247k EternalDarkness Comments

  • Sparrow air defence system 6.2 years ago

    @Generalkeath that's good, as I'll be rating description too.

  • Rainier Jaeger A-AADS 6.2 years ago

    @JohnnyBoythePilot nope, not too late.

  • Air Defence Challenge [CLOSED] 6.2 years ago

    @JohnnyBoythePilot that's nice. Thanks for the entry.

    +1
  • Air Defence Challenge [CLOSED] 6.2 years ago

    @GeneralOliverVonBismarck and just in time. I was just assembling the list of accepted entries.

  • Air Defence Challenge [CLOSED] 6.2 years ago

    @EliteArsenals24 ok, you can submit until the 2nd. I'm GMT+2.

  • Bofors 40 mm L/90X 6.2 years ago

    @SnoWFLakE0s it's fine. Thanks for the entry.

  • Air Defence Challenge [CLOSED] 6.2 years ago

    @EliteArsenals24 you can submit your entry on the 1st of June.

  • M.Corp Crocodile ARV 6.2 years ago

    @ChiyomiAnzai no. Tracks are often more difficult to make than the entire rest of the build.

  • custom weapons challenge. ENTRIES CLOSED 6.2 years ago

    You may want to specify that you are asking for an aviation weapon. Else you might get a bunch of ship and vehicle turret subassemblies.

    +3
  • M.Corp Spotter 6.2 years ago

    @RASEN1914 I'm glad you like it.

  • Just a regular simpleplanes multiplayer 6.2 years ago

    @Chancey21 I've only picked up one curse, and it's a pretty mild one. From the rules: "We are not going to moderate every curse word, but please try to keep it clean.".

    +1
  • Mitsubishi T-2 6.2 years ago

    @junglekiIIer sometimes, a build that is supposed to be a successor simply isn't a successor. Might be some bug or something. Download the original, strip it to a cockpit, and paste your build from subassemblies. Then try posting again. I'm also not sure if the change is enough for the build not to be considered a copy. Looks like a simpe stripdown of the original.

  • M.Corp Spotter 6.2 years ago

    @Mag101 thank you.

  • M.Corp Spotter 6.2 years ago

    @8bitgamer33 just stop it anywhere, spin it again, and then stop it in its original position. It shouldn't gain much speed for one revolution.

  • M.Corp Spotter 6.2 years ago

    @BogdanX I'm glad you like it. It takes around 100m to stop from 120km/h, which is roughly realistic.

    +1
  • M.Corp Spotter 6.2 years ago

    @ThomasRoderick I've used that trick before. However, it only works up to a certain speed, which is too slow, and suddenly it tries to spin at full speed.

    +1
  • M.Corp Spotter 6.2 years ago

    @StallFlight I did as much as I could. That's why it slowly accelerates to the max speed instead of hitting it in under a second.

  • M.Corp Spotter 6.2 years ago

    @StallFlight there is a rotator under it. However, if the rotator was powered, there would be no way to stop the radar.

  • M.Corp Spotter 6.2 years ago

    @Gameboi14 :)

    +1
  • Elco 80ft PT Boat ''LAGOON'' 6.2 years ago

    First time I'm seeing a deep V to shallow V hull better than on my river class. Good job.

    +2
  • Mitsubishi T-2 6.2 years ago

    Your post has been removed as it bypassed the successor system.

  • FIM-92 Stinger - Air Defence Challenge 6.2 years ago

    Now that was unexpected. Dunno how it will fare against other entries, but 10/10 for creativity.

    +9
  • Air Defence Challenge [CLOSED] 6.2 years ago

    @Generalkeath dunno. It depends on context really. If you're using them to distract from a system that would be difficult to lock on to, sure.

  • Air Defence Challenge [CLOSED] 6.2 years ago

    @SirTimothy1943 @Incertname air defence towers are borderline case. They are usually a building with multiple systems. A well made gun system would probably score better.

  • [PREDATOR] air defence system 6.2 years ago

    @Abhishek700 dunno.

