@ollielebananiaCFSP En effet, celui sur mes images est celui de SR, modifié par MisterT, et ensuite par moi à mon gout.
En tout cas, j'ai hate de voir le tien, il est très beau.
Hey, stop talking about him like "he", say "I", it can be seen 2km away that you and him are ... the same person, you could have avoided crossing lines with dots ... that betrayed you, moreover, reddit or not, go see in another site, you will see, but i don't want to converse with you anymore, you deleted your first account (or I can't see it) so as not to have everything deleted, but you use a secondary account, i can report you, I have proof, and ... stop, you don't gain anything by doing this, other than making enemies, you had the wisdom to remove that, or else it was removed, anyway , it is more visible, only by you, it is not any more on the French air force challenge, and so much the better, in any case, I block you.
Awnser to : "what the fuck are you talking about" 🙄
Come on, don't make the innocent. You spoke like him, you put points for skipping a line, don't be stupid to guess that this is your secondary Walvis account, do you take me for a blind man ? 😂
Anyway, I don't have time to talk with you any longer today, it's going crazy, but we have to change the future, think of something other than insulting a country for no reason, and stop pretending that you and Walvis are two different people, it's ridiculous, laughable, and not very discreet...
@Walvis
The fact that you apparently do not know the Second World War, and that you do not know French tanks does not authorize you to speak in this way, and to invoke the fact that I mention in my comment of "nationalism", is completely wrong, I am basing myself on real facts, and I do not understand your absurd attack.
-"France is not amazing stop being so proud of it"
We can call it insute, right ? Where are you from, let's laugh a little ? We have an incredible History, it is in terms of military victories far ahead of this little island called England, and insulting other countries' countries can make you think your comment can be deleted, who do you think you are saying this for? Do you know the history of our country? I do not think so. So stop your pathetic ad-ignoratum, and open a history book without messing around.
Have we committed scandals ? Which ones please ?
Without France, the colonized countries would only be backward countries without infrastructure, without hospitals as advanced, without anything, remote countries.
-"France is not the best country in the world"
The best country in the world does not exist, it is in everyone's heart depending on its origin, France on the other hand has one of the richest history in the world, and is a beautiful country, but criticizing you can be something that exceeds you, I think out of jealousy, if you tell me where you come from, I would find something to hurt you, and speak badly of your country.
Has France committed genocides like this country Turkey did, with the Armenian genocide, or like Nazi Germany ?
No matter what, I'm not fucking extremist, I'm just telling the truth, but in real, what are you trying to say ?
Anyway, I won't have more time to converse with you today, but a serious advice : do not insult a country without knowing it, and don't insult any country any course here, and do not insult those who are content to tell real facts, it discredits your words, anyone can verify what I'm saying.
- Which country has won the most military victories in the world ?
- objective response: France. LINK
- Who had the best army and the best equipped army between Germany and France in 1939 ?
-objective answer: France LINK
- Who has the best army in Europe today (and the 1st Europe's military power) ?
-objective answer: France LINK
- Who is the best general of all time and the one who has won the most battles ?
-objective answer: Napoléon. LINK
Who owns the 3rd nuclear arsenal in the world ?
-objective answer: France LINK
What is not OBJECTIVE in what I am saying ? On the contrary, my text is an example of objectivity, I am giving you VALID and PROVEN ARGUMENTS, not as the pathetic "mêmes" and at the level of those who say it concerning France, the same idiots full of jealousy and absurdities.
Once again, what I'm saying is true, have fun checking it out, it will teach you a few things, the B1 tank was 2x better armored than the German Panzers in 1939, more efficient, everyone knows that, there is something non-objective in there? Answer, no ! Seek, but you won't find, all I'm saying is the facts.
@Walvis
Yeah, except that the french army was better (navy, air froce, land), with better equipment, and numerically better, but not the leaders of our army, I advise you to go cultivate yourselves on the subject if that interests you, but if we had a good staff at the time, we would have largely won, we had everything better than the Germans, they used the strategy, the blitzkrieg, and won thanks to their strategy. At the time, France was considered as the 1st world military power !
