@ThatIsKrazyMan There is one done tho by Oukarine, but that one is not listed as a successor because the website is acting funny.
The rest are still working on theirs, they are showing their progress in Port SP
@w101tdi I'm not sure I can explain it easily. I recommend just using MisterT's original walk camera build (I linked it in the description), that is relatively simple to implement and the only thing you won't have is the body of the visitor (it will be just a floating camera).
I dont really have many tips for making a building as I havent made too many before but here is what comes to my mind right now:
In the case of a museum, dont overdo the building's decoration because the focus should be on the exhibition pieces and so by sparing parts on the building itself, you can use more parts on the pieces. You could maybe try designing the building around the thing you are exhibiting: I tried to make the building to look like a sort of warehouse that would be in a port where a ship docks which is relevant to Titanic.
In your case, an NBA/NFL museum would may be nice if you made the building look like a small arena or something.
@BaconAircraft Could you please help us out here?
Oukarine made an entry for the challenge but didn't use the challenge cockpit (see the comment made by him)
Can you set their post as a successor to this one?
@Vincent Could you please help here?
Oukarine made an entry for the challenge didn't use the challenge cockpit (see the comment below mine)
Can you set their post a successor to this one?
@TheTomatoLover What do you think I made this teaser for? Obviously I intend to publish the build when it's fully finished geez...
The FPS camera featured in the video is already publicly available, made by MisterT, you can find the link in the pinned comment.
@PapaKernels Hmm, It's certainly allowed, but then it's gonna lose some points for being a non-accurate replica. Maybe instead of Pennsylvania itself, you could make it to be a fictional, third Pennsylvania-class BB, that didnt have its gun arrangement changed during the refits, then I wont have to judge it as a replica but as a fictional ship, and you still get to build a Pennsylvania class BB. You could even write a cool fictional service history for it :D
@Samflugzeugpanzer the quad turrets are fine, however, don't you think that 18 guns in total (assuming the other three are twin turrets) might be a bit overkill?
Even Agincourt only had 14 and the Lyon-class would have had 16 but they were never built.
A sidenote: judgement won't be based on the strength, you don't have to build the biggest, fastest, most gunned, most overkill ship ever.
@Fineilldoitmyself
1. There weren't any dreadnoughts before 1906. HMS Dreadnought started this line of ships when it was launched in 1906 hence why the challenge is between 1906-1920 (battleships after 1920 were mostly battlecruisers or fast battleships)
If your dreadnought is in an AU with an alternative timeline where technology evolved faster and dreadnoughts were created by the 1850s, that's fine (although Im expecting a bit of lore written in the description then), but if it was meant to be in the real world timeline, then it's way too far fetched for a dreadnought to be that early.
2. As the rules state, the build has to be newly built and has to be a successor to this post. You can't enter with something you already published
@Planebuilder2123 Not sure. I stopped working on it nowadays for other projects and I dont wanna make any more promises I can't keep. I'll tag everyone who asked about it when it eventually gets finished, but as of now, I dont know when will that happen, sorry. :(
@Samflugzeugpanzer Did some digging for you and the most I could find was that HMS Renown, HMS Repulse and HMS Hood (all three are battlecruisers, not dreadnoughts but they were built in ww1) had above-waterline torpedo tubes. However, these were fixed tubes and not the rotary type that you'd see on a destroyer.
@TrippinMidget11222211 the profile who I originally answered to got deleted and with it, their comments were deleted too, so you can't really see the full context here.
I'm totally chill, but one upvote or not, it's still a blatant stealing of my work
@TWDDerSharkmarine I'd say no, let's leave those out of this challenge, maybe in the pre-dreadnought challenge I'm planning in the future.
You can make Kawachi tho, as far as I know they are counted as dreadnoughts not semi-dreadnoughts (they had a uniform 12 inch main battery although the wing guns were different caliber than the centerline ones, but still all of them were 12 inch)
@Samflugzeugpanzer As the description states, yes, super dreadnoughts are allowed.
There is no post limit (spam will simply be disqualified) so go ahead with the refits (one user can only take one place in the top 3 tho, so for example if one of your versions make it into the top three, then the others wont)
Good luck!
I'm honored that my Olympic was used for one of the gifs of this truly amazing build.
There are no words how cool this is (I already tested it on 4 of my ships, I just love it)
@Terminator2809 You got a ban message. The fact that you refused to read even that and you are spamming ED's, Minty's and my forum posts acting like you have no idea why, perfectly shows why you were banned.
