@GrangerDynamics je n'ai malheureusement pas beaucoup de temps en ce moment, mais si t'as besoin d'aide, je pourrais toujours t'aider, une Georges Leygues sera assez dure à faire sur simple planes à cause de ses formes, j'avais pour projet de faire un Horizon, il est à moitié commencé, je te conseille plutot de faire une Lafayette, aux formes plus épurées.
@edensk To elaborate ? Just look how it turns, never seen anything so sluggish, it's so unrealistic, take-off is a real horror, it turns right every time, and even if it's not loaded with its reservoirs and weapons, takeoff is just as catastrophic, go to War Thunder, and fly with the F-104, you will see the difference, but I don't want to stay talking about this plane all my life, but anyway, it is still a very nice plane, more to watch than to fly with.
@Typhoon03 From a distance, it doesn't look like, I'm just giving my opinion, but the glass parts are too big, and give the impression that it is small, the general appearance, the gun, in short, it does not make its 132 meters, I would give it barely 3000 tons, but it is still well done, there are details.
@K2K The Su11 is faster, and there is no big performance gap, the Mig21 has become a myth, the most manufactured, and very capable jet for its time, but the Su11 is an interceptor, the Mig21 a plane to do everything, they do not have the same roles. In dogfight the Mig would have the advantage, the other having no cannon, but the SU11 is not intended for dogfights.
@PoyuToyu Yes, they are beautiful battleships, the Richelieu and the Jean Bart had a rather particular design, look at where the chimney is placed, and also the 3 turrets of 3 parts at the back, which makes it possible to recognize them among all, c 'is indeed the front turrets of 4 guns.
@Numbers
The V1s, flying bombs, not very powerful, but they were doing damage in the suburbs of London, the V2 was rather an intercontinental missile, if the Germans had had the atomic bomb before the USA, it would have done damage.
@F104Deathtrap I rectify, the English have at that time 600 Hurricanes and Spitfires, otherwise, I pretty much agree on the rest, the Chain-Home radar has effectively helped the RAF. But what is sure is that the Germans were in numerical superiority (2500 planes).
@F104Deathtrap
Yet the English were fighting one-on-ten against the Germans, and winning, that's because they were necessarily better, the radars were for nothing once the fight started. And yes, after the Battle of the Britain, the Germans had lost their "best" pilots who took a beating with a lower enemy.
@F104Deathtrap
Here, no one has ever criticized the J20. You are probably referring to the CHL radar, but not all the German pilots were experienced, the Germany was trying to have as many as possible, impossible to train the pilots as well as in a smaller air force, the British had fewer planes, so they could better train their pilots.
@F104Deathtrap @Numbers The Quality of the pilot did a lot, at Mig Alley, the Mig were superiors, but the Americans had the most experienced pilots. It's not enough to have the best plane, you need someone who uses it well. If we compare the armament of the J20 to that of the Rafale, the Rafale trumps everything, the missiles, it has a cannon, which the J20 does not have, and better technologies, in France, there are fewer pilots than in China, our pilots are all trained to be exellent, for comparison, let's take the Battle of Britain, the English were 10 times less numerous , but they beat the Germans because they were better trained and knew how to use their Hurricanes and Spitfires.
@F104Deathtrap The Rafale dominated the F22 during dogfight, only a dogfight, I'm not talking about long-range engagement, but just the maniablility of planes, stealth planes are not always stealthy, sometimes they are visbiles on radar, sometimes no, it depends on the angle on which enemy radar waves come to "touch" the aircraft, some time ago , the radars of the Su-35 fighters of the Indian Air Force detected the Chinese J-20s. The duck wings of the Rafale, and how they are placed in relation to the aircraft offers an advantage over other aircraft, the Typhoon also has, but they are less effective.
@TheDerpingMemes Yes, when comparing the maneuverability, the SU35 knows how to make the cobra, it is much more maneuverable, much faster, more powerful, and just see the shape of the plane.
@TheDerpingMemes
The Su-57 could even beat the F-22, but the F22 was dominated by a Rafale in dogfight! Since then, the Americans refuse to simulate fights against the French...
@TheDerpingMemes The F35 is bad compared to the Rafale, the Rafale is much faster, the massacre in dogfight, and in long-range engagement thanks to its long-range missiles, in short, it is better.
@MIAW26PERSIAN that's okay, but on the picture in your description the cockades are the right color.
like French I feel offended to see an English cockade ... To make a French one, reverse the blue and the red !!!
pity that French is missing ...
+1@GrangerDynamics je n'ai malheureusement pas beaucoup de temps en ce moment, mais si t'as besoin d'aide, je pourrais toujours t'aider, une Georges Leygues sera assez dure à faire sur simple planes à cause de ses formes, j'avais pour projet de faire un Horizon, il est à moitié commencé, je te conseille plutot de faire une Lafayette, aux formes plus épurées.
+1Magnificent, the most beautiful F100 on the site, really !
Simple mais Joli ce Super Mystère !
The Duguay-Trouin is the the submarine which is under construction, of the Suffren class. I did a forum on french navy HERE if you want to watch...
+1@RezXVixy Here (Wikipedia..)
Good tank, but the WWII tag has nothing to do here, this tank was launched from 1952
Top speed is 2200 km/h !!!! 1389 is the cruise speed !
But this cursed google does not make the difference, his max speed is about mach 1.8
I don't really like two-seater fighter jets in general, this one either ! But it is well reproduced, with a lot of detail.
@RYAviation If you don't know how to answer me, a word of advice: don't !
Encore...
I'm not a fan of this plane, I don't even find it beautiful, but you reproduced it well, the cockpit is good, and there are lots of details.