The Luftwaffe implemented essentially six types of aircraft (a single single-seat fighter, another twin-engine fighter, three medium bombers and a ground attack aircraft) where the French Air Force put at least 18 in line. (six different types of fighters including one twin-engine, seven bombers, two assault aircraft, three types of reconnaissance aircraft), three times more.
Ground army level, better tanks, B1 tanks were twice as armored (32mm for the B1, 14.5mm for the Panzer II), B1 tanks also had better guns firing further... some B1 display a ratio of 14 destroyed panzers ! (copied from my 1st comment), more equipment, more soldiers ...
Navy level, more ships, more powerful ships, it is the 4th navy in the world, and well ahead of the Kriegsmarine. And to break a myth, I also point out that the Richelieu, launched to respond to the Bismarck was better armored than Bismarck, twice as well armed frontally, the Richelieu had 2 turrets of 4 380mm guns at the front, against only two turrets of two 380mm guns for Bismarck, the total firepower of the Bismarck's weapons was concentrated just in the front part of the Richelieu, so instead of showing off, the allies should rather have sent the Richelieu to sink Bismarck instead of the old Hood !
All that to say that with a good general staff adopting a strategy of real modern movement warfare, we could have crushed the German army, if we had put De Gaulle at the head of the general staff, it would have been something else, Moreover, De Gaulle was trying to make himself heard at the time, but no one listened to him, one should have, his strategy would have been the right one.
It's funny to make jokes about us .... But don't forget that we are the country in the world that has won the most wars and battles in the world, (1115 battles won), and don't forget Napoléon.
But that sort of thing will obviously never happen again, given that we have the 3rd nuclear arsenal in the world, the leading military power in Europe, first Air force of Europe, 1st Navy, 1st Army, no one will ever come to annoy us again.
@PaperPlaneHasDream
I know very well ! And the T055 is about 24 meters different from a Burke, so the destroyers in the game are undersized. But the T055 is almost a cruiser, let's say this boat is the maximum size for a destroyer.
@PaperPlaneHasDream
Oh well ... I didn't know you built it ... but anyway, if you say so, it's true.
Or the game's destroyers are a bit small, its destroyer is almost twice the size of theirs, while the Type 055 measures 180m, an Arleigh Burke class (those from SP seem to be based on it) are 156m.
Still, this ship is very well done.
Well ! They give you a gift by rewarding your 16 parts thing giving you 75 upvotes !!! And that's how you thank them ... It's not always the best who leave.
@BMilan
As we say, only fools and dead men don't change their minds ! Hopefully one day your taste will turn to Richelieu ! A few years ago, I liked the Iowas, now I don't like them at all, I now prefer French and Italian battleships, the Littorio class is a class of pretty battleships too.
@BMilan OK, no problem ! However, for me, the Richelieu is an interesting ship, better armored and better frontally armed than the Bismarck ! (the Richelieu had 2 turrets of 4 guns of 380mm at the front ! That is to say twice as much firepower as Bismarck at front, basically, the total firepower of the Bismarck concentrated in the front.) The Richelieu had revolutionary compact engines which owe it this chimney which gives it an style of its own, and very elegant, for me it is undoubtedly the most beautiful battleship of the second world war.
But each has its own tastes and choices!
Vuq had you made an English battleship, and an American, why not a French ? For the first war why not a Bretagne class, a Courbet is also pretty, for the second war, it would obviously be a Richelieu.
Superb ship ! I have also planned to make a 1/400 scale model, which will go with my Charles de Gaulle, Redoutable, De Grasse cruiser and Lafayette (at 1/400 all !)
The only criticism I could make on this ship is that the 100mm guns are too square, they are originally rounded.
@Ruskiwaffle1991 Lol, basically, unless you add normal motors yourself ! You will only have to adjust the power of the motors, and the weight with this mod, available for android.
@Ruskiwaffle1991
As SCP1471 said, you just need to download it, undo, and then redo, as you can't have mods. You will miss the pilot, the sound barrier, and the engines.
@KnightOfRen MisterT gave me the link to unlisted, it's been 8 months already.
I modified it to my tastes, added a canopy, modified the cockpit a little and some details, since it belongs to MisterT, I keep it to myself, on the other hand, I do not know if he will publish it a day, as this aircraft is based on the SpiritusRaptor's Mirage...
