@AltF4U yeah I know, I wrote this to Brields95 because he was complaining about how I didn't put a working link.
Btw, you can put working links into the description:
- Write a rectangular bracket "["
- Write something inside it (e.g. "link", "link to the build", "click here!")
- Close the rectangular bracket "]"
- Write a regular bracket "("
- Paste the link
- Close the bracket ")"
Dont write any spaces
It should look like this:
[Link to the origibal build] (https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/5FE6P3/B-17-Fortress-w-Incendiary-Canister)
(With no space between the two brackets, write it all in one)
@Brields95 oh sorry, I didn't think that a ctrl+c, ctrl+v would be a hard job for some people but looks like I was wrong. Here, be happy: -->link to the original build<--
Dude at least give some credit in the description to Weaverfish because he made the original plane
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/5FE6P3/B-17-Fortress-w-Incendiary-Canister
For the Bergetiger, it was almost certainly the result of a field rework. No official german document ever mentions the Bergetiger and only one was ever found (the one on the picture above, it was found abandoned in italy by the americans, the germans probably left it behind due to engine failure)
@IgaoBrHueHue You can edit the description, just click/tap on the little down arrow next to the download counter, and then click/tap on edit. There you can edit the description :)
Nice work dude... now when I'll upload my version (which I have been workin on for a month now) people will think I copied you 😅
Anyways, great job! :D
@TakicraftCorporation Látom akkor te is televagy projektekkel.
Nekem is van egy rakás amit vagy nem fejeztem még be vagy el se kezdtem:
- A Tigris tank utolsó variánsa amit még nem építettem meg, a Bergetiger (ez már szinte teljesen kész van csak lusta vagyok megcsinálni a gifeket meg a screenshotokat a poszthoz)
- Az Abrmams-em hídrakó változata (ez is már kvázi kész van csak ugyanaz van vele mint a tigrissel, nincs gif)
- akarok csinálni egy sornyi posztot a Sherman tank összes variánsáról amit a 2. vh-ban használtak (minimum 20 de lehet h több) ugyanígy még egyéb 2. vh-s tankokat is megakarok: pz4, panther, t-34 stb. De ezek még csak tervben vannak
- a bio-mban találasz egy listát még egyéb cuccokról is amik tervben vannak, ezek közül a 3 legfontosabb a BF-109 mert azt magyar lajstrommal csinálom meg, a gripen szintén magyar színeoben illetve a mávag héja ami pedig magától értetődően magyar
- dolgozom még egy repülőgép anyahajón is
- felakarom újítani a régi C-500as teherszállítómat, ezúttal teljes belsőtérrel, cockpittel meg minden, ugyanígy a B-200as bombázómat is.
- van egy minigame ötletem is bár azt nem biztos hogy megcsinálom
- akarok még egy avataros cuccot is építeni: egy tűz népe csatahajót
És ezek csak azok amik most eszembejutottak, plusz a gépemen még van egy pár félkész projekt.
Én nem annyira hallgatok másokra ha ilyesmiről van szó, és inkább csinálom amit én találok ki, csak sajnos időm nincs sok, de hogy nyáron kb 2-3 naponta fogok feltölteni valamit, az tuti biztos
@TakicraftCorporation Ah értem. Am az lánctalpas sportkocsit amiben segítettem mikor töltöd fel? Vagy még nem készült el? (Már nagyon várom a végleges verziót mert nagyon király)
A Huszár Gété jobb név lett volna, meg ha lett volna bajsza, meg matyó hímzés az oldalán meg egy tányér gulyás leves az anyós ülésen 😂
Am nagyon fasza lett! Szép munka! 😀
@Sm10684 No because books usually don't use slang, you'd only see it if the writer would want to express that a character is speaking with accent, then would he write 'lemme' instead of 'let me'
Lemme is more commonly used on the internet, not really in books. No it's not a real word on its own, it'a just the slang version/shortenning of a phrase
@Sm10684 I didn't check your other creations so I didn't know how many times you did it, and I didn't say you are too lazy to make your own creations, what I thought is that you are too lazy to press the create new aircraft button. I saw many new players who fall into this mistake, that they download a plane, use it a little, then they decide to build something but instead of clicking on start new aircraft, they just start building from that downloaded plane and poof, they get autocredited, and I thought you made this mistake too. I judged too early, I admit, I apologise for that.