@AliceShimada I needed a bunch of ocean liners for the screenshots and your ship was among the ones I had saved down on my device (it's actually quite a nice ship)
Welp, I thought you were going to use my wheel and EOT for building a ship or something, but this is just a blatant repost of my parts that I already posted... shame...
@Dominick0291 Atlanta and California are meh, Portland is a maybe
As for Texas, I already built it lol (look around on in my builds, you'll find it there)
ngl "Russian Air force Next Gen Air superiority Fighter 1." looks kinda cool. Stupid, but also cool. I might try to build it just for fun
@Littletrooper06 Nice! Thanks :)
T
@ThatIsKrazyMan There is one done tho by Oukarine, but that one is not listed as a successor because the website is acting funny.
The rest are still working on theirs, they are showing their progress in Port SP
@ThatIsKrazyMan Sure, I'll add you to the list
@Snowedin Check out my profile, the build has been published over a year ago
@w101tdi I'm not sure I can explain it easily. I recommend just using MisterT's original walk camera build (I linked it in the description), that is relatively simple to implement and the only thing you won't have is the body of the visitor (it will be just a floating camera).
I dont really have many tips for making a building as I havent made too many before but here is what comes to my mind right now:
In the case of a museum, dont overdo the building's decoration because the focus should be on the exhibition pieces and so by sparing parts on the building itself, you can use more parts on the pieces. You could maybe try designing the building around the thing you are exhibiting: I tried to make the building to look like a sort of warehouse that would be in a port where a ship docks which is relevant to Titanic.
In your case, an NBA/NFL museum would may be nice if you made the building look like a small arena or something.
@BaconAircraft Could you please help us out here?
Oukarine made an entry for the challenge but didn't use the challenge cockpit (see the comment made by him)
Can you set their post as a successor to this one?
@Vincent Could you please help here?
Oukarine made an entry for the challenge didn't use the challenge cockpit (see the comment below mine)
Can you set their post a successor to this one?
The post is now published:
>>Click here<<
All tags were requested
@32
@ShirakamiShimada
@FirstLandFish83828
@TheTomatoLover
@Dathcha
@YourLocalPerson
ㅤ
@TheTomatoLover What do you think I made this teaser for? Obviously I intend to publish the build when it's fully finished geez...
The FPS camera featured in the video is already publicly available, made by MisterT, you can find the link in the pinned comment.
A Proof of Concept to create an interactive educational experience using MisterT's FPS Camera feature.
Credits:
Map: ZENRIN Otaku City (Tokyo) MAP by Toscio56
Bus: [HYUNDAI] NEW Super Aerocity by Rebirth
Music: Titanic Honor & Glory Demo 3 - Belfast Ambience Music
@TylerKnox7 Nice modification but giving some credit would have been great.
Here's the list of participants I know of so far. If you are sure you want to join too, just let me know and I'll add your name as well:
- ShiroNeko - Vanitatum-class Dreadnaught, Vanitatum
- natemomog - Agamemnon class Battleship
- PapaKernels - USS Pennsylvania BB38
- Weissenwaltz - Sms Wilhelmshaven
- MentallyDistorted - Bretagne class Dreadnought
- Ayanon - IJN Fusou
- Oukarine - BB-1890
- Fineilldoitmyself - SMS Konig
- UnmanagedReservoir - RNVS Vengeance
- Yeetthehen - USS Good morning USA Freedom class Dreadnought
- LocalDealer - SMS Bayern
- Seredamia - HIVNS Sun yu
- Hiimakeplanes - HMS Incomparable 1915
- BacchaNIKI - Hida class Battleship
- Nitsu - HMS Indestructible
@PapaKernels Hmm, It's certainly allowed, but then it's gonna lose some points for being a non-accurate replica. Maybe instead of Pennsylvania itself, you could make it to be a fictional, third Pennsylvania-class BB, that didnt have its gun arrangement changed during the refits, then I wont have to judge it as a replica but as a fictional ship, and you still get to build a Pennsylvania class BB. You could even write a cool fictional service history for it :D
@Samflugzeugpanzer the quad turrets are fine, however, don't you think that 18 guns in total (assuming the other three are twin turrets) might be a bit overkill?
Even Agincourt only had 14 and the Lyon-class would have had 16 but they were never built.
