You're insane mate.
Amazing build. It was a pleasure watching it progress, and the end result is something I would really enjoy if my PC were ten times more powerful.
@Planemaker1012 I'm glad you like it. Half of the building process here was shaving off excess parts and tweaking functionality. I too was playing on a second-hand laptop at the time, and the goal is to make it not lag even on my device.
@BeastHunter that's strictly a US problem. I come from a nation that has been enslaved throughout most of the history, and that doesn't even have black people. Hence, I am completely insensitive to that word, and it doesn't impact my belief in freedom of speech one bit. Quite the opposite, in fact. If we ban words that offend some people, more people will find new words that offend them. We might as well, at that point, make a list of words approved by the government and not use any others.
In the culture I come from, nobody is offended by pejoratives. They are just names for certain groups of people.
@GermanPaperProjects I am not a racist. I believe all people are born equal, and race or genetics do not, on their own, dictate person's character or lifestyle.
I believe in unlimited freedom of speech, and in simple language that uses the simplest possible label for everything, regardless of how self-entitled people feel about it.
@asteroidbook345 thank you for clarifying all that. I was almost afraid I was up against a rational person here. So:
Lacking moral high ground means you are morally wrong. You admitted to not having it.
You have failed to discuss facts, thus making it apparent that you are also factually wrong.
You keep insisting on insulting me, proving the poor quality of your character, and making your entire statement pointless by virtue of being a lesser man.
@asteroidbook345 unfortunately, you have just lost your moral high ground by attacking my ideology without reasonable arguments, and by insulting me.
I must advise practicing your manners, as well as expanding your vocabulary, and learning how to converse.
It looks really nice, but it flies like a brick.
I think you should increase the size of ailerons, increase the size of actual elevator wings by a lot, and balance it better. It rolls heavily to the left.
She's too fast and a bit prone to drifting, but building style is great, especially for the part count. Very efficient as well. Weapon systems work perfectly. All in all, a very good build, I love it.
Having test-flown this plane, I have a few more suggestions. You should enable trim on elevators, and flaps are set so that one goes up and the other down when VTOL slider is moved. Other than that, very pleasant build to fly.
You should try to get elevator hinge line straight. You can achieve that with Overload. Other than that, exceptionally good looking build for a new guy, very promising.
Custom wings are very rare on first builds.
I advise using tags to make your build easier to find by others in the future.
Welcome to the community.
The build is very nice. I like it.
I'd just like to offer a small correction to the description: Tu-128 was an interceptor, not a fighter. The role of an interceptor is as far removed from the role of a fighter as is a bomber or an attacker. It's not a plane built for air superiority, but solely for taking out incoming bombers and reconnaissance aircraft.
@Terminator2809 since you have failed to read it, I'll paste it here for you:
"You have been permanently banned from PortSP for persistent immature and disruptive behavior, having been warned far too many times.
Sad to see you go, it's not us, it's you.
kind wishes
EternalDarkness"
Having pretty much mastered fuselages by now, I think you should also try custom wings. This technique offers decent, easy to make custom wings with low part count.
As always, nice build.
@CookieCrumzReturns new mods are pretty good too. Old community members, all of them.
I'm still here too, just not moderating. I'm also still making builds, though I rarely actually post them.
@Fish83828 nope. I've had it with all the drama. Somebody else can lost their faith in humanity every day while looking at all the NSFW builds and idiotic arguments that have been reported XD
You should have given the engine less torque in my opinion. Taking off is really difficult. Wheels could have been scaled by width to reduce the attachment point size. Other than that, it's a very nice build.
@CanadianAircraftBuilder it was that really well built twin by a bronze user. You gave it quite a praise. It was a copy that intentionally bypassed successor system.
@Imvictor you should never claim other people's builds as your own. The build you stole is a very popular build of my friend.
Stealing builds is against the rules.
Nice upgrade to the landing gear.
I advise against covering wings with fuselage blocks like that. Control surfaces clipping through is considered more of a noob move than naked wings. You can experiment with one of many custom wing techniques that actually give good looking wings. here's mine.
