Hello, @Jim1the1Squid, My company has launched our Uss Dammerung along with 25 IF3 . WT's. If we lose this war HarrisCraft may try to ruin us due to older conflicts in addition with this one. Make your moves carefully.
Sincerely, Ambassador General, General of the Armies and CEO of Wright tech
Axartar
Hmm interesting. I managed to fly through the bridge unscathed no weapons used, but I feel magnets may have a role to play in this. If you want to test this yourself my wt-if3 or whatever I named it was the plane I managed this in (activate g1) @Jerba
Lol I never thought about it that way, I like your perspective of it, I just accidentally made pitching inverted and was like. Effort to fix that so nope.
@TheSleepingInsomniac
Honestly currently I don't think they compare at all, simple planes is better for fine creations with finnicky parts. I tried on sr2 but the mirroring tools aren't good, furthermore you cant export models and lastly you can't Xml mod, this has become one of my favourite aspects of sp honestly me and impactForce are best friends. In addition sr2 requires a Lotttttt more processing power, my simple planes can handle about 1-1.5k parts MAX, whilst my sr2 can barely handle a basic space ship.
On the contrary I agree, the games should stay separate I've already payed (only a tiny discount in the bundle at the time) for the full version of the games, as they're both great for their desired aspects, sr2 performs great for space travel whilst sp cant scrape it. Also the plane aspects in sr2 are a LOT harder to use.
And for a possible money maker, They could start making official mods (dlcs) like underwater has been made and with all the underwater terrain ALREADY MADE by the devs why not add some underwater engines throw in underwater vision and maybe some real underwater weapons. you get the idea. this isn't (relative compared to moving the community to sr2) hard at all, even then the mod creators would likely be happy to help develop parts and locations. And charge small money for some of these and you could help satisfy the community.
I feel like i stopped making sense about halfway through the post, oh well.
Personally I don’t (often) use custom cockpits because even with designer suite and everything. If one thing reattached it can take ages to figure out what it was and what it attached to.
But if you want a more realistic cockpit
Or more upvotes (not guaranteed)
Then spend ages on the cockpits.
Yes but if I were to use the original blocks, it would be harder for mobile users and the challenge would probably be named the classic challenge.
Vanilla tends to describe a basic thing using easily accessible parts.
No fuselage was a little twist I wanted to disappoint people with. As in make them feel annoyed and make this challenge unique.
Don’t worry you comment wasn’t harsh and I’m really glad you entered my competition. Thank you! :)@JediWolf
@Oski So the the folktales are true, what incredibly idiotic species, I must proclaim to believing natural selection wiped them out of existence many a year ago!
Yepppp I’ve done it a lot (failing that is) And made 2 subs which work kinda. One with cooler functions but less manoeuvrability the other is manoeuvrable but not detailed @MintLynx
Yeah I played it with a friend a bit I found the open map fun and dislike the drone function it kinda ruins the fun of barn finds. Still love my Audi R8 beating the forza 2 twice@Awsomur
forza horizon 2
God of war series (good choice @Aeroman)
Simple planes
anything that can cure boredom temporarily
Sr2 I hate the building tools but the games good.
@Stormfur Due to google updating stuff. nvm just heres the dev saying it
We received notice from Google Play that they are going to start requiring 64-bit support. Normally, this wouldn't be a big issue, however doing this will require us to change how we build SimplePlanes for Android and we will need to change the scripting backend from Mono (which allows mod support) and move to IL2CPP (which does not allow mod support). Unfortunately, this means the Google Play version will no longer be able to support mods.
I just wanted to let you know so this didn't come out of the blue with the next update. Sorry for the bad news. However, the bright side is that the Android version will likely see performance improvements because of this. iOS has been built for 64-bit with IL2CPP for some time, so it won't see any additional performance gains. The macOS and Windows versions won't change and will continue to have mod support (except on the Mac App Store, where mod support is prohibited by Apple's TOS).
Hate to point this out but “still not paid due to medical expenses” in simple no WiFi or charge=ded @Armyguy1534
Hello, @Jim1the1Squid, My company has launched our Uss Dammerung along with 25 IF3 . WT's. If we lose this war HarrisCraft may try to ruin us due to older conflicts in addition with this one. Make your moves carefully.
Sincerely, Ambassador General, General of the Armies and CEO of Wright tech
Axartar
well, I guess we fight. So be it.
Hmm interesting. I managed to fly through the bridge unscathed no weapons used, but I feel magnets may have a role to play in this. If you want to test this yourself my wt-if3 or whatever I named it was the plane I managed this in (activate g1) @Jerba
Lol I never thought about it that way, I like your perspective of it, I just accidentally made pitching inverted and was like. Effort to fix that so nope.
@TheSleepingInsomniac
Oh ok but it still hasn’t got the same functions within xml (has it lol) @JohnnyBoythePilot
Honestly currently I don't think they compare at all, simple planes is better for fine creations with finnicky parts. I tried on sr2 but the mirroring tools aren't good, furthermore you cant export models and lastly you can't Xml mod, this has become one of my favourite aspects of sp honestly me and impactForce are best friends. In addition sr2 requires a Lotttttt more processing power, my simple planes can handle about 1-1.5k parts MAX, whilst my sr2 can barely handle a basic space ship.
