@Nerfenthusiast if you download a build and upload it after editing it, it becomes successor to the original, automatically crediting original and sending notification to its builder.
@Nerfenthusiast I'm not sure. Maybe add some soldiers at the base, or put the flag onto a build. Something we haven't seen with the original, something that shows effort on your behalf.
@Nerfenthusiast this build unfortunately doesn't provide any significant improvement over the original. That's the reason for its removal. I technically can unremove posts, but I won't do it here. I do understand that you had no bad intent, so I haven't issued a warning or a strike, but there is too little difference from original.
@AudioDud3 you do understand that moderators will still have access to your account, will compare suspicious planes, and remove copies, right? Just because your account is gone doesn't mean rules don't apply.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
This post seems to have failed to fully upload. I suggest reuploading it and tagging those who upvoted this version. This upload doesn't show specs, pictures, or predecessor link.
@Hyperloop I can test your next build before upload so I can give you more useful advice for such minor tweaks before the build is publicly posted. Just tag me on builds you want tested while they are still under 1250 parts.
You'll have to wait for a dozen more years for that one. World war three is yet to happen, and we are yet to see what technologies are to be used in it. Tag "futuristic" fits builds that "would be used in WW3 if it happened in 2118".
@Rsouissi you would put a cosmetic rotor on a free spin rotator and use VTOL nozzles to spin it. But don't put any wings in the cosmetic rotor, as that would cause dissymmetry of lift.
This is one very good looking build. However, I have a few tips regarding functionality:
- Engine and brakes should be much weaker. A truck this big shouldn't have a sports car acceleration and deceleration.
- Side doors should open on Ag input (input = Activate1) and extending tunnels should be enabled by the same activation group with zeroOnDeactivate = True, so they can't extend when the door is closed or stay open when the door closes.
It's simple, and you can do it yourself. Put it on a floppy rotator and hide VTOL nozzles in blade tips. Use a hidden jet for actual lift to avoid dissymmetry of lift.
@BogdanX rules of this website state: "If you are continually telling people their airplanes suck, then maybe you suck." and "Please, just be courteous.".
@Hypixel I always encourage users to use custom control surfaces. Those are fuselage pieces on hinge rotators containing wing pieces instead of control surfaces as a part of the wing piece.
@Blakenado11 that's not the main factor, as the system credits original automatically. The comment below is automated remove message. Your version doesn't offer significant improvement over the original.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
Excellent work. Only thing I'd change would be using actual rudder for turning, as gyro gives the same turning power at full speed and while standing still.
First, make sure you have proven yourself to be a top quality builder of things you want on your challenge. That way, people will know you can judge entries properly. Then make a challenge post describing requirements and rules (ex. no mod parts, min/max part count, number of entries per builder, etc.). Offer rewards (ex. first place - 5 upvotes, second place - 3 upvotes...). Once you've done that, you sit back and wait for entries.
@Ethansimmons04 I haven't issued you a strike for the repost, so you're not at a loss. From now on, when posting for this purpose, upload as unlisted and remove post once it has served its purpose.
@GhostHTX you'll notice I haven't removed it. If it was against the rules, it would have been removed. I just stated my opinion as a member of this community.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
Builds that only add a few random guns or change a color get removed if they are reported. Builds where the user invested effort to improve an existing build are fine.
Points are supposed to reflect your rating in the community. The more you have, the more people like you or your builds. It might be difficult to get them at the start, before you have a decent amount of followers, but if you keep posting quality work, followers will come.
@Type2volkswagen no problem. I like this concept.
@Nerfenthusiast if you download a build and upload it after editing it, it becomes successor to the original, automatically crediting original and sending notification to its builder.
@Nerfenthusiast I'd accept that, but I'm not sure about other mods. That would be a borderline case. More difference is always better.
@Nerfenthusiast I'm not sure. Maybe add some soldiers at the base, or put the flag onto a build. Something we haven't seen with the original, something that shows effort on your behalf.
@Nerfenthusiast this build unfortunately doesn't provide any significant improvement over the original. That's the reason for its removal. I technically can unremove posts, but I won't do it here. I do understand that you had no bad intent, so I haven't issued a warning or a strike, but there is too little difference from original.
@AudioDud3 you do understand that moderators will still have access to your account, will compare suspicious planes, and remove copies, right? Just because your account is gone doesn't mean rules don't apply.