@WarHawk95 Je sais pour le Mirage 2000, la maniabilité est atroce et irréaliste, et les Mystères ne sont pas conformes (missiles air-air), mais ils sont quand même esthétiquement beaux pour des photos. Je vais peut être commencer à construire un truc, probablement un navire, ayant abandonné mon Horizon...
@FrostyYeti Seriously ?? Do you know the History ? Did you know that France has a better army ? His B1 tanks were twice as armored (32mm for the B1, 14.5mm for the Panzer II), B1 tanks also had better guns firing further... some B1 display a ratio of 14 destroyed panzers ! There is no doubt that if France had been managed by better generals, it would have won ! If De Gaulle had been put at the head of the armies in 1939, the outcome of the war would have been quite different.
Our aviation was also better, and more numerous. You should know that the Germans adopted the Blitzkrieg strategy, while the French army was managed by incompetent generals, the Maginot line which was of no use was surrounded, and the strategy of the other armies was also disastrous. France was also an "industrial giant" at the time. What the Germans had more was their population, very high, even higher than present-day Germany,
Ce qu'il est beau !
+1@WarHawk95 Ils vont sans doute venir à 3, enfin à 1... Il va bien se faire chier à changer de comptes tout le temps.
@ollielebananiaCFSP En effet, celui sur mes images est celui de SR, modifié par MisterT, et ensuite par moi à mon gout.
+1En tout cas, j'ai hate de voir le tien, il est très beau.
Magnifique ce Mirage ! J'ai aussi des captures d'écran d'un Mirage III ICI., mais c'est vous qui l'avez fabriqué ?
Hey, stop talking about him like "he", say "I", it can be seen 2km away that you and him are ... the same person, you could have avoided crossing lines with dots ... that betrayed you, moreover, reddit or not, go see in another site, you will see, but i don't want to converse with you anymore, you deleted your first account (or I can't see it) so as not to have everything deleted, but you use a secondary account, i can report you, I have proof, and ... stop, you don't gain anything by doing this, other than making enemies, you had the wisdom to remove that, or else it was removed, anyway , it is more visible, only by you, it is not any more on the French air force challenge, and so much the better, in any case, I block you.
Awnser to : "what the fuck are you talking about" 🙄
Come on, don't make the innocent.
You spoke like him, you put points for skipping a line, don't be stupid to guess that this is your secondary Walvis account, do you take me for a blind man ? 😂
Anyway, I don't have time to talk with you any longer today, it's going crazy, but we have to change the future, think of something other than insulting a country for no reason, and stop pretending that you and Walvis are two different people, it's ridiculous, laughable, and not very discreet...
@Walvis
+1The fact that you apparently do not know the Second World War, and that you do not know French tanks does not authorize you to speak in this way, and to invoke the fact that I mention in my comment of "nationalism", is completely wrong, I am basing myself on real facts, and I do not understand your absurd attack.
-"France is not amazing stop being so proud of it"
We can call it insute, right ? Where are you from, let's laugh a little ? We have an incredible History, it is in terms of military victories far ahead of this little island called England, and insulting other countries' countries can make you think your comment can be deleted, who do you think you are saying this for? Do you know the history of our country? I do not think so. So stop your pathetic ad-ignoratum, and open a history book without messing around.
Have we committed scandals ? Which ones please ?
Without France, the colonized countries would only be backward countries without infrastructure, without hospitals as advanced, without anything, remote countries.
-"France is not the best country in the world"
The best country in the world does not exist, it is in everyone's heart depending on its origin, France on the other hand has one of the richest history in the world, and is a beautiful country, but criticizing you can be something that exceeds you, I think out of jealousy, if you tell me where you come from, I would find something to hurt you, and speak badly of your country.
Has France committed genocides like this country Turkey did, with the Armenian genocide, or like Nazi Germany ?
No matter what, I'm not fucking extremist, I'm just telling the truth, but in real, what are you trying to say ?
Anyway, I won't have more time to converse with you today, but a serious advice : do not insult a country without knowing it, and don't insult any country any course here, and do not insult those who are content to tell real facts, it discredits your words, anyone can verify what I'm saying.
@Walvis
Well, let's be OBJECTIVE !!!
- Which country has won the most military victories in the world ?
- objective response: France.
LINK
- Who had the best army and the best equipped army between Germany and France in 1939 ?
