@ShinyGemsBro
I sincerely thank you for your sense of justice.
Yes, I knew all about it... that he has copied multiple works of mine without permission, that he has copied great works of others without permission, and that he has made personal accusations against me.
But I knew there was nothing more I could do. I could respond to his accusations, but that would only lead to a futile fight. I am sure he would not admit that he copied without permission. I felt so helpless that I considered leaving the SP community.
Ah, my friend, it was then that you, Candor, spoke up. You spoke up for the feelings of those whose works were unauthorizedly copied, and you made the accusation. Your integrity saved me. Thank you.
But...let's not condemn him any further. Enough is enough. I am waiting for him to create his own ingenious work, not an unauthorized copy.
Finally, once again, thank you ShinyGemsBro.
Thanks to you I will be able to make planes again.
@PeterMuller
Read my profile.
And don't copy my work. You have copied my Bf109 without permission and posted it falsely as your own work.
If you think you won't be found out, you're wrong. The person who created it will know. Because I put a lot of effort and ingenuity into my work over a period of days.
If you want to do it, follow the rules and submit it as a "successor".
I will block you.
@CometInSky
Thanks for your comment.
I would not be offended if you put a jet engine, missiles, helicopter rotors, or anything else on my work.
However, if you post a "Jetted F4U" under the pretense that you made it yourself from scratch, I will be offended.I think it is against the SP rules.
If you want to enjoy it privately, you are free to modify it as you like :)
@MrGreen
Thank you for your warm comments. I am honestly glad to hear such words. Thanks also for the upvote and spotlight.
By the way, your Mk.1 crew capsule is lovely, and as someone who plays KSP and loves Kerbals, I am delighted.
@FairFireFlight
I am relieved that justice has been done.
I believe the following works were copied without permission, although this may be inaccurate as I can't see his account already.
Tonnkatsu's B-17
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/1l5uQ5/Boeing-B-17G-Flying-Fortress
Tonnkatsu's A6M1
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/b5djfk/Mitsubishi-A6M1-Zero
Alisuchanka's Bf-109
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/8TGOhu/Messerschmitt-BF-109-G-2
Sorry if I'm wrong.
@BeeBeeBanoBo
Thank you for your comment.
I am using this image as a reference for this work.
Do you mean the aircraft of 355 Squadron is the one in this image?
@Apollo018362
Sorry for the late reply.
Wow! Thanks for taking such a nice picture with the plane I made!
Thanks for the suggestion too. You mean you would take a screenshot of my work, right? I was very happy that you made that suggestion.
But I also love taking pictures of my planes. So I will continue to take my own screenshots of my work. Sorry about that.
@DatMaluchGuy19
Oh, such a compliment is too good for me. But thank you.
Well, some people can be a bit brusque at times(especially sick and tired of people like Peter Muller), but I like this SP community... a cross-national group of people who like games, airplanes, cars, mechs, etc... it's interesting and I like it.
@Seemeing
Thank you very much! I am glad to hear such words from you.
I downloaded and flew the "Raiden" you created. It is fantastic. Beautiful appearance, fun to fly and responsive, and the cockpit is much more detailed than my Raiden.
@100
I do not know the details, but I have heard that the landing gear is stored on one side at a time due to the hydraulic system. A large hydraulic system cannot be installed in a fighter plane, which is required to be small and light, so the landing gear is stored a little at a time on each side.
However, the J2M's landing gear was electrically driven (hence the many failures in the early days). So it may not be for the above reason. To be honest, I don't know.
However, news footage from that time shows that the landing gear was stowed at different times on the left and right sides of the aircraft.
@kiji
@Timplanes
@Mustang51
@PapaKernels
@Seaplanerider030805
Thank you all for your comments.
I am glad I could make a "corsair" that you all think is good.
@pancelvonat
Thank you very much.
I am glad that you noticed the detailed ideas in my work. If you have the opportunity to use this technique in your future work, please do so.
@WinsWings
@AlbertanPlaneMaker
@asteroidbook345
@SilverStar
Thanks for your comment.
I wanted to reproduce the siren as well. I knew this mod existed. But I am a mobile user and could not use the mod.
I hope they will release parts related to sound. It would expand the possibilities of the work.
@Ian_Yashima
Thanks.
I also saw your photo on your twitter. I think ASBE's work is excellent as seen in your photos. I am looking forward to seeing it completed :)
@BogdanX
Thank you very much for your kind advice. You are certainly right, if I drop the scale of the wing parts down to 0.1, they will no longer appear to pop out. I will keep this in mind as a reference.
@SemedianIndustries
Yourlocalhuman's comment made me a little depressed that he didn't give me a good or bad review of my work. In that sense, I thank you for speaking for me.
@Yourlocalhuman
I don't mind that you were just stating the facts. However, I am thinking of posting the P-51D next, so instead of pointing out that the plane exists in stock, I would be happy if you would download it, fly it in your skies, rate it if you think it is good, and point out any improvements you think are needed.
