@CRJ900Pilot @Mymessage what do you find wrong in this post? No nudity, no profanity, it's definitely not spam... SimplePlanes Masters group agrees with @TheLatentImage and @AndrewGarrison completely here. And with temporary ban being used more freely. This is an amazing build made by a skillful builder. If you don't like it, upvote something else. We don't need toxicity in this community.
@Minecraftpoweer it also has two engines, so one set of wheels on each side is for turning, and one for going. Inner wheels are set to an engine set to yaw.
@ChiChiWerx I'm aware I can't expect aame handling from all trIners. Most of them are capable of aerobatics, some are supersonic. ..thanks for the input.
@Jacobdaniel mod parts are not allowed. Maximum speed is one that is realistic for the type. It's not the same for De Havilland Tiger Moth and for Yak-130.
What I forgot to notice is that it doesn't meet 150 parts requirement. Can you make another version? What you have is a nice base, but you could add a lot more details, like fuselage covers for leading edges, some antennas, smoother shape (especially around exhausts)...
@ThePrototype yes, challenges like this one bring a lot of points. And take time and nerves. I have to write the post, answer questions from people that didn't read the post, rate every build I get, and finally present results.
@Ku I'd rather you skillfully make thos blocks into a good-looking plane. There are many things you can do with those parts. Custom contrul surfaces, antennas, custom canopy...
Not bad. But I like it more when people make more slender wings, and when I can see control surfaces. Design is interesting, having such short wings. Not that it's a bad thing. It gives it kinda futuristic feel.
@scotttheaviator1031 you need to put mods into your "Mods" folder. To find it, go to C:\Users[Your User Name]\AppData\LocalLow\Jundroo\SimplePlanes\Mods. You'll need to enable "view hidden files" to find it. Fine Tuner, Overload, and Color Editor (three crucial tool mods) won't lag.
Reviews haven't updated in years. But yeah, graphic design is still a big, big problem. Jundroo could at least use some decent textures. Ever taken a look at grass texture on Krakabloa?
@jamesPLANESii can't wait to see it. Of course, that doesn't mean you should rush it. If it's your usual quality, it will have a good chance of winning "Vintage" category.
@jamesPLANESii Cessna 150 isn't a trainer. It's a light civilian aircraft. As for gliders, I'd prefer actual powered aircraft. Any plane with twin controls can be considered a training aircraft. But don't want a Boeing 747. I want a plane you get when you google "Trainer aircraft".
@CRJ900Pilot @Mymessage what do you find wrong in this post? No nudity, no profanity, it's definitely not spam... SimplePlanes Masters group agrees with @TheLatentImage and @AndrewGarrison completely here. And with temporary ban being used more freely. This is an amazing build made by a skillful builder. If you don't like it, upvote something else. We don't need toxicity in this community.
+5@Stingray no problem
@Minecraftpoweer it also has two engines, so one set of wheels on each side is for turning, and one for going. Inner wheels are set to an engine set to yaw.
@Minecraftpoweer of course. You can tag me too, so I don't miss it.
Thanks for the entry
+1@freedompilot98 it happens. Are you gonna reupload?
Thanks for the entry
@ChiChiWerx I'm aware I can't expect aame handling from all trIners. Most of them are capable of aerobatics, some are supersonic. ..thanks for the input.
@Panzer828 for the start, change your color palette.
@Jacobdaniel mod parts are not allowed. Maximum speed is one that is realistic for the type. It's not the same for De Havilland Tiger Moth and for Yak-130.
Build it
+1It's ok
What I forgot to notice is that it doesn't meet 150 parts requirement. Can you make another version? What you have is a nice base, but you could add a lot more details, like fuselage covers for leading edges, some antennas, smoother shape (especially around exhausts)...
@lllKenlll ah, so that's the trick. I always scale exhaust and leave engine small.
@lllKenlll no problem. I love the rudders. And the exhaust. Whenever I scale exhaust, it glitches out.
Great build. I really enjoyed flying it.
Thanks for the entry. Just please use tags (under the picture).
@ThePrototype yes, challenges like this one bring a lot of points. And take time and nerves. I have to write the post, answer questions from people that didn't read the post, rate every build I get, and finally present results.
@Aeroman77 I've seen planes that can't make it off the ground. The rule means such planes will be disqualified without consideration.
@Panzer828 yes, fictional planes are fine. But I'd stick wit a more lightweight training design rather that full size attacker.
Much better
Maybe MiG 29?
@Ku I'd rather you skillfully make thos blocks into a good-looking plane. There are many things you can do with those parts. Custom contrul surfaces, antennas, custom canopy...
+1This is one of my favorite planes here. I upvoted it back when it was new, but we didn't have a spotlight then.
Thanks for the entry. Don't forget description. I'm rating that too (and am probably the first one to do that)
@Davisplanez yeah, that's a bonus.
Not bad. But I like it more when people make more slender wings, and when I can see control surfaces. Design is interesting, having such short wings. Not that it's a bad thing. It gives it kinda futuristic feel.
@Davisplanez of course, you can. But it wouldn't be pretty enough for my taste.
@Davisplanez trainers are my favorite kind of aircraft. I guess that's why they always turn out so well :)
@Davisplanez many of my builds are. Just not ships. You can't make a full-size ship with few enough parts to be considered mobile-friendly.
Great build man. Keep up the good work
+1Unfortunately, this entry doesn't meet part count requirement, having less than 150 parts.
@Ku oh, I forgot to look at that. Nope, you need 80 more parts. Can you do that?
Thanks for the entry
@Diver I see. I got a notification.
Thanks for the entry
@ShockRF no problem
@ShockRF [you put text you want to see like this], and add a (link you want to see like this), with nothing in between (
[text](link))@ShockRF it's this one
Maybe try adding more details instead? Your latest builds look a bit empty.
@Ian1231100 yes. Make it military-themed.
@scotttheaviator1031 no problem
@scotttheaviator1031 you need to put mods into your "Mods" folder. To find it, go to C:\Users[Your User Name]\AppData\LocalLow\Jundroo\SimplePlanes\Mods. You'll need to enable "view hidden files" to find it. Fine Tuner, Overload, and Color Editor (three crucial tool mods) won't lag.
@ThePilotDude nope. Focus is on military trainers, with some civilian, like motor gliders. RCs would be a bit too far off the subject.
Reviews haven't updated in years. But yeah, graphic design is still a big, big problem. Jundroo could at least use some decent textures. Ever taken a look at grass texture on Krakabloa?
@jamesPLANESii can't wait to see it. Of course, that doesn't mean you should rush it. If it's your usual quality, it will have a good chance of winning "Vintage" category.
@jamesPLANESii it's one of the planes I'm hoping to see on this challenge.
@jamesPLANESii Cessna 150 isn't a trainer. It's a light civilian aircraft. As for gliders, I'd prefer actual powered aircraft. Any plane with twin controls can be considered a training aircraft. But don't want a Boeing 747. I want a plane you get when you google "Trainer aircraft".
I haven't seen a build from you in a loooooooong time.
+1@Tessemi ok