@mightyscab I have delayed the judging to 10th of May, since I'm too busy these days. Still, competition is fierce, and to be honest, your chances are very slim.
@Stampede if it is so, than you should devote as much attention to the outline as possible. You did a nice work on that with those ww2 bombers, but it could be even better. Just keep working, and you'll be fine.
@Stampede what are the specs of your device? I usually build until I get too much lag to continue, ot until I can't add anything. Just from the pictures, I see it could be much better. Drivers escape hatch on the roof, interior, antenna, front grill, less gloss on the tires, etc. Also, you could have used more parts to get a better, more accurate shape.
@Stampede buddy, you have to details. That sells. I won't spotlight you just because you want me to. You do have some cute builds, but they could be a lot better. Try spending a few days on a single build. Don't load anything else in the editor. Stare at the build for an hour if necessary until you discover what to add. Add a detail, and then stare some more. Add small details. Pito-tubes, canopy frames, landing lights, leading edge slats etc. My builds aren't popular because I'm lucky, or because I'm making friends, but because I invest a lot of effort into each build. I trim its look, its functionality, delete five hours of progress just because I can't fit a small detail, and do it all over again. I have subassamblies that have more parts than most of your builds m8. You are good at making basic shapes. Now learn details.
@PyrusEnderhunter that's more than 90% of the submarine. If I go that far, I'll just add a few details and upload it myself. The problem is, with my method, that hull would take more hours than I care to spend on it.
@Stampede it's just a lot of trial an error, and experience. I learned by downloading other people's builds and copying their technique to learn how to do stuff. I could explain how to do one or two things, but to tell you all would be too much writing.
It looks great. However, it doesn't fly well. CoM and CoL should be further apart, and roll shouldn't be that sharp. Fix the nose drop by adding more lift.
Hey, that's my hull. It would be a nice thing to edit the description. I won't push to remove the post and reupload it as a successor, as I like what you did on this hull, but please edit the description to say something along the lines of "hull by EternalDarkness".
@ZephyrSystems
@Tully2001
@LatteCoffee55
@Waemoth
@RailfanEthan
@Ian1231100
@ShiptyCo
@Zandgard
@BroAeronautics
Well made ship. Pretty functional. Only thing I dislike is the main turret, as it is too short for its size, and the gun itself is too big.
@mightyscab I have delayed the judging to 10th of May, since I'm too busy these days. Still, competition is fierce, and to be honest, your chances are very slim.
I like the way it looks on the pictures. I'll wait till I get to my PC to test it.
@Mymessage I'll go through the comments when I start judging, but I can't guarantee I won't miss it.
@ElysiumDarkness how many parts can you run? I might be able to keep the next upload mobile-friendly.
@Stampede ugh, too much work. If I start, I won't be able to stop until it's just perfect, and that's hours of work.
@Stampede if it is so, than you should devote as much attention to the outline as possible. You did a nice work on that with those ww2 bombers, but it could be even better. Just keep working, and you'll be fine.
@Stampede what are the specs of your device? I usually build until I get too much lag to continue, ot until I can't add anything. Just from the pictures, I see it could be much better. Drivers escape hatch on the roof, interior, antenna, front grill, less gloss on the tires, etc. Also, you could have used more parts to get a better, more accurate shape.
@Stampede buddy, you have to details. That sells. I won't spotlight you just because you want me to. You do have some cute builds, but they could be a lot better. Try spending a few days on a single build. Don't load anything else in the editor. Stare at the build for an hour if necessary until you discover what to add. Add a detail, and then stare some more. Add small details. Pito-tubes, canopy frames, landing lights, leading edge slats etc. My builds aren't popular because I'm lucky, or because I'm making friends, but because I invest a lot of effort into each build. I trim its look, its functionality, delete five hours of progress just because I can't fit a small detail, and do it all over again. I have subassamblies that have more parts than most of your builds m8. You are good at making basic shapes. Now learn details.
@PyrusEnderhunter I don't know. So far, I have three failed attempts at making a submarine. Maybe try to steal a few tricks from here.
@Stampede you mean upvotes? Or advices?
@PyrusEnderhunter that's more than 90% of the submarine. If I go that far, I'll just add a few details and upload it myself. The problem is, with my method, that hull would take more hours than I care to spend on it.
@Stampede it's just a lot of trial an error, and experience. I learned by downloading other people's builds and copying their technique to learn how to do stuff. I could explain how to do one or two things, but to tell you all would be too much writing.
@PyrusEnderhunter I have no experience on those.
@mikoyanster I'll see what I can do. 50s planes aren't really my thing, but I'll try to make something.
@mikoyanster you tagged me. Is that an invite to participate?
@PyrusEnderhunter what project?
Interesting. A bit overarmed, but interesting. The letter "Š" makes me ask, where are you from?
It looks great. However, it doesn't fly well. CoM and CoL should be further apart, and roll shouldn't be that sharp. Fix the nose drop by adding more lift.
@ChaMikey no problem
Make something to carry that CIWS. A missile corvette would suffice.
Very nice. I love the way it looks. If it flies as well as it looks, it'll score high.
@Testin123 no. I have to extend the deadline, as I'm too busy to judge these days
@sexylips35 they'll need to update mope.io just so you can keep making stuff from it.
Nice missile. Thanks for the entry
Thanks for the entry, buddy
Very nice m8
Thanks for the entry :)
Hmm, the first gun on the challenge. I like it
@Kevinairlines @Cedy117 thanks guys
Yay, another entry! Judging this will be a pleasure.
First attempt: I was closing a final few feet to the tanker, when AI-controlled fighter rammed the tanker... It was fun.
iFalco v2 getting deleted? Nooooooooo
@Toobs thank you. I'm glad you like it.
@Supercraft888 great
@BogdanX thanks you very much. I see you enjoyed making that review :)
@mikoyanster @MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation thanks
@Treadmill103 thanks. Try it out off road.
@JayAr no problem buddy
@JayAr no problem. You have potential in shipbuilding.
Hey, that's my hull. It would be a nice thing to edit the description. I won't push to remove the post and reupload it as a successor, as I like what you did on this hull, but please edit the description to say something along the lines of "hull by EternalDarkness".
Nice work. Thanks for the entry
@AudioDud3 no problem
Thanks for the entry m8
Nice work. You could have used the remaining 15 parts for a few details tho
@zealt judging is on May the 5th. Take your time and do it right.
@ChasingHorizon m8, you are short on quality aircraft builds and land based vehicles. Thus, I can into invasion, and you can't XP