2,701 pilotred233 Comments

  • SimplePlane’s First Ever ! Bass Trumpet Instrument 2.5 years ago

    I think someone got bored :/

    +5
  • Time Warp 2.5 years ago

    So...When will there be a GUI for android?

    +3
  • Does thick wing not generate Greater lift? 2.7 years ago

    @horizoneer of course it wouldn't...However if you nudge more wings it totally would! :) Plus, do both wings have the same mass?

    +2
  • SimpleCheats - a slightly comprehensive guide 1.2 years ago

    What's part collision response?

    +1
  • Villagertank 1.4 years ago

    I smell element animation

    +1
  • sped up slow mo gameplay 1.4 years ago

    physics sure is different in slow motion, good experiment if u have time.

    +1
  • Plz mod this engine to 6000 hp 1.9 years ago

    https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/1UO85h/done

    +1
  • What's Your Best Crash? (No Cabin Pressure reference intended) 1.9 years ago

    Dangit most if my crashes end up turning into nothing but a cockpit block.

    +1
  • The front of my plane is dipping 2.0 years ago

    since I can't play rn I'll just give my theory on why it's dipping,

    here are reasons that MIGHT cause the plane to dip down while flying:
    -The wings may be too massive and cause the wing to fluctuate or as I call "flutter" which only happens on planes with massive wings. To fix this you can use multiple small wings and have a structure inside the massive wing to support the small wings.
    -The center of mass might be placed too far forwards from the center of lift, this has it's own perks and cons. For perks, this makes the plane harder to stall and allow it to fly faster. For cons, this feature can make a plane dip down while flying, making the plane highly unstable unless trimmed and in the worse case scenario have the elevator become so stiff that pitching up is difficult and this really matters a lot, especially in a fighter. The solution to this problem are various, as long as you can get the center of mass close to the center of lift but not to close or fast then the plane will fly smoothly.

    here are reasons I have found about why the plane may dip down while takeoff:
    -The front landing gear is shorter than the rear landing gear. This is a common mistake performed by newbies that makes takeoff difficult. The way to fix this is to mod the size of either front of rear landing gears.
    -The landing gears are t from the extremely low from the center of thrust. This is another problem performed by newbies, often people think their planes are a bit larger so they use large landing gears, which ends up making their plane harder to takeoff with. To solve this, you can use lower landing gears or you can nudge the landing gear inside the fuselage which can allow the landing gear to be any height you want.

    now I'll also talk about a problem that nearly everyone(including me) make sometimes:
    -the rear landing gear is not right behind the center of mass, this makes it hard for the plane to rotate. To fix this you can place the landing gears right behind the center of mass.

    +1
  • Pro Challange (Type "UPVOTE" to join) 2.0 years ago

    can we NOT upvote to join?

    +1
  • looks vs functionality? 2.1 years ago

    @ChallengerHellcat also thx for upvote. I didn't expect it tbh.

    +1
  • Simplerecordegg 2.1 years ago

    @RYMA232Aeronautics wait a minute...So you're saying it's supposed to be the instagram egg meme? I only heard about it today with the gossips in my class, sounded funny XD

    +1
  • Simplerecordegg 2.1 years ago

    @RYMA232Aeronautics so what is this supposed to be anyway?

    +1
  • 20 gallon challenge (closed) 2.2 years ago

    @HoptroGOD alright CHALLENGE ACCEPTED ;)

    +1
  • MINI BOMBER CHALLENGE 2.2 years ago

    Tag this with "challenge“ so that someone else would see this.

    +1
  • Anti-matter bomb 2.3 years ago

    @Strikefighter04 nope, everything will just get obliterated due to infinite blast radius.

    +1
  • Starter Plane Challenge! 2.5 years ago

    @Al3jandro6304 I...Might have too many to pick but most of my starter aircraft are just...fast...And not maneuverable so back to the drawing board!

    +1
  • Darts nuclear missile combat group - air defense radar vehicle 2.5 years ago

    @3516085740 but it fires chaff at the side...

    +1
  • MIK Copter HC-116 2.5 years ago

    Looks like a huey mik!

    +1
  • Helicopter Challenge 2.5 years ago

    @mikoyanster are we allowed to use mods?

