MiG-21UM "Mongol-B"
There are quite a few MiG-21's on SP... most of them "Fishbeds", not too many "Mongols". So why not do a 2-seater/trainer this time?
The MiG-21 itself is very well known to all, and needs little or no introduction -if interested, you can always check out HistoryNet.
The MiG-21UM "Mongol-B" (1968), was a two-seat trainer version of the MiG-21MF -a "modernized" MiG-21 with upgraded radar, R13-300 turbojet, and four instead of two underwing hardpoints.
Some features
• Realistic weight & fuel
• Custom landing gear and air brakes (AG1). Like on the real ’21, the rear air brake is locked when carrying an external fuel tank on the centerline hardpoint
• Movable nose cone
• Automatic additional intake vents at the nose
• MiG-ish half-cockpit, just to have a nice cockpit viewpoint rather than for actual functionality.
• External PTB-490 fuel tank (can be dropped with AG2) to make the plane’s range just a bit less terrible
• Automatic changeover (speed-related) from nosewheel steering to rudder
• Auto-afterburner @ 95% throttle. Don’t use it too much though, or you’ll run out of fuel in a matter of minutes.
Controls
- AG1 : air brakes
- AG2 : drop fuel tank
- AG3 : brake chute
- AG8 : toggle lights
Armament
The single-seater MF was equipped with a GSh-23 autocannon, but this was omitted on the UM trainer version. The UM could be equipped with a 12.7 mm machine gun in a centerline belly pod, but the weapon was so ineffective that this was almost never done.
This build depicts a trainer version, but let's give it some punch so that at least there's some extra fun to be had... it is, after all, a MiG-21. The plane has four underwing hardpoints, and is equipped with four R60 (AA-8 "Aphid") short-range IR homers, and two K-55 (AA-1 "Alkali") missiles.
HAVE FUN…
Specifications
Spotlights
- GrizzlitnCFSP 3.4 years ago
- MAHADI 3.4 years ago
- asteroidbook345 3.4 years ago
- RicardoACE 3.4 years ago
General Characteristics
- Predecessor COLD WAR Challenge [CLOSED]
- Created On Windows
- Wingspan 23.2ft (7.1m)
- Length 51.2ft (15.6m)
- Height 14.0ft (4.3m)
- Empty Weight 13,824lbs (6,270kg)
- Loaded Weight 19,046lbs (8,639kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 3.539
- Wing Loading 14.7lbs/ft2 (71.8kg/m2)
- Wing Area 1,295.5ft2 (120.4m2)
- Drag Points 2189
Parts
- Number of Parts 1635
- Control Surfaces 0
- Performance Cost 4,917
Required Mods
-
_Mechanical_Instrumentation
by Gestour
Version 1.0 (3/18/2019 6:06:03 AM)
View Mod Page
@MAHADI hahaha funny! 😏😒
@Mahfuzul2009 eijonnei mone eto rong. vaya admission level e asho lol!
@MAHADI mmm amar theke onek boro !
Matro class 9 e pori
@Mahfuzul2009 eito college shesh
@MAHADI hahahaha i was kidding btw jani na jiggesh kora thik hobe kina
Kon classe foren ?
@Mahfuzul2009 ki mushkil vai tomar pise lagbo ken
boro vai hoia classic upodesh ditasi lol
@Mahfuzul2009 lagso
@MAHADI Amar konow progress nai so konow tension o nai BTW tomar somossa ki ami pechal parle ? Amar pise lasts Ken?
@Mahfuzul2009 taile ar lav ki. progress atke jabe to lol!
tar cheye huddai pechal kom paro. ekhane era to ar bangali na.
@MAHADI bruh amare block korle kisu jay ase na arekta account khulum. Bruh
@Mahfuzul2009 eikhane beshi pechal parle koydin por block tar koydin por report khaba. huddai context sara message spam koiro na. ekta message e shob kotha ekbare likhba.
@MAHADI its upto me
It is my tendensy
@Mahfuzul2009 brother you speak too much
My tab almost became a chernobyl 2.0
And -0.00001 point for too much part
@MAHADI special rateing because it has a bd flag in it
RATING
Looks : 9.35/10 pts.
Performance : 9.35/10 pts.
Details : 9.1/10 pts.
Weaponry : 9/10 pts.
Functionality : 9.25/10 pts.
Description : 9.1/10 pts.
Bonus : 9.25 pts. (Looks)
OVERALL RATING : 9.2/10
Great work!!
Could you make a mobile version if not no worries :)
I like two seater fighter jets a lot (sometimes better than some single seaters) especially the F-16D
the background is very warthunder
@ollielebananiaCFSP meh... mostly cuz I can't be bothered. I usually don't look at the plane's belly when flying it.
you are so good at building, but why does the bottom of your wings (the transition between the wing and the control surface) always looks so bad ?
@hRmm yeah I know -but don't blame me... if SP would switch to using textures, we wouldn't have to spend 90% of the part count on silly details ;)
always 1500+ parts to torture my ipad lol
@SimplyPlain no problem! I liked it very much!!