There are some serious problems in your history narratives. Such as painting Putin as the savior of Russia even though the people of his country hate him and his policies and why he is currently being investigated by the FBK for corruption and bribery. So I think you should go back and check your facts. On the military ranking nuclear weapons mean almost nothing as in a real life conflict they most likely will never be used due to the principle of mutually assured destruction. The rankings i pulled from statista and it is based on fact not speculation as they use index numbers. You can see the formula they use which is comprehensive. Here
Your logic behind this copying principle honestly makes no sense and I fail to see how thinking one thing is a copy means thinking everything is a copy.
Your historical narrative on American intervention is also incorrect and I advise you to buy a history book on the age of terrorism.
Quite frankly a lot of your argument is lost in translation so if I am missing something or misinterpreting I apologize.
I am tired of arguing so I will just say I agree to disagree. I also would not like to continue this argument and get mods involved I’m sure both you and I don’t want to get strikes for a simple argument.
I really would recommend that you get an independent history textbook from an unbiased source.
For American history I would recommend: American History by Thomas S Kidd
For world history I would just recommend watching lots of documentaries. This way I feel you get the most viewpoints and gain the most information on details.
@CharlesDeGaulle
I’m not very patient so that’s why I take forever to do projects so I completely understand. But those 2 things should probably only take you an hour at most. I can show you the way to do it if you want me to @Falkenwut
Realistic turn performance but your speed or acceleration is too high. Try adjusting the power multiplier to match up with real-life engine specs, then add or remove drag points to get your max speed at around 35000 ft. You do it like this:
I have a 5000lbs of force sp stock engine
The real-life counterpart has 4000lbs
So, your multiplier in this engine should be .8
You can figure out the SP stock thrust by clicking on the engine you are using in the part selector.
Good job, keep it up!
@CharlesDeGaulle As for changing comments to make them look better, I am only changing small grammatical errors. You however have gone back and changed your original argument in your first comment, indicating that even you do not believe in your own thesis. You believe in something that you haven't even proven yet which is called circular reasoning. And as for logical accidents, you have a lot of the following, ad hominem, hasty generalization, tu quoque, equivocation, and finally the Fallacy of Sunk costs, as you try to string this argument out to find one area where you can win.
@CharlesDeGaulle
Sixth, if you really want to talk about destabilization in the Middle East look no further than the French who let Syria spiral out of control and placate the French into many concessions. They have been extremely cunning in their dealings with the French and you have not even noticed it. On their policy in Iran, of still trying to enforce the nuclear deal even though they are clearly violating it and every time they are caught somehow they get fewer restrictions every time. Also, the reason why we had to get involved in the Gulf War is that French and British colonial powers had destabilized the region ever since they were introduced. We also can't risk bombarding Russia's positions as we have been locked in hostile negotiations for years and such intervention is a blunder as it would endanger the US and others. But France seems to have no concept of this as you say that you blatantly strike Russia's positions making bad relations worse.
Seventh, if you really want to say, which you seem to imply, that the French army is better than everyone I advise you to look at who are the countries with the most armaments and best equipment. You would find that France is not even in the top 5 and is actually superseded by both India and South Korea.
If you look back on our comments here you will see that you are the only one calling me an idiot and various other childish insults. The only thing I seemed to imply was that you were unqualified to talk about this, which becomes more apparent as you are missing key facts in historical events. My arguments against your personage are logical and backed by fact, they are not personal and unfounded like your attacks are, which seem to be very infantile.
@CharlesDeGaulle
First, I will address your statement of the Blackhawk "copying" the Dauphin. Yes, the Dauphin might have been released 2 years prior but if you look at the two helicopters side by side, there is almost no resemblance or resemblance in any sort of configuration. Also, helicopters take years to develop so they were most likely being developed at the same time. If you look at the airframe of the NH-90 and Blackhawk side by side you can see the same windshield layout, same landing gear layout, same general shape, and almost the same rotor layout and sensor layout and loadout. It's like the designers weren't even trying to hide it when they built it. 2 years is not enough time for the US to scrap an entire airframe and start from the beginning. The bureaucracy here simply doesn't allow for it, it's actually quite funny.
Secondly, my response to your first comment was completely warranted, "Moreover, the name seems arrogant, since our canon is called Caesar, a bad pun, in any case, without France, the USA would not exist, I say it like that ..." Calling the whole US arrogant and suggesting that we owe you in some way is not a good way to make friends, just a tip for you.
