247k EternalDarkness Comments

  • GA Challenge Results 6.4 years ago

    @Zippy6 sure, I'll spotlight the build once it's posted. Other spotlight went to the entry itself.

  • GA Challenge Results (post 2) 6.4 years ago

    @asteroidbook345 no problem.

  • GA Challenge Results 6.4 years ago

    @Zippy6 you can chose one more of your builds to be spotlighted.

  • GA Challenge Results 6.4 years ago

    @Chancey21 ok.

  • GA Challenge Results 6.4 years ago

    @TheAtomicFox

  • GA Challenge Results 6.4 years ago

    @LordAidanYT @Stoney @Garrett1235

  • GA Challenge Results 6.4 years ago

    @ND40X @Griffinthedragon @bolty

  • GA Challenge Results 6.4 years ago

    @Strikefighter04 @Tw1st3dPs7ch0 @Deboss311

  • GA Challenge Results 6.4 years ago

    @Deboss311 @GhostHTX @asteroidbook345

  • GA Challenge Results 6.4 years ago

    @mikoyanster @ThunderNova @WrightAirCo

    +1
  • GA Challenge Results 6.4 years ago

    @Othawne @Aeromen @jlewisifer

  • GA Challenge Results 6.4 years ago

    @RamboJutter @Kimcotupan15 @jamesPLANESii

    +1
  • GA Challenge Results 6.4 years ago

    @Chancey21 @Zippy6 @BRuthless congrats, you won.

    +2
  • Heli rotor animation messed up? 6.4 years ago

    Read this. Helicopter rotors on SP are way more realistic than you think.

    +1
  • Stealth Frigate teaser kek 6.4 years ago

    More of a corvette, judging by the size of those windows. But a cute corvette.

  • Your opinion on challenges? 6.4 years ago

    Depends on how you do them. I often see spammy challenges for people not experienced enough to judge builds. But there are also good ones. I myself like to host an occasional challenge. My post with highest number of points is my Trainer Challenge, which scored a total of 11924 points (upvotes + successors). It still gets some occasional points, and might be the top scoring post overall on the site (not sure about that).

  • Cessna Citation X 6.4 years ago

    Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
    Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.

  • Ferrari f40 6.4 years ago

    Oh, wait, this is your third bypass of successor system. That's ban material.

  • Ferrari f40 6.4 years ago

    I have, after downloading and comparing both builds, determined that all of the flaws of the Juanfly154’s Ferrari F80 are carried over to this one, everything is done the same way, and you only added the interior and slightly edited the front bumper. These changes would have been more than enough if this build was a successor to the original, but since you are claiming this as your own work and you have bypassed successor system, I have to remove this build and issue you a strike.

  • AS350 Ecureuil 6.4 years ago

    Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
    Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.

  • HEINKEL HE-51B PREVIEW 6.4 years ago

    You need to remove "s" from "https" when using Imgur as a host. Otherwise, only you can see your pictures, and only while you're logged into Imgur. I fixed it for you here.

    +2
  • I have a small request because I am soo nice. 6.4 years ago

    I can't unfeature a build. Also, I feature very rarely. I'll let other moderators decide if they want to feature that build.

    +1
  • Ship hulls 6.4 years ago

    @DankDorito you build a ship first, then worry about buoyancy. Otherwise, you might exceed planned mass, have different CoM location...

    +2
  • Ship hulls 6.4 years ago

    @DankDorito a tiny fuselage block can hold that much if you mod it. I don't think any of my hulls can by default.

  • Ship hulls 6.4 years ago

    @DankDorito dunno. You can always edit buoyancy. These aren't even good hulls anymore though.

  • how to change beaconlights'input 6.4 years ago

    That, unfortunately, isn't possible.

  • Mod Meme 6.4 years ago

    One of our guys thought it would be funny to fill the "feature" line with only MiGs, and just took any good MiGs he could find.