That's all.
@L0RR3B0RR3
Thank you for your comment.
As you pointed out, this aircraft is prone to stall due to rapid pitch-up during low-speed flight. ...I tried various balance adjustments, etc., but it seems they were insufficient. I will try to improve it in my next work.
@Dragoranos
Thank you for your comment. Thank you also for your appropriate remarks on my text. You are correct in pointing out that this is a typo on my part. My apologies.
I have corrected the notation from "air superiority fighter" to "escort fighter" as you indicated.
@xNotDumb
I can only say that this is the result of looking at photos of actual airplane interiors and roughly reproducing them with the technology I have. I have no intention of imitating or plagiarizing.
@Yourlocalhuman
Sorry, I did not understand the intent of your comment. Of course I know that the P-51 B is available as a stock plane. Is there some rule that says you can't upload the same model as a stock plane...?
@ShinyGemsBro
+15I sincerely thank you for your sense of justice.
Yes, I knew all about it... that he has copied multiple works of mine without permission, that he has copied great works of others without permission, and that he has made personal accusations against me.
But I knew there was nothing more I could do. I could respond to his accusations, but that would only lead to a futile fight. I am sure he would not admit that he copied without permission. I felt so helpless that I considered leaving the SP community.
Ah, my friend, it was then that you, Candor, spoke up. You spoke up for the feelings of those whose works were unauthorizedly copied, and you made the accusation. Your integrity saved me. Thank you.
But...let's not condemn him any further. Enough is enough. I am waiting for him to create his own ingenious work, not an unauthorized copy.
Finally, once again, thank you ShinyGemsBro.
Thanks to you I will be able to make planes again.
@PeterMuller
+5Read my profile.
And don't copy my work. You have copied my Bf109 without permission and posted it falsely as your own work.
If you think you won't be found out, you're wrong. The person who created it will know. Because I put a lot of effort and ingenuity into my work over a period of days.
If you want to do it, follow the rules and submit it as a "successor".
I will block you.
@CometInSky
+4Thanks for your comment.
I would not be offended if you put a jet engine, missiles, helicopter rotors, or anything else on my work.
However, if you post a "Jetted F4U" under the pretense that you made it yourself from scratch, I will be offended.I think it is against the SP rules.
If you want to enjoy it privately, you are free to modify it as you like :)
@MrGreen
+4Thank you for your warm comments. I am honestly glad to hear such words. Thanks also for the upvote and spotlight.
By the way, your Mk.1 crew capsule is lovely, and as someone who plays KSP and loves Kerbals, I am delighted.
@FairFireFlight
+3I am relieved that justice has been done.
I believe the following works were copied without permission, although this may be inaccurate as I can't see his account already.
Tonnkatsu's B-17
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/1l5uQ5/Boeing-B-17G-Flying-Fortress
Tonnkatsu's A6M1
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/b5djfk/Mitsubishi-A6M1-Zero
Alisuchanka's Bf-109
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/8TGOhu/Messerschmitt-BF-109-G-2
Sorry if I'm wrong.
@Erc90F4RU
+3@SonsoftheMoth
@MAPA
Thank you very much!
I will keep up the good work.
@Kangy
+3Thank you! Your warm comments are encouraging:)
The pace is slow, but I will continue to make better builds.
@RolandTelmsFrossag @Shugie @GoldenSidewinder @Jaspy190 @2700kMoogie @CN0703
+3Thankyou so much! :)
@Elorus
Thanks for your translation.
@BeeBeeBanoBo
+3Thank you for your comment.
I am using this image as a reference for this work.
Do you mean the aircraft of 355 Squadron is the one in this image?
@MrGreen
+3Aah! So that's what the name means! I think it is a wonderful name to honor the brave Jevadaiah. He even went to the ISS recently :)
@SyntheticL
+3Thank you for your comments.
I see! I never played War Thunder, so I didn't know that, but it is a tough one to make enemies with.
@Apollo018362
+2Sorry for the late reply.
Wow! Thanks for taking such a nice picture with the plane I made!
Thanks for the suggestion too. You mean you would take a screenshot of my work, right? I was very happy that you made that suggestion.
But I also love taking pictures of my planes. So I will continue to take my own screenshots of my work. Sorry about that.
@DatMaluchGuy19
+2Oh, such a compliment is too good for me. But thank you.
Well, some people can be a bit brusque at times(especially sick and tired of people like Peter Muller), but I like this SP community... a cross-national group of people who like games, airplanes, cars, mechs, etc... it's interesting and I like it.
You finally made it. Congrats!
+2Zero's final model, beautiful.
@ariakenori
+2Thanks for the comment. I am honored that you enjoy my posts :)
@WinsWings
+2@froge
Thank you very much :)
@WinsWings
+2Thank you!