However, the autocredit system is still not broken, it was your mistake that your hauler got wrongly credited to something completely different.
No hard feelings
@Sm10684 sigh
Alright, lemme explain how the autocredit system works:
In each plane's xml file, there's a code which consists of 6 characters (letters and numbers) when the vehicle is uploaded, the website stores this code and then when you download it, even if you delete the entire plane and build something completely different (like you did with your hauler) this code remains in the xml file, so when you upload your new build, the server will immediately detect this code and will autocredit it. So no, not the autocredit system is broken, only you are too lazy to click on New Aircraft in the designer menu, and start building from there. If you just start building based on a downloaded plane, the system will autocredit it. The solution: if you want to start a new build, click on New Aircraft in the designer menu.
@Sm10684 no it isn't broken at all, it does it's job, automatically credits the original authors/builds when someone reuploads their stuff. Just because there's a way to go around it, it doesn't mean it's broken (not to mention that normal, non-douchebag people doesn't even try to go around it)
@Randomdoggo That's not how things work here. People don't just reupload stuff without changing anything, that's just stealing (even if he credits the original author)
I mean, if he gets upvotes for this post, he would get those upvotes for absolutely zero work, which is not really fair in my opinion. I hope you understand my concern
@701wwj666 yeah I know that GTA 5 mod. I used to have fun with it in the game cuz the creator screwed up the handling of the car and it was as strong as a tank XD
anyways, nice build, good job!
@Supernovaboss504 but it'd make no sense if you think about it. The whole point of spotlight is that people with more points (which usually means more followers too) can spotlight the builds of people with less points (and usually less followers) so that more people will notice them
Quick advice: in the upload window, you can set the visiblity from public to unlisted, therefore only you can access it (and those who you send the link to) via the 'posts' button on your profile page
@FuzzyAircraftProductions so am I, yet if he is american and he wants to use that date format, leave it to him, we have no right to tell him which format he should use. This is really not that big of a problem.
@SubXTribe No, they are placed on the side in MW3 too, here's a pic of an AH-6 in MW3:
https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/callofduty/images/0/0b/AH-6LittleBirdInvisibleThreatMW3.png/revision/latest?cb=20131103122035
and an MH-6 in MW3:
https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/callofduty/images/b/b0/LittlebirdinParisMW3.png/revision/latest?cb=20130131204956
no guns on the MH-6 at all, while the AH-6 has it's guns on the side.
You might have confused them with an AH-1 Viper or a AH-64 Apache or an Mi-24 Hind or an Mi-24 Havoc which all have guns on their front and are presented in CoD MW3
@SubXTribe I currently have a lotta other plans but updating some of my old builds (inculding helis) is among them so maybe in the future. For now I have tons of other ideas to build before starting updating my old builds
Nice job! :)
Only problem is that AH-6s' weapons are not on the front. They are placed on the side where you placed the benches. Also usually MH-6s have benches on their side because those are the transport variants while AH-6s have miniguns and rocked pods on their sides because those are the attack variants.
But great work anyways!
@TakicraftCorporation mindenképp csekkold le. Teljesen átdolgozták a USS Beast-et és adtak hozzá néhány menő újítást is: van rajta katapult, liftek amik levisznek a hajó belső hangárába meg ilyen kötelek amik elkapják a repülődet leszálláskor (ahhoz viszont kell az egyik új darab is amit a futóművek szekcióban találsz meg a designerben)
@TakicraftCorporation Egy Metallic Unis Green-t kérnék :D Am nagyon adom az 1.8-at, a mágnes meg a csörlő kurva hasznos és pont jól jön egy projekthez aminek már nekiakartam állni (illetve majd csak nekifogok, nyáron, ha letudtam az érettségit) az új USS Beast-re meg nem találok szavakat, nagyon jól ellehet vele szórakozni (kilőttem a katapultal a tigris tankomat XD)
Meg a többi funkció is nagyon jól hangzik, bár még nem volt alkalmam leteszteli mindet. Az új helikopter alkatrészek egyenlőre még annyira nem jönnek be mert egy kicsit nehéz irányítani de majd hozzászokom.