    +1
  • judas torpedo bomber flying boat(1st ever rejected design) 2.6 years ago

    @Sarin nope...It's too ugly for a remake thank you.

    +1
  • judas torpedo bomber flying boat(1st ever rejected design) 2.6 years ago

    @Sarin yep...I couldn't really build something good looking...So yeah...I do...Maybe I should try building another one.

    +1
  • Engines and intakes. 2.6 years ago

    @DPSAircraftManufacturer well I could either call it a prototype it a spaceship which do you prefer?(btw it's not really a spaceship it's an experimental prototype, no military or civilian use)

    +1
  • Engines and intakes. 2.6 years ago

    @DPSAircraftManufacturer plus I don't just need an engine, I need an advanced one, one that can operate way higher than the exact altitude of space( need to be a lot more than 330,000ft of performance) and must be highly fuel efficient, no exhaust/small exhaust, exceedingly higher power and thrust than any sort of ram jet engine you've ever created(because so far those I've checked on were too weak for the craft needed). It doesn't need to look good and it has to have as little part count as possible. Best is to use single engine with no decorations and which means the craft will have 2 parts (cockpit and engine). It's size must not be too big nor small and must be a BFE150 engine with the same exact size.
    This was really difficult and I couldn't create an engine like it because I simply couldn't xml the engine must suck up air. It was impossible to do that at higher altitude.

    +1
  • Dog fight challenge, results 2.7 years ago

    @Jacobdaniel oh... nice...I'll watch that after I get on with my notifications. Plus I assume my plane will be eliminated faster than anything else because that plane really "flew like a brick"...Ok...I'm sorry about that sarcasm.

    +1
  • Is there any way to create spaceships without VTOL? 2.7 years ago

    @DPSAircraftManufacturer it's top secret...The ship is so fast it could potentially glitch the game while it travels.

    +1
  • Is there any way to create spaceships without VTOL? 2.7 years ago

    Yes. I have created a super fast vtol without using VTOL engines or any wings. Instead it uses a gyro and superior thrust to weight ratio. It flies like a spaceship but I do not dare upload it because it could reach speeds. That aren't normally reachable by any craft. So let's leave that one out.

    +1
  • Should I release my unfinished projects (read below) 2.7 years ago

    I'm actually thinking about the same thing...I have some prototypes I don't dare share to the community because they could break the community. I've already made some stuff better but also ruined some stuff. Nowadays I don't dare upload a prototype that is too overpowered to prevent the exploitation of the game and it's mechanics( I've done that a few times already and I will not do it again)

    +1
  • Ask for your engine 2.7 years ago

    @DPSAircraftManufacturer wait...Update...Prototype now reaches 2,500,000mph but I've been met with a new problem... Damn...Also create that ram jet engine OK?

    +1
  • Ask for your engine 2.7 years ago

    @DPSAircraftManufacturer also, no thunderbolt, absolute ram jet capable of unreachable speeds. Example right below. However if you want me to release the prototype then no. Because it's 1/6 times the speed of sound and will glitch the game.

    +1
  • Ask for your engine 2.7 years ago

    @DPSAircraftManufacturer thanks to a new engine that I created btw.

    +1
  • Ask for your engine 2.7 years ago

    @DPSAircraftManufacturer no it's just a test of your skill...im requesting a super powerful engine way more powerful than any existing ones you've probably created. Btw I just recently build a prototype even faster than the previous... It could go 1,099,999mph(about) and is my new fastest craft. It's got no wings! Just gyro.

    +1
  • Ask for your engine 2.7 years ago

    @CruzerBlade you guys should be friends!

    +1
  • Ask for your engine 2.7 years ago

    Hmmmm what if you could create the ultimate engine? I know I would if I build engines.
    By ultimate engine I mean by:
    -high power and fast enough for a ram jet.(maybe go as fast as you can make it, build an aircraft to try it, my fastest experimental plane goes 16,000mph then it breaks apart).
    -fast accelerating.
    -Fuel efficient.
    -compact.(can fit 1 by 1 by 4 block radius)
    -reliable.
    -light.
    -has enough intake.
    -it has to be build with less than 51 parts including the cockpit.(easy right)
    P.S. just a test.

