@LieutenantSOT If it's in a dive, yes, it's still possible. But the dude who is responsible for the strength of the plane will nervously wag his finger at his temple.
@Souka Apparently, you used MiG-33 (AKA MiG-29m) drawings. And I have just the MiG-29. It is logical that the drawings do not match, if the planes are different.
@EngineerOtaku It's annoying when you find a good drawing and start building an airplane on it, but not everything is drawn there, so you look for another one. AND IT DOESN'T MATCH!!!
@Souka I don't know about the drawing. Maybe I used a different one. (All drawings have one problem: they are ALL different. Two identical blueprints may not fit.)
@Wernster
I like your style . It fits my philosophy: ,,Beauty doesn't have to be complicated,,
73 parts - It's low for that look.
I know someone who can do it for at least 300 parts.
Ein Hoch auf die Deutsche Engineering!!!
+1nice. T
+1@JuanNotAnAlt
+1@rexzion
@BeastHunter
Now you can eat cookies
+1@FlyingPatriot ?
+1TigerLAG
+1@PapaKernels THX
+1@Nofferston
+1It is ready. U can check it.
@djokir это здесь при чём?
+1Hetzer.
+1@Sm1leyFaCe
+1You're back!
Noice!
+1Ok. Enrolled.
Nice plane.
+1I hope they don't have children...
+1Ok. Enrolled.
+1Ok. Enrolled.
+1@An2k No problem.
+1It looks very strange, but yes.
It's enrolled.
+1@LieutenantSOT If it's in a dive, yes, it's still possible. But the dude who is responsible for the strength of the plane will nervously wag his finger at his temple.
+1@PapaKernels I will fly this completely.
+1Ok. Enrolled.
+1Ok. Enrolled.
+1@SuperSuperTheSylph On my planes there is always that possibility.
+193 parts... It is awesome. I was expecting at least 250 from such an assembly. Soon your builds can be run on a calculator.
+1Ok. Enrolled.
+1Dry - 30.
+1Awesome.
+1I've seen such an arrangement of the engine somewhere...
Ok. Enrolled.
+1Ok. Enrolled.
+1@Shootingstar07 I'll kill for that.
+1Oh, my. It looks... I cant say how it looks.
+1I can make same plane in 150 parts...
+1Chonk... Chonk MiG.
+1@LieutenantSOT I was just trying to make nice.
+1T
+1@PapaWii This is a demonstration of pre-fender control. I had to dig into the FT code, but it looks and works great.
+1All is well, but eats only a small remark. The OVT is spelled in all capital letters.
+1In an attempt to find the perfect balance between detalization and economy, we invaded Poland .
+1The fighting is about to start here, so let's defuse the situation.
Black humor :
Do you know what they call an electrician's funeral?
Grounding.
+1@TemporaryBrightness I'd be more surprised if you asked him to bring a death certificate.
+1Nice . But the way , u have gold now . Congrulations !
+1@Souka Apparently, you used MiG-33 (AKA MiG-29m) drawings. And I have just the MiG-29. It is logical that the drawings do not match, if the planes are different.
+1@EngineerOtaku It's annoying when you find a good drawing and start building an airplane on it, but not everything is drawn there, so you look for another one. AND IT DOESN'T MATCH!!!
+1@Souka I don't know about the drawing. Maybe I used a different one. (All drawings have one problem: they are ALL different. Two identical blueprints may not fit.)
+1@Ergi I was on low start. I knew about it beforehand and prepared everything at once.
+1Ok.Enrolled.
+1@VinerBoss писать по русски ты мне можешь . Но в самолёте должна быть ,,изюминка,, . Здесь мне нужна оригинальность .
+1Input =
+1sum(fireWeapons)@Wernster
+1I like your style . It fits my philosophy: ,,Beauty doesn't have to be complicated,,
73 parts - It's low for that look.
I know someone who can do it for at least 300 parts.
You can't trust game titles ...
And also that I'm a terrible pilot.
+1