Te mit gondolsz róla?
@JamesBoA yes I know the actual shortening of the Soviet Union was USSR (United Soviet Socialist Republics)
I asked because I thought maybe he purposefully wrote URSS which stands for some made up thing, but probably it's just a typo
@NicePlanes what do you mean by improving?
Credit: the turret is from Kaqiusha321's M1A2 Abrams
+1"Lófaszt, nehogy már, te vagy a blade runner"
Nice build!
@JDog3106 Outdated? I didn't notice. Not even after 5 ppl already commented it already, so thanks for notifiying sarcasm ;)
Very good but... can it do the Wuxi Finger Hold? 🤔
@AltF4U yeah I know, I wrote this to Brields95 because he was complaining about how I didn't put a working link.
Btw, you can put working links into the description:
- Write a rectangular bracket "["
- Write something inside it (e.g. "link", "link to the build", "click here!")
- Close the rectangular bracket "]"
- Write a regular bracket "("
- Paste the link
- Close the bracket ")"
Dont write any spaces
It should look like this:
[Link to the origibal build] (https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/5FE6P3/B-17-Fortress-w-Incendiary-Canister)
(With no space between the two brackets, write it all in one)
@Brields95 oh sorry, I didn't think that a ctrl+c, ctrl+v would be a hard job for some people but looks like I was wrong. Here, be happy:
-->link to the original build<--
Dude at least give some credit in the description to Weaverfish because he made the original plane
+2https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/5FE6P3/B-17-Fortress-w-Incendiary-Canister
@Culydeath Glad to hear, have fun then!
@Culydeath I don't think so. With almost 1000 parts and a huge size, even my computer lags sometimes, so I doubt a mobile could easily run it, sry
Edit:
A user named Strolled commented earlier:
"Runs surprisingly well on my iPad for that size and detail, good job!"
And another user named FlyingSausage commented:
"This thing works on my phone with no lag lmao"
Maybe your mobile is worth a try too :)
@ChromeGamer25 There were Bergepanzers based on Panzer III and Panzer IV chassis too, Bergetiger wasn't the only field recovery vehicle the germans had. They built recovery vehicles on any chassis they found, these vehicles were't officially produced, they were normal tanks which were modified to be recovery vehicles by field engineers.
There were many types of Bergepanzers:
Bergepanzer III
Bergepanzer IV
Bergepanzer 38(t)
Bergepanzer V Bergepanther
Bergepanzer VI Bergetiger
Bergepanzer T-34 (a bergepanzer based on a captured T-34)
For the Bergetiger, it was almost certainly the result of a field rework. No official german document ever mentions the Bergetiger and only one was ever found (the one on the picture above, it was found abandoned in italy by the americans, the germans probably left it behind due to engine failure)
@IgaoBrHueHue You can edit the description, just click/tap on the little down arrow next to the download counter, and then click/tap on edit. There you can edit the description :)
I'm a simple man (...who grew up playing the HL games)
+1I see Half-Life related stuff, I press like.
putting memes aside, amazing job dude, amazing!
Nice work dude... now when I'll upload my version (which I have been workin on for a month now) people will think I copied you 😅
Anyways, great job! :D
3
@TakicraftCorporation Látom akkor te is televagy projektekkel.
