploaded a picture, write "", and the picture will show up. If you are using Imgur, remove "s" from "https" (beginning of the link).
+3Ask whoever is in charge of the school Wi-Fi to remove him from the list maybe? Black lists are generally stored on the server, not on the blacklisted device.
+6@Griffinthedragon yes, you can replace your entry.
@Viper3000ad you can use multiple rotators per control surface.
Oh, and the rudder input is inverted. Not a big deal though, as rudder isn't necessary for flying it.
Excellent build, especially for your level. Very smooth flier, nice details, and good proportion.
+1By the way, to tag a user, put "@" in front of their username. That sends them notification about your comment. You can tag up to three users per comment, the rest won't get a notification.
I'll feature your plane so everybody can see it on the front page :)
Most tanks nowadays use boom25 or boom50 launchers, so you may want to download one of those.
Will it have the ability to turn on the spot now? Previous one only had turning with brakes I think.
+2sees flag of Yugoslavia, hits upvote
+3Still, it's a cute build.
I'm sorry, but your part count is too far below the requested 150 parts. Perhaps try to upgrade your entry with some custom control surfaces?
@Chancey21 my guess is "spefy - smashes head on the keyboard".
+1No problem.
Looks nice. However, that vertical windshield is a huge weak spot. Also, judging by the door, it's the size of a normal APC. Judging by the RCWS, it's the size of a four floor apartment building (if the little thing above the windshield is RCWS).
You can tag people in a comment to send them notification. If the build is a joint project, you should keep your plane a successor to their unlisted version.
+2@haogejiuhaoge1 I can't do a thing. I only moderate the site. You need guys with blue tags. Or post your suggestion to Uservoice. You can find the link to it under "Stuff".
+1@haogejiuhaoge1 there is a mod for that. It's called "Limitless spin". You may want to suggest this to devs though, so iOS people can have it too.
@Simplemike I'm glad to hear that.
Btw, upvote is for the flight model. This is a very stable flyer. Landing gear is a bit basic, but nice. I'm glad you have left control surfaces visible (I hate it when people cover control surfaces), but I think you should try experimenting with custom ones. And what I meant by "better, more realistic proportion" is that the fuselage is too tall. Usually, planes of this category (busyness turboprop) have nearly cylindrical or perfectly cylindrical fuselage.
+1@Simplemike sorry if I've hurt your feelings buddy, that's not what I was going for. I hope that my feedback will help you improve your skill.
+1Except that the part count is too low, it's not a successor, and wouldn't win due to other entries being far more detailed, having custom surfaces, and better, more realistic proportion, @Vidal99977
24/7 server for Multiplayer mod is
157.7.205.136.Tags in the post don't work. Only in comments. And you can only tag three people per comment. Fourth person won't get a notification.
Unless you are a moderator. I can tag as many as I want XD
Maybe tag the winners in a comment so they know they've won?
+1@ShrimpRex you need to add more bits. Honestly, I've seen some entries that haven't yet been submitted, and you don't stand much chance without at least 250 parts. Minimal part count for the build to be rated as an entry is 150.
+1@Speedhunter I've just placed very floaty blocks on a piston, made them tiny by scaling them (don't scale mass, it reduces buoyancy), and placed a VTOL engine (equally tiny) on the floating block so it will always stay above the surface.
+1Just post it already. There's no need to have ten teaser posts for one build.
+1Nice fuselage and cockpit. Wings do seem to have an accurate shape, but are, I believe, a bit too big. Also, needs flaps.
+1@Spacedoge12345plane it would be a borderline case. Point system is there so that builders can get a reward for their own work, not for posting something you are no longer happy with.
@Notaleopard I don't know. If it looks like the plane from the cartoon, then it is.
No, people still can't reupload your work without sufficient changes. Rules are rules.
+3Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
@ThunderNova no problem.
+1IS ENTRY (by ThunderNova)
@ThunderNova oh. I'll comment a link to it on the challenge so I don't miss it while judging :)
+2Aww, not for the GA challenge :(
+1Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
If you want to make a statement, use a forum post, not a build. And make sure it is appropriate to a child-friendly community about planes. I find this post to be too far off-topic to be tolerated. I will not issue you a strike for it, but please, refrain form advertising your views via builds.
Well, you don't get points for a comment upvote, so it's fine.
+58@engineerier antennas, custom landing gear and control surfaces, registration, more complex fuselage shape, intake for turbocharger, door outlines and handles, position and landing lights...
+2I can accept it, but I'd rather have a conventional plane.
+1Looking at the old version of this build, I can see that your kung fu has progressed greatly. Good job.
+4@Vidal99977 it's fine. I'll just skip it when I start judging entries.
+6Use this. It lets you edit part properties without leaving the editor. calculateDrag is in the first tab for every part. And here's the tutorial for sharp trailing edge. You can use multiple intakes placed that way with different intake angles to get a curve on the trailing edge.
+1You should, in my opinion, practice techniques for sharp trailing edge. It will give the build a far more realistic look. If you want, I can link you to my simple sharp trailing edge tutorial. I also think that your wings are too thick and that the fuselage is a bit too skinny. However, upvote for the effort and paint scheme. Also, use calculateDrag = False to get realistic drag (should be around 3500 for this plane).
+1@Vidal99977 dude, that's an airliner. It has 100 seats, as opposed to 11 that the challenge allows.