@ToeTips
@Randomplayer
Thank you!
It took me a year and a half, but I finally achieved platinum. Thanks to everyone who has upvoted and spotlighted me :)
@WinsWings
I see.
The Intrepid Sea, Air & Space Museum is one of those museums that I would like to visit someday, both in terms of its valuable aircraft collection and in terms of being able to ride on a real Essex-class aircraft carrier.
@WinsWings
Thank you!
I also referred to this article in preparing this one. Border Models new 35th scale B5N2 TYPE 97 Kate
B5N2 in 1/35 scale...fascinating, isn't it?
Sometimes online information on high precision models is useful for builds in SP.
@WinsWings
@Dogedogebread13
Thanks for the comment.
The landing gear is the best feature of this plane and I wanted to represent it well. I am glad to hear your praise.
@Kangy
Thank you for your comments!
I was very particular in making the fuselage shape as close to the actual aircraft as possible this time. I am very happy to hear your compliments on the shape of the fuselage.
Although the number of parts is a bit large. I was not able to create many detailed parts this time.
It is very difficult to reproduce the exact shape with as few parts as possible.
@KingOfTypos
The "double stack fuselage method"!? Wow, thanks for giving my creation technique a cool name.
Indeed, when I create a fuselage, I combine the upper and lower halves of the fuselage. This allows me more flexibility in shaping the fuselage cross section. In some cases, like the nose section of the Ju-87, I combine the top, middle, and bottom three fuselage parts ("triple stack fuselage method"?).
Whatever it is, I'm glad my technique is useful to you. I look forward to seeing the F6F you build :)
@KingOfTypos
Thanks for introducing me to your methods. I will make use of it when I can understand it.
OK, whatever plane it is (even if it's not a Bf109) I eagerly await your next work :)
@KingOfTypos
Thank you for your comment.
I'm surprised you noticed it! Yes, I am using EternalDarkness' fuselage slicing wing method, just like you. ...well, to be precise, I use something similar to that. I am ashamed to say that I am not very good at math, so I am not using EternalDarkness' fuselage slicing wing method perfectly.
The rolls may indeed be excessive. This is a reminder for my next work.
Bf109 is good! I would love to see a Bf109 made by an excellent modeler like you :)
@Navalmen
Thanks for your comments.
It is true that this aircraft originally had a habit of rolling left on its own. So I corrected it with wing attachment angles, etc., but I guess I didn't completely fix it. My apologies.
@BogdanX
Thanks for your comments.
As always, thank you for your perceptive points.
I was aware of the problem of the directional instability during takeoff and landing. However, I could not find the cause and could not fix it. Thanks for pointing out the cause.
Your various pointers and advice are helpful. If you have any other areas for improvement or good points, I would be glad to hear them.
@BogdanX
Thanks for the comment.
You are right, it could have been better with suspension on the landing gears. But I wanted to minimize the number of parts used. I did not feel that it would interfere with the landing, and it would not affect the appearance significantly, so I decided to omit the suspension.
@WinsWings
Thank you for choosing my piece for third place! I am happy because I didn't think I could win a prize.
This was my first time participating in the Challenge. It was a very fun challenge. I also enjoyed looking at the other participants' works that were submitted one after another.
I look forward to seeing what the next competition will be like. Thank you very much.
@Ownedpilot
Thanks for the comment. My work was made possible because of the current version of SP, which has more features such as slicing the fuselage, etc. You are amazing for making such a beautiful Hs P.75 four years ago.
@WinsWings
I submitted a piece to be entered in the Challenge. Henschel Hs P.75
Please let me know if there are any problems with how to participate. I hope you like it.
@WinsWings
Thank you very much. If I can create a good build that I am comfortable with, I will post it the way you taught me.
This is my first time participating in the Challenge, so please let me know if I am making any mistakes.
@WinsWings
I too like pusher type airplanes and would love to participate in this challenge.
Is it correct that all I have to do to participate in this challenge is to download this post and submit my own work based on it?
@Kangy
Thank you so much for your thorough description, I really appreciate it!
I understand it very well. I see, so that's why most WW2 fighters have black nose tops.
I have never tried discord before. When I have a little more time on my hands, I might give it a try. I would be very happy to have your advice then :)
@Jaspy190
Thank you for writing these interesting facts.