    +1
  • New patch notes, v1.8.305 6.4 years ago

    Finally, an option to stop the rotor shake. This will be very useful in designs using helicopter rotors for things other than helicopters, like ground effect vehicles and hovercraft.

    +2
  • I just discovered something 6.4 years ago

    Coaxial setup also allows speed and maneuverability normal helicopters can't achieve, and is rather docile in retreating blades stall or when a blade tip goes supersonic, as both of these events happen on both sides simultaneously.

    +1
  • GA Challenge results delayed 6.4 years ago

    @jamesPLANESii yes, although I'm close to completing them. I'm writing a short review for every entry that qualified, and I don't always have inspiration for those. I want to give every competitor feedback. Since I've already lost a whole lot of those reviews along with ratings when the site crashed, I'm now less motivated and it's now going a lot slower.

  • 12th Doctors Tardis 6.4 years ago

    No problem. Nearly three times the part count that I could run, but it looks amazing. Maybe add some pictures of it in use to description, as most people can't actually play with it.

    +5
  • FIRST CF GUN EVER :) 6.4 years ago

    @CCCP I don't know. Damage it does is based on collision, so there's a chance it'll go straight through the opponent on MP due to synchronisation not being quite good, I thing.

  • M.Corp Armoured Games 6.4 years ago

    @CCCP I've long since lost files of this mod, so I can't do anything with it.

  • Martin RB-57 Canberra 6.4 years ago

    No problem, @Sgtk .

    +2
  • 'gon' gunship 6.4 years ago

    Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here

  • Why Can't I Spotlight? (Answered) 6.4 years ago

    @Gestour *fewer

    +1
  • Rough Terrain crane 65-40m 6.4 years ago

    @Minecraftpoweer lol

  • Rough Terrain crane 65-40m 6.4 years ago

    @Minecraftpoweer I've seen that one on the teaser I think.

  • Rough Terrain crane 65-40m 6.4 years ago

    @Minecraftpoweer I literally featured your build so I could use it XD
    I mean, build definitely is feature-worthy, but I usually let other mods do the featuring.

  • Rough Terrain crane 65-40m 6.4 years ago

    @Minecraftpoweer no problem. This build got featured because it yote a truck :)

  • Rough Terrain crane 65-40m 6.4 years ago

    @Minecraftpoweer good enough.

  • Rough Terrain crane 65-40m 6.4 years ago

    @Minecraftpoweer you can find easy-to-catch Jundroo trucks on my Armoured Games map. I can't test now, as I'm not on my laptop.

  • Rough Terrain crane 65-40m 6.4 years ago

    How far can it yeet a Jundroo truck?

    +4
  • General Aviation Challenge [CLOSED] 6.4 years ago

    @Chancey21 slowly but surely, yes. I was planning on finishing today, but I was busy. Should be done tomorrow or the day after.

    +1
  • New Steam patch is live, v1.8.304 6.4 years ago

    @MilesTPrower you don't need detacher delay to make a custom cannon. Delay is an option of the bomb/missile itself, and you can fire custom cannons by launching the weapon that is meant to serve as ammunition. Just attach it directly onto the small side of detacher if it's a bomb cannon, or to big side if it's a custom missile.

    +1
  • A miracle. 6.4 years ago

    @DrunkenRaider Tully has purposefully featured all MiGs. I'm not sure why. I don't think it should bother anyone though. "Feature" feature is obsolete since we got spotlights.

  • IPTN N-219 (Launch Colours) 6.4 years ago

    Nice build for your level. It's obvious you know stuff about aircraft. Do you already use Overload mod and Fine Tuner mod? I must recommend investing some effort into custom control surfaces, as I believe they would have made this build a lot better.

    +1
  • Dumb shit 6.4 years ago

    Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here

  • Tracks 6.4 years ago

    @5N1P3R12335 @GeneralPatrick2 your comment has been removed for excessive profanity.

  • Teaser: Brought To You By SP 1.8.1 6.4 years ago

    @AerialFighterSnakes dunno. I have to completely rework performance since update to rotors made it behave differently.