@TheSupremeCoco grandayy did not make it, he too, utilized the the demo tool for first order motion model for image animation which is works of Aliaksandr Siarohin, Stéphane Lathuilière, Elisa Ricci, and Sergey Tulyakov. I pinned the demo and paper in the above pinned comment. Take a read and test, these people made something that is really cool.
@BogdanX Interesting concept tho. I guess a benefit of that is the reduction of part count. I don't really consider part count to be a limitation, so each individual track section are freely articulated along with each road wheel, averaging to about 250-300 parts total for entire track assembly with wheels and return rollers etc.
@BogdanX Thank you, although I can't really tell if this is sarcasm or genuine compliment, from past arguments and disagreements. Nonetheless disagreements aside, I think we have two separate approaches on making such interesting mechanics, while you emphasize reducing partcount while maintaining some decent functionality of the tracks, I'd rather just throw consideration to partcount out the window and make something that has aspects like simulated torsion bars, return roller and sprockets etc. Two separate approaches, but both work quite well in their own aspects and goals.
Thanks.
Indeed, ironically jundroo doesn’t bother fixing it. I think the entire hangar side of the yellow curb on the first taxiway is hollow, I’ve managed to get my MiG gear stuck in that and slide down the taxiway in its entirety yesterday. @BogdanX
@CrazyCatZe Good question. Considering it has an interior and 4 ATGMs sloshing abouts on the roof and way too many moving parts, I have no clue. Ching chong magic? I guess?
@Blue0Bull Interestingly, it's not because the height that is the issue on the yeager curb, is that there is a gap in the yeager curb. The spring sticks into the hole and gets stuck on occasion.
The video may be loud to some headphone users.
The clanking sound is the front camera hitting every ramp its about to go up. I apologize in advance if that mildy anger any headphone users.
A friend added the sound clips, couldn't not share it.
The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't.
By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation.
The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is.
Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't.
In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't.
If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was.
The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows. Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is.
However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.
Very nice. Paneling is good, only thing is that remember to disable drag and mass from most parts so it doesn't fly like millions of parachutes attached.
@RAAF XML modd a few VTOL nozzles to increase exhaust scale, bound engine to something like AG-7, put turret on detacher on AG-7, press 7, turret goes pop, nozzles fire
The build isnt finished. Stuff and the entire turret needs to be reworked, fixed and added.
@TheSupremeCoco grandayy did not make it, he too, utilized the the demo tool for first order motion model for image animation which is works of Aliaksandr Siarohin, Stéphane Lathuilière, Elisa Ricci, and Sergey Tulyakov. I pinned the demo and paper in the above pinned comment. Take a read and test, these people made something that is really cool.
@SavageMan yes
Just don't upload 4head. )))
@MAHADI baited
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Hi Dad I'm Dad.
Texas Instruments Ti-84 Advanced
chonk
@typeZERO legit, read the pinned comment.
@TheSavageManZ Ye, thanks man. )))
@LostCausesIncorporated Back in my day, we were using iPhone 5s! Damn millennials.
b
Dame dame
@AndrewGarrison Uncanny indeed
@MontyPython yes.
Po-2 best 5th generation biplane. ))))))
0/10 not registered in Democratic People's Republic of Korea, best Korea.
@MrSilverWolf no u
Boneless begleitpanzer 57.
Jokes aside, very cool looking.
If you want it to slowly come back
smooth(Pitch,0.01)
If you want positive pitch and negative pitch to both deflect the same way
abs(Pitch)
@BogdanX Interesting concept tho. I guess a benefit of that is the reduction of part count. I don't really consider part count to be a limitation, so each individual track section are freely articulated along with each road wheel, averaging to about 250-300 parts total for entire track assembly with wheels and return rollers etc.
@BogdanX Thank you, although I can't really tell if this is sarcasm or genuine compliment, from past arguments and disagreements. Nonetheless disagreements aside, I think we have two separate approaches on making such interesting mechanics, while you emphasize reducing partcount while maintaining some decent functionality of the tracks, I'd rather just throw consideration to partcount out the window and make something that has aspects like simulated torsion bars, return roller and sprockets etc. Two separate approaches, but both work quite well in their own aspects and goals.
To boop the lettuce you must beep the lettuce: @Physoman
Thanks.
Indeed, ironically jundroo doesn’t bother fixing it. I think the entire hangar side of the yellow curb on the first taxiway is hollow, I’ve managed to get my MiG gear stuck in that and slide down the taxiway in its entirety yesterday. @BogdanX
漂亮
@CrazyCatZe Good question. Considering it has an interior and 4 ATGMs sloshing abouts on the roof and way too many moving parts, I have no clue. Ching chong magic? I guess?
@Blue0Bull Interestingly, it's not because the height that is the issue on the yeager curb, is that there is a gap in the yeager curb. The spring sticks into the hole and gets stuck on occasion.
The video may be loud to some headphone users.
The clanking sound is the front camera hitting every ramp its about to go up. I apologize in advance if that mildy anger any headphone users.
@DarthAbhinav oh thank god
That bomb placement on the rear.... Idk unless ur planning on the plane to pull cobras with the bomb on and lawndart with the bombs dropped, idk.
@AGKxCREW Ugh i tried making one like 2-3 years ago. Not really sure if its still relevant.
@AWESOMENESS360 no
windows xp noises @Sovetzkysoyusz
@Tank6376 yes
Original here
A friend added the sound clips, couldn't not share it.
The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't.
By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation.
The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is.
Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't.
In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't.
If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was.
The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows. Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is.
However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.
@Memri no we. we comrade. no we.
@Squidge try high physics
Very nice. Paneling is good, only thing is that remember to disable drag and mass from most parts so it doesn't fly like millions of parachutes attached.
漂亮
:b:
p e t e r i s t h a t y o u
where did the second engine go?
@asteroidbook345 Nope, 3 people have successfully navigated there.
@RAAF XML modd a few VTOL nozzles to increase exhaust scale, bound engine to something like AG-7, put turret on detacher on AG-7, press 7, turret goes pop, nozzles fire
@RAAF no, because I made it ammorack for jokes
lol
:b:
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
hhmmmmm
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmm free monies hmmmmmmmmmmmm
Two words: Object 279)))))) @biliHKG36