I always appreciate your upvotes and spotlights. Even more than that, I'm happy to hear your compliments and comments :)
@ThomasRoderick
+2Thank you very much! :)
@Wholzz
+2@Hahahahaahahshs
@The26thMeowng
Thank you all for your comments :)
The next one is under consideration.
@Noplane
+2Thank you very much. I will continue to do my best to grow, even if only a little bit :)
@Seemeing
+2Thank you very much! I am glad to hear such words from you.
I downloaded and flew the "Raiden" you created. It is fantastic. Beautiful appearance, fun to fly and responsive, and the cockpit is much more detailed than my Raiden.
@100
I do not know the details, but I have heard that the landing gear is stored on one side at a time due to the hydraulic system. A large hydraulic system cannot be installed in a fighter plane, which is required to be small and light, so the landing gear is stored a little at a time on each side.
However, the J2M's landing gear was electrically driven (hence the many failures in the early days). So it may not be for the above reason. To be honest, I don't know.
However, news footage from that time shows that the landing gear was stowed at different times on the left and right sides of the aircraft.
https://youtu.be/0t92uHBA814
So I reproduced that movement in this work.
+2Excellent work!
+2Beautiful modeling with a small number of parts.
I am glad that my work has inspired you :)
@WinsWings
+2Thank you for your comment.
And I am so glad you spotlighted this piece!Thank you so much :)
@HuskyDynamics01
+2Thank you for your comment.
I am honored to hear you say that :)
@SonsoftheMoth
+2Thanks for the comment! Thanks for taking a look at my other works :)
@kiji
+2@Timplanes
@Mustang51
@PapaKernels
@Seaplanerider030805
Thank you all for your comments.
I am glad I could make a "corsair" that you all think is good.
@pancelvonat
+2Thank you very much.
I am glad that you noticed the detailed ideas in my work. If you have the opportunity to use this technique in your future work, please do so.
@WinsWings
+2@AlbertanPlaneMaker
@asteroidbook345
@SilverStar
Thanks for your comment.
I wanted to reproduce the siren as well. I knew this mod existed. But I am a mobile user and could not use the mod.
I hope they will release parts related to sound. It would expand the possibilities of the work.
@WinsWings
+2The challenge you created made it possible for me to create this piece. Thank you.
@WinsWings
+2Thank you!
@Ian_Yashima
+2Thanks.
I also saw your photo on your twitter. I think ASBE's work is excellent as seen in your photos. I am looking forward to seeing it completed :)
@MrShenanigansSP
+2Well, J-2 Skyly is also good. It might be a good idea to build one for dogfighting with Sanka.
@asteroidbook345
+2Oh my, you're Japanese-American? I'm glad you have close roots :)
It is very frustrating, but your Ki-100 is far more beautiful and complete than my work. It's a great piece of work! :)
+2@MikuisNOTaboi
+2Thanks for the comment.
Ah, Betty. That sounds interesting too.
@WhoflerMan
+2Thank you! It was worth all the hard work I put into it.
@ShinyGemsBro
+2Thanks for the comment :)
@Sergio666
+2Thanks a lot!
@WolfHunter9111
+2Thanks for the comment. I'm glad you say so :)
@BogdanX
+2Thank you very much for your kind advice. You are certainly right, if I drop the scale of the wing parts down to 0.1, they will no longer appear to pop out. I will keep this in mind as a reference.
@MikuisNOTaboi
+2Thanks for your comment!
@shipfinder568
+2Thanks for following my account. I also understood for the first time how it works, that users without points cannot upvote. Thank you.
@SemedianIndustries
+2Yourlocalhuman's comment made me a little depressed that he didn't give me a good or bad review of my work. In that sense, I thank you for speaking for me.
@Yourlocalhuman
I don't mind that you were just stating the facts. However, I am thinking of posting the P-51D next, so instead of pointing out that the plane exists in stock, I would be happy if you would download it, fly it in your skies, rate it if you think it is good, and point out any improvements you think are needed.
That's all.
@L0RR3B0RR3
+2Thank you for your comment.
As you pointed out, this aircraft is prone to stall due to rapid pitch-up during low-speed flight. ...I tried various balance adjustments, etc., but it seems they were insufficient. I will try to improve it in my next work.
@Dragoranos
+2Thank you for your comment. Thank you also for your appropriate remarks on my text. You are correct in pointing out that this is a typo on my part. My apologies.
I have corrected the notation from "air superiority fighter" to "escort fighter" as you indicated.
As someone who plays KSP and loves Kerbals, I give you the upvote.
+2@xNotDumb
+2I can only say that this is the result of looking at photos of actual airplane interiors and roughly reproducing them with the technology I have. I have no intention of imitating or plagiarizing.
@Yourlocalhuman
+2Sorry, I did not understand the intent of your comment. Of course I know that the P-51 B is available as a stock plane. Is there some rule that says you can't upload the same model as a stock plane...?
@Kangy
+2Thank you for your comment!