Third, America has bought Aerospatiale's devices for mostly small branches like the coast guard or mostly use them for transport because they didn't want to build another helicopter for such a small role it plays, so there is not much of an argument there.
Fourth, describing France as an imperialist power who got involved where she shouldn't is actually a correct characterization. Look at the 19th and 20th-century colonies which she held and then tell me all of those areas arent completely destabilized. West Africa is a nightmare as they entirely depend on European goods, if they had not been colonized in the way France did they would probably be much more prosperous today. Let us not forget that the French also owned Syria and Vietnam, the sites of terrible tragedies that were brought on by the destabilizing French control in the region. If you don't want to talk about French colonial rule we can always talk about domestic and foreign policy. The French are actually the site of most pagan rituals stemming from right after the French revolution and most domestic policies cripple her infrastructure and role on the world stage. For foreign policy, we have the many wars with Germany and most notably the Treaty of Paris in 1919, where the US called for less harsh repercussions to not send the country spiraling into nothing. However, the French government refused and pushed forward with its crippling terms effectively giving Hitler his stage to rise.
Btw I understand a bit of French as I know 3 Latin languages, so if anyone is pretentious it’s you, in thinking everyone else in the world is insignificant and stupid. Don’t underestimate me or anyone else here, we know a lot more than you, you just clearly don’t know it yet. You still haven’t refuted my arguments with sufficient evidence so I think it’s funny that you “put me in my place” because that obviously did not occur. I also find it funny that you think France has never done any wrong, if you cannot see your own countries faults don’t go talking about other peoples countries.
@CharlesDeGaulle
I’m not gonna bother to argue with you because you clearly don’t get the point. It was a copy and that is all, I never insulted you yet you felt like you needed to do that to me. I wasn’t even talking to you in the first place so why concern yourself with this, unless arguing on peoples posts is all you have time to do.
@CharlesDeGaulle
@JoshuaW I haven't seen PID yet on one of those. Especially on FBW most players don't use PID. Ive been trying to figure it out for some time and i still don't fully understand it
(Continued) You are certainly in the grey area as I solicited no attack from you and yet you decided you wanted to get into an argument. So my best advice is, don’t get into an argument that no one asked for and don’t get into an argument you cannot win.
I think the fact that you have to use ad-hominem (a logical fallacy) to try and get your point across just shows how sour as a person you must really be. Nothing in my comments justify you calling me an idiot and it goes to show that you are uneducated in forming a cohesive argument.
Secondly, the Blackhawk is a style of helicopter while a 155 mounted on a 6X6 is a platform. Platforms are the only way to do things while styles can have multiple interpretations. And regarding your comment that France built a 6X6 SPG before America doesn’t prove anything. That is a fallacy called false cause, and actually the Americans built many SPGs before France they just didn’t have it mounted on a cheaper vehicle. Since America didn’t copy their tech, truck, or gun it’s not a copy especially since we have recoil tech on BRUTUS that far exceeds CAESER.
In regards to your logic of the Blackhawk, there are many ways to build a helicopter everyone didn’t have to choose the style it was built in but they did because it was a successful helicopter. There are multiple examples of this such as chinas new helicopter and this helicopter.
On your comment about opening up a history book I advise that you do the same as we never had to help you in the war. It was Japan who bombed Pearl Harbor, not the Germans. Had the Germans not declared war we probably would not have helped, as it was seen as a very costly and risky move at the time. We didn’t have to bail you out but we did.
I’m not really sure you can say we owe Europe for our creation as the United States was not built by European culture but by the frontier. If you would like to contest this point I would ask you to read Frederick Turners “Frontier thesis.” While yes the majority of people did come from Europe they fled for a reason, because there were tyrants back home. The US is actually a refugee nation fleeing from the feudalism system so your argument about we owing Europe anything is entirely false.
In regard to your personal attack (ad-hominem) on me being toxic, I would like you to notice who is the one calling people names, as it is you not I. The definition of toxic is: very harmful or unpleasant
I would say that the one who is being unpleasant is the one calling people names. Also please watch your language on SimplePlanes please, Andrew Garrison already talked about this stuff in his most recent forum post. (Continued on next post)
@CharlesDeGaulle
Nice I like the notification of a strike thing. Very helpful.
“Drained your soul” lmao that’s pretty much right. I mod a server with a bunch of my friends. It’s exhausting.