    +1
  • Someone, teach me the secerets of making good jet. 2.7 years ago

    @ViciousTNT correct! Plus you could mirror and usually that solves my problem, I'd usually make sure the plane is fully symmetrical.

    +1
  • Engine efficiency 2.7 years ago

    There are multiple ways of doing it but I will only state four ways. Firstly, you can use a lighter fuselage so the thrust to weight is higher. Second, if you can XML, you can set input max to 0.1 while setting engine power to 10 multiplier. The engine will perform like a normal engine but more fuel efficient, add more zeros and the engine will be more efficient. Third, you can use a more efficient engine. Four, you can lessen the drag so the plane can travel faster with less power.

    +1
  • Mobile turret 2 (flyable) 2.7 years ago

    What a strange design, I build turret based planes for missile locks and this is why I don't fit the turret with weapons, instead I fit the plane with missiles on detachers or vertically, so the missile can track any direction without any problem. And I usually use small but fast firing, accurate and high damage guns.

    +1
  • shoot the falling bomb with the obliterator (read description) 2.7 years ago

    @ZackAttack5050 very difficult... How far am I supposed to lead?

    +1
  • _Mechanical_Instrumentation 2.7 years ago

    @Irobert55 it wasn't needed I think...Ammo is really limited in the game.

    +1
  • Maritime Patrol Aircraft Challenge (SS2 entry) 2.7 years ago

    Lol did I criticize it too much?XD

    +1
  • Maritime Patrol Aircraft Challenge (SS2 entry) 2.7 years ago

    Actually even if you don't disqualify him, that plane won't perform well anyways...Sorry but after testing this plane, I decided to criticize it here in this comment. Too little offensive armament too little parts too unmaneuverable for a single engined plane too high wing loading aaaaand too vulnerable to fire. Done.

    +1
  • Maritime Patrol Aircraft Challenge [CLOSED] 2.7 years ago

    This is a good challenge...Might as well try...

    +1
  • Albatross RH-1 Recon Plane 2.8 years ago

    Woow how do you do that? I didn't believe it was based in the twin prop until I saw the indicator below the picture!

    +1
  • Mobile Multiplayer???? 2.8 years ago

    Yes

    +1
  • Ki-84 Hayate [NON PREMIUM] 2.8 years ago

    Hey do you happen to come from the wings of duty community? Nice to meet you I guess, username hurricanetheneko (shhhhh)

    +1
  • Advanced Targeting 2.9 years ago

    Wait...I've tested this mod a slight bit...(no offense hellfirecoder I know you've been one of the first players in simple planes to upload a plane and you've worked hard for this mod but I have a bit of criticism oh the bomb drop)the lead indicator seegreat but not as accurate as I thought, although I've never learnt calculus or momentum or convergence, I've realised that the lead in all weapons used isn't perfect, it seems like the lead in guns are a tad far and for bombs a slight bit too low...The biggest problem is the indicators position while Bombing the bridge with default bomber( it was made by a player who could model it, brilliant job!). It seems like when the indicator showed on top of the bridge, the bomb would actually needed to be drop 3.1-3.5sec late or else it will totally miss... This result was only tested from the bandit final approach spawn and the other bridge near Yeager was not tested... The bomb indicator strangest thing is the path... The path seems to be wrong as the bomb would usually be dropped lower than the indicator, maybe you expected everyone to have their detachers to have no launching power whatsoever.
    Still...I have my last words! This is probably still my new favorite mod! As a war thunder rb player, I really think the lead indicator can help practicing leading unless if it is accurate enough, war thunder's one isn't perfect either, aiming at the lead requires a slight higher lead, but always accurate enough. Have a good day anyway 😁(sorry for criticism, don't feel down, you can do some improvement, I believe in you!l)

    +1
  • mini aircraft carrier test 1 3.0 years ago

    Lol! I tried to create a carrier too but it was supposed to fly, for my build the plane was too heavy and the carrier was so big and made of so many parts that it crashed my game whenever I try to save it.

    +1
  • Simple Torpedo 4.6 years ago

    Awesome!the first ever plane launched torpedo I've seen so far, good results need testing...

    +1
  • Bomber Challenge 1.4 years ago

    So at least have 2 boom 250? And if I were to fit missiles instead, would that count as bombload?

  • MZQ-A1 1.4 years ago

    what a weird creation...