On the contrary I agree, the games should stay separate I've already payed (only a tiny discount in the bundle at the time) for the full version of the games, as they're both great for their desired aspects, sr2 performs great for space travel whilst sp cant scrape it. Also the plane aspects in sr2 are a LOT harder to use.
And for a possible money maker, They could start making official mods (dlcs) like underwater has been made and with all the underwater terrain ALREADY MADE by the devs why not add some underwater engines throw in underwater vision and maybe some real underwater weapons. you get the idea. this isn't (relative compared to moving the community to sr2) hard at all, even then the mod creators would likely be happy to help develop parts and locations. And charge small money for some of these and you could help satisfy the community.
I feel like i stopped making sense about halfway through the post, oh well.
+5Personally I don’t (often) use custom cockpits because even with designer suite and everything. If one thing reattached it can take ages to figure out what it was and what it attached to.
But if you want a more realistic cockpit
Or more upvotes (not guaranteed)
Then spend ages on the cockpits.
yep sorry, hear were just size alterations @MrPlanesandsirens
Ok I’ll try and fufill this ASAP
This may be today or tomorrow @AlanGrand
Oh so basically autopilot is naff and whichever car is driven by autopilot loses.
+2Sounds about right. Lol
911 ftw (before watching)
They weren’t 😂 @RYAviation
The mobile part I meant about xml @JediWolf
Yes but if I were to use the original blocks, it would be harder for mobile users and the challenge would probably be named the classic challenge.
Vanilla tends to describe a basic thing using easily accessible parts.
No fuselage was a little twist I wanted to disappoint people with. As in make them feel annoyed and make this challenge unique.
Don’t worry you comment wasn’t harsh and I’m really glad you entered my competition. Thank you! :)@JediWolf
@Oski So the the folktales are true, what incredibly idiotic species, I must proclaim to believing natural selection wiped them out of existence many a year ago!
I thought those things were only found in legends. Such stupidity is unrivalled! Quite spectacular!
+4Yepppp I’ve done it a lot (failing that is) And made 2 subs which work kinda. One with cooler functions but less manoeuvrability the other is manoeuvrable but not detailed @MintLynx
2/3
+1I have very little experience with submarines but I dunno I might. I like trying 😂
I can’t wait for the apology forum/video/post after this stuffs done
Also your building the same plane. Of course they’re gonna be similar besides loads of small details show a large difference.
+1Ok I’ll see. I expect I’ll be able to do it later, if I can’t it may be a few days. Thanks! @Catofthepeople
Whattt!?!? This changed my view off the internet. Well that’s a thing. @CrashFighter05
Yeah I played it with a friend a bit I found the open map fun and dislike the drone function it kinda ruins the fun of barn finds. Still love my Audi R8 beating the forza 2 twice@Awsomur
@Awsomur no sadly.
my xbox died.
insert flashbacks
forza horizon 2
God of war series (good choice @Aeroman)
Simple planes
anything that can cure boredom temporarily
Sr2 I hate the building tools but the games good.
Omg it only drops from convoys, how did you get that!
@Awsomur yeaahhhh that would be awsome. and with the joke of deadpool cleaning up ashes after the click its possible yayyyy
Sadly yep. @Awsomur
@Awsomur x-men never disappoints except....
@Awsomur oh damn I never watched xmen 3 im sorry I watched 1,2 & future past I think
@vcharng just search bridge destroying guns (or similar) in the sp search, they used to be everywhere
@vcharng some can for some reason idk
no worries @Strucker
@Strucker in simple google
@L3dg3ndary yep or modern day cheetahs or panthers. and orangutans and elephants.
@robloxweponco no problems
ideally the therazinosaurus, mind, I find beezlebufo funny.
@Stormfur Due to google updating stuff. nvm just heres the dev saying it
We received notice from Google Play that they are going to start requiring 64-bit support. Normally, this wouldn't be a big issue, however doing this will require us to change how we build SimplePlanes for Android and we will need to change the scripting backend from Mono (which allows mod support) and move to IL2CPP (which does not allow mod support). Unfortunately, this means the Google Play version will no longer be able to support mods.
I just wanted to let you know so this didn't come out of the blue with the next update. Sorry for the bad news. However, the bright side is that the Android version will likely see performance improvements because of this. iOS has been built for 64-bit with IL2CPP for some time, so it won't see any additional performance gains. The macOS and Windows versions won't change and will continue to have mod support (except on the Mac App Store, where mod support is prohibited by Apple's TOS).
No problem I love your builds @MAHADI
I agree it’s mor imprecise @SubXTribe
Imjaystation, morgz, morgz mum, The paul brothers, deji, ricegum damn too many ppl
@Strucker I hope so, If you need anything in particular, ask
@Genterprizes ahh jolly good my good fellow
@SanitaterAirlines no probbb muchh
@MAHADI wow Its amazing, i've already upvoted it so past (And present) me obviously though it was great!
@GabetheDoge thanks, I hope you can use them well
+1@IStoleYourMeme yeah I used to see these a lot when I was ios they sorta died and I kinda copied the style, I tried to add my own twist though.
@Gameboi14 hahahahah i love that, took me wayyyy to long to get the joke though.
Thanks @edensk