I find it funny that you think the BRUTUS is an American copy of the CAESER truck. Only the names are similar and it pretty much ends at that. If every 6X6 155mm Howitzer is a copy of the CAESER then I don't know what to tell you bud, because you are clearly disillusioned. Almost every SPG is a 155mm on a 6X6 chassis and the BRUTUS actually has better tech with the soft recoil so it's not a copy. It still wouldn't be a copy if France made the first 6x6 155mm, which they didn't.
@CharlesDeGaulle
@CharlesDeGaulle Wow, you sure seem like a nice guy (sarcasm). It was no insult to the French or the Europeans so I'm not sure why you reacted like that. The entire western world wouldn't exist as we know it without the US, bailing you out of both WWI and WWII so if you really want to take potshots like that I can do this all day.
@RYAviation Just because it is fictional doesn't mean it shouldn't defy the laws of physics if it is supposed to be a somewhat realistic design like this.
Well, if that were the dimensions of a real plane it would have wing loading, lift, and capacity issues since the wings are so small compared to the rest of the body. So maybe you should do some research on aeronautics, lift, and conventional designs before you criticize me who has studied aerospace for years.@RYAviation
@KnightOfRen it works for everyone else dude just sayin. when you attach parts you do it outside of that blueprint view. Then you adjust the dimesions when you go back to that view. There is an orthographic view button in the viewing controls that looks like two squares.
Power multiplier shoul be .593 on the engines then adjust drag points for max speed at 30-35k feet
Oh please make a realistic flight model!
There are some serious problems in your history narratives. Such as painting Putin as the savior of Russia even though the people of his country hate him and his policies and why he is currently being investigated by the FBK for corruption and bribery. So I think you should go back and check your facts. On the military ranking nuclear weapons mean almost nothing as in a real life conflict they most likely will never be used due to the principle of mutually assured destruction. The rankings i pulled from statista and it is based on fact not speculation as they use index numbers. You can see the formula they use which is comprehensive. Here
Your logic behind this copying principle honestly makes no sense and I fail to see how thinking one thing is a copy means thinking everything is a copy.
Your historical narrative on American intervention is also incorrect and I advise you to buy a history book on the age of terrorism.
Quite frankly a lot of your argument is lost in translation so if I am missing something or misinterpreting I apologize.
I am tired of arguing so I will just say I agree to disagree. I also would not like to continue this argument and get mods involved I’m sure both you and I don’t want to get strikes for a simple argument.
I really would recommend that you get an independent history textbook from an unbiased source.
For American history I would recommend: American History by Thomas S Kidd
For world history I would just recommend watching lots of documentaries. This way I feel you get the most viewpoints and gain the most information on details.
@CharlesDeGaulle
Those numbers were just examples
I’m not very patient so that’s why I take forever to do projects so I completely understand. But those 2 things should probably only take you an hour at most. I can show you the way to do it if you want me to @Falkenwut
Also, most afterburners automatically engage around 95% RPM so i would get rid of the activation group
Realistic turn performance but your speed or acceleration is too high. Try adjusting the power multiplier to match up with real-life engine specs, then add or remove drag points to get your max speed at around 35000 ft. You do it like this:
I have a 5000lbs of force sp stock engine
The real-life counterpart has 4000lbs
So, your multiplier in this engine should be .8
You can figure out the SP stock thrust by clicking on the engine you are using in the part selector.
Good job, keep it up!
@CharlesDeGaulle As for changing comments to make them look better, I am only changing small grammatical errors. You however have gone back and changed your original argument in your first comment, indicating that even you do not believe in your own thesis. You believe in something that you haven't even proven yet which is called circular reasoning. And as for logical accidents, you have a lot of the following, ad hominem, hasty generalization, tu quoque, equivocation, and finally the Fallacy of Sunk costs, as you try to string this argument out to find one area where you can win.
@CharlesDeGaulle
Sixth, if you really want to talk about destabilization in the Middle East look no further than the French who let Syria spiral out of control and placate the French into many concessions. They have been extremely cunning in their dealings with the French and you have not even noticed it. On their policy in Iran, of still trying to enforce the nuclear deal even though they are clearly violating it and every time they are caught somehow they get fewer restrictions every time. Also, the reason why we had to get involved in the Gulf War is that French and British colonial powers had destabilized the region ever since they were introduced. We also can't risk bombarding Russia's positions as we have been locked in hostile negotiations for years and such intervention is a blunder as it would endanger the US and others. But France seems to have no concept of this as you say that you blatantly strike Russia's positions making bad relations worse.
