@PapaFoxtrotA51 Ah. Yeah. The physics becomes space-like, but the appearance doesn't. When you get to that height, try setting the weather to clear, and the time to night.
Thank you, that's awesome. I should probably organize a new generation. It's good to know that I was an inspiration for these builds, since I quite like them. These builds might inspire me to make a few weapons again...
@Spikerya As in making good weapons, yes, but I don't have a monopoly on making cool guns. His designs have a different style, which I happen to like a lot. That's why I follow him.
Make the title nice and short, and keep the concept behind it simple. You nailed the unique aspect of the challenge, but it needs to be a little more simple. Also, I would recommend having a sign or something for the first screenshot. Sometimes challenges don't get recognition for unknown reasons, so wait a bit, and then come up with another compelling idea!
When I feel burned out, I take a break. Sometimes it only lasts a few days, and sometimes it lasts a month. Take a hiatus, and soon enough, you will return with a rekindled passion for building.
@AN0NYM0US Thanks! Remember to not abuse the voting system with your alt. (I'm sure you wouldn't anyway, but I just want to make sure). I'm looking forward to what you create.
@AN0NYM0US Ah. The organization took me a few hours to begin. I started with my bio, then, with every upload, add to it. As for airplane descriptions, I type those up in a word doc.
@AN0NYM0US I look forward to see what you build! I'm not sure what you mean by the last part of your reply though. Are you referring to the builds themselves, or how I present them (with graphics)?
[edit]: NEVERMIND. I misread the title. It's on a plane? Ignore this comment.
I think "refrigerator" might be a mischaracterization. I haven't read the article, but it most likely cools things for research purposes (for physics experiments), or it has manufacturing applications (maybe some devices are assembled best in cold temperatures?). Just speculation though.
@TMach5 Understandable. The other entries were great too, so they deserve some love anyway. Once again, thanks for hosting the challenge. Challenges are draining for those who host them, so I respect everyone who successfully hosts challenges... and, to be clear, you hosted this challenge very well. Clear rules, fun roleplay elements, and on-time judging made this challenge a blast to participate in.
I do have to say that my entry had a finite amount of fuel... it's engines just didn't use much fuel to begin with. Still, I suppose it's the journey that counts more than the destination, and I guess I did use a loophole, so the disqualification is somewhat justified. Anyway, this challenge was fun. Thanks for hosting it. It was a pleasure to participate in.
If this is about tide pods, then you should probably be informed that it was never a trend to eat or drink laundry detergent. The joke is that no sane person would eat or drink laundry detergent.... and somehow a good amount of people forgot that the jokes are ironic, and decided to bite down on tide pods for a little bit of internet fame.
@randomusername The inputcontroller should be edited on the VTOL engine. The nozzles should turn with throttle to allow you to have different amounts of thrust with different percentages of throttle.
@ThomasRoderick Yes, but that trick only allows for one level of throttle. Any percent of throttle is seen as 100% by the inputconroller. This engine configuration, which I will reveal in a few days, fixes that problem.
@randomusername The tank is unedited. I did some editing on the engines though. I'll reveal my methods later. As for your record, it can also be accomplished by using some modded detachers, given that the airframe is strong enough to withstand that kind of force...
It always takes a little more effort to be noticed when you first create your account, but after you build a good base of followers, its smooth sailing.
@PapaFoxtrotA51 Ah. Yeah. The physics becomes space-like, but the appearance doesn't. When you get to that height, try setting the weather to clear, and the time to night.
@PapaFoxtrotA51 When in the atmosphere, use normal propulsion (use throttle). Use the special engines when you reach a minimum of 80k feet.
Nice idea. Maybe use cleavers for larger blast radius?
@Ohhh999 That means that you fired it. Make sure you are aiming at the ground, then you will see the explosion.
Thank you, that's awesome. I should probably organize a new generation. It's good to know that I was an inspiration for these builds, since I quite like them. These builds might inspire me to make a few weapons again...
@Spikerya I never thought of it that way. I like the sound of it though. Thanks!
@Spikerya As in making good weapons, yes, but I don't have a monopoly on making cool guns. His designs have a different style, which I happen to like a lot. That's why I follow him.
Good build. The background is too dark, though, so I can't see much in the screenshots.
+1Make the title nice and short, and keep the concept behind it simple. You nailed the unique aspect of the challenge, but it needs to be a little more simple. Also, I would recommend having a sign or something for the first screenshot. Sometimes challenges don't get recognition for unknown reasons, so wait a bit, and then come up with another compelling idea!
@Macmuggo1281 I accidentally inverted the engine input. You can mess with the input, or you can drive by using the opposite pitch input
+1@Z3RO Thank you. I was aiming for that, and I am glad that it is noticeable in the final design.