A sidenote: judgement won't be based on the strength, you don't have to build the biggest, fastest, most gunned, most overkill ship ever.
@Fineilldoitmyself
1. There weren't any dreadnoughts before 1906. HMS Dreadnought started this line of ships when it was launched in 1906 hence why the challenge is between 1906-1920 (battleships after 1920 were mostly battlecruisers or fast battleships)
If your dreadnought is in an AU with an alternative timeline where technology evolved faster and dreadnoughts were created by the 1850s, that's fine (although Im expecting a bit of lore written in the description then), but if it was meant to be in the real world timeline, then it's way too far fetched for a dreadnought to be that early.
2. As the rules state, the build has to be newly built and has to be a successor to this post. You can't enter with something you already published
@Planebuilder2123 Take a look at this post: link
@Planebuilder2123 Not sure. I stopped working on it nowadays for other projects and I dont wanna make any more promises I can't keep. I'll tag everyone who asked about it when it eventually gets finished, but as of now, I dont know when will that happen, sorry. :(
@Samflugzeugpanzer Did some digging for you and the most I could find was that HMS Renown, HMS Repulse and HMS Hood (all three are battlecruisers, not dreadnoughts but they were built in ww1) had above-waterline torpedo tubes. However, these were fixed tubes and not the rotary type that you'd see on a destroyer.
@Samflugzeugpanzer A general rule of thumb is: if you can prove that at least one real life example had it, then go for it!
@TrippinMidget11222211 the profile who I originally answered to got deleted and with it, their comments were deleted too, so you can't really see the full context here.
I'm totally chill, but one upvote or not, it's still a blatant stealing of my work
@TWDDerSharkmarine I'd say no, let's leave those out of this challenge, maybe in the pre-dreadnought challenge I'm planning in the future.
You can make Kawachi tho, as far as I know they are counted as dreadnoughts not semi-dreadnoughts (they had a uniform 12 inch main battery although the wing guns were different caliber than the centerline ones, but still all of them were 12 inch)
@Tookan Nope, this challenge is only for dreadnoughts. But I might do a pre-dreadnought one after this.
@Samflugzeugpanzer As the description states, yes, super dreadnoughts are allowed.
There is no post limit (spam will simply be disqualified) so go ahead with the refits (one user can only take one place in the top 3 tho, so for example if one of your versions make it into the top three, then the others wont)
Good luck!
I'm honored that my Olympic was used for one of the gifs of this truly amazing build.
There are no words how cool this is (I already tested it on 4 of my ships, I just love it)
@Terminator2809 You got a ban message. The fact that you refused to read even that and you are spamming ED's, Minty's and my forum posts acting like you have no idea why, perfectly shows why you were banned.
@CanadianAircraftBuilder Thanks man! There were some ups and downs but overall, these years have been great, so I'm looking forward to the next 5 :)
@AliceShimada I needed a bunch of ocean liners for the screenshots and your ship was among the ones I had saved down on my device (it's actually quite a nice ship)
@V No problem, sorry for the late night message, I didn't know you timezone. But thanks for the help
Credits of the ships on the screenshots:
- Atoka220: RMS Carpathia and RMS Oceanic
- AliceShimada: RMS Serendipity
- BMilan: RMS Olympic
BMilan#3634
Welp, I thought you were going to use my wheel and EOT for building a ship or something, but this is just a blatant repost of my parts that I already posted... shame...
@Dominick0291 Have you read the title or the big "attention" sign at the top of the post??
@Joshuabrey Both the blimp and this ship are named after a real person, Paul von Hindenburg. Also, this ship was built way earlier than the blimp
@Dominick0291 Atlanta and California are meh, Portland is a maybe
As for Texas, I already built it lol (look around on in my builds, you'll find it there)
@MonkiMan Sorry but no, I'm not interested in tanks nowadays
@Dathcha What are you talking about? I have 34.9k points, I am platinum
@ProfessionalLander sure, you can use it if you give credit :)
@Atoka220 Wanna make a lovely little bonfire in your room? download my build on your device then hehe
@Theaverageman I don't play it
@Samflugzeugpanzer Sorry but no
@Dominick0291 sorry but no, I see no point in building a fletcher class destroyer, because there are plenty of them on the website
@Feve @RishantYT747fan The real life wreck lies about 3 kilometers away from the island of Kea
@ZeroWithSlashedO He wasn't banned, he left
@hadum Ohh, that's a great idea!
Approved! Thanks for the recommendation!