Profile image

M.Corp Bull APC AT

242k EternalDarkness  6.9 years ago

A new generation of APC, designed to quickly transport troops over any kind of terrain. This example is equipped with four ATGMs and a 20mm cannon. The turret can be swapped for 3x 20mm or 1x 37mm gun turret, 6x SAM/MANPADS, 76mm FSS (Fire Support System), or 30mm grenade launcher + 12.7 machine gun. Vehicle is available in APC, Fire Support, Anti-aircraft gun or missile defence, Medivac, Anti-tank, or Command version. The vehicle is amphibious and mine protected.

Spotlights

General Characteristics

  • Successors 2 airplane(s)
  • Created On Windows
  • Wingspan 10.4ft (3.2m)
  • Length 26.3ft (8.0m)
  • Height 10.0ft (3.0m)
  • Empty Weight 26,290lbs (11,925kg)
  • Loaded Weight 28,119lbs (12,754kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 1.278
  • Wing Loading 1,038.4lbs/ft2 (5,070.2kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 27.1ft2 (2.5m2)
  • Drag Points 6650

Parts

  • Number of Parts 412
  • Control Surfaces 0
  • Performance Cost 1,850
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image

    @thefalkenreich sure.

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    hey could I use this for a RP?

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    472 KASA

    Sam version please

    6.4 years ago
  • Profile image

    bombing around maywar with this thing was a blast, keep up the good work

    6.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    106k SimpleFlow

    Succ it, im higher

    6.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    12.8k Stampede

    Alright but thanks anyway, but maybe in your freetime @EternalDarkness

    +1 6.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Stampede ugh, too much work. If I start, I won't be able to stop until it's just perfect, and that's hours of work.

    6.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    12.8k Stampede

    Ok, thank you for every. But for real, could you real quick spice up my MAZ? @EternalDarkness

    6.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Stampede if it is so, than you should devote as much attention to the outline as possible. You did a nice work on that with those ww2 bombers, but it could be even better. Just keep working, and you'll be fine.

    6.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    12.8k Stampede

    I don't want you to underestimate me, it's just my pc is like "NO DETAILS FOR U" @EternalDarkness

    6.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    12.8k Stampede

    It would be of so much kindness If you could, it's just my pic is like 5 years old so yeah@EternalDarkness

    6.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    12.8k Stampede

    My pic lags so much I couldn't add those. Could you so I can reuplosd? @EternalDarkness

    6.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Stampede what are the specs of your device? I usually build until I get too much lag to continue, ot until I can't add anything. Just from the pictures, I see it could be much better. Drivers escape hatch on the roof, interior, antenna, front grill, less gloss on the tires, etc. Also, you could have used more parts to get a better, more accurate shape.

    6.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    12.8k Stampede

    I'm not positive, but I just made a new post I hope is acceptable @EternalDarkness

    6.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    12.8k Stampede

    Ok thank you I will work on that @EternalDarkness

    6.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Stampede buddy, you have to details. That sells. I won't spotlight you just because you want me to. You do have some cute builds, but they could be a lot better. Try spending a few days on a single build. Don't load anything else in the editor. Stare at the build for an hour if necessary until you discover what to add. Add a detail, and then stare some more. Add small details. Pito-tubes, canopy frames, landing lights, leading edge slats etc. My builds aren't popular because I'm lucky, or because I'm making friends, but because I invest a lot of effort into each build. I trim its look, its functionality, delete five hours of progress just because I can't fit a small detail, and do it all over again. I have subassamblies that have more parts than most of your builds m8. You are good at making basic shapes. Now learn details.

    6.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @EternalDarkness ok. thanks anyways

    6.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    12.8k Stampede

    I guess but I really need some spotlights to spread word because so few people are interested in me now @EternalDarkness

    6.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @PyrusEnderhunter I don't know. So far, I have three failed attempts at making a submarine. Maybe try to steal a few tricks from here.

    6.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @EternalDarkness so what do u suggest I do?

    6.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Stampede you mean upvotes? Or advices?

    6.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @PyrusEnderhunter that's more than 90% of the submarine. If I go that far, I'll just add a few details and upload it myself. The problem is, with my method, that hull would take more hours than I care to spend on it.

    6.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    12.8k Stampede

    Ok then, also if you can, could I have some support from you? Everything will help on my way to platinum! @EternalDarkness

    6.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Stampede it's just a lot of trial an error, and experience. I learned by downloading other people's builds and copying their technique to learn how to do stuff. I could explain how to do one or two things, but to tell you all would be too much writing.

    6.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    something that looks like the hull of a submarine (Grab fuselage blocks and nose cones, make it into a capsule-like shape, then XML)

    6.9 years ago
  • Log in to see more comments