@CalebRepublic you put wings inside the fuselage. You are going to make the rough shape of your wing with the structural wing and then scale it down to .1. You will then make rough sizes of your control surfaces and scale them down as well and connect those wings to the moving control surfaces. If you take a look inside my F-16s wings and control surfaces, you can see what I am talking about. You should do this after you make your airfoil shape
@Boatrider its easy to slap together wing parts it gets difficult to create control surfaces that look nice. The reason why good builders are good builders is that they go the extra mile
@ChiChiWerx yeah but why do all these random people like reignsupreme get 150-300 upvotes on something that looks lumpy, not smooth, or not fully functional. Is it just because people are plat? randomusername got 97 upvotes on her jet that is ahead of mine. It doesn't even have custom surfaces and prob took her an hour. This took me 2 months! kinda upset if you couldn't tell lol.
@Trijets No, because they do not have a curve as an actual airfoil does. Not only does it look nicer but it also shows you have put in a lot of effort and time.
Very good! Great Airfoil especially for a beginner. Slight left roll and the tail is stuck but it's worth my spotlight for sure. Some plats cant even make an airfoil this good. If you ever need any help with testing replicas you can always mention me!
Aww man you didn’t do a rotary bomb bay or custom weapons and no “custom” control surfaces also the acceleration is way too fast. ☹️ But overall very well done!
@Notnoob1000 You sound like you are from Texas, my friend! "I got these down a place they call Tex-ass, This one is Des and this one is Troy and together they destroy" lol its from Thor Ragnarok
@Thelegitpilot13 then we could have longer times for that warning to pop up: Platinum it would never happen, Gold: 1-2 years, silver, bronze, and white 1 year to 6 months
Hey just a btw you won’t be able to spotlight any post from someone who has a higher point total than you. For example if I uploaded a successor you would not be able to spotlight it
Great but it would be better if it was bonded to fire weapons. If it’s fire guns mobile can’t use it. Plus i don’t think people will have much of a problem with the barrel rotating a bit when firing a missile
Yeah the mk.100 is going to be interesting. Some of the shapes might be hard to do but I’ll make a cockpit on that one since it’s a little simpler than my other planes@TheFantasticTyphoon
@SupremeDorian cool beans
TheFantasticTyphoon yeah you really have to watch him lol@SupremeDorian @TheFantasticTyphoon
@WarHawk95 @BogdanX I think I have the right question.... What do you guys choose the mods? or Where do you guys choose the mods?
BIG BRAIN@CalebRepublic NP
@ChiChiWerx thanks man btw I have made a t-38 talon testbed that ill tag you on it doesnt have custom wings or anything yet tho
Go ahead and delete your 4.0 version. Right next to the downloads hit the drop down and hit remove.
@CalebRepublic you put wings inside the fuselage. You are going to make the rough shape of your wing with the structural wing and then scale it down to .1. You will then make rough sizes of your control surfaces and scale them down as well and connect those wings to the moving control surfaces. If you take a look inside my F-16s wings and control surfaces, you can see what I am talking about. You should do this after you make your airfoil shape
@Boatrider its easy to slap together wing parts it gets difficult to create control surfaces that look nice. The reason why good builders are good builders is that they go the extra mile
@CalebRepublic link
Not bad! next time try custom wings for a better airfoil shape. :)
@ChiChiWerx yeah but why do all these random people like reignsupreme get 150-300 upvotes on something that looks lumpy, not smooth, or not fully functional. Is it just because people are plat? randomusername got 97 upvotes on her jet that is ahead of mine. It doesn't even have custom surfaces and prob took her an hour. This took me 2 months! kinda upset if you couldn't tell lol.
@Trijets No, because they do not have a curve as an actual airfoil does. Not only does it look nicer but it also shows you have put in a lot of effort and time.
@ChiChiWerx I still think I should have gotten way more upvotes on this RIP
And yes wing area is almost always incorrect in SP. It sometimes will count some fuselage parts as well. IDK it's very weird
Very good! Great Airfoil especially for a beginner. Slight left roll and the tail is stuck but it's worth my spotlight for sure. Some plats cant even make an airfoil this good. If you ever need any help with testing replicas you can always mention me!
well done!
looks great but there are no custom control surfaces
RIP should have used the YF-23
+1very smooth design and very well done, but yes control surfaces could be better. Also, maneuverability and acceleration should be much lower.
very good!
Cool. But that nose tho
Aww man you didn’t do a rotary bomb bay or custom weapons and no “custom” control surfaces also the acceleration is way too fast. ☹️ But overall very well done!
What physics are you running it on I can run it on medium physics on my phone and it’s an iPhone 8@Mastermind1941
@Notnoob1000 You sound like you are from Texas, my friend! "I got these down a place they call Tex-ass, This one is Des and this one is Troy and together they destroy" lol its from Thor Ragnarok
@otayahiromo8211 yes at least the look of it is except for the intakes and some other stuff
+1Got 6 boxes of 6.5 Creedmore ammo in my garage. I don't think anyone will be messing around here lol. America!
Beautiful clean lines!
@Aviator007 less engine power and less drag is the way to go. look up the turn speed, the speed at sea level, and speed at altitude
lol basically a su-25t
Yeah ur right hmmmmm@Pietro
+1Whaaaaaa ur a genius!!!!
anybody want a IFV that cant go through a city? cause i sure do lol. This is a big boy lol
+1extruded c-47 over here
ok
+1It’s under the view icon@CropzAirlines
Cool. Use the blueprint tool next time for more accurate builds.
I basically did this on my M-17 CIWS but it was way more basic
I’m sorry but I couldn’t help but see the similarity between this build and this one
Not bad really good trimotor
wasnt expecting this. a beta on top of another beta EXPLOSIONS
+2@Thueerra u good
+1@WarHawk95 IK im just saying the fire guns icon wont pop up even if there is something binded to it you would have to have a gun on there
+1@Thelegitpilot13 then we could have longer times for that warning to pop up: Platinum it would never happen, Gold: 1-2 years, silver, bronze, and white 1 year to 6 months
Hey just a btw you won’t be able to spotlight any post from someone who has a higher point total than you. For example if I uploaded a successor you would not be able to spotlight it
Great but it would be better if it was bonded to fire weapons. If it’s fire guns mobile can’t use it. Plus i don’t think people will have much of a problem with the barrel rotating a bit when firing a missile
+2Hey can we petition that? I’d probably be best if you did it since you are plat@ForeverPie
+1Would that work though? Would it not be too hard for the devs to implement?@ForeverPie
Yeah they are right tho that would produce fat lag I’m kinda not about that@nadvgia
Yeah I started from scratch again there were just too many flaws and the design was very odd@Aeromen
Yeah the mk.100 is going to be interesting. Some of the shapes might be hard to do but I’ll make a cockpit on that one since it’s a little simpler than my other planes@TheFantasticTyphoon
+1