Very sleek. Good shape and colors.
Good design. It has a practical look to it. I think your screenshots could have been a little better, though.
+1Good shape. I think that a fully-fleshed out design from this would be absolutely astonishing.
Hm, a current build might fit into this challenge. I'll have to figure out the lore, but I can probably make it work.
@Mymessage Definitely. I will never be able to accomplish this level of craftsmanship again
+1When I feel burned out, I take a break. Sometimes it only lasts a few days, and sometimes it lasts a month. Take a hiatus, and soon enough, you will return with a rekindled passion for building.
+1@AN0NYM0US Thanks! Remember to not abuse the voting system with your alt. (I'm sure you wouldn't anyway, but I just want to make sure). I'm looking forward to what you create.
@AN0NYM0US Ah. The organization took me a few hours to begin. I started with my bio, then, with every upload, add to it. As for airplane descriptions, I type those up in a word doc.
@AN0NYM0US I look forward to see what you build! I'm not sure what you mean by the last part of your reply though. Are you referring to the builds themselves, or how I present them (with graphics)?
@AN0NYM0US Sure! Just give credit in the description. Nothing extravagant, just mention me in the desc or something.
It's a part of history that would be dangerous to ignore, so as long as no one is praising nazi ideology, then I'm fine with seeing nazi planes.
+3Your builds are always superb. This is certainly no exception. Good job!
+1Looks awesome. I like 3 the best.
[edit]: NEVERMIND. I misread the title. It's on a plane? Ignore this comment.
I think "refrigerator" might be a mischaracterization. I haven't read the article, but it most likely cools things for research purposes (for physics experiments), or it has manufacturing applications (maybe some devices are assembled best in cold temperatures?). Just speculation though.
@TMach5 Understandable. The other entries were great too, so they deserve some love anyway. Once again, thanks for hosting the challenge. Challenges are draining for those who host them, so I respect everyone who successfully hosts challenges... and, to be clear, you hosted this challenge very well. Clear rules, fun roleplay elements, and on-time judging made this challenge a blast to participate in.
I do have to say that my entry had a finite amount of fuel... it's engines just didn't use much fuel to begin with. Still, I suppose it's the journey that counts more than the destination, and I guess I did use a loophole, so the disqualification is somewhat justified. Anyway, this challenge was fun. Thanks for hosting it. It was a pleasure to participate in.
@CenturiVonKikie Yes. Thanks!
+2@goboygo1 Mod is just engaging in a bit of banter, no worries there.
@Iamsilverdahedgie @Awsomur Here it is! Please refer to the bottom comment.
@Jetpackturtle @F4f879 @PorkyClown3 Here it is! Please refer to the bottom comment.
@Ephwurd @Quagga @DarthAbhinav As requested, here it is! The camera angles are bad, so sorry about that. I was in a huge rush.
@GeminiTitan Nice! This was an entry-level design. A better one for space travel is here!
Very cools. I like the unique idea, and you executed it very well.
If this is about tide pods, then you should probably be informed that it was never a trend to eat or drink laundry detergent. The joke is that no sane person would eat or drink laundry detergent.... and somehow a good amount of people forgot that the jokes are ironic, and decided to bite down on tide pods for a little bit of internet fame.
+3@Kingzfire Thanks! The vehicle's link is in the description.
@QXY I think I had the wrong light setting on. Nice use of the Null Mass plane, by the way.
@randomusername The inputcontroller should be edited on the VTOL engine. The nozzles should turn with throttle to allow you to have different amounts of thrust with different percentages of throttle.
@randomusername Don't use engines on rotators. Use VTOL nozzles that rotate on throttle input!
@ThomasRoderick Yes!
@GustoTheMagnificent Good observation. Unfortunately that is difficult to fix though.
+1@ThomasRoderick Yes, but that trick only allows for one level of throttle. Any percent of throttle is seen as 100% by the inputconroller. This engine configuration, which I will reveal in a few days, fixes that problem.
+1I like its geometry. Well done.
@randomusername The tank is unedited. I did some editing on the engines though. I'll reveal my methods later. As for your record, it can also be accomplished by using some modded detachers, given that the airframe is strong enough to withstand that kind of force...
+1@chancey21 Yep, but that's too easy. It also is less user-friendly and more clunky part-wise than this kind of engine configuration.
@WaffleCakes nope. I'll explain in a later post.
@ShatSlanger @Ephwurd Thanks. I was going for something a little more rugged.
@Ephwurd I was going for personal transport, so I probably should have just called it personal transport instead of corvette.
It always takes a little more effort to be noticed when you first create your account, but after you build a good base of followers, its smooth sailing.
Fundamentals come before advanced/intermediate techniques. However, a tutorial on fuselage blocks would be nice.
+2