the colors on the armament are also incorrect you should have used common conventions for the paint scheme of the armament. Sorry to nitpick but im a weapons guy
realistically its performance is ok except for the engine which is way too small to produce enough power. This also goes 500 knts with the wings not swept its not really feasible and its supposed to be more of an attacker based on the design. The engine just seems too small in comparisin to the rest of the plane to be honest. The functionality of everything is great however. On the design, it seems more eastern design than western design. Japan hasnt made an indigenous fighter yet so i would have gone more along the lines of a multrole fighter jet.
Make some good stuff first then put links to your best builds, maybe some tutorials and a bit about yourself. Nobody really ever looks at profiles so it’s not that important
COM directly under the rotors you can get it there most of the time using the weight shift. Also, go into xml in the rotor scalars and turn everything that has torque in the name to 0. Gyros are ok to use for Helios but try to only use 1 and for basic operation only. You can add another one for hover if you like.
Thnx I’ve been doing a lot of flight models recently in lieu of time consuming projects. Learned a lot more about how wing loading and things like that impact performance. I would like to see an AOA performance fix in the near future though. Gotta be honest, one of the most frustrating things, and yes it’s up there with the undo button lol. Thanks a lot again nice to have praise from a dev @weebabyseamus
@edensk First of all, you’re assumption of F-16 performance is inaccurate at best. If you have ever flown an F-16 or even in a simulation like DCS you normally won’t hit even 20 AOA plus it’s even harder to hit it in SP. ChiChiWerx already hit on your 4Gs comment, and for stall speed the F-16 normally lands at 130-140knts. Your nitpicking on detail is something that I have not found while reviewing this build and he did have someone help him with the flight model. ME. So if you want to critique this build I would like you to first do some more research and have some toleration for Simple Planes inaccuracies in AOA. And second, have some respect for the builder. I am only that harsh on people who call it a replica and flies like crap. So I would advise you to hold your tongue. I respect you and your outlooks most of the time but certainly not on this.
@RYAviation @Love0police Indeed I can't fully understand what you are saying. Basically, it is a call to arms against another group so actually, it is fear-mongering that's actually the perfect word for it.
@Falkenwut you should have decreased drag points to achieve cruise speed instead of increasing thrust I always make sure the engine thrust is correct first then i adjust drag points
Accelerates way too fast. The Su-25 is not a fighter or a rocket for that matter. Body of the aircraft looks ok but I would encourage you to start making custom wings as they make performance better and they also look much better
First of all how can “let’s blow up some terrorists” is not a true false question so it cannot be true since it is not a statement but a directive. Second even if it was a true false question and it was true still does not invalidate my argument nor does it validate yours.
@RYAviation
that moment when BogdanX takes shots at your build...
+1cool
+1looks soviet but the radar scope doesnt match up with any Russian planes i know of....
is the first picture LG or an airbrake?
@MatthewCoolman no
@IntelHDGraphics4000 yeah I know, 60 bucks for a nonexisting item is brutal
too bad its $60+
the colors on the armament are also incorrect you should have used common conventions for the paint scheme of the armament. Sorry to nitpick but im a weapons guy
@Dimkal the tails still look too extended, did you use a blueprint when you built the weapons?
+1realistically its performance is ok except for the engine which is way too small to produce enough power. This also goes 500 knts with the wings not swept its not really feasible and its supposed to be more of an attacker based on the design. The engine just seems too small in comparisin to the rest of the plane to be honest. The functionality of everything is great however. On the design, it seems more eastern design than western design. Japan hasnt made an indigenous fighter yet so i would have gone more along the lines of a multrole fighter jet.
+1Those also dont look like GBU-12s but i think the HARM is ok
I have to test it out but it looks really good. They don't look like GBU-38s the tails look too long on them which version are they?
@Dllama4 you should make a jetpack guy for your next build it would be pretty funny lol
@ThatKindaWeeb nope look at the formatting thread on the forums page its the first one. then go to links
Would spotlight!
Ha funny @SnoWFLakE0s
Try building some replicas first it’s hard to give you any advice if your planes are mostly abstract
+1Make some good stuff first then put links to your best builds, maybe some tutorials and a bit about yourself. Nobody really ever looks at profiles so it’s not that important
Holy...
+1COM directly under the rotors you can get it there most of the time using the weight shift. Also, go into xml in the rotor scalars and turn everything that has torque in the name to 0. Gyros are ok to use for Helios but try to only use 1 and for basic operation only. You can add another one for hover if you like.
Did you get a photo of the jet pack guy? Lol
So is the viewpoint 30ft above the camera? Lol
Hmmm I will try and see thank you for bringing this to my attention it might be a problem with an update I’ll get back to you on it@Rakoval500k
I love how German medium tanks are everyone else’s heavy tanks... 😂
+1It’s from the new update@SuperStriker33
Thnx I’ve been doing a lot of flight models recently in lieu of time consuming projects. Learned a lot more about how wing loading and things like that impact performance. I would like to see an AOA performance fix in the near future though. Gotta be honest, one of the most frustrating things, and yes it’s up there with the undo button lol. Thanks a lot again nice to have praise from a dev @weebabyseamus
@edensk First of all, you’re assumption of F-16 performance is inaccurate at best. If you have ever flown an F-16 or even in a simulation like DCS you normally won’t hit even 20 AOA plus it’s even harder to hit it in SP. ChiChiWerx already hit on your 4Gs comment, and for stall speed the F-16 normally lands at 130-140knts. Your nitpicking on detail is something that I have not found while reviewing this build and he did have someone help him with the flight model. ME. So if you want to critique this build I would like you to first do some more research and have some toleration for Simple Planes inaccuracies in AOA. And second, have some respect for the builder. I am only that harsh on people who call it a replica and flies like crap. So I would advise you to hold your tongue. I respect you and your outlooks most of the time but certainly not on this.
+2BTW @2Papi2Chulo I like how you were able to keep a good cockpit view and still do the ECM I really like how that feature turned out!
I did the flight model. Am I a worthy pupil yet?@ChiChiWerx
+2You said DCS. YES!
Someone else actually knows what that is ahahahahahaha!
Inspect element
Flies great, fights great, looks great! Best F-16 replica out there!
Best F-16 cockpit I’ve seen that’s not 2k parts+
AWESOME!
AWESOME!
+1I win
updoot
IDK its just coffee. Good if you put the right things in it, but I agree with @WSI normally I go for a red bull
+1@Yooiiyzz Nope MK.52 standard USN missile cells contain 4
+1well these fit 4 in a single VLS Cell it would be nice to have a VLS cell to go with it
+2Ah yes the smallest ship in the navy
+2Ah yes, the convention on cluster munitions banned these
+1😂
whoa that is awesome!
+1@RYAviation @Love0police Indeed I can't fully understand what you are saying. Basically, it is a call to arms against another group so actually, it is fear-mongering that's actually the perfect word for it.
@Falkenwut you should have decreased drag points to achieve cruise speed instead of increasing thrust I always make sure the engine thrust is correct first then i adjust drag points
+1Accelerates way too fast. The Su-25 is not a fighter or a rocket for that matter. Body of the aircraft looks ok but I would encourage you to start making custom wings as they make performance better and they also look much better
+4Maybe it’s cuz I’m on mobile...@riko
Oh I’m having trouble with the missiles btw it seems they don’t launch with the ballistic thing but they only launch when you launch “T”@riko
Nice sub! Any way to control the missiles?
First of all how can “let’s blow up some terrorists” is not a true false question so it cannot be true since it is not a statement but a directive. Second even if it was a true false question and it was true still does not invalidate my argument nor does it validate yours.
@RYAviation