Nekem is van egy rakás amit vagy nem fejeztem még be vagy el se kezdtem:
- A Tigris tank utolsó variánsa amit még nem építettem meg, a Bergetiger (ez már szinte teljesen kész van csak lusta vagyok megcsinálni a gifeket meg a screenshotokat a poszthoz)
- Az Abrmams-em hídrakó változata (ez is már kvázi kész van csak ugyanaz van vele mint a tigrissel, nincs gif)
- akarok csinálni egy sornyi posztot a Sherman tank összes variánsáról amit a 2. vh-ban használtak (minimum 20 de lehet h több) ugyanígy még egyéb 2. vh-s tankokat is megakarok: pz4, panther, t-34 stb. De ezek még csak tervben vannak
- a bio-mban találasz egy listát még egyéb cuccokról is amik tervben vannak, ezek közül a 3 legfontosabb a BF-109 mert azt magyar lajstrommal csinálom meg, a gripen szintén magyar színeoben illetve a mávag héja ami pedig magától értetődően magyar
- dolgozom még egy repülőgép anyahajón is
- felakarom újítani a régi C-500as teherszállítómat, ezúttal teljes belsőtérrel, cockpittel meg minden, ugyanígy a B-200as bombázómat is.
- van egy minigame ötletem is bár azt nem biztos hogy megcsinálom
- akarok még egy avataros cuccot is építeni: egy tűz népe csatahajót
És ezek csak azok amik most eszembejutottak, plusz a gépemen még van egy pár félkész projekt.
Én nem annyira hallgatok másokra ha ilyesmiről van szó, és inkább csinálom amit én találok ki, csak sajnos időm nincs sok, de hogy nyáron kb 2-3 naponta fogok feltölteni valamit, az tuti biztos
@TakicraftCorporation Ah értem. Am az lánctalpas sportkocsit amiben segítettem mikor töltöd fel? Vagy még nem készült el? (Már nagyon várom a végleges verziót mert nagyon király)
A Huszár Gété jobb név lett volna, meg ha lett volna bajsza, meg matyó hímzés az oldalán meg egy tányér gulyás leves az anyós ülésen 😂
Am nagyon fasza lett! Szép munka! 😀
@Akali Thanks :)
@Sm10684 No because books usually don't use slang, you'd only see it if the writer would want to express that a character is speaking with accent, then would he write 'lemme' instead of 'let me'
+1Lemme is more commonly used on the internet, not really in books. No it's not a real word on its own, it'a just the slang version/shortenning of a phrase
@Sm10684 it's a slang for 'let me'
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=lemme
@Sm10684 I didn't check your other creations so I didn't know how many times you did it, and I didn't say you are too lazy to make your own creations, what I thought is that you are too lazy to press the create new aircraft button. I saw many new players who fall into this mistake, that they download a plane, use it a little, then they decide to build something but instead of clicking on start new aircraft, they just start building from that downloaded plane and poof, they get autocredited, and I thought you made this mistake too. I judged too early, I admit, I apologise for that.
However, the autocredit system is still not broken, it was your mistake that your hauler got wrongly credited to something completely different.
No hard feelings
@Sm10684 sigh
+1Alright, lemme explain how the autocredit system works:
In each plane's xml file, there's a code which consists of 6 characters (letters and numbers) when the vehicle is uploaded, the website stores this code and then when you download it, even if you delete the entire plane and build something completely different (like you did with your hauler) this code remains in the xml file, so when you upload your new build, the server will immediately detect this code and will autocredit it. So no, not the autocredit system is broken, only you are too lazy to click on New Aircraft in the designer menu, and start building from there. If you just start building based on a downloaded plane, the system will autocredit it. The solution: if you want to start a new build, click on New Aircraft in the designer menu.
Awesome build! Which map did you use for the thumbnail screenshots?
@AdlerSteiner -.-
@Sm10684 no it isn't broken at all, it does it's job, automatically credits the original authors/builds when someone reuploads their stuff. Just because there's a way to go around it, it doesn't mean it's broken (not to mention that normal, non-douchebag people doesn't even try to go around it)
@Sm10684 what do you mean it's high?