+1Very well ! but I still prefer an FT 17, this thing is still very strange, a mixture of steamroller and tank ...
+1Great ship, and for 499 parts, it is impressive !
very nice tank ! In the event of a battle, I think it ends badly for the bike..
+3@RicardoAs1515 Yeah, sometimes it ends badly ! Either way your plane is superb.
@edensk To elaborate ? Just look how it turns, never seen anything so sluggish, it's so unrealistic, take-off is a real horror, it turns right every time, and even if it's not loaded with its reservoirs and weapons, takeoff is just as catastrophic, go to War Thunder, and fly with the F-104, you will see the difference, but I don't want to stay talking about this plane all my life, but anyway, it is still a very nice plane, more to watch than to fly with.
Nice ship.
+2@edensk The real take off anyway faster ...
+1it flies badly, the takeoff is horrible, but it is beautiful, it is a plane that just deserves to stay on the runway.
@Typhoon03 From a distance, it doesn't look like, I'm just giving my opinion, but the glass parts are too big, and give the impression that it is small, the general appearance, the gun, in short, it does not make its 132 meters, I would give it barely 3000 tons, but it is still well done, there are details.
+1A destroyer ? It looks more like a corvette.
Removed
Very good F15, it is beautiful, flies well, nice plane.
+2This plane is beautiful.
+1@K2K The Su11 is faster, and there is no big performance gap, the Mig21 has become a myth, the most manufactured, and very capable jet for its time, but the Su11 is an interceptor, the Mig21 a plane to do everything, they do not have the same roles. In dogfight the Mig would have the advantage, the other having no cannon, but the SU11 is not intended for dogfights.
+1@K2K All Soviet planes looked the same back then ... No, it looks like an SU11
Oh, no, this cursed plane, it will barely serve as an agricultural plane ... on the ground, you put it in the field, it scares all the birds ...
+1@PoyuToyu Yes, they are beautiful battleships, the Richelieu and the Jean Bart had a rather particular design, look at where the chimney is placed, and also the 3 turrets of 3 parts at the back, which makes it possible to recognize them among all, c 'is indeed the front turrets of 4 guns.
@PoyuToyu This one is fictionnal, the real are : Richelieu, Jean Bart, Dunkerque and Strasbourg.
Nice camo !!
Nice ! Now make the Richelieu !
+1How can this thing do 1234 parts ?? We are in a level of detail that normally exceeds 3000 parts, beautiful ship, with the mods, it's so realistic.
+1ㅤ
+1@Numbers
+1The V1s, flying bombs, not very powerful, but they were doing damage in the suburbs of London, the V2 was rather an intercontinental missile, if the Germans had had the atomic bomb before the USA, it would have done damage.
@F104Deathtrap I rectify, the English have at that time 600 Hurricanes and Spitfires, otherwise, I pretty much agree on the rest, the Chain-Home radar has effectively helped the RAF. But what is sure is that the Germans were in numerical superiority (2500 planes).
+2@F104Deathtrap
+1Yet the English were fighting one-on-ten against the Germans, and winning, that's because they were necessarily better, the radars were for nothing once the fight started. And yes, after the Battle of the Britain, the Germans had lost their "best" pilots who took a beating with a lower enemy.
@F104Deathtrap
Here, no one has ever criticized the J20. You are probably referring to the CHL radar, but not all the German pilots were experienced, the Germany was trying to have as many as possible, impossible to train the pilots as well as in a smaller air force, the British had fewer planes, so they could better train their pilots.
@F104Deathtrap @Numbers The Quality of the pilot did a lot, at Mig Alley, the Mig were superiors, but the Americans had the most experienced pilots. It's not enough to have the best plane, you need someone who uses it well. If we compare the armament of the J20 to that of the Rafale, the Rafale trumps everything, the missiles, it has a cannon, which the J20 does not have, and better technologies, in France, there are fewer pilots than in China, our pilots are all trained to be exellent, for comparison, let's take the Battle of Britain, the English were 10 times less numerous , but they beat the Germans because they were better trained and knew how to use their Hurricanes and Spitfires.
@RicardoAs1515 okay, I had not seen, the plane is superb otherwise !
@F104Deathtrap The Rafale dominated the F22 during dogfight, only a dogfight, I'm not talking about long-range engagement, but just the maniablility of planes, stealth planes are not always stealthy, sometimes they are visbiles on radar, sometimes no, it depends on the angle on which enemy radar waves come to "touch" the aircraft, some time ago , the radars of the Su-35 fighters of the Indian Air Force detected the Chinese J-20s. The duck wings of the Rafale, and how they are placed in relation to the aircraft offers an advantage over other aircraft, the Typhoon also has, but they are less effective.
Very nice plane, but without livery .
+1@TheDerpingMemes the Rafale had put 8 to 1 in dogfight against the English Eurofighters ...
@TheDerpingMemes Yes, when comparing the maneuverability, the SU35 knows how to make the cobra, it is much more maneuverable, much faster, more powerful, and just see the shape of the plane.
@TheDerpingMemes ok, but I'm sure the Su-35 beat the F35...
@TheDerpingMemes
The Su-57 could even beat the F-22, but the F22 was dominated by a Rafale in dogfight! Since then, the Americans refuse to simulate fights against the French...
@TheDerpingMemes Lol, it can beat the Su-25, they should have said nothing, it's ridiculous
@TheDerpingMemes The F35 is bad compared to the Rafale, the Rafale is much faster, the massacre in dogfight, and in long-range engagement thanks to its long-range missiles, in short, it is better.