-objective answer: France
LINK
- Who has the best army in Europe today (and the 1st Europe's military power) ?
-objective answer: France
LINK
- Who is the best general of all time and the one who has won the most battles ?
-objective answer: Napoléon.
LINK
Who owns the 3rd nuclear arsenal in the world ?
-objective answer: France
LINK
What is not OBJECTIVE in what I am saying ? On the contrary, my text is an example of objectivity, I am giving you VALID and PROVEN ARGUMENTS, not as the pathetic "mêmes" and at the level of those who say it concerning France, the same idiots full of jealousy and absurdities.
Once again, what I'm saying is true, have fun checking it out, it will teach you a few things, the B1 tank was 2x better armored than the German Panzers in 1939, more efficient, everyone knows that, there is something non-objective in there? Answer, no ! Seek, but you won't find, all I'm saying is the facts.
+2@Walvis
+2Yeah, except that the french army was better (navy, air froce, land), with better equipment, and numerically better, but not the leaders of our army, I advise you to go cultivate yourselves on the subject if that interests you, but if we had a good staff at the time, we would have largely won, we had everything better than the Germans, they used the strategy, the blitzkrieg, and won thanks to their strategy.
At the time, France was considered as the 1st world military power !
The Luftwaffe implemented essentially six types of aircraft (a single single-seat fighter, another twin-engine fighter, three medium bombers and a ground attack aircraft) where the French Air Force put at least 18 in line. (six different types of fighters including one twin-engine, seven bombers, two assault aircraft, three types of reconnaissance aircraft), three times more.
Ground army level, better tanks, B1 tanks were twice as armored (32mm for the B1, 14.5mm for the Panzer II), B1 tanks also had better guns firing further... some B1 display a ratio of 14 destroyed panzers ! (copied from my 1st comment), more equipment, more soldiers ...
Navy level, more ships, more powerful ships, it is the 4th navy in the world, and well ahead of the Kriegsmarine. And to break a myth, I also point out that the Richelieu, launched to respond to the Bismarck was better armored than Bismarck, twice as well armed frontally, the Richelieu had 2 turrets of 4 380mm guns at the front, against only two turrets of two 380mm guns for Bismarck, the total firepower of the Bismarck's weapons was concentrated just in the front part of the Richelieu, so instead of showing off, the allies should rather have sent the Richelieu to sink Bismarck instead of the old Hood !
All that to say that with a good general staff adopting a strategy of real modern movement warfare, we could have crushed the German army, if we had put De Gaulle at the head of the general staff, it would have been something else, Moreover, De Gaulle was trying to make himself heard at the time, but no one listened to him, one should have, his strategy would have been the right one.
It's funny to make jokes about us .... But don't forget that we are the country in the world that has won the most wars and battles in the world, (1115 battles won), and don't forget Napoléon.
But that sort of thing will obviously never happen again, given that we have the 3rd nuclear arsenal in the world, the leading military power in Europe, first Air force of Europe, 1st Navy, 1st Army, no one will ever come to annoy us again.
@PaperPlaneHasDream
+2I know very well ! And the T055 is about 24 meters different from a Burke, so the destroyers in the game are undersized. But the T055 is almost a cruiser, let's say this boat is the maximum size for a destroyer.
@PaperPlaneHasDream
+4Oh well ... I didn't know you built it ... but anyway, if you say so, it's true.
Or the game's destroyers are a bit small, its destroyer is almost twice the size of theirs, while the Type 055 measures 180m, an Arleigh Burke class (those from SP seem to be based on it) are 156m.
Still, this ship is very well done.
Well ! They give you a gift by rewarding your 16 parts thing giving you 75 upvotes !!! And that's how you thank them ...
It's not always the best who leave.
Impressive creation, once again.
Not bad, this destroyer, prettier than American destroyers, but still a little too oversized.
+2The best Bf-109 on the site, I think.
+3Frightening
+3Two heads are better than one.
It's not just a German helicopter, but half French-half German.
+2Three days ago, I posted the same phorum (with the same title), for my 2666 points ...
+3@ali21pashaie Okay, I said it wasn't for sure, you're right, I made more inquiries, and saw that this embargo was lifted on October 18th.