Seventh, if you really want to say, which you seem to imply, that the French army is better than everyone I advise you to look at who are the countries with the most armaments and best equipment. You would find that France is not even in the top 5 and is actually superseded by both India and South Korea.
If you look back on our comments here you will see that you are the only one calling me an idiot and various other childish insults. The only thing I seemed to imply was that you were unqualified to talk about this, which becomes more apparent as you are missing key facts in historical events. My arguments against your personage are logical and backed by fact, they are not personal and unfounded like your attacks are, which seem to be very infantile.
@CharlesDeGaulle
First, I will address your statement of the Blackhawk "copying" the Dauphin. Yes, the Dauphin might have been released 2 years prior but if you look at the two helicopters side by side, there is almost no resemblance or resemblance in any sort of configuration. Also, helicopters take years to develop so they were most likely being developed at the same time. If you look at the airframe of the NH-90 and Blackhawk side by side you can see the same windshield layout, same landing gear layout, same general shape, and almost the same rotor layout and sensor layout and loadout. It's like the designers weren't even trying to hide it when they built it. 2 years is not enough time for the US to scrap an entire airframe and start from the beginning. The bureaucracy here simply doesn't allow for it, it's actually quite funny.
Secondly, my response to your first comment was completely warranted, "Moreover, the name seems arrogant, since our canon is called Caesar, a bad pun, in any case, without France, the USA would not exist, I say it like that ..." Calling the whole US arrogant and suggesting that we owe you in some way is not a good way to make friends, just a tip for you.
Third, America has bought Aerospatiale's devices for mostly small branches like the coast guard or mostly use them for transport because they didn't want to build another helicopter for such a small role it plays, so there is not much of an argument there.
Fourth, describing France as an imperialist power who got involved where she shouldn't is actually a correct characterization. Look at the 19th and 20th-century colonies which she held and then tell me all of those areas arent completely destabilized. West Africa is a nightmare as they entirely depend on European goods, if they had not been colonized in the way France did they would probably be much more prosperous today. Let us not forget that the French also owned Syria and Vietnam, the sites of terrible tragedies that were brought on by the destabilizing French control in the region. If you don't want to talk about French colonial rule we can always talk about domestic and foreign policy. The French are actually the site of most pagan rituals stemming from right after the French revolution and most domestic policies cripple her infrastructure and role on the world stage. For foreign policy, we have the many wars with Germany and most notably the Treaty of Paris in 1919, where the US called for less harsh repercussions to not send the country spiraling into nothing. However, the French government refused and pushed forward with its crippling terms effectively giving Hitler his stage to rise.
Actually, the US is energy-independent now :)
Awesome!
Btw I understand a bit of French as I know 3 Latin languages, so if anyone is pretentious it’s you, in thinking everyone else in the world is insignificant and stupid. Don’t underestimate me or anyone else here, we know a lot more than you, you just clearly don’t know it yet. You still haven’t refuted my arguments with sufficient evidence so I think it’s funny that you “put me in my place” because that obviously did not occur. I also find it funny that you think France has never done any wrong, if you cannot see your own countries faults don’t go talking about other peoples countries.
@CharlesDeGaulle
I’m not gonna bother to argue with you because you clearly don’t get the point. It was a copy and that is all, I never insulted you yet you felt like you needed to do that to me. I wasn’t even talking to you in the first place so why concern yourself with this, unless arguing on peoples posts is all you have time to do.
@CharlesDeGaulle
@JoshuaW I haven't seen PID yet on one of those. Especially on FBW most players don't use PID. Ive been trying to figure it out for some time and i still don't fully understand it
It's actually my least favorite city it's very dirty there. Its got some cool stuff but its more of a novelty than anything else to me
@GabeGabeTheFangster7
Ugh New York
btw you can't really fix this game. It's a closed architecture code so its very hard to make big changes
@realSavageMan is your profile pic, Chiang Kai Shek lol
I think you are the first person to successfully use a PID code
looks good btw. I would use a nose cone tho it makes it look a bit wierd. just do 6-8 fuselage pieces. Cockpit looks epic btw
when ppl actually listen to me, ChiChiWerx, BogdanX, and Eternal Darkness. lol
YEE YEE
R u from texas 2??????!!!!!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
man i would hate to see the be-HIND of that lmfao
Wow really good job this makes f-16s and SUs really easy to make now. Thank you!
(Continued) You are certainly in the grey area as I solicited no attack from you and yet you decided you wanted to get into an argument. So my best advice is, don’t get into an argument that no one asked for and don’t get into an argument you cannot win.