I like the sleek look of the Ki-48, but I don't think I'll make one right now, as I've just finished making the Ki-45, which is partially appropriated from the Ki-48 design.
I will keep it in mind as a candidate to make one.
@Jaspy190
Yes, you are correct about the models later than Type 1-Tei (including Ki-100).
Models prior to Type1-Hei had a 12.7mm machine gun in the nose.
@Killer123562
Thank you for your comment.
I have received some requests for jets from the late Great War, such as the Me-262, and I would like to consider the P-59 as a candidate.
@BeeBeeBanoBo
Hmmm...ki 61 is good too. It looks smart and I like it. However, I'm totally undecided on what to make next, so I hope you'll be patient with me.
@WinsWings
+1Thank you!
Glad to hear you say that.
@ToeTips
+1@Randomplayer
Thank you!
It took me a year and a half, but I finally achieved platinum. Thanks to everyone who has upvoted and spotlighted me :)
@WinsWings
+1I see.
The Intrepid Sea, Air & Space Museum is one of those museums that I would like to visit someday, both in terms of its valuable aircraft collection and in terms of being able to ride on a real Essex-class aircraft carrier.
@WinsWings
+1Thank you for your comment!
So you saw the real TBF! I envy you.
It must have been big...it's one of the largest single-engine prop plane.
@Englishgarden
+1@FalHartIndustries
Thank you :)
@WinsWings
+1Thank you!
I also referred to this article in preparing this one.
Border Models new 35th scale B5N2 TYPE 97 Kate
B5N2 in 1/35 scale...fascinating, isn't it?
Sometimes online information on high precision models is useful for builds in SP.
@WinsWings
+1@Dogedogebread13
Thanks for the comment.
The landing gear is the best feature of this plane and I wanted to represent it well. I am glad to hear your praise.
@TheTankMuseum2005
+1Thank you!
@Kangy
+1Thank you for your comments!
I was very particular in making the fuselage shape as close to the actual aircraft as possible this time. I am very happy to hear your compliments on the shape of the fuselage.
Although the number of parts is a bit large. I was not able to create many detailed parts this time.
It is very difficult to reproduce the exact shape with as few parts as possible.
@L0RR3B0RR3
+1Thank you. I am glad to hear you say so.
@WinsWings
+1Thank you very much! :)
@WinsWings
+1Thanks for the comments. Thanks also for the spotlight!
@Jaspy190
+1Thank you very much :)
@Randomplayer
+1Thanks for answering the question.
@KingOfTypos
The "double stack fuselage method"!? Wow, thanks for giving my creation technique a cool name.
Indeed, when I create a fuselage, I combine the upper and lower halves of the fuselage. This allows me more flexibility in shaping the fuselage cross section. In some cases, like the nose section of the Ju-87, I combine the top, middle, and bottom three fuselage parts ("triple stack fuselage method"?).
Whatever it is, I'm glad my technique is useful to you. I look forward to seeing the F6F you build :)
+1@KingOfTypos
+1Thanks for introducing me to your methods. I will make use of it when I can understand it.
OK, whatever plane it is (even if it's not a Bf109) I eagerly await your next work :)
@KingOfTypos
+1Thank you for your comment.
I'm surprised you noticed it! Yes, I am using EternalDarkness' fuselage slicing wing method, just like you. ...well, to be precise, I use something similar to that. I am ashamed to say that I am not very good at math, so I am not using EternalDarkness' fuselage slicing wing method perfectly.
The rolls may indeed be excessive. This is a reminder for my next work.
Bf109 is good! I would love to see a Bf109 made by an excellent modeler like you :)
@MrShenanigansSP
+1Thank you for your comment.
I am glad to hear your compliments :)
@Navalmen
+1Thanks for your comments.
It is true that this aircraft originally had a habit of rolling left on its own. So I corrected it with wing attachment angles, etc., but I guess I didn't completely fix it. My apologies.
@BogdanX
+1Thanks for your comments.
As always, thank you for your perceptive points.
I was aware of the problem of the directional instability during takeoff and landing. However, I could not find the cause and could not fix it. Thanks for pointing out the cause.
Your various pointers and advice are helpful. If you have any other areas for improvement or good points, I would be glad to hear them.