+1@Nerfenthusiast that's an auto-comment for when build isn't different enough from original.
@OC3LOT1142 I got a moderator tag months ago. I'm glad you like the IFV.
Join Discord servers. All the people are there. You can find links to a few in my bio.
+3Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
@Lucastricolorfactory :)
Sully is unrealistic? Try Braveheart.
This post seems to have failed to fully upload. I suggest reuploading it and tagging those who upvoted this version. This upload doesn't show specs, pictures, or predecessor link.
No problem.
+1@Hyperloop I can test your next build before upload so I can give you more useful advice for such minor tweaks before the build is publicly posted. Just tag me on builds you want tested while they are still under 1250 parts.
+1You'll have to wait for a dozen more years for that one. World war three is yet to happen, and we are yet to see what technologies are to be used in it. Tag "futuristic" fits builds that "would be used in WW3 if it happened in 2118".
+2@Rsouissi you would put a cosmetic rotor on a free spin rotator and use VTOL nozzles to spin it. But don't put any wings in the cosmetic rotor, as that would cause dissymmetry of lift.
@14ROVI I hope I'll be seeing more mods from you. You seem to be quite good at making them.
Great mod. Gun has excellent sound and is XML editable. I love it.
+1This is one very good looking build. However, I have a few tips regarding functionality:
+6- Engine and brakes should be much weaker. A truck this big shouldn't have a sports car acceleration and deceleration.
- Side doors should open on Ag input (input = Activate1) and extending tunnels should be enabled by the same activation group with zeroOnDeactivate = True, so they can't extend when the door is closed or stay open when the door closes.
It's simple, and you can do it yourself. Put it on a floppy rotator and hide VTOL nozzles in blade tips. Use a hidden jet for actual lift to avoid dissymmetry of lift.
@BogdanX rules of this website state: "If you are continually telling people their airplanes suck, then maybe you suck." and "Please, just be courteous.".
+5Hi Ced. Haven't seen you in quite a while. What's up?
@FrostyGamingWWM can't you just be nice?
@Quip you can block any user you find unpleasant. It stops them from commenting on your posts.
@MailboxIsMyGender your comment has been removed for sexually suggestive content. Please read the rules here.
+1@Squirrel snitches to Andrew
+2@Tully2001 we're joking a little m8.
+1@Squirrel plays "age is just a number" card again
+1@Squirrel plays "age is just a number" card
+1@Hypixel yup. It's a joke suggestion, of course, as standalone control surface wouldn't be very useful.
@Hypixel I always encourage users to use custom control surfaces. Those are fuselage pieces on hinge rotators containing wing pieces instead of control surfaces as a part of the wing piece.
@Blakenado11 that's not the main factor, as the system credits original automatically. The comment below is automated remove message. Your version doesn't offer significant improvement over the original.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
@Grandmother large rudder scaled to fit a small custom surface would do. I have a ship that turns very well with rudders only.
+1Excellent work. Only thing I'd change would be using actual rudder for turning, as gyro gives the same turning power at full speed and while standing still.
@Tully2001 good point. But, if he's too lazy, maybe he doesn't deserve tags? :)
+3@Squirrel use tags scrub!
+1@mojoyup no problem.
You have posted this build three times (by accident, I guess). I have removed two examples for you.
First, make sure you have proven yourself to be a top quality builder of things you want on your challenge. That way, people will know you can judge entries properly. Then make a challenge post describing requirements and rules (ex. no mod parts, min/max part count, number of entries per builder, etc.). Offer rewards (ex. first place - 5 upvotes, second place - 3 upvotes...). Once you've done that, you sit back and wait for entries.
+1@Ethansimmons04 I haven't issued you a strike for the repost, so you're not at a loss. From now on, when posting for this purpose, upload as unlisted and remove post once it has served its purpose.
@Efacel lol
@Efacel no problem buddy. Btw, you have to tag someone in order to send them a notification about your comment.
@GhostHTX you'll notice I haven't removed it. If it was against the rules, it would have been removed. I just stated my opinion as a member of this community.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
Builds that only add a few random guns or change a color get removed if they are reported. Builds where the user invested effort to improve an existing build are fine.
Points are supposed to reflect your rating in the community. The more you have, the more people like you or your builds. It might be difficult to get them at the start, before you have a decent amount of followers, but if you keep posting quality work, followers will come.