I think the fact that you have to use ad-hominem (a logical fallacy) to try and get your point across just shows how sour as a person you must really be. Nothing in my comments justify you calling me an idiot and it goes to show that you are uneducated in forming a cohesive argument.
Secondly, the Blackhawk is a style of helicopter while a 155 mounted on a 6X6 is a platform. Platforms are the only way to do things while styles can have multiple interpretations. And regarding your comment that France built a 6X6 SPG before America doesn’t prove anything. That is a fallacy called false cause, and actually the Americans built many SPGs before France they just didn’t have it mounted on a cheaper vehicle. Since America didn’t copy their tech, truck, or gun it’s not a copy especially since we have recoil tech on BRUTUS that far exceeds CAESER.
In regards to your logic of the Blackhawk, there are many ways to build a helicopter everyone didn’t have to choose the style it was built in but they did because it was a successful helicopter. There are multiple examples of this such as chinas new helicopter and this helicopter.
On your comment about opening up a history book I advise that you do the same as we never had to help you in the war. It was Japan who bombed Pearl Harbor, not the Germans. Had the Germans not declared war we probably would not have helped, as it was seen as a very costly and risky move at the time. We didn’t have to bail you out but we did.
I’m not really sure you can say we owe Europe for our creation as the United States was not built by European culture but by the frontier. If you would like to contest this point I would ask you to read Frederick Turners “Frontier thesis.” While yes the majority of people did come from Europe they fled for a reason, because there were tyrants back home. The US is actually a refugee nation fleeing from the feudalism system so your argument about we owing Europe anything is entirely false.
In regard to your personal attack (ad-hominem) on me being toxic, I would like you to notice who is the one calling people names, as it is you not I. The definition of toxic is: very harmful or unpleasant
I would say that the one who is being unpleasant is the one calling people names. Also please watch your language on SimplePlanes please, Andrew Garrison already talked about this stuff in his most recent forum post. (Continued on next post)
@CharlesDeGaulle
Nice I like the notification of a strike thing. Very helpful.
“Drained your soul” lmao that’s pretty much right. I mod a server with a bunch of my friends. It’s exhausting.
I find it funny that you think the BRUTUS is an American copy of the CAESER truck. Only the names are similar and it pretty much ends at that. If every 6X6 155mm Howitzer is a copy of the CAESER then I don't know what to tell you bud, because you are clearly disillusioned. Almost every SPG is a 155mm on a 6X6 chassis and the BRUTUS actually has better tech with the soft recoil so it's not a copy. It still wouldn't be a copy if France made the first 6x6 155mm, which they didn't.
@CharlesDeGaulle
@CharlesDeGaulle Wow, you sure seem like a nice guy (sarcasm). It was no insult to the French or the Europeans so I'm not sure why you reacted like that. The entire western world wouldn't exist as we know it without the US, bailing you out of both WWI and WWII so if you really want to take potshots like that I can do this all day.
Looks too long compared to the wings. But other than that it looks kool
Ah yes the European copy of the blackhawk
@RYAviation Just because it is fictional doesn't mean it shouldn't defy the laws of physics if it is supposed to be a somewhat realistic design like this.
A HEMTT can climb about 25 degrees @Chancey21
Lmao
G.I. Hosè?
Did you mean G.I. José
Well, if that were the dimensions of a real plane it would have wing loading, lift, and capacity issues since the wings are so small compared to the rest of the body. So maybe you should do some research on aeronautics, lift, and conventional designs before you criticize me who has studied aerospace for years.@RYAviation
@Rakoval500k These work for me. You are probably attaching them incorrectly try attaching them with the attachment menu then move them into place
@KnightOfRen it works for everyone else dude just sayin. when you attach parts you do it outside of that blueprint view. Then you adjust the dimesions when you go back to that view. There is an orthographic view button in the viewing controls that looks like two squares.
hmmm flares dont work for me
Just absolutely gross.
Body is too long or wings arent wide enough, other than that it looks good
@KnightOfRen it takes me maybe 10 mins to find an accurate blueprint and then scale it in the designer
@KnightOfRen wdym, its the easiest system ever lmfao
all you have to do is import a picture and scale it and build...
Cool but..... The nose is too long or the wings aren't big enough
looks soviet but the radar scope doesnt match up with any Russian planes i know of....
is the first picture LG or an airbrake?
@MatthewCoolman no
@IntelHDGraphics4000 yeah I know, 60 bucks for a nonexisting item is brutal