Reporting a comment of a moderator simply attracts more moderators. Since there is profanity in the name of this build, I must conclude that @Seeras rightfully removed it. You may post this build again under a different, more appropriate name.
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here. Specifically, this rule: "Please, remember that this is a game about airplanes. While we do allow off-topic conversations in the forums, if you talk about religion or politics then there is a good chance that your post will be removed. Especially if we feel that it is likely to stir up debate."
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
More specifically: "Please, remember that this is a game about airplanes. While we do allow off-topic conversations in the forums, if you talk about religion or politics then there is a good chance that your post will be removed. Especially if we feel that it is likely to stir up debate."
I'm focusing on part count reduction, so I have sacrificed detachers and and base rings you have on your launchers, reducing part count by 16. I'm trying to make some highly functional builds that even people on low end devices will be able to use.
I have made a simplified ripoff of this system for my upcoming IFV. Mine doesn't use detachers. You simply launch rockets with very short delay. You'll still get credit for the idea. Also, these are fun to use near bridges and wind turbines.
@Nickr this build would need a significant redesign to comply with my current standards. I'd rather move on to new builds than waste my time on revamping old ones. I think I could get the part count of this one as it is down to around 850 parts with new techniques and pieces, but I won't bother. You can check out my latest ship, a frigate, that has only 670 parts and better quality than this build.
From the rules: "Please, remember that this is a game about airplanes. While we do allow off-topic conversations in the forums, if you talk about religion or politics then there is a good chance that your post will be removed. Especially if we feel that it is likely to stir up debate."
From the rules: "Please, remember that this is a game about airplanes. While we do allow off-topic conversations in the forums, if you talk about religion or politics then there is a good chance that your post will be removed. Especially if we feel that it is likely to stir up debate."
@TheFantasticTyphoon @Roswell @Nickr @Anio I appreciate you guys being on my side, but it is currently unnecessary and puts you in the situation where you are borderline breaking the rules. I wouldn't like to have to strike you for being on my side.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
@Linethesmarty I do not understand your problem. Mods have been a part of the game since the start, if that's what you are having a problem with. If it is my red tag you are having a problem with, I am a moderator of this site, appointed by game developers.
@JH22444 I have built the ship, and then optimised it, spending hours looking what two parts can be replaced with one and what subsystem can be made more efficiently.
For some reason, I cannot download this to do further tests. Would you mind posting it again unlisted? You can post unlisted build by selecting "unlisted" option in the upload menu.
@lxc010826 it has many of the same mistakes that would have been done differently if you were building the helicopter yourself. Taking parts is fine, but your post needs to be a successor to the original. As I've said, you can post this build again, but as a successor to the original. I will help you with that. I usually wouldn't, but I think improvements you have made on this build are very nice.
Don't forget to tag me in your reply. To do that, hit "Reply" button on my comment or put "@" in front of my username (example: @lxc010826). Otherwise I won't be notified of your comment.
Your post has been removed for bypassing the successor system. I believe that this is the original build that you heavily modified. Please post this build again as a successor to the original. If you want, I will give you instructions on how to do that.
Since you are a new player and probably unfamiliar with the rules, I won't issue you a strike this time, even though bypassing of successor system is a serious offense.
@LlamaIndustries if you want to make the mod part dissappear, download the build into the editor, after the "mod part" message click undo and redo. There are far better helicopters on the site though, dunno why you'd want this one.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
Your post has been removed. While it's fine to tweak existing designs, you must put some of you own effort and imagination into them before posting them. I appreciate the credit given, but simply mirroring an existing build is not acceptable for upload.
Please keep celebration posts and off-topic posts in the forums. From the rules: "No sympathy posts or memorial posts. Move those discussions to the forums." and "We allow a wide variety of uploads that are not actually airplanes. However, we do reserve the right to remove posts if they are too far off-topic.".
@AWESOMENESS360 this is a different design, and it is even more part efficient than Bogdan's. We have used pretty much the same technique to get them to work, so we decided to post them on the same day.
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
@MAHADI someone reported a comment containing excessive profanity. I had to remove it and notify the guy who posted it.
@AudioDud3 your comment has been removed for excessive profanity.
@AudioDud3 your comment has been removed for excessive profanity.
Reporting a comment of a moderator simply attracts more moderators. Since there is profanity in the name of this build, I must conclude that @Seeras rightfully removed it. You may post this build again under a different, more appropriate name.
You seem to have accidentally posted this twice. I have removed the one with no upvotes for you.
+1Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here. Specifically, this rule: "Please, remember that this is a game about airplanes. While we do allow off-topic conversations in the forums, if you talk about religion or politics then there is a good chance that your post will be removed. Especially if we feel that it is likely to stir up debate."