Custom wings still need wing parts inside them. Control surfaces on them are usually done with hinges moving a sculpted fuselage piece with a small wing hidden inside it, or by having custom surfaces empty and using stock control surfaces.
If you go with stock control surfaces on hidden wings, scale the wing thinner so control surfaces move less and don't clip out of the custom wing body.
You really ought to experiment with traction settings of single wheels. You're making some really nice builds, and these twin wheels are just taking away from them.
A pair of these flew over my house yesterday. They flew soo low my windows are till rattling!
It's a beautiful aircraft, and you have made a very good model of it. Good job.
You can edit description by pressing the little triangle next to the number of downloads, and then "edit". I'm not requesting that you do, as I find the comment and auto credit above description to be more than enough. Just for future use, when you find yourself in the need to correct a typo or something.
@JuliusCeasor98 it's all right. The site has a system for finding original builds, and links them automatically. Still, thanks. I'm glad you like this build.
@WarringMunky I'm not a Catholic priest.
+3@Kerbango it's very nice.
You could do LZ-120 for my challenge.
I didn't think I'd ever see a Kraguj properly done on SP. Good job.
+1@MrShenanigansSP I will probably accommodate a few late entries.
+1@UnmanagedReservoir you can't limit art, eh?
+1@UnmanagedReservoir you can't limit art, eh?
You're insane mate.
+4Amazing build. It was a pleasure watching it progress, and the end result is something I would really enjoy if my PC were ten times more powerful.
@Planemaker1012 I'm glad you like it. Half of the building process here was shaving off excess parts and tweaking functionality. I too was playing on a second-hand laptop at the time, and the goal is to make it not lag even on my device.
+1@BeastHunter that's strictly a US problem. I come from a nation that has been enslaved throughout most of the history, and that doesn't even have black people. Hence, I am completely insensitive to that word, and it doesn't impact my belief in freedom of speech one bit. Quite the opposite, in fact. If we ban words that offend some people, more people will find new words that offend them. We might as well, at that point, make a list of words approved by the government and not use any others.
In the culture I come from, nobody is offended by pejoratives. They are just names for certain groups of people.
@GermanPaperProjects @Graingy for clarification of my attitude, refer to the comment below.
@GermanPaperProjects I am not a racist. I believe all people are born equal, and race or genetics do not, on their own, dictate person's character or lifestyle.
+4I believe in unlimited freedom of speech, and in simple language that uses the simplest possible label for everything, regardless of how self-entitled people feel about it.
@Graingy no worries.
@asteroidbook345 thank you for clarifying all that. I was almost afraid I was up against a rational person here. So:
+1Lacking moral high ground means you are morally wrong. You admitted to not having it.
You have failed to discuss facts, thus making it apparent that you are also factually wrong.
You keep insisting on insulting me, proving the poor quality of your character, and making your entire statement pointless by virtue of being a lesser man.
@asteroidbook345 unfortunately, you have just lost your moral high ground by attacking my ideology without reasonable arguments, and by insulting me.
+1I must advise practicing your manners, as well as expanding your vocabulary, and learning how to converse.
It looks really nice, but it flies like a brick.
+5I think you should increase the size of ailerons, increase the size of actual elevator wings by a lot, and balance it better. It rolls heavily to the left.
She's too fast and a bit prone to drifting, but building style is great, especially for the part count. Very efficient as well. Weapon systems work perfectly. All in all, a very good build, I love it.
+5This is a very impressive trawler. I don't think I've seen actual funcfioning trawling features before in the game.
@Garuda dobrodošao na SimplePlanes. Ovo je jednostavan, brzinski projekat, ali mi je drago da ti se sviđa.
+1@Dathcha ah, the good old times XD
Having test-flown this plane, I have a few more suggestions. You should enable trim on elevators, and flaps are set so that one goes up and the other down when VTOL slider is moved. Other than that, very pleasant build to fly.