@ReinMcDeer
+1Thank you for your comment.
I always have a lot of trouble when creating the fuselage behind the canopy.
@BogdanX
+1Thanks for the comment.
You are right, it could have been better with suspension on the landing gears. But I wanted to minimize the number of parts used. I did not feel that it would interfere with the landing, and it would not affect the appearance significantly, so I decided to omit the suspension.
@WinsWings
+1Thank you for choosing my piece for third place! I am happy because I didn't think I could win a prize.
This was my first time participating in the Challenge. It was a very fun challenge. I also enjoyed looking at the other participants' works that were submitted one after another.
I look forward to seeing what the next competition will be like. Thank you very much.
@Timothy19452022
+1You like P-51?
Try this.
@Ownedpilot
+1Thanks for the comment. My work was made possible because of the current version of SP, which has more features such as slicing the fuselage, etc. You are amazing for making such a beautiful Hs P.75 four years ago.
@Jaspy190 @Dragoranos
+1Thanks for the comment. Thanks also for the request. I will consider it.
@Skam
Thankyou so much :)
@WinsWings
+1I submitted a piece to be entered in the Challenge.
Henschel Hs P.75
Please let me know if there are any problems with how to participate. I hope you like it.
@WinsWings
+1Thank you very much. If I can create a good build that I am comfortable with, I will post it the way you taught me.
This is my first time participating in the Challenge, so please let me know if I am making any mistakes.
@WinsWings
+1I too like pusher type airplanes and would love to participate in this challenge.
Is it correct that all I have to do to participate in this challenge is to download this post and submit my own work based on it?
@ShinyGemsBro
+1Thanks for your comment.Thanks for the upvote too.
I will endeavor to make more less parts builds in the future so you can fly it.
@IceCraftGaming
+1@Samflugzeugpanzer
@WinsWings
Thank you so much!!
@Bryan5
+1Congratulations on reaching 10K :)
You are a builder I admire, and once again you have shown us a wonderful build with remarkable realism and originality. Great work!!
+1@Kangy
+1Thank you so much for your thorough description, I really appreciate it!
I understand it very well. I see, so that's why most WW2 fighters have black nose tops.
I have never tried discord before. When I have a little more time on my hands, I might give it a try. I would be very happy to have your advice then :)
@GabrielSatori @Dragoranos
Thankyou!!
@GabrielSatori
+1Oops, I forgot to fix it. Thanks for pointing that out.
I updated the XML file and fixed the bug.
@ChamDel78
+1Thanks for making the new version. It's quite avant-garde :)
@OTOjustGoose
+1Thank you so much!
@HR
+1Thank you! I'm glad you like it.
Modern cars are cool, but I think old cars have beautiful curves :)
@asteroidbook345
+1Indeed.
Even I, a Japanese, think so.
@Jaspy190
+1Thank you for writing these interesting facts.
I like the sleek look of the Ki-48, but I don't think I'll make one right now, as I've just finished making the Ki-45, which is partially appropriated from the Ki-48 design.
I will keep it in mind as a candidate to make one.
@Jaspy190
+1Yes, you are correct about the models later than Type 1-Tei (including Ki-100).
Models prior to Type1-Hei had a 12.7mm machine gun in the nose.
@Killer123562
+1Thank you for your comment.
I have received some requests for jets from the late Great War, such as the Me-262, and I would like to consider the P-59 as a candidate.
@Jaspy190
+1Thanks a lot!
I would like to make the Ki-100 as well.
@botto28
+1Thankyou!
@BeeBeeBanoBo
+1Hmmm...ki 61 is good too. It looks smart and I like it. However, I'm totally undecided on what to make next, so I hope you'll be patient with me.
@JustLookingForFriends
+1Thank you! Thanks also for the request. I will consider it.
@AnHNWhiteCornet
+1Thank you! The windows are the part I was particular about :)
@BeeBeeBanoBo
+1Aah! Yes, okay, you mean this one? Okay, I don't know if I can do it well, but I will try to make it.
@Yourlocalhuman
+1Thanks for your comments. I am also pleased that you have tested and evaluated my planes.
@shipfinder568
+1Thank you for your comment. Thank you for fighting with the plane I built :)