@Randomdoggo Thanks
@Randomdoggo That's not how things work here. People don't just reupload stuff without changing anything, that's just stealing (even if he credits the original author)
+1I mean, if he gets upvotes for this post, he would get those upvotes for absolutely zero work, which is not really fair in my opinion. I hope you understand my concern
@Sm10684 I hope you know that playing out the autocredit system like that is against the rules and you can get banned if you do it
What did you change? As I see the part count, paint, and size are all the same. What is changed then?
@EternalDarkness is this legit?
@701wwj666 yeah I know that GTA 5 mod. I used to have fun with it in the game cuz the creator screwed up the handling of the car and it was as strong as a tank XD
anyways, nice build, good job!
Isn't this the police car from Zootopia?
+3@Supernovaboss504 but it'd make no sense if you think about it. The whole point of spotlight is that people with more points (which usually means more followers too) can spotlight the builds of people with less points (and usually less followers) so that more people will notice them
Quick advice: in the upload window, you can set the visiblity from public to unlisted, therefore only you can access it (and those who you send the link to) via the 'posts' button on your profile page
+1@FuzzyAircraftProductions so am I, yet if he is american and he wants to use that date format, leave it to him, we have no right to tell him which format he should use. This is really not that big of a problem.
Awesome build!
+1btw what map did you use for the suspension gif?
@FuzzyAircraftProductions He is probably american. In the US, they write dates like: mm/dd/yyyy
+1@TheAtomicFox
@Minecraftpoweer
@TheAtomicFox Challenge Accepted! :D
If I make Aang and his airbending staff, while carrying Katara who sits in a canoe therfore the whole thing being amphibious, is good? XDD
+1@SubXTribe No, they are placed on the side in MW3 too, here's a pic of an AH-6 in MW3:
https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/callofduty/images/0/0b/AH-6LittleBirdInvisibleThreatMW3.png/revision/latest?cb=20131103122035
and an MH-6 in MW3:
https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/callofduty/images/b/b0/LittlebirdinParisMW3.png/revision/latest?cb=20130131204956
no guns on the MH-6 at all, while the AH-6 has it's guns on the side.
You might have confused them with an AH-1 Viper or a AH-64 Apache or an Mi-24 Hind or an Mi-24 Havoc which all have guns on their front and are presented in CoD MW3
@SubXTribe I currently have a lotta other plans but updating some of my old builds (inculding helis) is among them so maybe in the future. For now I have tons of other ideas to build before starting updating my old builds
Nice job! :)
Only problem is that AH-6s' weapons are not on the front. They are placed on the side where you placed the benches. Also usually MH-6s have benches on their side because those are the transport variants while AH-6s have miniguns and rocked pods on their sides because those are the attack variants.
But great work anyways!
@TakicraftCorporation mindenképp csekkold le. Teljesen átdolgozták a USS Beast-et és adtak hozzá néhány menő újítást is: van rajta katapult, liftek amik levisznek a hajó belső hangárába meg ilyen kötelek amik elkapják a repülődet leszálláskor (ahhoz viszont kell az egyik új darab is amit a futóművek szekcióban találsz meg a designerben)
@TakicraftCorporation Egy Metallic Unis Green-t kérnék :D Am nagyon adom az 1.8-at, a mágnes meg a csörlő kurva hasznos és pont jól jön egy projekthez aminek már nekiakartam állni (illetve majd csak nekifogok, nyáron, ha letudtam az érettségit) az új USS Beast-re meg nem találok szavakat, nagyon jól ellehet vele szórakozni (kilőttem a katapultal a tigris tankomat XD)
Meg a többi funkció is nagyon jól hangzik, bár még nem volt alkalmam leteszteli mindet. Az új helikopter alkatrészek egyenlőre még annyira nem jönnek be mert egy kicsit nehéz irányítani de majd hozzászokom.
Te mit gondolsz róla?
Wow ez de király! Hol lehet megrendelni? 😃😂
+1@AdlerSteiner For what?
@JamesBoA yes I know the actual shortening of the Soviet Union was USSR (United Soviet Socialist Republics)
I asked because I thought maybe he purposefully wrote URSS which stands for some made up thing, but probably it's just a typo