You should try to get elevator hinge line straight. You can achieve that with Overload. Other than that, exceptionally good looking build for a new guy, very promising.
Custom wings are very rare on first builds.
I advise using tags to make your build easier to find by others in the future.
Welcome to the community.
The build is very nice. I like it.
I'd just like to offer a small correction to the description: Tu-128 was an interceptor, not a fighter. The role of an interceptor is as far removed from the role of a fighter as is a bomber or an attacker. It's not a plane built for air superiority, but solely for taking out incoming bombers and reconnaissance aircraft.
Are those custom wings that I see? (:
+1@Terminator2809 since you have failed to read it, I'll paste it here for you:
+1"You have been permanently banned from PortSP for persistent immature and disruptive behavior, having been warned far too many times.
Sad to see you go, it's not us, it's you.
kind wishes
EternalDarkness"
@Terminator2809 You had a message accompanying the ban.
+1It took you a while to reply XD
I'm always happy to help promising shipbuilders.
I now run a Discord server for shipbuilding on SimplePlanes. Drop by if you're not already in it.
The heart of the greatest plane ever made!
+2Having pretty much mastered fuselages by now, I think you should also try custom wings. This technique offers decent, easy to make custom wings with low part count.
+1As always, nice build.
@CookieCrumzReturns new mods are pretty good too. Old community members, all of them.
I'm still here too, just not moderating. I'm also still making builds, though I rarely actually post them.
@Fish83828 lol
@Fish83828 nope. I've had it with all the drama. Somebody else can lost their faith in humanity every day while looking at all the NSFW builds and idiotic arguments that have been reported XD
+3@Fish83828 I'm glad you like it.
@RedAndGreenAmongus a lot of effort went into reducing the part count. I'm glad it was worth it.
@MAPA you're welcome buddy.
+2You should have given the engine less torque in my opinion. Taking off is really difficult. Wheels could have been scaled by width to reduce the attachment point size. Other than that, it's a very nice build.
+1@CanadianAircraftBuilder original was by my buddy Authros, I watched it being made, so easily recognized it.
@CanadianAircraftBuilder it was that really well built twin by a bronze user. You gave it quite a praise. It was a copy that intentionally bypassed successor system.
@Imvictor you should never claim other people's builds as your own. The build you stole is a very popular build of my friend.
Stealing builds is against the rules.
@CanadianAircraftBuilder @MAPA link to the original build. This is a copy.
Nice upgrade to the landing gear.
+2I advise against covering wings with fuselage blocks like that. Control surfaces clipping through is considered more of a noob move than naked wings. You can experiment with one of many custom wing techniques that actually give good looking wings. here's mine.
Custom wings still need wing parts inside them. Control surfaces on them are usually done with hinges moving a sculpted fuselage piece with a small wing hidden inside it, or by having custom surfaces empty and using stock control surfaces.
If you go with stock control surfaces on hidden wings, scale the wing thinner so control surfaces move less and don't clip out of the custom wing body.
@MAPA you're welcome buddy. It's a duty of us veterans to help the new guys get better and get noticed.
+1It's so boxy, Short Sherpa fell in love with it.
+1I like it though.
You really ought to experiment with traction settings of single wheels. You're making some really nice builds, and these twin wheels are just taking away from them.
+2Flight model is quite good. I like it. Very nice simple build.
+2You could/should have used single wheels for landing gear, but that's a minor detail.
A pair of these flew over my house yesterday. They flew soo low my windows are till rattling!
+7It's a beautiful aircraft, and you have made a very good model of it. Good job.
You can edit description by pressing the little triangle next to the number of downloads, and then "edit". I'm not requesting that you do, as I find the comment and auto credit above description to be more than enough. Just for future use, when you find yourself in the need to correct a typo or something.
+1@JuliusCeasor98 it's all right. The site has a system for finding original builds, and links them automatically. Still, thanks. I'm glad you like this build.
Hey look! A Wolfy build! Looks great mate, I just love the wood in the cockpit.
+2@IICXLVIICDLXXXIIIDCXLVII you have a point there.
+1