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
More specifically: "Please, remember that this is a game about airplanes. While we do allow off-topic conversations in the forums, if you talk about religion or politics then there is a good chance that your post will be removed. Especially if we feel that it is likely to stir up debate."
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
I'm focusing on part count reduction, so I have sacrificed detachers and and base rings you have on your launchers, reducing part count by 16. I'm trying to make some highly functional builds that even people on low end devices will be able to use.
+2I have made a simplified ripoff of this system for my upcoming IFV. Mine doesn't use detachers. You simply launch rockets with very short delay. You'll still get credit for the idea. Also, these are fun to use near bridges and wind turbines.
+2@Nickr this build would need a significant redesign to comply with my current standards. I'd rather move on to new builds than waste my time on revamping old ones. I think I could get the part count of this one as it is down to around 850 parts with new techniques and pieces, but I won't bother. You can check out my latest ship, a frigate, that has only 670 parts and better quality than this build.
From the rules: "Please, remember that this is a game about airplanes. While we do allow off-topic conversations in the forums, if you talk about religion or politics then there is a good chance that your post will be removed. Especially if we feel that it is likely to stir up debate."
From the rules: "Please, remember that this is a game about airplanes. While we do allow off-topic conversations in the forums, if you talk about religion or politics then there is a good chance that your post will be removed. Especially if we feel that it is likely to stir up debate."
Grips banhammer more tightly
+3Resurrects removed builds to form a defensive line
@TheFantasticTyphoon @Roswell @Nickr @Anio I appreciate you guys being on my side, but it is currently unnecessary and puts you in the situation where you are borderline breaking the rules. I wouldn't like to have to strike you for being on my side.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
Your post has been removed as spam.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
@GeneralOliverVonBismarck by accident. It's not done yet.
This plane skipped the leg day.
+4@420931117 read the description please. All controls are listed there.
Congratulations, @WNP78.
+5@Linethesmarty I do not understand your problem. Mods have been a part of the game since the start, if that's what you are having a problem with. If it is my red tag you are having a problem with, I am a moderator of this site, appointed by game developers.
+9@Linethesmarty eh?
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
Don't call out users oin the forums. If you think someone is intentionally causing drama, tag a moderator and explain the problem.
@Megamonster my post classifying "add a part" posts was about no-effort ones. Here, the task requires you to actually invest some effort.
Rules are the rules. I didn't write them, I just apply them. They aren't even difficult to follow.
@JH22444 I have built the ship, and then optimised it, spending hours looking what two parts can be replaced with one and what subsystem can be made more efficiently.
For some reason, I cannot download this to do further tests. Would you mind posting it again unlisted? You can post unlisted build by selecting "unlisted" option in the upload menu.
@lxc010826 it has many of the same mistakes that would have been done differently if you were building the helicopter yourself. Taking parts is fine, but your post needs to be a successor to the original. As I've said, you can post this build again, but as a successor to the original. I will help you with that. I usually wouldn't, but I think improvements you have made on this build are very nice.
Don't forget to tag me in your reply. To do that, hit "Reply" button on my comment or put "@" in front of my username (example: @lxc010826). Otherwise I won't be notified of your comment.
Your post has been removed for bypassing the successor system. I believe that this is the original build that you heavily modified. Please post this build again as a successor to the original. If you want, I will give you instructions on how to do that.
Since you are a new player and probably unfamiliar with the rules, I won't issue you a strike this time, even though bypassing of successor system is a serious offense.
@JH22444 mediocre phones can usually run up to some 800 parts. It's not potato friendly.
@LlamaIndustries if you want to make the mod part dissappear, download the build into the editor, after the "mod part" message click undo and redo. There are far better helicopters on the site though, dunno why you'd want this one.
It's pretty. I forgot you were making one.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
Your post has been removed as it is against the site rules. You have been issued a strike.
Your post has been removed. While it's fine to tweak existing designs, you must put some of you own effort and imagination into them before posting them. I appreciate the credit given, but simply mirroring an existing build is not acceptable for upload.
Now the link is clickable.
+6@edensk @IStoleYourMeme @D0M1N420R @SodiumChloride @X4JB why is my comment section spammed with my publically accessible tutorial?
That's huge, Đorđe.
+2@BogdanX it was your idea to post at the same time. I decided to accept it.
@BlazeInfinity alternative was winter camo.
Please keep celebration posts and off-topic posts in the forums. From the rules: "No sympathy posts or memorial posts. Move those discussions to the forums." and "We allow a wide variety of uploads that are not actually airplanes. However, we do reserve the right to remove posts if they are too far off-topic.".
@AWESOMENESS360 this is a different design, and it is even more part efficient than Bogdan's. We have used pretty much the same technique to get them to work, so we decided to post them on the same day.