I saw that you mentioned me on the Su-30, but (strangely), your post is no longer there !! What were you saying ?
Lanc.. I can't see who it is anymore, but I've seen his name before.
No, it's not sure, : https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/no-iran-can%E2%80%99t-purchase-russias-sukhoi-su-30sm-flanker-jets-65086
@DripYeager I would never have thought of that !
@AN2Felllla For boat drawings, there is a good site: Shipbucket
+2@THEYE But now it's too late, I have 17 more :(
@THEYE I was talking about the points.
Nothing is perfect ... but it is pretty.
+1@ArkRoyalTheDDhunter Lol, It's okay, we all make mistakes 🤣!
@BMilan
+1As we say, only fools and dead men don't change their minds ! Hopefully one day your taste will turn to Richelieu ! A few years ago, I liked the Iowas, now I don't like them at all, I now prefer French and Italian battleships, the Littorio class is a class of pretty battleships too.
@BMilan OK, no problem ! However, for me, the Richelieu is an interesting ship, better armored and better frontally armed than the Bismarck ! (the Richelieu had 2 turrets of 4 guns of 380mm at the front ! That is to say twice as much firepower as Bismarck at front, basically, the total firepower of the Bismarck concentrated in the front.) The Richelieu had revolutionary compact engines which owe it this chimney which gives it an style of its own, and very elegant, for me it is undoubtedly the most beautiful battleship of the second world war.
+1But each has its own tastes and choices!
Vuq had you made an English battleship, and an American, why not a French ? For the first war why not a Bretagne class, a Courbet is also pretty, for the second war, it would obviously be a Richelieu.
Wow, how beautiful he is !
@ArkRoyalTheDDhunter no, you have more, 3,528 points, I'v only 2,576
@NFIGMT Ah, okay, thanks for the info !
@SyntheticL thanks !
Very nice plane !
@Leota maybe Surcouf
Superb ship ! I have also planned to make a 1/400 scale model, which will go with my Charles de Gaulle, Redoutable, De Grasse cruiser and Lafayette (at 1/400 all !)
The only criticism I could make on this ship is that the 100mm guns are too square, they are originally rounded.
First.
Very nice tank !
@Ruskiwaffle1991 Lol, basically, unless you add normal motors yourself ! You will only have to adjust the power of the motors, and the weight with this mod, available for android.
+1@Ruskiwaffle1991
+1As SCP1471 said, you just need to download it, undo, and then redo, as you can't have mods. You will miss the pilot, the sound barrier, and the engines.
@FelixTheDoggo yeah, well it's not obvious ... Without a Japanese flag, we take it for an American destroyer.
Beautiful ship, well done, but what's the difference between an Arleigh Burke and that, apart from the fact that he is Japanese ?
@KnightOfRen MisterT gave me the link to unlisted, it's been 8 months already.
I modified it to my tastes, added a canopy, modified the cockpit a little and some details, since it belongs to MisterT, I keep it to myself, on the other hand, I do not know if he will publish it a day, as this aircraft is based on the SpiritusRaptor's Mirage...
@ChrisPy Thanks, and no I am not using reshade, just basic screenshots
@WarHawk95 Je sais pour le Mirage 2000, la maniabilité est atroce et irréaliste, et les Mystères ne sont pas conformes (missiles air-air), mais ils sont quand même esthétiquement beaux pour des photos. Je vais peut être commencer à construire un truc, probablement un navire, ayant abandonné mon Horizon...
@SCP1471 thanks !
Beautiful replica!
@FrostyYeti Seriously ?? Do you know the History ? Did you know that France has a better army ? His B1 tanks were twice as armored (32mm for the B1, 14.5mm for the Panzer II), B1 tanks also had better guns firing further... some B1 display a ratio of 14 destroyed panzers ! There is no doubt that if France had been managed by better generals, it would have won ! If De Gaulle had been put at the head of the armies in 1939, the outcome of the war would have been quite different.
+3Our aviation was also better, and more numerous. You should know that the Germans adopted the Blitzkrieg strategy, while the French army was managed by incompetent generals, the Maginot line which was of no use was surrounded, and the strategy of the other armies was also disastrous. France was also an "industrial giant" at the time. What the Germans had more was their population, very high, even higher than present-day Germany,