    +1
  • [PREDATOR] air defence system 6.2 years ago

    @Abhishek700 yes, custom missiles would add extra points.

    +1
  • Delta Airlines Delta-Shaped Aircraft 6.2 years ago

    @ktoper74 no problem.

  • Delta Airlines Delta-Shaped Aircraft 6.2 years ago

    You seem to have posted the same build twice. I have removed one example for you.

  • Is this over-kill & too OP? 6.2 years ago

    Well, you usually won't be having two different missiles on one platform. Even platforms compatible with multiple types of missile usually use one at the time. Also, missiles are generally heavy. Land launched missiles based on air-to-air missiles will be air-to-air missile plus a booster. I don't think you can fit them in those boxes off the sides of the truck. Maybe those could fit missiles that are usually paired with MANPADS, but I don't see a point of that.

    +1
  • Koenigsegg regera 6.2 years ago

    Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
    Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.

  • +1 part challange 6.2 years ago

    Your post has been removed as spam. Please do not participate in spamming contests, including "add a part" projects.

  • +1 part challange 6.2 years ago

    Your post has been removed as spam. Please do not participate in spamming contests, including "add a part" projects.

  • +1 part challange 6.2 years ago

    Your post has been removed as spam. Please do not participate in spamming contests, including "add a part" projects.

  • +1 part challange 6.2 years ago

    Your post has been removed as spam. Please do not participate in spamming contests, including "add a part" projects.

  • +1 part challange 6.2 years ago

    Your post has been removed as spam. Please do not participate in spamming contests, including "add a part" projects.

  • +1 part challange 6.2 years ago

    Your post has been removed as spam. Please do not participate in spamming contests, including "add a part" projects.

  • +1 part challange 6.2 years ago

    Your post has been removed as spam. Please do not participate in spamming contests, including "add a part" projects.

  • +1 part challange 6.2 years ago

    Your post has been removed as spam. Please do not participate in spamming contests, including "add a part" projects.

  • +1 part challange 6.2 years ago

    Your post has been removed as spam. Please do not participate in spamming contests, including "add a part" projects.

  • +1 part challange 6.2 years ago

    Your post has been removed as spam. Please do not participate in spamming contests, including "add a part" projects.

  • +1 part challange 6.2 years ago

    Your post has been removed as spam. Please do not participate in spamming contests, including "add a part" projects.

  • +1 part challange 6.2 years ago

    Your post has been removed as spam. Please do not participate in spamming contests, including "add a part" projects.

  • +1 part challange 6.2 years ago

    Your post has been removed as spam. Please do not participate in spamming contests, including "add a part" projects.

  • +1 part challange 6.2 years ago

    Your post has been removed as spam. Please do not participate in spamming contests, including "add a part" projects.

  • +1 part challange 6.2 years ago

    Your post has been removed as spam. Please do not participate in spamming contests, including "add a part" projects.

  • How does one become a moderator (mod)? 6.2 years ago

    @Megamonster you need to tag a user so they get notified about your reply, like I did at the start of this comment. It is not necessary if you are commenting on their post though.
    To become a moderator, you must be knowledgeable about the community, spending a lot of time here. You must also be on good terms with most of the community. Oh, and you must be over 16 years old. If you fulfill those requirements, you stand a chance of being picked for a moderator among over a thousand such users when we need another moderator, which is once in a blue moon. Developers pick a new moderator, often based on recommendations from old moderators.
    Also, don't think that being a moderator is much of a privilege. We do get certain additional options, but we have to use them unbiased and in accordance with guidelines and rules, not for fun. Only real plus side is the red badge.

    +17
  • Avro Type 698 demonstration 6.2 years ago

    Not bad. Does a great job showcasing the build. That landing was awful though. You opened the chute early.

    +4
  • Victory 6.2 years ago

    That cannon looks fat. Other than that, nice ship.

  • Su-25 Frogfoot 6.2 years ago

    The difference seems to be in the weapon layout. You have also added arresting hook and flares. Those changes are too minor for the upload.

  • Regarding reporting users/posts 6.2 years ago

    @GeneralOliverVonBismarck